Breve Análise do Huawei P40 Pro - Smartphone com uma câmera impressionante
Competing Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Oppo Find X2 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 202 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3168x1440 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 219 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.90" | 3200x1440 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 188 g | 256 GB NVMe | 5.80" | 2436x1125 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 584 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Oppo Find X2 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -24% | -64% | 12% | -116% | -120% | |
| Brightness middle | 584 | 597 2% | 734 26% | 787 35% | 579 -1% | 778 33% |
| Brightness | 576 | 608 6% | 748 30% | 793 38% | 576 0% | 775 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 89 -6% | 95 0% | 98 3% | 89 -6% | 99 4% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.2 -100% | 3.2 -191% | 1.2 -9% | 4.61 -319% | 4.4 -300% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 3.6 -57% | 6.8 -196% | 2.6 -13% | 7.72 -236% | 8.7 -278% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.6 11% | 2.7 -50% | 1.5 17% | 4.2 -133% | 5.6 -211% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.11 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.244 98% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6355 102% | 6268 104% | 6299 103% | 6339 103% | 7201 90% | 7250 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 365 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 365 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 365 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro | |
| Huawei P30 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 30 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (450373 - 527856, n=4) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (55.6 - 70, n=4) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (103.2 - 116.6, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (63 - 71.8, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (95 - 124, n=3) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (20917 - 23690, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G (1914 - 2287, n=4) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
| Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P40 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro | Huawei P30 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | 1% | -57% | -26% | -6% | 78% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1775 | 1606 -10% | 1632 -8% | 499.2 -72% | 849 -52% | 1547 ? -13% | 1882 ? 6% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 395.7 | 729 84% | 697 76% | 205.1 -48% | 250.8 -37% | 575 ? 45% | 1467 ? 271% |
| Random Read 4KB | 228.1 | 202.6 -11% | 202.4 -11% | 119.2 -48% | 174.4 -24% | 210 ? -8% | 278 ? 22% |
| Random Write 4KB | 271.8 | 205 -25% | 221.4 -19% | 108.5 -60% | 159.2 -41% | 188.5 ? -31% | 310 ? 14% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.3 ? | 67.6 ? -18% | 82.6 ? 0% | 70.6 ? -14% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 68.1 ? | 58.3 ? -14% | 68.2 ? 0% | 59.8 ? -12% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P40 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.92 / 1.41 / 1.47 Watt |
| Carga |
3.35 / 6.37 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro 3046 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -99% | -30% | -4% | -33% | -37% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.92 | 1.47 -60% | 0.76 17% | 0.58 37% | 0.68 26% | 1.24 ? -35% | 0.882 ? 4% |
| Idle Average * | 1.41 | 3.43 -143% | 1.91 -35% | 1.99 -41% | 2.6 -84% | 2.33 ? -65% | 1.448 ? -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.47 | 3.52 -139% | 1.96 -33% | 2.03 -38% | 2.77 -88% | 2.49 ? -69% | 1.603 ? -9% |
| Load Average * | 3.35 | 6.2 -85% | 4.72 -41% | 3.13 7% | 3.74 -12% | 3.55 ? -6% | 6.57 ? -96% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.37 | 10.63 -67% | 10.15 -59% | 5.43 15% | 6.82 -7% | 7.09 ? -11% | 9.92 ? -56% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | Oppo Find X2 Pro 4260 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro 3046 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro 5260 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 9% | 27% | 50% | 31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1474 | 1858 26% | 2084 41% | 1966 33% | ||
| H.264 | 1137 | 1131 -1% | 1046 -8% | 1193 5% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 743 | 654 -12% | 720 -3% | 791 6% | 1112 50% | 838 13% |
| Load | 198 | 221 12% | 336 70% | 344 74% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Não seria bom…
Com o P40 Pro, a Huawei lançou mais uma vez um excelente smartphone com câmera e, provavelmente, até o melhor telefone com câmera disponível no momento. No entanto, as desvantagens não decorrem do hardware, mas do software. Embora existam certas soluções alternativas para os serviços ausentes do Google e a resultante falta da Play Store, muitos aplicativos e recursos de conforto ainda estão ausentes. Além disso, a certificação DRM para smartphone está sob a autoridade do Google e, portanto, não é possível transmitir o conteúdo HD criptografado. Da mesma forma, faltam codecs de áudio Bluetooth populares, como o aptX e o aptX HD.
Embora o Huawei P40 Pro possua hardware poderoso e uma ótima câmera, o AppGallery atualmente não pode compensar a falta de serviços do Google.
Embora o Huawei P40 Pro possua hardware poderoso e uma ótima câmera, o AppGallery atualmente não pode compensar a falta de serviços do Google. Dito isto, o último poderia oferecer um pouco mais de espaço em termos de brilho.
Embora o Huawei P40 Pro seja definitivamente um candidato a ser um dos melhores smartphones do mercado, a falta de muitos aplicativos e a integração do Google significa que usuários menos avançados em particular podem ter dificuldades ao tentar acessar aplicativos populares.
Huawei P40 Pro
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
