Breve Análise do HP 250 G7: Reciclagem de sucata feita à maneira da HP
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | HP 250 G7-15S40ES i5-1035G1, GeForce MX110 | 1.8 kg | 22.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
74.7 % v7 (old) | Lenovo V155-15API R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
76.6 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
76.6 % v7 (old) | Asus M509DA-EJ153T R3 3200U, Vega 3 | 1.8 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
78.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (54.8 - 339, n=21) | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (86 - 348, n=21) | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 150 cd/m²
Contraste: 434:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.36
ΔE Greyscale 15.05 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.93% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
HP 250 G7-15S40ES BOE BOE0687, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES BOE0687, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo V155-15API AUO61ED, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX BOE CQ NT156FHM-N61, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus M509DA-EJ153T Chi Mei N156HGA-EA3, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW CEC PANDA LM156LF-CL07, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -1% | -1% | 8% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.64 | 39.61 3% | 38.14 -1% | 38.17 -1% | 41.58 8% | 39.53 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 59.5 2% | 57.4 -1% | 57.5 -1% | 62.4 7% | 59.5 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.93 | 40.93 3% | 39.4 -1% | 39.44 -1% | 43 8% | 40.84 2% |
Response Times | 124% | -28% | -29% | -51% | -80% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 41 ? -8% | 44 ? -16% | 41 ? -8% | 45 ? -18% | 36 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 12 ? -20% | 14 ? -40% | 15 ? -50% | 14 ? -40% | 25 ? -150% |
PWM Frequency | 5000 ? | 25000 ? 400% | 250 ? -95% | 178 ? -96% | ||
Screen | 8% | 14% | -4% | 16% | 46% | |
Brightness middle | 178 | 205 15% | 220 24% | 203 14% | 226 27% | 250 40% |
Brightness | 174 | 205 18% | 200 15% | 188 8% | 212 22% | 228 31% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 88 7% | 80 -2% | 87 6% | 84 2% | 83 1% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.52 -27% | 0.355 13% | 0.635 -55% | 0.485 -18% | 0.205 50% |
Contrast | 434 | 394 -9% | 620 43% | 320 -26% | 466 7% | 1220 181% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.66 | 11.15 12% | 10.36 18% | 10.84 14% | 7.76 39% | 5.65 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.77 | 19.08 16% | 18.91 17% | 22.18 3% | 12.44 45% | 13.7 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.36 | 2.98 32% | 5.09 -17% | 4.45 -2% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 15.05 | 12.62 16% | 12.49 17% | 12.87 14% | 9.11 39% | 6.32 58% |
Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.38 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.58 85% | 2.11 104% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 20050 32% | 14189 46% | 12808 51% | 15854 41% | 9905 66% | 7287 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 3% | 36 -3% | 36.4 -2% | 40 8% | 38 3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 59 2% | 57 -2% | 57.4 -1% | 63 9% | 59 2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
27% | -5% /
5% | -11% /
-6% | -9% /
3% | -11% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 5000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 5000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=98, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (144 - 171, n=8) | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (242 - 2642, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (518 - 803, n=11) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (607 - 1002, n=9) | |
Average of class Office (208 - 2248, n=100, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=98, last 2 years) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (382 - 431, n=7) | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (1178 - 1873, n=7) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 18.7, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (3.32 - 6.44, n=8) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (55.3 - 70.9, n=6) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=98, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1 (0.705 - 0.769, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.192, n=97, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3323 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3981 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5171 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3412 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110 () | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110 () | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |
* ... smaller is better
HP 250 G7-15S40ES Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | Lenovo V155-15API Union Memory RTOTJ128VGD3EYX | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus M509DA-EJ153T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -60% | 30% | 0% | 13% | 31% | 7% | |
Write 4K | 152.5 | 72.4 -53% | 176.1 15% | 128.7 -16% | 114.9 -25% | 179.3 18% | 143 ? -6% |
Read 4K | 40.59 | 27.84 -31% | 50.4 24% | 52.3 29% | 52.7 30% | 47.7 18% | 43.2 ? 6% |
Write Seq | 720 | 145.1 -80% | 1457 102% | 984 37% | 1361 89% | 1265 76% | 855 ? 19% |
Read Seq | 1131 | 496 -56% | 1424 26% | 1291 14% | 1385 22% | 1184 5% | 1328 ? 17% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 423.2 | 129.6 -69% | 381 -10% | 235.7 -44% | 181.1 -57% | 450.6 6% | 419 ? -1% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 276.1 | 200.9 -27% | 436.5 58% | 324.6 18% | 340.5 23% | 556 101% | 330 ? 20% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 968 | 146.4 -85% | 1455 50% | 984 2% | 1519 57% | 1455 50% | 972 ? 0% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2223 | 522 -77% | 1725 -22% | 1390 -37% | 1515 -32% | 1717 -23% | 2174 ? -2% |
AS SSD | -78% | 27% | -22% | 2% | 39% | 6% | |
Seq Read | 1784 | 480.8 -73% | 1542 -14% | 1384 -22% | 1358 -24% | 1477 -17% | 1892 ? 6% |
Seq Write | 860 | 135.8 -84% | 1249 45% | 559 -35% | 1300 51% | 1339 56% | 805 ? -6% |
4K Read | 35.84 | 23.55 -34% | 38.79 8% | 44.64 25% | 44.88 25% | 46.26 29% | 47.2 ? 32% |
4K Write | 105.1 | 47.43 -55% | 89.3 -15% | 97.8 -7% | 77.5 -26% | 143.9 37% | 135.4 ? 29% |
4K-64 Read | 464.1 | 186.5 -60% | 966 108% | 324.3 -30% | 586 26% | 937 102% | 520 ? 12% |
4K-64 Write | 773 | 86.8 -89% | 885 14% | 388.4 -50% | 738 -5% | 1190 54% | 736 ? -5% |
Access Time Read * | 0.107 | 0.118 -10% | 0.106 1% | 0.046 57% | 0.1368 ? -28% | ||
Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.132 -230% | 0.044 -10% | 0.047 -18% | 0.057 -43% | 0.024 40% | 0.0396 ? 1% |
Score Read | 678 | 258 -62% | 1159 71% | 507 -25% | 767 13% | 1131 67% | 756 ? 12% |
Score Write | 964 | 148 -85% | 1099 14% | 542 -44% | 945 -2% | 1468 52% | 952 ? -1% |
Score Total | 1953 | 529 -73% | 2842 46% | 1284 -34% | 2115 8% | 3181 63% | 2055 ? 5% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 771 | 894 16% | 589 -24% | 765 -1% | 712 ? -8% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 240.2 | 304.9 27% | 163.4 -32% | 239.9 0% | 300 ? 25% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 469.2 | 642 37% | 425 -9% | 528 13% | 525 ? 12% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -69% /
-70% | 29% /
28% | -11% /
-14% | 8% /
7% | 35% /
37% | 7% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 2367 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9867 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1600 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 500 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Dual-Channel) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (2115 - 2140, n=3) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Single-Channel) | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (48 - 49.7, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Asus M509DA-EJ153T | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Dual-Channel) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Single-Channel) | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1366x768 med (1/3) | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (74.9 - 82.7, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average of class Office (16.4 - 146.2, n=101, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP ProBook 445 G7 175W4EA | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng |
Total War: Three Kingdoms - 1280x720 Low (incl textures) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 () | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng |
Tomb Raider - 1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 (47.1 - 48.1, n=2) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Dual-Channel) | |
Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES (Single-Channel) |
Farming Simulator 19 - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 () | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 81.2 | 66.4 | 45.7 | 24.4 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 161.4 | 124.3 | 84.2 | 44.9 |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 137.4 | 71.1 | 48.1 | 20.8 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 108.1 | 56.6 | 49.7 | 18.5 |
Sims 4 (2014) | 151.1 | 66.4 | 37 | 32.1 |
GTA V (2015) | 86 | 73.4 | 19.6 | 6.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 95.1 | 82.7 | 36.2 | 32.4 |
Civilization VI (2016) | 50.1 | 25 | 9.4 | |
Fortnite (2018) | 62.7 | 41.8 | 14.9 | 9.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.2 | 25.2 | 23.6 | |
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 171 | 36.3 | 14.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 22 | 10 | 9 | 8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 25 | 8 | ||
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 33 | 16 | 12 | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 19 | 9 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 30.9 | 14.2 | 11.8 | |
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 80.9 | 30.7 | 17.5 | 12.3 |
Apex Legends (2019) | 31.1 | 12.8 | 10.5 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 22 | 10 | ||
Metro Exodus (2019) | 16.4 | 6.7 | ||
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 40.7 | 15.6 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 25 | 9 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 28.5 | 11.2 | ||
Rage 2 (2019) | 19 | 7.2 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 37.6 | 10.8 | 6 | |
Control (2019) | 22.6 | 6.6 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 24.5 | 9.4 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 88.6 | 48.8 | 43.2 | 32.3 |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 17 | 8 | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 33 | 10.8 | ||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 15.1 | 9.5 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 20.8 | 10.2 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 13.2 | |||
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 15.8 | 7.1 | ||
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 25.6 | 9.8 | ||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 17.1 | |||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 51 | 16.6 | 11.1 | |
F1 2020 (2020) | 33 | 17 | 13 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 14 | 7 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 26.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 40.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.6 dB(A) |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES i5-1035G1, GeForce MX110 | Lenovo V155-15API R5 3500U, Vega 8 | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus M509DA-EJ153T R3 3200U, Vega 3 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -2% | -10% | -6% | -5% | -7% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 26.6 | 29.8 -12% | 30.3 -14% | 30.3 -14% | 30.2 -14% | 30.7 -15% | 29 ? -9% | 24.4 ? 8% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.6 | 29.8 -12% | 30.3 -14% | 30.3 -14% | 30.2 -14% | 30.9 -16% | 29.1 ? -9% | 24.7 ? 7% |
Idle Average * | 28.6 | 29.8 -4% | 30.3 -6% | 30.3 -6% | 30.2 -6% | 31.6 -10% | 30 ? -5% | 24.9 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 29.8 -4% | 30.3 -6% | 31.1 -9% | 30.2 -6% | 31.6 -10% | 31.5 ? -10% | 26 ? 9% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 32.1 10% | 32.7 8% | 40.7 -14% | 34.8 2% | 34.3 4% | 37.1 ? -4% | 34.9 ? 2% |
Load Maximum * | 40.3 | 34.5 14% | 32.8 19% | 40.8 -1% | 39.5 2% | 33.8 16% | 41.5 ? -3% | 40.3 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
HP 250 G7-15S40ES i5-1035G1, GeForce MX110 | Lenovo V155-15API R5 3500U, Vega 8 | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus M509DA-EJ153T R3 3200U, Vega 3 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -2% | 6% | -1% | 2% | -6% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.4 | 42 -15% | 40.7 -12% | 33.7 7% | 35 4% | 35.1 4% | 40.6 ? -12% | 41.1 ? -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.5 | 45.4 -24% | 40.7 -12% | 36.1 1% | 36.1 1% | 42.4 -16% | 45.4 ? -24% | 44.1 ? -21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.1 | 28.2 -0% | 25.4 10% | 24.9 11% | 28.1 -0% | 25.4 10% | 25.6 ? 9% | 27.5 ? 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.3 | 28.6 -1% | 25.9 8% | 27.4 3% | 30.3 -7% | 25.8 9% | 26.8 ? 5% | 28.9 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
HP 250 G7-15S40ES audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 0.45 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.8 / 7.3 / 7.5 Watt |
Carga |
42 / 61 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES i5-1035G1, GeForce MX110 | Lenovo V155-15API R5 3500U, Vega 8 | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | Asus M509DA-EJ153T R3 3200U, Vega 3 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | 38% | 22% | 12% | 22% | -4% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 4.7 -24% | 2.3 39% | 3.5 8% | 3.7 3% | 3.2 16% | 4.4 ? -16% | 4.57 ? -20% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 7.4 -1% | 4.8 34% | 6.2 15% | 6.2 15% | 5.7 22% | 7.37 ? -1% | 7.53 ? -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 8 -7% | 5.7 24% | 6.6 12% | 8.4 -12% | 6.1 19% | 7.63 ? -2% | 9.16 ? -22% |
Load Average * | 42 | 40.7 3% | 26.2 38% | 32 24% | 31.1 26% | 36.5 13% | 40.9 ? 3% | 42.5 ? -1% |
Load Maximum * | 61 | 42 31% | 27 56% | 29 52% | 43.1 29% | 37.5 39% | 62 ? -2% | 60.7 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
HP 250 G7-15S40ES i5-1035G1, GeForce MX110, 41 Wh | Lenovo V155-15API R5 3500U, Vega 8, 36 Wh | Acer Extensa 15 EX215-51-56UX i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 37 Wh | Asus M509DA-EJ153T R3 3200U, Vega 3, 32 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -20% | 20% | -5% | 35% | 3% | 61% | |
Reader / Idle | 723 | 1041 44% | 1061 47% | 833 15% | 1300 ? 80% | ||
H.264 | 389 | 505 30% | 426 10% | 704 ? 81% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 279 -20% | 402 15% | 334 -5% | 466 33% | 339 -3% | 595 ? 70% |
Load | 103 | 94 -9% | 130 26% | 91 -12% | 117.5 ? 14% |
Pro
Contra
O portátil de escritório da HP tem um processador Core i5-1030NG7 atual, da geração Ice Lake abordo que fornece desempenho suficiente para aplicativos de escritório e Internet. O núcleo gráfico GeForce MX110 dedicado é mais poderoso do que a iGPU Intel, mas não oferece nenhuma vantagem significativa sobre ele. Ele também não transforma o 250 G7 em um portátil para jogos.
Liberação na HP. O 250 G7 15S40ES combina hardware antigo e novo. O resultado não é convincente.
Um SSD NVMe de 256 GB garante um sistema veloz e fluente. É possível trocar por um modelo de maior capacidade e/ou mais rápido. Uma expansão de memória também seria possível graças ao segundo slot de memória não utilizado. O processo de abertura da carcaça que é necessário para realizar ambos os procedimentos não foi projetado de uma forma muito amigável pela HP.
A tela é uma decepção amarga. A HP usa um modelo TN muito escuro e de baixo contraste que possui ângulos de visão instáveis. Além disso, ela também oferece uma reprodução de cores pobre e uma cobertura insatisfatória do espaço de cores. Como resultado, ler no painel escuro cansa os olhos. Apenas a superfície mate defende a tela.
A variante HP 250 G7 que temos conosco não pode ser recomendada para compra devido à tela. No segmento de portáteis de 500 euros (~$ 596), telas IPS mais brilhantes e com ângulos de visão estáveis são agora o padrão. No entanto, o núcleo gráfico do MX110 também não é um recurso desejável. Os portáteis Ryzen atuais oferecem mais desempenho de GPU pelo mesmo preço.
Se a unidade ótica integrada é um motivo potencial para comprar o dispositivo, um portátil Ryzen 2000/3000 de baixo custo da série HP 255 G7 de construção idêntica, seria uma alternativa melhor. Caso contrário, dispositivos com uma APU Ryzen 4000 são atualmente recomendados no segmento de 500-Euros (~$596). O Acer Aspire 5 A515-44 e o Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ARE05, por exemplo, podem ser mencionados aqui.
Nota: A avaliação do 250 G7 é pior do que a do modelo 250 G7 que analisamos no ano passado. Este último foi avaliado de acordo com um método de classificação mais antigo. As duas avaliações não são comparáveis.
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
- 09/01/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck