Breve Análise do Dell Precision 5540: Workstation que funciona como aquecedor de mão
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000 | 2.1 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (81.2 - 227, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 427 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Dell Precision 5540 SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA AUO30EB, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | -5% | -27% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 66.5 -33% | 84.4 -16% | 62.4 -38% | 68.2 -32% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 91.5 -8% | 96.2 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.3 | 68.4 -30% | 98.5 1% | 63.4 -35% | 68.8 -29% |
| Response Times | -788% | -1295% | 3081% | -1498% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 52.8 ? -1786% | 51 ? -1721% | 34.4 ? -1129% | 60.8 ? -2071% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 3.2 ? | 32 ? -900% | 31 ? -869% | 14 ? -338% | 32.8 ? -925% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.9 ? | 1020 ? 323% | 26040 ? 10709% | ||
| Screen | 2% | -23% | -12% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 427 | 588 38% | 445 4% | 542 27% | 417 -2% |
| Brightness | 411 | 555 35% | 462 12% | 528 28% | 412 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 85 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 0.29 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.5 22% | 4.75 -48% | 3.5 -9% | 4.4 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.4 | 6.3 25% | 7.79 7% | 7.8 7% | 6.7 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.8 | 0.6 79% | 1.3 54% | 1.9 32% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.5 -150% | 4.49 -149% | 4.8 -167% | 5 -178% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.33 94% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6176 105% | 6836 95% | 7374 88% | 7690 85% | 7575 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 86.8 | 63.2 -27% | 87 0% | 58.8 -32% | 62.3 -28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 91.1 -9% | 96 -4% |
| Contrast | 1470 | 890 | 1322 | 1438 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -269% /
-161% | -441% /
-214% | 1014% /
604% | -514% /
-233% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.9 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3684 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4558 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5296 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Precision 5540 SK hynix PC400 512 GB | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average SK hynix PC400 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 23% | 65% | 43% | 5% | 5% | |
| Write 4K | 98 | 93.6 -4% | 105.6 8% | 162.2 66% | 102.7 5% | 103.1 ? 5% |
| Read 4K | 41.25 | 41.87 2% | 46.32 12% | 43.71 6% | 38.32 -7% | 41.2 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 1295 | 1698 31% | 2910 125% | 2441 88% | 1417 9% | 1341 ? 4% |
| Read Seq | 1441 | 1978 37% | 2820 96% | 1753 22% | 1289 -11% | 1668 ? 16% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.2 | 383.1 -11% | 545 27% | 397.6 -7% | 278.9 -35% | 411 ? -4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 400.1 | 326.9 -18% | 632 58% | 520 30% | 348.8 -13% | 377 ? -6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1366 | 2778 103% | 3349 145% | 2519 84% | 1895 39% | 1387 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2201 | 3119 42% | 3333 51% | 3448 57% | 3352 52% | 2748 ? 25% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1381 | 1575 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1371 | 1607 | ||||
| AS SSD | 28% | 56% | 58% | 48% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 1743 | 2357 35% | 2860 64% | 2980 71% | 2379 36% | 2198 ? 26% |
| Seq Write | 930 | 1235 33% | 2604 180% | 2094 125% | 1780 91% | 1075 ? 16% |
| 4K Read | 39.1 | 43.29 11% | 45.15 15% | 45.05 15% | 51 30% | 34.5 ? -12% |
| 4K Write | 92.1 | 99.7 8% | 100.2 9% | 155.4 69% | 109.5 19% | 95.9 ? 4% |
| 4K-64 Read | 956 | 1020 7% | 1428 49% | 1291 35% | 1184 24% | 973 ? 2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 863 | 1502 74% | 1401 62% | 1506 75% | 1725 100% | 899 ? 4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.074 | 0.07 5% | 0.049 34% | 0.064 14% | 0.057 23% | 0.082 ? -11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.053 | 0.039 26% | 0.037 30% | 0.024 55% | 0.034 36% | 0.053 ? -0% |
| Score Read | 1170 | 1299 11% | 1759 50% | 1634 40% | 1472 26% | 1228 ? 5% |
| Score Write | 1048 | 1726 65% | 1762 68% | 1871 79% | 2013 92% | 1102 ? 5% |
| Score Total | 2781 | 3640 31% | 4411 59% | 4300 55% | 4217 52% | 2905 ? 4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2145 | 2015 | 1989 | 1701 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 565 | 597 | 457 | 346 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1320 | 1449 | 1121 | 1050 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
26% | 61% /
60% | 51% /
52% | 27% /
30% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 36376 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 39269 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11695 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28401 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7320 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3356 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Workstation (23.3 - 156.5, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q (32.4 - 33.4, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| Anno 1800 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| 1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q () | |
| Dell Precision 5540 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 79.5 | ||||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 32.4 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 145 | 132 | 118 | 108 | 43.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 41.7 | 28.8 | 12.3 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 101 | 87 | 73 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 27.86 | 12.9 | 9.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.3 / 38 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.8 °C / -6.9 F).
Dell Precision 5540 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.55 / 0.93 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.4 / 12.1 / 12.7 Watt |
| Carga |
98 / 135.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 35% | -38% | -33% | 10% | -6% | -3% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 3.79 49% | 9.4 -27% | 13.7 -85% | 6.8 8% | 6.2 16% | 6.5 ? 12% | 8.1 ? -9% |
| Idle Average * | 12.1 | 6.9 43% | 17.4 -44% | 17.5 -45% | 11.3 7% | 9.6 21% | 11.7 ? 3% | 12.4 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.7 | 9.2 28% | 19.6 -54% | 20.9 -65% | 14.3 -13% | 21.2 -67% | 15.6 ? -23% | 17.8 ? -40% |
| Load Average * | 98 | 62 37% | 103 -5% | 77.2 21% | 78 20% | 104.3 -6% | 106 ? -8% | 91.9 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 89.9 | 64 29% | 91.7 -2% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 135.1 | 108 20% | 216 -60% | 123.7 8% | 126 7% | 135.3 -0% | 134.7 ? -0% | 157.4 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Precision 5540 i9-9980HK, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | -32% | -7% | 14% | 32% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 897 | 577 -36% | 1036 15% | 910 1% | 927 ? 3% | ||
| H.264 | 634 | 1053 66% | 560 -12% | 544 -14% | 671 ? 6% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 461 | 844 83% | 357 -23% | 532 15% | 582 26% | 467 1% | 509 ? 10% |
| Load | 102 | 100 -2% | 65 -36% | 79 -23% | 131 28% | 199 95% | 80.3 ? -21% |
Pro
Contra
Em nossa análise, o Dell Precision 5540 provou ser um workstation capaz. Embora o chassi se baseia no mesmo design e, portanto, com a mesma alta qualidade do XPS 15, também é o motivo da seleção de portas insuficiente. Dito isto, a porta Thunderbolt 3 oferece muita flexibilidade e é capaz de compensar as portas ausentes com um adaptador adequado.
O Dell Precision 5540 é uma boa opção para usuários que estão no mercado por um dispositivo com desempenho intermediário e uma tela de alta resolução. Como de costume, o chassi é sólido e a duração da bateria é boa.
Infelizmente, a CPU não funciona tão bem quanto o esperado. Embora a Nvidia Quadro T2000 atinja o nível de desempenho esperado, o processador não consegue acompanhar. O desempenho tende a cair constantemente para ser 15% mais lento no final, do que o desempenho máximo inicial em nosso circuito de testes. Embora a tela OLED 4K pareça fantástica, ela cem com um custo de uma duração da bateria significativamente mais curta.
Dell Precision 5540
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
