Breve Análise do Conversível Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA (i7-8550U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 473 cd/m²
Contraste: 830:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.14
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA BOE075E, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng Chi Mei (CMN1376), IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Lenovo LEN40A9, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -25% | 3% | 6% | -6% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.4 | 47.32 -28% | 66.2 1% | 68.1 4% | 60.9 -7% | 63.4 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.5 | 71.1 -22% | 97.4 6% | 99.5 9% | 86.4 -6% | 88.6 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.2 | 48.83 -26% | 68.1 3% | 70.2 6% | 61.9 -6% | 64 -3% |
| Response Times | -28% | -21% | 250% | 7% | -34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.2 ? | 48 ? 2% | 52 ? -6% | 36 ? 27% | 40.4 ? 18% | 41.6 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 32.8 ? -19% | 37.2 ? -35% | 27 ? 2% | 28.8 ? -4% | 34 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 3049 ? | 1042 ? -66% | 25000 ? 720% | 210.1 ? -93% | ||
| Screen | -14% | 21% | 7% | -2% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 473 | 322.6 -32% | 389.8 -18% | 311 -34% | 267.2 -44% | 510.7 8% |
| Brightness | 441 | 306 -31% | 396 -10% | 278 -37% | 239 -46% | 481 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 88 0% | 82 -7% | 75 -15% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.19 67% | 0.27 53% | 0.2 65% | 0.27 53% | 0.66 -16% |
| Contrast | 830 | 1698 105% | 1444 74% | 1555 87% | 990 19% | 774 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.72 | 7.7 -107% | 2.72 27% | 3.98 -7% | 3.5 6% | 2.4 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.83 | 11.1 -42% | 5.49 30% | 8.48 -8% | 6.4 18% | 7.3 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.14 | 1.25 42% | 3.81 -78% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 7.9 -55% | 4.2 18% | 5.57 -9% | 1.3 75% | 2.4 53% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.88 76% | 2.1 105% | 2.51 88% | 2.146 103% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 7569 86% | 7044 92% | 7470 87% | 7810 83% | 6523 100% | 6747 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.9 | 44.1 -25% | 62.2 6% | 64 9% | 56 -5% | 57 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.8 | 69.9 -23% | 98.2 8% | 99 9% | 86 -5% | 88.1 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-19% | 1% /
12% | 88% /
52% | -0% /
-2% | -9% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 3049 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 3049 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 3049 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3525 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4303 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3723 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -23% | 18% | 17% | -53% | |
| Seq Read | 1824 | 1283 -30% | 1693 -7% | 2218 22% | 520 -71% |
| Seq Write | 986 | 735 -25% | 1214 23% | 1840 87% | 466 -53% |
| 4K Read | 41.84 | 37.69 -10% | 42.69 2% | 49.11 17% | 31.24 -25% |
| 4K Write | 104.1 | 96.9 -7% | 95.9 -8% | 102.3 -2% | 79.2 -24% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1196 | 586 -51% | 1621 36% | 1216 2% | 379.4 -68% |
| 4K-64 Write | 739 | 204.7 -72% | 605 -18% | 1072 45% | 223.8 -70% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.061 | 0.045 26% | 0.051 16% | 0.043 30% | 0.066 -8% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.037 -3% | 0.037 -3% | 0.037 -3% | 0.053 -47% |
| Score Read | 1420 | 752 -47% | 1833 29% | 1487 5% | 463 -67% |
| Score Write | 941 | 375 -60% | 823 -13% | 1359 44% | 350 -63% |
| Score Total | 3051 | 1495 -51% | 3569 17% | 3594 18% | 1057 -65% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1103 | 950 -14% | 1374 25% | 917 -17% | 335.9 -70% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 541 | 263.8 -51% | 631 17% | 233.5 -57% | 213 -61% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 418.6 | 726 73% | 971 132% | 607 45% | 186.8 -55% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1892 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7928 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 71 | 34.9 | 29 | 9.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.4 | 13 | 6.5 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 58 | 32.4 | 20.1 |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook 13 i7 GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 1% | 2% | -1% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30.13 -4% | 27.8 4% | 28.4 2% | 28 3% | 28.6 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 30.13 -4% | 27.8 4% | 28.4 2% | 28 3% | 28.6 1% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 30 -3% | 27.8 4% | 28.4 2% | 28 3% | 28.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 30.13 -4% | 27.8 4% | 28.4 2% | 28 3% | 28.6 1% |
| Load Average * | 32.6 | 33.4 -2% | 33.9 -4% | 33.2 -2% | 32.5 -0% | 34.2 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.7 | 33 10% | 39.9 -9% | 35.2 4% | 42.2 -15% | 47 -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.6 / 36.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.68 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.4 / 11.8 / 15.5 Watt |
| Carga |
38 / 39.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN51T02DUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 48% | 42% | 30% | 18% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.1 30% | 1.8 59% | 3.2 27% | 3 32% | 3.8 14% |
| Idle Average * | 11.8 | 4.3 64% | 3.8 68% | 6 49% | 5.4 54% | 11 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.5 | 4.9 68% | 7.7 50% | 9.2 41% | 7.5 52% | 11.3 27% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 24.3 36% | 26.9 29% | 29.5 22% | 40.1 -6% | 35.6 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.8 | 22.8 43% | 38.5 3% | 35.6 11% | 57.1 -43% | 37.2 7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ae048ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 79% | 146% | 87% | 67% | -21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 873 | 971 11% | 1882 116% | 1218 40% | 695 -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 398 | 686 72% | 852 114% | 527 32% | 651 64% | 279 -30% |
| Load | 69 | 175 154% | 212 207% | 166 141% | 135 96% | 60 -13% |
Pro
Contra
As maiores razões para possuir um Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA sobre alternativas como o HP Spectre x360 13 ou o Lenovo Yoga C930 são sua S Pen integrada, tela muito brilhante e peso extremamente leve. Os usuários que trabalham frequentemente durante viagens ou em movimento, acharão que o Samsung é mais versátil do que a popular série XPS 13 ou Spectre.
A Samsung teve que cortar alguns cantos para criar um conversível tão leve. Como a solução de resfriamento é tão pequena, o desempenho do Turbo Boost da CPU é limitado, e abaixo da média. Componentes e SKUs também são limitados, pois a RAM e a WLAN estão soldadas e não são atualizáveis. A capacidade da bateria é menor do que o normal para uma duração de bateria menor que a da concorrência. Por fim, a base e a tampa são ligeiramente mais flexíveis do que as do Spectre 13, Zenbook UX333 ou Blade Stealth. Estes são sacrifícios que os proprietários em potencial terão que ter em mente se quiserem a versatilidade do conversível Samsung.
Um aspecto que achamos que no Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA poderia ter sido melhor é a sua S Pen. A caneta é muito pequena e fina para uso confortável. Tomar notas nesta máquina para aula ou de outra forma é significativamente mais complicado do que no Surface Pro, EliteBook x360, ou inclusive no Yoga C930. Se você pretende usar o NP930QAA como um burro de anotações, recomendamos testar o S Pen antes de se comprometer com a compra de $1300.
Mais brilhante e mais leve do que muitos concorrentes no mercado hoje, o versátil Samsung Notebook 9 Pen NP930QAA é um companheiro de trabalho quase perfeito para o uso em exteriores e viajantes frequentes. A pequena e desconfortável S Pen coloca um enorme amortecedor no sistema em comparação com os stylus mais fortes e maiores do Surface Pro, EliteBook x360 ou Yoga C930.
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
- 01/30/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
