Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, SSD de 512 GB, FHD)

Muito caro!

VAIO, a antiga divisão de PCs da Sony, está de volta para atrapalhar o mercado, ou pelo menos tentar fazê-lo. Um de seus dispositivos de retorno é o VAIO A12, um conversível de 12,5 polegadas que pode ter dificuldade em justificar seu alto preço. Continue lendo para descobrir como o A12 funciona em nossos testes e se pode causar problemas para outros 2-em-1 de 12,5 polegadas, como o Surface Pro.
VAIO A12-92993
Processador
Intel Core i7-8500Y 2 x 1.5 - 4.2 GHz, Amber Lake-Y
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Análises do: 1050 MHz, 25.20.100.6374
Memória
16 GB 
, soldada, dual channel, máximo 16 GB
Pantalha
12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, native pen support, InfoVision IVO04E6, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 452 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD (SDHC/SDXC), até 32GB para SDHC, até 512GB para SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek USB GBE Familiy Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LN940, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 305.5 x 211.9
Bateria
23.4 Wh Lítio-Ion
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.07 MPix
Secondary Camera: 0 MPix Windows Hello
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, Caneta VAIO Digitizer, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 290 g
Preço
2799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12
VAIO A12

Size Comparison

320 mm 235 mm 15.4 mm 1.5 kg305.5 mm 211.9 mm 24 mm 1.1 kg304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 210 mm 9.75 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s +394%
Average of class Convertible
  (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years)
79 MB/s +174%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s +174%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s +173%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s +611%
Average of class Convertible
  (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years)
99.9 MB/s +235%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s +190%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s +183%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
588 MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (519min - 577max) MBit/s -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
532 MBit/s -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s -13%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s +11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
616 MBit/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (560min - 611max) MBit/s +4%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
570 MBit/s
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s -45%
280
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
InfoVision IVO04E6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 315 cd/m²
Contraste: 1500:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47.52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
46% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
VAIO A12-92993
InfoVision IVO04E6, , 1920x1080, 12.5"
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3"
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13"
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13"
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
AU Optronics AUO572D, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
42%
48%
46%
44%
43%
Display P3 Coverage
46
67.1
46%
70.5
53%
68.1
48%

67.8
47%

67.5
47%
66.2
44%
sRGB Coverage
69.3
95.5
38%
98.6
42%
99.4
43%

99.1
43%

96.7
40%
97.4
41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
47.52
67.9
43%
71.5
50%
69.9
47%

69.3
46%

68.2
44%
68.1
43%
Response Times
720%
20%
-14%
13%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52.8 ?(24.4, 28.4)
43 ?(21, 22)
19%
56.8 ?(26.8, 30)
-8%
47.2 ?(21.2, 26)
11%
47 ?(23, 24)
11%
52 ?(24.4, 27.6)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 ?(15.6, 14.8)
25 ?(13, 12)
18%
36 ?(19.6, 16.4)
-18%
42.4 ?(19.6, 22.8)
-39%
26 ?(14, 12)
14%
37.2 ?(21.2, 16)
-22%
PWM Frequency
990 ?(99)
22000 ?(50)
2122%
1852 ?(98)
87%
Screen
19%
10%
20%
5%
22%
Brightness middle
315
484
54%
548
74%
474
50%
452
43%
389.8
24%
Brightness
294
473
61%
545
85%
418
42%
412
40%
396
35%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
86
-3%
76
-15%
85
-4%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.33
-57%
0.51
-143%
0.33
-57%
0.48
-129%
0.27
-29%
Contrast
1500
1467
-2%
1075
-28%
1436
-4%
942
-37%
1444
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.4
4.29
2%
3.65
17%
3.2
27%
4.05
8%
2.72
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.1
6.46
9%
7.15
-1%
6.1
14%
6.64
6%
5.49
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.9
1.34
54%
1.81
38%
0.9
69%
1.56
46%
1.25
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
4.3
10%
5.5
-15%
4.5
6%
4.87
-1%
4.2
12%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.51 88%
2.154 102%
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.1 105%
CCT
7307 89%
7315 89%
7052 92%
5881 111%
7160 91%
7470 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
62
41%
65.2
48%
64
45%
62
41%
62.2
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
69.5
95
37%
99.1
43%
99.4
43%
97
40%
98.2
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
260% / 147%
26% / 19%
17% / 25%
21% / 13%
18% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Greyscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Colour Saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Colour Saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (Benchmark)
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
VAIO A12-92993 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø232 (221.39-245.57)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø488 (465.07-568.99)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø220 (212.35-271)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (68.6 - 287, n=59, last 2 years)
233 Points +85%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points +29%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points +12%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (126 - 132, n=4)
129.8 Points +3%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
126 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (110.1 - 2889, n=62, last 2 years)
1659 Points +577%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points +184%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points +170%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points +161%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points +132%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points +111%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
271 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (245 - 271, n=4)
252 Points +3%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
245 Points
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (1.86 - 3.26, n=6, last 2 years)
2.81 Points +91%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.71 Points +16%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.69 Points +15%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.47 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1.43 - 1.47, n=2)
1.45 Points -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.43 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (11 - 25, n=6, last 2 years)
20.2 Points +698%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.95 Points +135%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.48 Points +117%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.53 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (2.45 - 2.53, n=2)
2.49 Points -2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.45 Points -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Convertible
  (149.8 - 755, n=59, last 2 years)
613 Points +92%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
320 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (304 - 320, n=2)
312 Points -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Convertible
  (242 - 6954, n=60, last 2 years)
3741 Points +541%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (584 - 591, n=2)
588 Points +1%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
584 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Convertible
  (50984 - 92146, n=14, last 2 years)
79869 Points +223%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
32487 Points +32%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
31171 Points +26%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
30033 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
28118 Points +14%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24696 Points
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24567 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (22283 - 25962, n=4)
24377 Points -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1822 ms * -42%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1281 - 1822, n=4)
1499 ms * -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
1380 ms * -8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1289 ms * -1%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1281 ms *
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1189 ms * +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
1177 ms * +8%
Average of class Convertible
  (468 - 2676, n=60, last 2 years)
655 ms * +49%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (0.73 - 20.1, n=59, last 2 years)
10.9 fps +414%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.12 fps
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  ()
2.12 fps 0%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2159 Seconds * -22%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1772 - 2159, n=2)
1966 Seconds * -11%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1772 Seconds *
Average of class Convertible
  (193 - 1059, n=56, last 2 years)
383 Seconds * +78%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
 
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
2.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
27.17 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
27 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
245 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.07 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Convertible
  (1486 - 7963, n=56, last 2 years)
5855 Points +85%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3737 Points +18%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points +9%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3161 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2884 - 3161, n=4)
3028 Points -4%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2945 Points -7%
Essentials
Average of class Convertible
  (3975 - 12059, n=56, last 2 years)
10538 Points +46%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7995 Points +11%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7919 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7460 Points +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7195 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
7039 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6709 - 7257, n=4)
6976 Points -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6741 Points -6%
Productivity
Average of class Convertible
  (2764 - 10800, n=56, last 2 years)
7820 Points +30%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6238 Points +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6026 Points
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5745 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5698 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (5164 - 6026, n=4)
5615 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5509 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
5353 Points -11%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Convertible
  (811 - 12360, n=56, last 2 years)
6762 Points +242%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
2952 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2939 Points +49%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2840 Points +44%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2714 Points +37%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1978 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1791 - 2060, n=4)
1927 Points -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1791 Points -9%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible
  (4435 - 5830, n=3, last 2 years)
5108 Points +46%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points +8%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3493 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points 0%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2588 - 3493, n=4)
2894 Points -17%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2737 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible
  (2921 - 6089, n=3, last 2 years)
4810 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points +1%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4700 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (4141 - 4700, n=3)
4416 Points -6%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points -9%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3493 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4126 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4700 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3161 pontos
Ajuda
VAIO A12-92993
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-40%
-27%
-3%
-16%
-17%
39%
Write 4K
113.9
83.2
-27%
121.7
7%
95.4
-16%
91
-20%
140
23%
Read 4K
46.8
43.84
-6%
32.66
-30%
39.19
-16%
36.84
-21%
52.4
12%
Write Seq
1868
636
-66%
359.3
-81%
1197
-36%
948
-49%
1617 ?(112 - 2730, n=62)
-13%
Read Seq
2226
900
-60%
1463
-34%
1705
-23%
922
-59%
1716 ?(501 - 2665, n=62)
-23%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.4
192.9
-38%
353.6
13%
399.2
27%
355.8
14%
227.8
-27%
Read 4K Q32T1
284.6
247.4
-13%
387
36%
260.7
-8%
256.9
-10%
299.2
5%
Write Seq Q32T1
1881
861
-54%
358.1
-81%
1287
-32%
1222
-35%
1259
-33%
Read Seq Q32T1
3402
1615
-53%
1779
-48%
3025
-11%
3460
2%
3112
-9%
Write 4K Q8T8
410.2
381
-7%
1264 ?(369 - 1814, n=13)
208%
Read 4K Q8T8
527
750
42%
1193 ?(527 - 1620, n=13)
126%
AS SSD
-146%
-58%
-25%
-37%
-4%
-1%
Seq Read
2650
1154
-56%
1385
-48%
2243
-15%
2062
-22%
1693
-36%
1976 ?(1030 - 2806, n=62)
-25%
Seq Write
1328
393.6
-70%
302.1
-77%
847
-36%
832
-37%
1214
-9%
4K Read
56.8
34.42
-39%
30.97
-45%
42.48
-25%
41.45
-27%
42.69
-25%
50.5 ?(31.7 - 61, n=62)
-11%
4K Write
142.5
68.9
-52%
102.7
-28%
112.2
-21%
91.1
-36%
95.9
-33%
4K-64 Read
1316
494.1
-62%
472.7
-64%
741
-44%
669
-49%
1621
23%
4K-64 Write
767
171.3
-78%
411.2
-46%
597
-22%
596
-22%
605
-21%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.213
-433%
0.082
-105%
0.041
-3%
0.063
-58%
0.051
-28%
0.05092 ?(0.029 - 0.103, n=62)
-27%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.3
-934%
0.053
-83%
0.032
-10%
0.041
-41%
0.037
-28%
0.08337 ?(0.025 - 2.52, n=62)
-187%
Score Read
1638
644
-61%
642
-61%
1008
-38%
917
-44%
1833
12%
1451 ?(752 - 2125, n=62)
-11%
Score Write
1042
280
-73%
544
-48%
794
-24%
770
-26%
823
-21%
Score Total
3462
1225
-65%
1469
-58%
2257
-35%
2105
-39%
3569
3%
Copy ISO MB/s
1941
985
-49%
512
-74%
761
-61%
1374
-29%
1755 ?(917 - 3259, n=43)
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
273.1
143.1
-48%
226.9
-17%
237.3
-13%
631
131%
Copy Game MB/s
876
676
-23%
317.3
-64%
512
-42%
971
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-93% / -107%
-43% / -47%
-14% / -15%
-27% / -29%
-11% / -9%
19% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Sequential Read: 2465 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1856 MB/s
512K Read: 1739 MB/s
512K Write: 1840 MB/s
4K Read: 50.4 MB/s
4K Write: 89.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 202.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 262.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible
  (471 - 40768, n=58, last 2 years)
8236 Points +595%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points +53%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points +40%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points +40%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1185 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (821 - 1378, n=10)
1175 Points -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1088 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (2965 - 154219, n=41, last 2 years)
34379 Points +354%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points +35%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
9307 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points +21%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points +10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
7568 Points
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
6692 Points -12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (4521 - 7568, n=10)
6316 Points -17%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (365 - 29684, n=59, last 2 years)
6101 Points +533%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points +23%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1185 Points +23%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points +17%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
964 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (563 - 976, n=11)
816 Points -15%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
733 Points -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (94 - 11749, n=58, last 2 years)
2130 Points +637%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
347 Points +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
335 Points +16%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
289 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (205 - 289, n=6)
245 Points -15%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
226 Points -22%
3DMark 11 Performance
1291 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41219 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5622 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
858 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
420 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
328 pontos
Ajuda
Carga Máxima
 28.6 °C37.7 °C40 °C 
 28.7 °C37.3 °C42 °C 
 31.3 °C39.9 °C42.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C
42.4 °C40.8 °C27.4 °C
47.1 °C43.1 °C28.3 °C
44.8 °C42 °C29.2 °C
Máximo: 47.1 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-14.3 °C / -25.7 F).
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Heat
-9%
-15%
-7%
-21%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.4
40.4
5%
44.4
-5%
44.3
-4%
49.4
-17%
44.2
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
47.1
43.8
7%
52
-10%
48.9
-4%
47.1
-0%
48.2
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
26.6
33.5
-26%
32
-20%
30
-13%
38
-43%
33
-24%
Idle Bottom *
24.9
30.2
-21%
31.2
-25%
26.6
-7%
30.8
-24%
35.6
-43%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.331.12527.225.63128.728.24027.429.95025.329.76323.2268022.422.310022.522.612521.823.216021.822.420021.622.325021.123.731520.526.24002033.75001940.463019.346.880019.149.4100018.357.8125017.358.6160016.764.2200016.562.8250016.162.9315015.661.1400015.861.5500015.864.3630015.669.9800015.463.71000015.452.81250015.344.81600015.235.4SPL29.274.8N1.229.8median 17.3median 49.4Delta2.415.93539.234.335.232.336.532.633.131.933.430.231.929.831.128.929.928.228.127.53127.336.927.145.427.150.12652.225.258.924.757.824.158.623.958.823.667.523.668.323.364.623.265.423.163.422.963.322.957.923.157.922.953.622.761.122.664.622.660.435.775.52.533.6median 23.6median 58.61.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVAIO A12-92993HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
VAIO A12-92993 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (47.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.41 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 6.5 / 7.1 Watt
Carga midlight 20.2 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
VAIO A12-92993
i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13"
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13"
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
-29%
-28%
-63%
-38%
4%
7%
-71%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.2
27%
3
32%
4.8
-9%
4.9
-11%
1.8
59%
3.55 ?(1.8 - 5.7, n=10)
19%
Idle Average *
6.5
8.7
-34%
7.2
-11%
9
-38%
8.9
-37%
3.8
42%
Idle Maximum *
7.1
10.4
-46%
10
-41%
10.5
-48%
11
-55%
7.7
-8%
7.61 ?(5 - 12.5, n=10)
-7%
Load Average *
20.2
29.2
-45%
37.1
-84%
42.8
-112%
32
-58%
26.9
-33%
Load Maximum *
28
40.8
-46%
38.2
-36%
57.8
-106%
36
-29%
38.5
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 34min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 44.17763.1.0)
7h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 37min
VAIO A12-92993
i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 23.4 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
55%
-22%
42%
43%
161%
114%
Reader / Idle
514
1083
111%
790
54%
781
52%
1882
266%
H.264
223
523
135%
389
74%
WiFi v1.3
431
509
18%
300
-30%
395
-8%
459
6%
852
98%
Load
97
131
35%
84
-13%
83
-14%
137
41%
212
119%

Pro

+ Desempenho comparativamente bom do sistema
+ SSD NVMe veloz
+ 512 GB de armazenamento
+ 16 GB de RAM
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Câmera IV
+ Base de teclado e caneta ativa incluída
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Módulo LTE

Contra

- Caro
- Base de teclado com sensação barata
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Brilho fraco da tela
- Carcaça flexível
- Bateria pequena
- Alto falantes abaixo da média
- Posicionamento estranho do carregador
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
The VAIO A12 convertible review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.
The VAIO A12 convertible review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.

O VAIO A12 é uma espécie de enigma. O preço é muito alto e tem inúmeros inconvenientes, embora o VAIO seja bom em algumas áreas.

O processador da série Y é mais eficiente em termos energéticos do que os seus homólogos da série U e ainda é poderoso o suficiente para o trabalho de escritório diário. No entanto, a CPU dual-core atingirá seus limites em programas que exigem muitos recursos. Os 16 GB de RAM parecem um exagero aqui, no entanto, os recebem muito bem, e o SSD de 512 GB também. No geral, não tivemos problemas de desempenho inesperados, e o A12 até nos surpreendeu com comparativamente boas pontuações nos benchmarks de desempenho do sistema.

O VAIO A12 é simplesmente muito caro. Não oferece nada que seus concorrentes não possam fazer melhor e também tem uma série de problemas. Procure outra coisa e poupe algum dinheiro

O A12 também tem a aparência de deve ser um dispositivo robusto com seu design grosso e o uso de materiais premium, mas ocorre o oposto. O tablet se flexiona muito facilmente para o nosso gosto e o dock de teclado se curva no meio ao digitar. Da mesma forma, apreciamos que a VAIO tenha equipado o A12 com um leitor de cartão SD em tamanho completo, mas a decisão de incluir um USB 2.0 em um dispositivo tão caro é desconcertante.

Em última análise, não seriamos tão duros com o A12 se fosse mais barato. Poderíamos perdoar um dispositivo por ter uma tela fraca, uma bateria pequena, alto-falantes abaixo da média e portas mal pensadas se fosse uma barganha, mas nenhuma que custasse € 2.799 (~$3148). O Surface Pro 6 não tem nenhum dos problemas que o A12 traz, tem uma CPU mais potente e é quase € 800 (~$900) mais barato também.

Em suma, o A12 está muito aquém das nossas expectativas, e pouco faz para justificar o seu preço alto. Embora o VAIO A12 tenha recebido respeitáveis 82% no geral, recomendamos que você considere um de seus concorrentes: você gastará menos e obterá um dispositivo melhor.

VAIO A12-92993 - 05/02/2019 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 79%
Peso
74 / 35-78 → 90%
Bateria
81%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
46 / 91 → 51%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
74%
84%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, SSD de 512 GB, FHD)
Sebastian Bade, 2019-05- 2 (Update: 2019-05- 4)