Breve Análise do HP Elite x3 Phablet (incl. Lap Dock)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 268 cd/m²
Contraste: 1072:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 333 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 357.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 357.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| HP Elite x3 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| LG G6 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HP Elite x3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.06 / 0.27 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.86 / 1.46 / 1.59 Watt |
| Carga |
8.1 / 9.35 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Elite x3 4150 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -90% | -4% | 31% | 11% | -4% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.86 | 2.85 -231% | 0.78 9% | 0.68 21% | 0.62 28% | 0.77 10% | 0.66 23% |
| Idle Average * | 1.46 | 2.95 -102% | 2.13 -46% | 1.13 23% | 1.43 2% | 2.04 -40% | 1.01 31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.59 | 3.26 -105% | 2.17 -36% | 1.16 27% | 1.48 7% | 2.24 -41% | 1.09 31% |
| Load Average * | 8.1 | 8.92 -10% | 6.32 22% | 4.69 42% | 5.52 32% | 4.69 42% | 3.97 51% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.35 | 9.39 -0% | 6.49 31% | 5.24 44% | 10.47 -12% | 8.66 7% | 8.34 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elite x3 4150 mAh | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | 23% | 23% | 13% | 21% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2205 | 1078 -51% | 1538 -30% | 1565 -29% | 1835 -17% | 1789 -19% | 1371 -38% |
| H.264 | 760 | 611 -20% | 947 25% | 742 -2% | 813 7% | 779 3% | 724 -5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 422 | 369 -13% | 758 80% | 736 74% | 587 39% | 692 64% | 407 -4% |
| Load | 185 | 179 -3% | 219 18% | 275 49% | 225 22% | 252 36% | 320 73% |
Pro
Contra
O HP Elite x3 é um phablet maciço, que a HP anuncia como um tablet e não sem razão. Ele combina um design robusto e funcional para obter uma ferramenta empresarial bem sucedida. Destina-se ao setor de saúde, logística, POS, indústria e, principalmente, trabalhadores móveis que precisam de acesso fácil aos seus dados e que desejam usar o menor número possível de dispositivos.
A última tarefa em particular, o HP Elite x3 domina muito bem, dado que não só pode ser usado como um smartphone, mas também como um cliente fino e com o Lap Dock também como um portátil com algumas limitações. Usá-lo como um portátil não foi muito legal durante o teste. A tela é bastante escura e a reprodução das cores poderia ser melhor. No entanto, gostamos das portas adicionais que transformam o Elite x3 em uma ferramenta de apresentação versátil. A grande bateria no Lap Dock também é uma vantagem.
O HP Elite x3 é um phablet robusto com uma forte base de hardware que representa uma solução empresarial bem sucedida para muitas áreas corporativas.
O HP Elite x3 não possui fraquezas reais, pois combina recursos de segurança abrangentes com uma plataforma móvel relativamente segura: Windows 10 Mobile. Apesar da pouca importância que o sistema operacional possa ter para o consumidor privado, é fácil para empresas de médio e grande porte integrar o dispositivo em sua infraestrutura de TI existente e administrá-lo. Além disso, recebe atualizações de segurança regularmente. Mas, mesmo para as pequenas empresas e os trabalhadores autônomos, a HP oferece uma entrada comparativamente acessível na computação em nuvem com o Workspace, o que torna desnecessária a compra e manutenção de hardware adicional. Isso é completado por vários produtos de garantia e serviço. O preço está a partir de cerca de 790 Libras.
No entanto, como produto de consumo, só podemos recomendar o phablet para os fanáticos Hard-core do Windows.
HP Elite x3
- 06/02/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
