Breve Análise do HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4: Conversível com ângulos de visão limitados
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.6 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 9.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 70 %
iluminação com acumulador: 550 cd/m²
Contraste: 2464:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.71 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA InfoVison IVO857A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 BOE HF NV140QUM-N54, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 14% | 2% | -5% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 83.8 21% | 69.9 1% | 67.2 -3% | 66.1 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.2 | 99.9 8% | 99.2 8% | 90.8 -2% | 97.8 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.9 | 83.3 14% | 71.5 -2% | 66.5 -9% | 67.8 -7% |
| Response Times | 39% | 78% | 582% | 908% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 74 ? | 44.4 ? 40% | 47.6 ? 36% | 42 ? 43% | 39.2 ? 47% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 44 ? | 27.2 ? 38% | 29.2 ? 34% | 37 ? 16% | 25.6 ? 42% |
| PWM Frequency | 952 ? | 2500 ? 163% | 17000 ? 1686% | 26040 ? 2635% | |
| Screen | -9% | 7% | -23% | -0% | |
| Brightness middle | 542 | 501.7 -7% | 549.8 1% | 350 -35% | 470.1 -13% |
| Brightness | 653 | 501 -23% | 520 -20% | 343 -47% | 443 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 70 | 82 17% | 86 23% | 73 4% | 88 26% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.32 -45% | 0.39 -77% | 0.29 -32% | 0.38 -73% |
| Contrast | 2464 | 1568 -36% | 1410 -43% | 1207 -51% | 1237 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.72 | 5.48 -16% | 2.12 55% | 6.36 -35% | 2.47 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.5 | 10.03 4% | 3.66 65% | 11.63 -11% | 5.73 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.71 | 8.1 -5% | 2.6 66% | 8.04 -4% | 3.7 52% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.07 106% | 2.3 96% | 2.47 89% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6670 97% | 6730 97% | 6884 94% | 7716 84% | 7373 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 74.1 18% | 65.4 4% | 59 -6% | 62 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 91 -9% | 98.2 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.22 | 1.37 | 1.7 | 1.52 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
2% | 29% /
20% | 185% /
94% | 302% /
170% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 44 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 952 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 952 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 952 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3941 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4884 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4004 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 57% | 15% | 37% | -55% | 5% | |
| Write 4K | 146.4 | 128.6 -12% | 106.7 -27% | 137.6 -6% | 64.3 -56% | 138.5 ? -5% |
| Read 4K | 46.91 | 45.25 -4% | 49.94 6% | 47.05 0% | 34.13 -27% | 44.2 ? -6% |
| Write Seq | 981 | 1949 99% | 1223 25% | 2372 142% | 466.4 -52% | 1265 ? 29% |
| Read Seq | 908 | 2359 160% | 1801 98% | 1568 73% | 498.3 -45% | 1237 ? 36% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 474.9 | 445 -6% | 325.3 -32% | 204.5 -57% | 193.3 -59% | 404 ? -15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 442.3 | 404.5 -9% | 551 25% | 350.8 -21% | 179.7 -59% | 421 ? -5% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1451 | 3019 108% | 1224 -16% | 2395 65% | 396.8 -73% | 1491 ? 3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1638 | 3564 118% | 2350 43% | 3286 101% | 547 -67% | 1741 ? 6% |
| AS SSD | 5% | -244% | 50% | -69% | -1% | |
| Seq Read | 1352 | 2213 64% | 1801 33% | 2276 68% | 488.2 -64% | 1363 ? 1% |
| Seq Write | 855 | 1401 64% | 1125 32% | 2331 173% | 403.2 -53% | 1227 ? 44% |
| 4K Read | 44.14 | 55.2 25% | 39.7 -10% | 51.4 16% | 31.07 -30% | 40.8 ? -8% |
| 4K Write | 153.5 | 130.3 -15% | 67 -56% | 128.6 -16% | 70.8 -54% | 127.3 ? -17% |
| 4K-64 Read | 768 | 878 14% | 1253 63% | 1561 103% | 255.1 -67% | 957 ? 25% |
| 4K-64 Write | 971 | 1478 52% | 209 -78% | 1273 31% | 156.5 -84% | 1081 ? 11% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.036 28% | 0.069 -38% | 0.044 12% | 0.093 -86% | 0.07744 ? -55% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.023 | 0.086 -274% | 0.625 -2617% | 0.03 -30% | 0.048 -109% | 0.03671 ? -60% |
| Score Read | 947 | 1154 22% | 1472 55% | 1840 94% | 335 -65% | 1134 ? 20% |
| Score Write | 1210 | 1748 44% | 388 -68% | 1635 35% | 268 -78% | 1331 ? 10% |
| Score Total | 2628 | 3467 32% | 2583 -2% | 4424 68% | 781 -70% | 3046 ? 16% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2161 | 1293 | 208.1 | 1169 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 572 | 560 | 74.3 | 446 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1433 | 927 | 164.5 | 874 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 31% /
27% | -115% /
-135% | 44% /
45% | -62% /
-63% | 2% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1864 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7796 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1070 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (20.7 - 143.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.45 - 31.1, n=83) | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Convertible (4.16 - 122.6, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (7.45 - 22.7, n=82) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 34.16 | 9.89 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 75.7 | 41.5 | 19.4 | 17.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 20.33 | 13.14 | 11.68 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.2 / 32.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.36 / 2.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 7.8 / 10.3 Watt |
| Carga |
36 / 49.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -39% | 14% | -11% | 11% | 4% | -26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 5.6 -65% | 2.6 24% | 4.7 -38% | 3.8 -12% | 3.81 ? -12% | 5.21 ? -53% |
| Idle Average * | 7.8 | 10.5 -35% | 5.3 32% | 9.4 -21% | 7.5 4% | 6.94 ? 11% | 8.16 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 12 -17% | 7 32% | 16 -55% | 8.6 17% | 8.75 ? 15% | 11.1 ? -8% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 53.3 -48% | 43.1 -20% | 26.4 27% | 33.1 8% | 35 ? 3% | 46.2 ? -28% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 64.6 -31% | 49 1% | 34 31% | 31.8 36% | 47.5 ? 4% | 67 ? -35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.9 | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30T-E-109 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -23% | -5% | -2% | 34% | 18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 729 | 1381 89% | 1344 ? 84% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 564 | 436 -23% | 537 -5% | 551 -2% | 602 7% | 594 ? 5% |
| Load | 177 | 189 7% | 114.9 ? -35% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Bom conversível com alguns problemas na tela
O HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 foi equipado com um hardware melhor. O ganho efetivo no desempenho varia de acordo com o benchmark. Em geral, os usuários podem esperar um aumento de 5 a 20% no desempenho. Outra melhoria que notamos rapidamente foi o Wi-Fi mais rápido.
A HP melhorou o hardware do EliteBook x360 1030 G4 e manteve muitos de seus pontos fortes. Infelizmente, a proteção de tela nubla a tela táctil decente.
O HP Sure View ainda requer algumas melhorias importantes. A própria tela táctil mate é bastante boa, mas é visivelmente prejudicada pela tecnologia de proteção de tela. As cores ricas e o brilho decente do painel são perdidos e os ângulos de visão disponíveis para o usuário são muito limitados. Se você pode ficar sem essa opção, definitivamente ficará mais feliz com um modelo sem o Sure View. A CPU Ice-Lake ausente é outra coisa que não conseguimos entender.
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA
- 03/24/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
