Breve Análise do Conversível Topjoy Falcon (Modelo de Pré Produção)

Mini laptop.

O Topjoy Falcon atualmente listado no Kickstarter é um mini conversível com o Windows 10 e um processador quad-core Gemini-Lake com refrigeração ativa. Usamos um modelo de pré-produção da Topjoy para nossa análise, executando-o na maioria das nossas séries de testes. Descubra as vantagens e desvantagens do minicomputador em nossa análise.

Klaus Hinum, 👁 Klaus Hinum, ✓ Katja Steyrleuthner (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/30/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Topjoy Falcon

Processador

Intel Pentium Silver N5000 4 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Gemini Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel UHD Graphics 605

Memória

8 GB

, DDR3-2400 single channel

Pantalha

8.00 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 275 PPI, Multitouch, native pen support, AUO17D8, IPS, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Gemini Lake

Disco rígido

FORESEE 256GB, 256 GB

, 214 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC269

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Fones

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/)

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 200 x 130

Bateria

22 Wh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 8 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Island, Iluminação do Teclado: sim

Released

10/25/2018

peso

680 g

Preço

859 Dollar

Links

Topjoy página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Apple MacBook 12 2017 Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Apple iPad 6 2018 Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Topjoy Falcon DIN A4 ❌

USB-C (probably Gen.1) with charging function, mini-HDMI, audio port, USB 3.0 (Type-A)


279 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	252 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	266 cd/m²	264 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	261 cd/m²	263 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO17D8 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 269.1 cd/m² Minimum: 32.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 782:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19

	Topjoy Falcon AUO17D8, , 1920x1200, 8"	Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 PVO, , 1920x1200, 8.9"	Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Sharp SHP14A6, , 1800x1200, 10"	Chuwi LapBook SE 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
Display P3 Coverage		42.94	66.5	65
sRGB Coverage		64.4	97.5	94.8
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage		44.4	67.5	66.5
Response Times			138%	4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(17, 20)		44 ?(22, 22) -19%	39.2 ?(19.2, 20) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(20, 13.6)		25.6 ?(11.6, 14) 24%	27.7 ?(14.8, 12.9) 18%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(100, 266)		1020 ?(99) 410%	200 ?(29) 0%
Screen		-22%	53%	-36%
Brightness middle	266	207 -22%	456 71%	227 -15%
Brightness	269	205 -24%	426 58%	210 -22%
Brightness Distribution	88	89 1%	88 0%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.34	0.14 59%	0.31 9%	0.44 -29%
Contrast	782	1479 89%	1471 88%	516 -34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.6	7.98 -122%	1.3 64%	6.6 -83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.2		3 63%	12.2 -49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.7		1.1 59%	1.9 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	8.36 -132%	1.4 61%	7.9 -119%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.24 ^98%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6442 ^101%	7768 ^84%	6687 ^97%	8879 ^73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		41	62.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		64	96.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -22%	96% / 74%	-16% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

≤ 266 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % (266 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø222 (221.28-228.02)

Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø232 (230.48-237.35)

Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø230 (228.26-236.29)

Chuwi LapBook SE Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø157.8 (150.45-161.13)

Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30, Intel Core m3-7Y30: Ø238 (227.93-249.83)

Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y: Ø162.9 (162.13-163.67)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=59, last 2 years)	233 Points +199%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	105 Points +35%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points +15%
Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000	78 Points
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000 (73 - 80, n=12)	77.5 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel Pentium Silver N5000	77 Points -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	73 Points -6%
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel Celeron N4100	69.8 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y	65 Points -17%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	38 Points -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=62, last 2 years)	1659 Points +618%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	250 (227.93^min - 249.83^max) Points +8%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000 (210 - 284, n=12)	240 Points +4%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel Pentium Silver N5000	237 Points +3%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000	236 Points +2%
Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000	231 (221.28^min - 228.02^max) Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y	164 Points -29%
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel Celeron N4100	161 (150.45^min - 161.13^max) Points -30%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Intel Atom Z3795	118 Points -49%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

78 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

18.22 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

231 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible (4435 - 5830, n=3, last 2 years)	5108 Points +131%
Apple MacBook 12 2017 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256	3078 Points +39%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7	2685 Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points +15%
Topjoy Falcon UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, FORESEE 256GB	2216 Points
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2201 Points -1%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605 (1933 - 2393, n=9)	2186 Points -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	2141 Points -3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1139 Points -49%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	911 Points -59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash	741 Points -67%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Convertible (2921 - 6089, n=3, last 2 years)	4810 Points +54%
Apple MacBook 12 2017 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256	3946 Points +26%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points +14%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605 (3120 - 3606, n=8)	3283 Points +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3259 Points +4%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3125 Points 0%
Topjoy Falcon UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, FORESEE 256GB	3122 Points
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1227 Points -61%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1008 Points -68%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2216 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2672 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3122 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		1990 pontos
Ajuda

	Topjoy Falcon FORESEE 256GB	Average FORESEE 256GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
Sequential Read
Sequential Write
512K Read
512K Write
4K Read
4K Write
4K QD32 Read
4K QD32 Write

AS SSD

DiskSpd

FORESEE 256GB

Sequential Read: 472.2MB/s

Sequential Write: 431.4MB/s

4K Read: 12.06MB/s

4K Write: 26.05MB/s

4K-64 Read: 87.9MB/s

4K-64 Write: 188MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.23ms

Access Time Write: 0.444ms

Copy ISO: 474MB/s

Copy Program: 150MB/s

Copy Game: 344MB/s

Score Read: 147Points

Score Write: 257Points

Score Total: 482Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=58, last 2 years)	8236 Points +1010%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	1384 (1376^min - 1390^max) Points +87%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y	1257 Points +69%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	757 Points +2%
Topjoy Falcon Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	742 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605 (588 - 902, n=13)	701 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	626 Points -16%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	612 Points -18%
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	482 Points -35%

3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Convertible (2965 - 154219, n=41, last 2 years)	34379 Points +667%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	7138 (7124^min - 7152^max) Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y	6602 Points +47%
Topjoy Falcon Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	4485 Points
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	4200 Points -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605 (2874 - 4485, n=10)	3518 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	3349 Points -25%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000	3261 Points -27%
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	2826 Points -37%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		4171 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		824 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3723 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-8250U	89.2 fps +261%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, R3 2200U	67.3 fps +172%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	66.7 (39^min - 89^max) fps +170%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE Intel HD Graphics 610, Pentium 4415U	47.3 fps +91%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220	30 fps +21%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000	25.5 fps +3%
Topjoy Falcon Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000	24.7 (11^min - 35^max) fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605 (22.7 - 24.7, n=2)	23.7 fps -4%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000	22.7 fps -8%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE Intel UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100	20 fps -19%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	11.7	9.29
World of Warships (2015)	24.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	5.15
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	9.1	6	5.5
World of Tanks enCore (2018)	53	8.9
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	11 (too slow)
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	6.5
League of Legends (2019)	49.8	39	26.6	24.9	23.6	15
F1 2019 (2019)	8.2
Hearthstone (2020)	31.1

Carga Máxima


30 °C	30 °C	31 °C
27 °C	30 °C	31 °C
28 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C


32 °C	33 °C	28 °C
32 °C	31 °C	28 °C
32 °C	31 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke 62 Mini + Fluke t3000 FC

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.73 Watt
Ocioso	2.5 / 4 / 4.1 Watt
Carga	8.1 / 19.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Topjoy Falcon Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, FORESEE 256GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"	Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.9"	Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10"	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 8.3"	Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Average Intel UHD Graphics 605	Average of class Convertible
Power Consumption		11%	-50%	-51%	-47%	-26%	-214%
Idle Minimum *	2.5	1.8 28%	2.88 -15%	4.9 -96%	2.7 -8%	2.8 ?(1.9 - 3.8, n=13) -12%	5.25 ?(1.8 - 16.6, n=58, last 2 years) -110%
Idle Average *	4	3.2 20%	4.8 -20%	7.4 -85%	6.3 -58%	5.01 ?(3.5 - 6.5, n=13) -25%	8.19 ?(4.2 - 20.7, n=58, last 2 years) -105%
Idle Maximum *	4.1	4.4 -7%	7.5 -83%	7.5 -83%	7.6 -85%	5.65 ?(3.9 - 7.5, n=13) -38%	11 ?(4.5 - 33.9, n=58, last 2 years) -168%
Load Average *	8.1	10.8 -33%	16.9 -109%	11.8 -46%	12.6 -56%	13.3 ?(8.1 - 15.8, n=13) -64%	44.9 ?(14.6 - 85, n=58, last 2 years) -454%
Load Maximum *	19.6	10.6 46%	23.8 -21%	8.9 55%	24.6 -26%	17.5 ?(13.2 - 23.5, n=13) 11%	65.7 ?(24.9 - 120.8, n=58, last 2 years) -235%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		5h 37min

	Topjoy Falcon Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 22 Wh	Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102 Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 39 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh	Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh	Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh	Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 39 Wh	Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 53.9 Wh	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Average of class Convertible
Battery Runtime		78%	60%	33%	-25%	32%	103%	120%		74%
WiFi v1.3	337	600 78%	540 60%	448 33%	252 -25%	444 32%	684 103%	740 120%		587 ?(326 - 981, n=59, last 2 years) 74%
Reader / Idle		1066		771						1304 ?(528 - 3353, n=24, last 2 years)
Load		251		180		347				115.6 ?(42 - 219, n=43, last 2 years)
H.264				384		564			607	776 ?(540 - 1105, n=13, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Tamanho pequeno

+ Desempenho estável da CPU graças a um ventilador

+ A carcaça permanece fria sob uso intenso

Contra

- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao teclado e ao trackpad

- Caneta não calibrada de forma precisa

- PWM no atual modelo de pr-e produção

- Recepção WLAN fraca

O Topjoy Falcon é um pequeno conversível com uma carcaça de alta qualidade. Enquanto em termos de dispositivos de entrada, você precisa fazer algumas concessões significativas em partes, o desempenho do quad-core Gemini-Lake permanece sem culpa, graças também ao ventilador integrado. Em termos de tela, a Topjoy ainda pretende fazer algumas melhorias e usar um modelo com maior brilho. Essa seria nossa principal reclamação sobre o painel AUO embutido (além do uso de PWM até 100% de brilho). Nós realmente recomendamos a caneta ativa opcional, uma vez que ajuda consideravelmente na operação da tela pequena.

No geral, o Falcon é um conceito muito interessante, mas ainda precisa de algum ajuste em seu estado atual. Para o reduzido Preço Kickstarter a partir de $399 (~350 Euros), você poderia obter um segundo portátil prático para a estrada a um preço acessível. No entanto, você precisaria confiar em que a Topjoy ainda fará sua lição de casa.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Topjoy Falcon (Modelo de Pré Produção)

Klaus Hinum, 2018-10-30 (Update: 2018-10-31)