Breve Análise do HP Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 1070)

Name: HP Omen 17-w110ng
Brand: HP

Omen se encontra com Pascal. Depois que outro fabricante de portáteis de gama alta já equiparam seus sistemas com a mais recente geração de GPUs da Nvidia, a HP é a próxima com a série Omen e lança uma máquina para jogos por um preço atraente. Mas será que a razão preço-desempenho é correta? Vamos descobrir.

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-w110ng (Omen 15-ce Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5 (Micron), ForceWare 373.06

Memória

8 GB

, 2x 4 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots ocupados

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, G-Sync, Full HD, 75 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2, 1x 2,5-polegadas

Placa de Som

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 2 conectores de 3,5 mm (fones e microfone), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 416 x 279

Bateria

95 Wh, 8300 mAh

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força: 230 Watts, Acessórios: Guia de início rápido, panfletos de serviço, Software: diversas ferramentas HP, McAfee LiveSafe Avaliação, MS Office 365 Avaliação, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

3.25 kg, Suprimento de energia: 808 g

Preço

1800 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nexoc G734III	77 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s +1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	76 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w010ng	70 MB/s -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	87 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w010ng	86 MB/s -1%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -1%
Nexoc G734III	86 MB/s -1%
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -68%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	676 MBit/s
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	575 MBit/s -15%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	566 MBit/s -16%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	512 MBit/s -24%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	440 MBit/s -35%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
MSI GS73VR 6RF Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	536 MBit/s +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	529 MBit/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	465 MBit/s -12%
Nexoc G734III Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	450 MBit/s -15%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	446 MBit/s -16%


339 cd/m²	358 cd/m²	348 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	362 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
316 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	337 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 362 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 342.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 362 cd/m²
Contraste: 1168:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-w010ng AUO119B, 3840x2160	Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080	MSI GS73VR 6RF 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), 1920x1080
Display		38%	2%	30%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	66.6	88.5 33%	67.4 1%	90 35%	68 2%	66.9 0%
sRGB Coverage	84.1	100 19%	85.8 2%	99.9 19%	87.5 4%	85.2 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.5	100 63%	62.8 2%	83.6 36%	64 4%	62.3 1%
Response Times		-25%	4%	42%	1%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(13, 24)	49 ?(17, 32) -32%	36 ?(14, 22) 3%	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) 24%	33.6 ?(14, 19.6) 9%	38 ?(14, 24) -3%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(4, 20)	28 ?(6, 22) -17%	23 ?(5, 18) 4%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 60%	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) -7%	22 ?(4, 18) 8%
PWM Frequency			50 ?(5)
Screen		-3%	-1%	13%	-12%	3%
Brightness middle	362	316 -13%	314 -13%	337.2 -7%	329.2 -9%	328 -9%
Brightness	342	312 -9%	308 -10%	315 -8%	321 -6%	317 -7%
Brightness Distribution	87	90 3%	92 6%	86 -1%	93 7%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.31	0.29 6%	0.28 10%	0.308 1%	0.267 14%	0.3 3%
Contrast	1168	1090 -7%	1121 -4%	1095 -6%	1233 6%	1093 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	5.69 -26%	4.17 7%	2.96 34%	5.93 -32%	3.74 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.31	7.94 15%	8.94 4%	5.45 41%	11.07 -19%	8.97 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.48	6.12 -76%	3.84 -10%	2.57 26%	6.72 -93%	2.67 23%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.56 ^86%	2.41 ^91%	2.25 ^98%	2.12 ^104%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6144 ^106%	5875 ^111%	6950 ^94%	7114 ^91%	7611 ^85%	6861 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	87 58%	56 2%	74.3 35%	57 4%	56 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84	100 19%	86 2%	100 19%	87 4%	85 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 2%	2% / 0%	28% / 21%	-3% / -7%	2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	145 Points -2%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points -5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	134 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	677 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points -6%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points -1%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.62 Points -4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.45 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points 0%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.41 Points -1%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.37 Points -1%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7881 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7206 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	30656 Points +16%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	26510 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	269.2 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	252 Points -6%
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	247.6 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	230.8 Points -14%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	116.1 Points -57%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	37923 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	37205 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ	33508 Points -10%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	18466 Points -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1904 ms * -78%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1811 ms * -70%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1067 ms *
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	966 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3423

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20283

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5484

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

3426 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

26510 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7206 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.47 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

69.9 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.69 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

679 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

148 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

112.6 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 7 | PCMark 8

PCMark 7 - Score
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6803 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	5637 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5556 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5233 Points -6%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +15%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4833 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points -13%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4180 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4012 Points -17%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3309 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5394 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points -7%
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5011 Points -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4774 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4054 Points -25%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK, 2700 MHz, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8531 Points +20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	7128 Points
Nexoc G734III Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5262 Points -26%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points -27%
MSI GS73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	5062 Points -29%
HP Omen 17-w010ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ, 2600 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4678 Points -34%

PCMark 7 Score		5556 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4833 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7128 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5394 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	HP Omen 17-w010ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		20%	99%	-45%	-30%	126%
Read Seq	1156	1234 7%	1917 66%	334.3 -71%	481.7 -58%	1718 49%
Write Seq	294.9	583 98%	1283 335%	319 8%	315.4 7%	1305 343%
Read 512	616	606 -2%	871 41%	242.3 -61%	303.1 -51%	1250 103%
Write 512	294.7	428.3 45%	1199 307%	254.4 -14%	314.4 7%	1438 388%
Read 4k	42.7	41.42 -3%	51 19%	20.3 -52%	25.93 -39%	44.42 4%
Write 4k	153.3	137.2 -11%	142.1 -7%	42.51 -72%	84.6 -45%	154.4 1%
Read 4k QD32	600	622 4%	603 1%	251.6 -58%	273.9 -54%	744 24%
Write 4k QD32	295.3	348.3 18%	382.4 29%	167.1 -43%	274.9 -7%	578 96%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 70.7 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 140.2 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 111.6 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 15.8 ms

Índice de Explosão: 263 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 3.6 %

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	92468 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	86780 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	79578 Points -8%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	74477 Points -14%
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	67791 Points -22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	34679 Points -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16757 Points +6%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16219 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15806 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11506 Points -27%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	5863 Points -63%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23356 Points +13%
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22282 Points +8%
Nexoc G734III NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20881 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	20656 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14904 Points -28%
HP Omen 17-w010ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	7903 Points -62%

3DMark 11 Performance		14116 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		107777 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22908 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		11779 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6894 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		4729 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	57 (47^min - 64^max) fps +12%
Nexoc G734III GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	53.2 fps +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	50.8 (41^min - 58^max) fps
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	34.8 (28^min - 39^max) fps +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	34 (28^min - 38^max) fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	92.8 (80^min - 103^max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	90 fps 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	89.7 (80^min - 102^max) fps
MSI GS73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	61.4 fps -32%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	38 (34^min - 44^max) fps +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	36.1 (32^min - 41^max) fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	197.1	171	161	103.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	196.3	150	94.8	50.8	34
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	173	151.7	105.6	89.7	36.1
XCOM 2 (2016)	86.4	74.9	66.1	39.2	22.8
Far Cry Primal (2016)	107	93	83	79	37
Doom (2016)	147.5	140.1	125.7	116.6	49.8
No Man's Sky (2016)	118.6	114.5	104	48.7	43.3
Mafia 3 (2016)	72.3	70.2	43.2		19
Battlefield 1 (2016)	176.3	159.5	118.9	110.1	45.7

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 35 dB
HDD		34 dB
Carga		45 / 52 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise		3%	2%	3%	0%	7%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	28.4 5%	29.7 1%	30 -0%
Idle Minimum *	33	32 3%	31 6%	31.9 3%	33.2 -1%	31 6%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	32 6%	32 6%	33.2 2%	32 6%
Idle Maximum *	35	34 3%	33 6%	34 3%	33.2 5%	33 6%
Load Average *	45	41 9%	49 -9%	47 -4%	47.5 -6%	40 11%
Load Maximum *	52	51 2%	50 4%	49.4 5%	52.5 -1%	47 10%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


45 °C	41.3 °C	43.4 °C
41.1 °C	42 °C	37.5 °C
29.8 °C	28.7 °C	29.1 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C


48.3 °C	51.9 °C	54.3 °C
32.3 °C	41.4 °C	42 °C
27.5 °C	31.5 °C	25.7 °C

Máximo: 54.3 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 38.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat		1%	-4%	-4%	-18%	5%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	50.2 -12%	50 -11%	50.8 -13%	59 -31%	42.9 5%
Maximum Bottom *	54.3	54.1 -0%	60.5 -11%	60 -10%	66 -22%	41.5 24%
Idle Upper Side *	29.6	28.9 2%	29.1 2%	27.4 7%	33.2 -12%	31.6 -7%
Idle Bottom *	28.6	24.3 15%	26.9 6%	28.8 -1%	30.6 -7%	29.5 -3%

* ... smaller is better

… adjust the sound to your own preferences.

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	19 / 25 / 31 Watt
Carga	90 / 193 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17-w010ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M	Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption		27%	11%	-14%	-16%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	19	10 47%	13 32%	22.6 -19%	18.4 3%	24 -26%
Idle Average *	25	19 24%	20 20%	32.7 -31%	22.8 9%	31 -24%
Idle Maximum *	31	25 19%	27 13%	32.8 -6%	24 23%	36 -16%
Load Average *	90	83 8%	90 -0%	114.7 -27%	175.5 -95%	94 -4%
Load Maximum *	193	118 39%	210 -9%	167.9 13%	229.5 -19%	204 -6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		4h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 55min

	HP Omen 17-w110ng 95 Wh	HP Omen 17-w010ng 62 Wh	Nexoc G734III 60 Wh	MSI GS73VR 6RF 65 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v6 75.81 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 90 Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-16%	-25%	-11%	-23%
Reader / Idle	432	435 1%	400 -7%	353 -18%	418 -3%	311 -28%
H.264	233	214 -8%	208 -11%			186 -20%
WiFi v1.3	247	240 -3%	177 -28%	213 -14%	201 -19%	210 -15%
Load	115	76 -34%	95 -17%	66 -43%	103 -10%	84 -27%

Pro

+ Tela IPS (amplos ângulos de visão e alto contraste)

+ Sem bleeding la iluminação de fundo, sem PWM

+ Boa razão preço-desempenho

+ Suporte G-Sync

+ Veloz SSD NVMe

+ Iluminação de teclado elegante

+ Alto desempenho de jogos

+ 8 GB de VRAM

+ Processador veloz

+ Design fino e atraente

+ Durações de bateria aceitáveis

Contra

- Sem USB 3.1 Gen. 2

- O clickpad deixa uma impressão barata

- Manutenção complicada

- Sem drive ótico

- Bateria integrada

In review: HP Omen 17-w110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Muitas pessoas pensam sobre portáteis empresariais ou de escritório quando escutam HP, mas o nome Omen representa a série de jogos da HP. O nosso modelo de teste, o Omen 17-w110ng, consegue atender as expectativas de um portátil para jogos. Os usuários recebem uma poderosa combinação de CPU/GPU dentro de um elegante chassi, mas ele é feito apenas de plástico e não conta com uma unidade ótica. A falta de dita unidade não é um fator decisivo quando considera as plataformas de jogos como Steam, onde você pode descarregar seus jogos.

Um pouco questionável é a seleção de portas com apenas três portas USB 3.0. Teríamos esperado, pelo menos, uma porta USB 3.1 Gen.2 com um conector Type-C. A HP deveria dar uma olhada nos dispositivos de entrada. Estamos falando sobre o touchpad em particular, que deixa uma impressão barata para esta faixa de preços. As dimensões também não são perfeitas, porque uma altura de apenas 6,5 centímetros (~2,6 pol.) não é muito generosa.

Em resumo, o HP Omen 17-w110ng é um bom pacote por um preço justo. O desempenho do sistema de jogos não causa críticas. O portátil roda muito bem, e você pode desfrutar de jogos sem restrição alguma.

O pacote geral é bastante convincente, apesar das desvantagens mencionadas. O desempenho é muito bom, e o aparelho foi feito para gamers, o qual é demonstrado pelos resultados de nossos testes. O veloz Core i7-6700HQ da Intel fornece suficiente desempenho para todos os aplicativos, e inclusive jogos exigentes podem ser jogados em FHD (algumas vezes em 4K) graças à Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. O preço também é atraente, em 1800 Euros (~$ 2007). Aparelhos similares da concorrência normalmente têm um preço entre 2000-2500 Euros (~$2230-$2787), portanto, a série Omen da HP definitivamente deveria estar em sua lista de desejos.

HP Omen 17-w110ng - 10/26/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

72%

Conectividade

59 / 81 → 73%

Peso

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Bateria