Breve Análise do HP Omen 15: gamer acessível de nível de entrada com uma duração de bateria decente

Name: HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Brand: HP

Bem balanceado.

Graças à sua CPU Core i5-9300H e GPU GeForce GTX 1650, o Omen 15 é capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente em sua tela IPS FHD de 15,6 polegadas e, como bônus, vem com um SSD NVMe e uma duração de bateria decente. Se apenas a tela não estivesse tão fraca.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-9300H 4 x 2.4 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1560 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, GDDR5, 128-bit bus, Nvidia 431.36, Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2666, single-channel, dois slots (um ocupado)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05CE, IPS, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake HM370

Disco rígido

WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, 512 GB

, 446 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones, conector para microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Sensores: acelerômetro, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 263

Bateria

52.5 Wh, 4550 mAh Lítio-Ion, 11.55 V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, McAfee Live Safe (versão de avaliação), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.317 kg, Suprimento de energia: 445 g

Preço

979 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Dell G5 15 5590 Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 HP Omen 15-dc1020ng HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80.5 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.4 MB/s -3%
Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	19.1 MB/s -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +38%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.3 MB/s -2%
Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32.2 MB/s -63%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	642 (581^min - 693^max) MBit/s -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	617 MBit/s -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	601 (562^min - 639^max) MBit/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	252 MBit/s -63%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	671 MBit/s +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	666 (597^min - 686^max) MBit/s +3%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 (556^min - 690^max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	646 MBit/s
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	586 MBit/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	332 MBit/s -49%

Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø657 (556-690)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (597-686)

Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (581-693)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (562-639)


263 cd/m²	248 cd/m²	255 cd/m²
214 cd/m²	251 cd/m²	216 cd/m²
216 cd/m²	222 cd/m²	200 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LGD05CE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 263 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 231.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 216 cd/m²
Contraste: 1476:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.37% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell G5 15 5590 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF FX505DY IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		64%	3%	5%	-1%	2%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	38.37	63.8 66%	39.56 3%	40.33 5%	37.97 -1%	39.26 2%	40.04 4%
sRGB Coverage	57.6	93.4 62%	59.5 3%	60.6 5%	57 -1%	59.1 3%	60.2 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.69	65 64%	40.91 3%	41.69 5%	39.23 -1%	40.56 2%	41.4 4%
Response Times		64%	16%	10%	2%	-7%	-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(21.2, 18.8)	14 ?(7, 7) 65%	30.4 ?(14, 16.4) 24%	34 ?(17.2, 16.8) 15%	42 ?(20.8, 21.2) -5%	45 ?(22, 23) -13%	44.8 ?(18.8, 26) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4)	11 ?(7, 4) 63%	27.6 ?(17.6, 10) 7%	28 ?(17.2, 10.8) 5%	26.8 ?(16, 10.8) 9%	30 ?(17, 13) -1%	30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2) -4%
PWM Frequency				21280 ?(34)			20830 ?(30)
Screen		21%	-8%	-5%	7%	-12%	-0%
Brightness middle	251	316 26%	286.2 14%	240.1 -4%	238 -5%	234 -7%	211.5 -16%
Brightness	232	295 27%	267 15%	231 0%	226 -3%	219 -6%	200 -14%
Brightness Distribution	76	84 11%	84 11%	85 12%	83 9%	82 8%	82 8%
Black Level *	0.17	0.42 -147%	0.33 -94%	0.34 -100%	0.27 -59%	0.17 -0%	0.23 -35%
Contrast	1476	752 -49%	867 -41%	706 -52%	881 -40%	1376 -7%	920 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.2	2.7 56%	5.45 12%	4.2 32%	4.11 34%	8.6 -39%	3.92 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.6	5.65 70%	18.08 3%	17.8 4%	6.89 63%	17.49 6%	17.63 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.8	1.58 67%	4.47 7%	4.09 15%	3.76 22%	4.06 15%	4.16 13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.2	2.35 44%	5.3 -26%	2.8 33%	1.78 58%	8.55 -104%	3.1 26%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.41 ^91%	2.1 ^105%	2.2 ^100%	2.41 ^91%	3.02 ^73%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7454 ^87%	6904 ^94%	7679 ^85%	6925 ^94%	6311 ^103%	7802 ^83%	6578 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.5	60 64%	37.6 3%	38.4 5%	36 -1%	37 1%	38.1 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.4	93 62%	59.1 3%	60.4 5%	57 -1%	59 3%	60 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		50% / 34%	4% / -3%	3% / -1%	3% / 5%	-6% / -9%	-1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.2 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)

Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1144 (1121.11-1191.01)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)

CPU clock speeds during the CineBench R15 loop

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6539

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

24623

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6575

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

769 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

97.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

171 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1723 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

419 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +63%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H	176 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (169 - 176, n=11)	172.6 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	171 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	165 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	157 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	144 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points +346%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	1191 Points +55%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1082 Points +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	805 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	799 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (717 - 850, n=11)	784 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H	757 Points -2%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)	9755 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (6421 - 6677, n=5)	6561 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	6539 Points
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	6338 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4770 Points -27%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)	63783 Points +159%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	34465 Points +40%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	24623 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (21798 - 25656, n=5)	24198 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	20687 Points -16%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points +74%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	419 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (398 - 427, n=9)	415 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	403 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	386 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	340 Points -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8336 Points +384%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	2707 Points +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1825 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1793 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (1530 - 1877, n=9)	1727 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	1723 Points

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	21920 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (14195 - 16101, n=4)	15338 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	15170 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	3868 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (3596 - 4109, n=4)	3854 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	3700 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)	54312 Points +251%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	20450 Points +32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	17684 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (14853 - 17684, n=7)	16246 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	15458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	11396 Points -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)	8126 Points +71%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	5089 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (4704 - 5089, n=7)	4898 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	4744 Points
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	4723 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3898 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	1162 ms * -5%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (1079 - 1349, n=8)	1138 ms * -3%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	1137 ms * -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)	1107 ms *
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	847 ms * +23%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)	502 ms * +55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years)	95460 Points +178%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	37088 Points +8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)	34350 Points
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	33522 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (22225 - 34957, n=7)	32344 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	30675 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	30577 Points -11%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)	526 Points +120%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	243.8 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H (Edge 44)	238.9 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (150.3 - 254, n=7)	231 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	219 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	218.1 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	213.1 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		6369 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3691 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3609 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5107 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4873 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +60%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5609 Points +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	5150 Points +6%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	5069 Points +4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4973 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	4873 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (4400 - 5150, n=8)	4817 Points -1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4732 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4322 Points -11%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10833 Points +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	9859 Points +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	9161 Points +7%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8819 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (8108 - 9161, n=8)	8670 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	8575 Points
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8355 Points -3%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	8308 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7424 Points -13%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9904 Points +36%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	7809 Points +8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7328 Points +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7310 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	7261 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (5633 - 7809, n=8)	6986 Points -4%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	6808 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6518 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6305 Points -13%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12134 Points +141%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6631 Points +31%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	6252 Points +24%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5282 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	5182 Points +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5178 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5044 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (4717 - 5182, n=8)	5021 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4682 Points -7%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=19, last 2 years)	5222 Points +41%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5077 Points +38%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	4165 Points +13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3917 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	3691 Points
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (3416 - 3848, n=5)	3666 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3642 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=17, last 2 years)	6098 Points +19%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5857 Points +15%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	5291 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	5107 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4956 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (4556 - 5107, n=5)	4953 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4701 Points -8%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G

Sequential Read: 1917 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1747 MB/s

512K Read: 1358 MB/s

512K Write: 1058 MB/s

4K Read: 30.23 MB/s

4K Write: 140.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 589 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 508 MB/s

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Dell G5 15 5590 KBG30ZMS128G	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Average WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-21%	-26%	-23%	-64%	-14%	23%
Write 4K	112.1	137.5 23%	132.2 18%	109.1 -3%	64.3 -43%	50.2 -55%	183.3 ?(112.1 - 270, n=8) 64%
Read 4K	42.01	57 36%	55.5 32%	42.05 0%	29.3 -30%	35.32 -16%	48.2 ?(42 - 53.6, n=8) 15%
Write Seq	1964	984 -50%	986 -50%	1457 -26%	131.1 -93%	991 -50%	2135 ?(1715 - 2583, n=8) 9%
Read Seq	2065	1564 -24%	1318 -36%	1421 -31%	776 -62%	1526 -26%	2102 ?(1753 - 2464, n=8) 2%
Write 4K Q32T1	318.2	237.4 -25%	220.3 -31%	287.8 -10%	96.8 -70%	445.1 40%	452 ?(318 - 805, n=8) 42%
Read 4K Q32T1	406.7	340.7 -16%	315.5 -22%	317.9 -22%	198.6 -51%	526 29%	619 ?(407 - 1014, n=8) 52%
Write Seq Q32T1	2534	959 -62%	987 -61%	1455 -43%	127.8 -95%	1647 -35%	2537 ?(2519 - 2548, n=8) 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	3438	1732 -50%	1416 -59%	1739 -49%	1044 -70%	3427 0%	3466 ?(3438 - 3481, n=8) 1%

3D Mark 11 (single-channel mode, battery)

3DMark 06 Standard Score		32694 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		11257 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		71342 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22167 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8075 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3573 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +226%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	20196 Points +50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	17170 Points +28%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14723 Points +9%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	13575 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	13512 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	13447 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	13125 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (10885 - 13575, n=30)	12797 Points -5%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	9466 Points -30%
MSI GF75 8RD-001 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	8741 Points -35%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	8181 Points -39%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points +150%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	95292 Points +66%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	72026 Points +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	57365 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (38016 - 66073, n=21)	55346 Points -4%
MSI GF75 8RD-001 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	50801 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	49314 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	44557 Points -22%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	40948 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	35511 Points -38%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +229%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	15415 Points +62%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	13355 Points +40%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	11563 Points +21%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	9536 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	9534 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	9428 Points -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	9292 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (7741 - 9810, n=32)	9195 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	7791 Points -18%
MSI GF75 8RD-001 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	7324 Points -23%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	6327 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +268%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	5977 Points +68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4867 Points +37%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3568 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H	3565 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H (Dual-Channel-Modus)	3547 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (2900 - 3700, n=31)	3430 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	2536 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1790 Points -50%

BioShock Infinite | The Witcher 3 | Far Cry New Dawn | X-Plane 11.11 | Dota 2 Reborn

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	136.9 fps +56%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	115.8 fps +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	102.3 fps +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)	90.8 fps +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	87.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (68.5 - 99.4, n=18)	86.4 fps -1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	73.9 fps -16%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	53.1 fps -39%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +289%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	105.2 fps +69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	83.9 fps +35%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62.7 fps +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (45 - 70.4, n=29)	61.7 fps -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	61.1 (51^min) fps -2%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	38.5 fps -38%

Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (120 - 131, n=2, last 2 years)	125.5 fps +167%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	72 fps +53%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)	55 fps +17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	53 (37^min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (40 - 56, n=6)	49.8 fps +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	47 fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)	108.4 fps +97%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)	64.7 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (44.5 - 77.3, n=18)	61.5 fps +12%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	55 fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)	151.2 fps +84%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	105.8 (93.9^min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (58.5 - 119, n=20)	93.2 fps +14%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (Dual-Channel-Modus)	89.9 fps +10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	82 (70.2^min) fps

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G: Ø37.2 (33-41)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø45 (37-48)

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø36.9 (34-39)

Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, KBG30ZMS128G: Ø60.1 (36-65)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	213.6	200.3	190.4	87.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	157.1	109.6	62.2	37
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	114	103	89	82
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	78	62	55
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	60	53	52	47
Rage 2 (2019)	117	97	74	60
F1 2019 (2019)	128	97	74	60

Barulho

Ocioso		28.8 / 29.5 / 31.1 dB
Carga		35.2 / 41 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-12%	-9%	-17%	-14%	-10%	-4%	-3%
off / environment *	28.8	30.5 -6%	28.2 2%	28 3%	30 -4%	30.4 -6%	27.6 ?(24 - 30.8, n=23) 4%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=155, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	28.8	32.8 -14%	28.2 2%	29.4 -2%	30 -4%	30.4 -6%	28.1 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23) 2%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=156, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average *	29.5	32.8 -11%	28.2 4%	31.9 -8%	31 -5%	30.4 -3%	28.8 ?(24 - 33.6, n=23) 2%	27.3 ?(23 - 37.5, n=156, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum *	31.1	32.8 -5%	31.4 -1%	33 -6%	33 -6%	33.4 -7%	31 ?(24 - 39, n=23) -0%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=156, last 2 years) 2%
Load Average *	35.2	42.5 -21%	39.8 -13%	41.2 -17%	46 -31%	42 -19%	41.7 ?(30.1 - 53, n=23) -18%	42.8 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=156, last 2 years) -22%
Witcher 3 ultra *	35.2		47 -34%	53.8 -53%	46 -31%
Load Maximum *	41	47.5 -16%	50.2 -22%	55.7 -36%	49 -20%	48.7 -19%	46.4 ?(36.3 - 53, n=23) -13%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -30%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39.5 °C	40.3 °C	39.3 °C
35.9 °C	40.3 °C	39.4 °C
25 °C	28.3 °C	27.7 °C

Máximo: 40.3 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C


47.5 °C	40.2 °C	48.5 °C
40.9 °C	43.8 °C	35.6 °C
25.2 °C	27.5 °C	24.2 °C

Máximo: 48.5 °C
Médio: 37 °C

alimentação elétrica 54.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


23.3 °C	23.7 °C	23.5 °C
23.4 °C	23.9 °C	23.7 °C
22.6 °C	22.7 °C	22.4 °C

Máximo: 23.9 °C
Médio: 23.2 °C


23.3 °C	23.6 °C	24 °C
24.6 °C	24 °C	23.8 °C
22 °C	22.1 °C	22.3 °C

Máximo: 24.6 °C
Médio: 23.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 31 °C | Temperatura do quarto 18.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38.7 °C	39.6 °C	38.5 °C
35.4 °C	39.8 °C	38.8 °C
25.8 °C	28.6 °C	27.5 °C

Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


48.3 °C	39.8 °C	47.6 °C
41.7 °C	42.3 °C	37 °C
26.7 °C	27.6 °C	24.5 °C

Máximo: 48.3 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-33%	-17%	-34%	-6%	-13%	-13%	-20%
Maximum Upper Side *	40.3	47.6 -18%	41.2 -2%	55.8 -38%	47 -17%	51.5 -28%	46 ?(39.8 - 52.8, n=23) -14%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) -15%
Maximum Bottom *	48.5	59.6 -23%	40 18%	58.2 -20%	50 -3%	48.3 -0%	49.2 ?(36.5 - 58.7, n=23) -1%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Upper Side *	23.9	33.8 -41%	34.6 -45%	33.4 -40%	24 -0%	27.2 -14%	28.3 ?(22.9 - 35, n=23) -18%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) -31%
Idle Bottom *	24.6	36.5 -48%	34.4 -40%	33.6 -37%	25 -2%	27.4 -11%	28.9 ?(23 - 37.4, n=23) -17%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) -31%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.09 / 0.3 Watt
Ocioso	4.04 / 7.2 / 11.4 Watt
Carga	80.8 / 144.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-103%	-16%	-57%	-2%	-8%	-13%	-128%
Idle Minimum *	4.04	14.7 -264%	7 -73%	7.4 -83%	5 -24%	3.5 13%	4.96 ?(2 - 13, n=23) -23%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) -237%
Idle Average *	7.2	18.6 -158%	9.9 -38%	8.6 -19%	7 3%	6.9 4%	8.61 ?(5.3 - 15.7, n=23) -20%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -164%
Idle Maximum *	11.4	22.6 -98%	12 -5%	39.1 -243%	11 4%	8.5 25%	14.8 ?(8.9 - 30.6, n=23) -30%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) -135%
Load Average *	80.8	90 -11%	68.4 15%	65.9 18%	89 -10%	127 -57%	81.7 ?(57 - 128, n=23) -1%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -32%
Witcher 3 ultra *	93.6		94.9 -1%	106.9 -14%	90 4%
Load Maximum *	144.5	120 17%	130.9 9%	141.3 2%	132 9%	179 -24%	131.9 ?(80 - 192.2, n=23) 9%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -72%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		15h 51min
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		0h 59min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)		6h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 11min

	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 57 Wh	Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-18%	31%	20%	39%	-40%	-1%
Reader / Idle	951	466 -51%	916 -4%	1044 10%	890 -6%	301 -68%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) -41%
H.264	482				506 5%		409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -15%
WiFi v1.3	385	285 -26%	482 25%	486 26%	463 20%	197 -49%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -3%
Witcher 3 ultra	59						78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years) 33%
Load	71	87 23%	123 73%	88 24%	168 137%	69 -3%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 21%

Pro

+ Painel IPS mate

+ SSD NVMe

+ Baia de unidade de 2,5 polegadas

+ Permaneceu moderadamente morno

+ Não muito barulhento

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ Teclado iluminado

+ Fácil manutenção

Contra

- Tela escura

- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

- RAM de um canal

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (7DT48EA). Review unit courtesy of Cyberport.

No momento deste artigo, o HP Omen 15-dc1020ng era o portátil Omen 15 mais acessível. Cerca de US $ 1.000 te dão um portátil para jogos Core i5-9300He GeForce GTX 1650 capaz de rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente em sua tela em resolução FHD e detalhes médios. Alguns jogos inclusive permitiram configurações e resoluções mais altas. Para obter o máximo do sistema, aconselhamos adicionar um segundo módulo de memória para ativar o modo de canal duplo.

O dispositivo permanece razoavelmente frio e silencioso, independentemente da carga de trabalho, particularmente em casos de uso ocioso e de carga baixa a média. Também oferece uma duração de bateria decente de aproximadamente 6,5 horas ao navegar na Web ou 8 horas ao assistir a filmes.

O atual modelo de nível básico da Hewlett Packard, o Omen 15, é um portátil para jogos bem equilibrado a um preço moderado.

A HP também optou por um rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB, que pode ser atualizado para um dispositivo de armazenamento mais espaçoso. Além disso, os usuários podem adicionar um SSD ou HD secundário de 2,5 polegadas. Um compartimento de armazenamento e um quadro de montagem estão incluídos por padrão.

O painel IPS FHD mate oferece amplos ângulos de visão e uma relação de contraste decente. No entanto, seu brilho máximo é muito baixo e ainda mais reduzido com a bateria, e a cobertura do espaço de cores foi decepcionante, por dizer o mínimo. Esperamos mais de um portátil na faixa de preço do Omen 15. O teclado é utilizável e inclui uma luz de fundo. Infelizmente, o Omen 15 não possui o Thunderbolt 3, o que teria permitido o uso de uma GPU externa mais potente.

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng - 09/20/2019 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

66 / 80 → 82%

Peso

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Bateria

73 / 95 → 77%

Pantalha

80%

Desempenho do jogos

84%

Desempenho da aplicação

86%

Temperatura

89 / 95 → 94%

Ruído

92 / 90 → 100%

Audio

61%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Médio

75%

82%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do HP Omen 15: gamer acessível de nível de entrada com uma duração de bateria decente

Sascha Mölck, 2019-07-25 (Update: 2019-07-25)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

HP Omen 15-dc1020ng audio analysis

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison