Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Samsung Galaxy Book 12 LTE
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 376 cd/m²
Contraste: 12533:1 (Preto: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -13% | -19% | -13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 77.3 | 67.6 -13% | 62.8 -19% | 58.8 -24% | 65.2 -16% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.8 | 99 7% | 94 1% | 87.5 -6% | 91 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.1 | 69.1 -17% | 64.7 -22% | 60.6 -27% | 66.1 -20% |
| Response Times | 2435% | -343% | -428% | -523% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4 ? | 42 ? -950% | 42.4 ? -960% | 37 ? -825% | 45 ? -1025% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 29 ? -45% | 30.8 ? -54% | 26 ? -30% | 24 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21000 8300% | 210.1 ? -16% | ||
| Screen | -90% | -141% | -176% | -117% | |
| Brightness middle | 376 | 417 11% | 523.2 39% | 369 -2% | 406 8% |
| Brightness | 378 | 401 6% | 522 38% | 331 -12% | 396 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 75 -18% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.29 -867% | 0.42 -1300% | 0.46 -1433% | 0.3 -900% |
| Contrast | 12533 | 1438 -89% | 1246 -90% | 802 -94% | 1353 -89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 3.63 11% | 4 2% | 5.52 -35% | 5.28 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.45 | 6.74 -4% | 8.6 -33% | 9.29 -44% | 9.83 -52% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.64 | 2.18 40% | 5.5 -51% | 6.95 -91% | 6.71 -84% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 3.09 71% | 2.16 102% | 2.58 85% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7113 91% | 6767 96% | 7546 86% | 7009 93% | 6532 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 74 | 63 -15% | 64.86 -12% | 56 -24% | 59 -20% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 99 6% | 93.97 1% | 88 -5% | 91 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 779% /
399% | -166% /
-155% | -208% /
-178% | -218% /
-150% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3538 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4291 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 47% | 46% | 162% | |
| Read Seq | 511 | 723 41% | 1294 153% | 1066 109% | 2408 371% |
| Write Seq | 473.7 | 853 80% | 865 83% | 593 25% | 1702 259% |
| Read 512 | 443.7 | 225 -49% | 406 -8% | 653 47% | 1301 193% |
| Write 512 | 395.4 | 445 13% | 589 49% | 535 35% | 1288 226% |
| Read 4k | 40.46 | 46 14% | 31.75 -22% | 35.92 -11% | 53.6 32% |
| Write 4k | 91.9 | 125 36% | 72.2 -21% | 128.3 40% | 162.2 76% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 289.1 | 423 46% | 493.3 71% | 460.6 59% | 504 74% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 260.7 | 373 43% | 434.5 67% | 425.4 63% | 420.8 61% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1683 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6149 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 888 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.9 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.8 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 58.5 | 24.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| / 30.3 / dB |
| Carga |
| 31.7 / 31.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.5 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.3 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 2.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 9 / 11.9 Watt |
| Carga |
27.3 / 27.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 8% | 8% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.6 8% | 2.85 27% | 3.86 1% | 3.5 10% |
| Idle Average * | 9 | 8.1 10% | 6.76 25% | 6.4 29% | 7.2 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 8.7 27% | 6.91 42% | 7.17 40% | 7.9 34% |
| Load Average * | 27.3 | 25.5 7% | 32.88 -20% | 30.5 -12% | 29.6 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 27.9 | 23.5 16% | 37.41 -34% | 32.4 -16% | 30.8 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 4% | -31% | -31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1031 | 1054 2% | 1075 4% | 711 -31% | 713 -31% |
| H.264 | 409 | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 744 | 486 | 355 | 345 | |
| Load | 168 | 105 | 95 | 111 |
Pro
Contra
Os potenciais compradores com bastante dinheiro dificilmente errarão com o Samsung Galaxy Book 12 LTE, se eles gostam da ideia de um teclado que pode se conectar e da alta portabilidade. Além da escassa seleção de portas, a Samsung realmente conseguiu combinar o melhor dos dois mundos em um único aparelho.
O S-Pen e a capa de teclado ambos são incluídos no pacote de entrega e se desempenham tão bem quanto o tablet bem projetado e perfeitamente construído.
Embora a tela Super-AMOLED não seja perfeita, pode ser vista como o único ponto de venda no novo conversível da Samsung com o seu ótimo valor de preto e alto contraste. Nossa unidade de teste foi um dispositivo LTE e cumpriu todos os requisitos de portabilidade, incluindo GPS / GLONASS, TPM, BitLocker no Windows 10 Pro e ótima duração da bateria. Os usuários de escritório e de negócios estarão encantados com o posicionamento flexível e bons dispositivos de entrada, enquanto a qualidade das câmeras é mais do que um pouco de extra agradável.
O fato da Samsung ter escolhido um sistema de resfriamento silencioso e temperaturas aceitáveis da carcaça em relação ao desempenho total sob carga contínua não deve ser notável enquanto o dispositivo for usado para o propósito pretendido - como um aparelho de escritório. Portanto, definitivamente recomendamos este dispositivo para compra.
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
-
10/24/2019 v7 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn