Breve Análise do Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 – Portátil compacto com problemas de desempenho
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 | |
| 88 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3840x2400 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.5 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 92.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.8 % v6 (old) | 08/2018 | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 555 cd/m²
Contraste: 1688:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 JDI LPM139M422A, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Sharp LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 BOE HF NV140QUM-N54, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 JDI LPM139M422A, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -4% | 25% | 16% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 64.5 -3% | 64.3 -3% | 98.8 48% | 83.8 26% | 65.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 91.4 -8% | 95.8 -4% | 99.9 1% | 99.9 1% | 97.7 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 66.6 -3% | 65.7 -4% | 86.4 26% | 83.3 21% | 67.5 -2% |
| Response Times | 17% | -26% | 98% | 11% | 17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 41.6 ? 16% | 62 ? -25% | 46 ? 7% | 44.4 ? 10% | 42 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 25.6 ? 17% | 39 ? -27% | 32.4 ? -5% | 27.2 ? 12% | 25 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 29070 ? | 113600 ? 291% | ||||
| Screen | -71% | -64% | -8% | -102% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 557 | 414 -26% | 353 -37% | 512 -8% | 501.7 -10% | 550 -1% |
| Brightness | 532 | 401 -25% | 335 -37% | 491 -8% | 501 -6% | 512 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 94 8% | 90 3% | 91 5% | 82 -6% | 88 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.28 15% | 0.25 24% | 0.32 3% | 0.32 3% | 0.32 3% |
| Contrast | 1688 | 1479 -12% | 1412 -16% | 1600 -5% | 1568 -7% | 1719 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.06 -119% | 4.4 -214% | 1.7 -21% | 5.48 -291% | 2.28 -63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 6.5 -160% | 7.21 -188% | 3.4 -36% | 10.03 -301% | 4.36 -74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 3.5 -400% | 1.1 -57% | 1 -43% | 2.22 -217% | 0.8 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 3 -50% | 5.49 -175% | 1.9 5% | 8.1 -305% | 3.27 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.42 91% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.07 106% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6689 97% | 6840 95% | 7689 85% | 6817 95% | 6730 97% | 6819 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.5 | 61.1 -2% | 61 -2% | 77.4 24% | 74.1 19% | 62 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | 91.4 -8% | 96 -4% | 99.9 0% | 100 1% | 98 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-48% | -31% /
-48% | 38% /
17% | -25% /
-66% | -2% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 29070 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 29070 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 29070 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3841 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5617 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4599 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3861 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3963 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 40917 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13104 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2741 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 980 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 52 | 30 | 16.3 | 9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112 | 92.6 | 59.7 | 52.7 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.6 | 40.8 | 37.9 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 38 | 17 | 14 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 38 | 14 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 38 / 38 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) | ||
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, Lite-On CA3-8D512 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 1% | 1% | 3% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30 -1% | 29.6 -0% | 28.5 4% | 30.3 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30 -1% | 29.6 -0% | 28.5 4% | 30.3 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 29 2% | 30 -1% | 29.6 -0% | 28.5 4% | 30.3 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 29 4% | 30 1% | 29.6 2% | 29 4% | 31.3 -3% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 33.5 12% | 33.9 11% | 34.4 9% | 33 13% | 39.3 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 40.5 -7% | 38.1 -0% | 36.1 5% | 40.7 -7% | |
| Load Maximum * | 38 | 40.5 -7% | 38.1 -0% | 42.1 -11% | 39.5 -4% | 41.2 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.45 / 0.73 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.3 / 8.5 / 12 Watt |
| Carga |
54.8 / 61.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4" | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD SM0512F, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | -50% | 4% | -9% | 14% | 1% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 5.3 -23% | 10.7 -149% | 3.8 12% | 5.6 -30% | 4.7 -9% | 4.1 ? 5% | 4.44 ? -3% |
| Idle Average * | 8.5 | 7.8 8% | 13.6 -60% | 8.6 -1% | 10.5 -24% | 8.7 -2% | 7.91 ? 7% | 7.55 ? 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12 | 9.8 18% | 15.7 -31% | 10.3 14% | 12 -0% | 9.8 18% | 10.4 ? 13% | 9.45 ? 21% |
| Load Average * | 54.8 | 46 16% | 60 -9% | 52.1 5% | 53.3 3% | 39.4 28% | 58.6 ? -7% | 45.8 ? 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.1 | 43 9% | 64 -36% | 48.2 -2% | 46.9 -0% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 61.5 | 48.3 21% | 71 -15% | 65.2 -6% | 64.6 -5% | 40.4 34% | 68.9 ? -12% | 68.4 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7 i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 57.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 58 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | -39% | 7% | -30% | -6% | 8% | |
| H.264 | 715 | 376 -47% | 687 -4% | 911 ? 27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 622 | 682 10% | 329 -47% | 728 17% | 436 -30% | 506 -19% | 726 ? 17% |
| Load | 146 | 114 -22% | 157 8% | 115.4 ? -21% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – O desempenho pobre impede uma melhor pontuação
Depois de analisar a revisão de 2020 do MateBook X Pro ficamos com a impressão de que a Huawei simplesmente transplantou novos e melhores componentes de em um design já existente sem pensar muito na otimização e ajustes finos. Não temos outra explicação do porquê a CPU se desempenhou ainda pior que no seu antecessor de dois anos atrás, e porque a GPU permaneceu abaixo de suas capacidades. Comparando o dispositivo com GPUs integrados modernos que cominar um processador ULV com uma GPU dedicada de nível de entrada se tornou um ponto de controvérsia, e optar por uma CPU Ice Lake da Intel com sua GPU G7 integrada teria sido uma escolha muito melhor. Isso não somente teria eliminado alguns componentes, também teria melhorado e otimizado o resfriamento muito mais facilmente. Embora o desempenho ainda seja adequado para um subportátil compacto você deve considerar que os concorrentes do MateBook X Pro conseguem alcançar o mesmo nível de desempenho sem gráficos dedicados.
As boas notícias são que esses são os únicos pontos negativos que temos Em todos os outros aspectos, o subportátil da Huawei deixou uma boa impressão, começando com a bela e bem feita carcaça de alumínio de alta qualidade, a tela de alta resolução (embora sua usabilidade em exteriores tenha sido um pouco limitada por causa de sua superfície muito refletiva), e a duração mais que adequada da bateria.
Apesar do fato de que o desempenho de sua CPU tenha sido um pouco pobre o MateBook X Pro continua sendo um subportátil decente. Você pode optar com confiança pelo modelo Core i5 mais barato. Suas diversas qualidades incluem, entre outras coisas, a bela carcaça e a excelente tela.
A 1.600 Euros (~$1.806) o MateBook X Pro não é uma barganha, e simplesmente não podemos entender porque e como a Huawei não notou os problemas de desempenho durante seu desenvolvimento No entanto, a experiência na vida real envolve mais do que apenas desempenho, e considerando tudo o dispositivo merece nossa recomendação. Porém, você pode riscar o processador Core i7 da sua lista de desejos com confiança pois não consegue melhorar o desempenho.
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7
- 06/03/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
