Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH: O XPS 15 2-em-1 que a Dell deveria ter feito
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH (Yoga C940 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1020 MHz, Memoría: 1751 MHz, GDDR5, 441.41, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, native pen support, LG Philips LP156WFC-SPU1, IPS, LEN8992, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB
peso
2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 573 g
Preço
1800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 2 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.7 kg | 16 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPU1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 502.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 462.6 cd/m² Minimum: 0.04 cd/m²iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 484.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1865:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.19
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH LG Philips LP156WFC-SPU1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Chi Mei CMN15E8 / N156HCE-EN1 CMN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 31% | 1% | 0% | 3% | 4% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 88.1 43% | 66.6 8% | 63.6 3% | 64.2 4% | 64.8 5% | 68.1 11% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.7 | 99.6 7% | 87.7 -5% | 89.4 -4% | 95.1 3% | 96.2 4% | 94.2 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.6 | 91.8 44% | 64.1 1% | 64.3 1% | 65.8 3% | 66.3 4% | 68.4 8% |
| Response Times | 94% | 12% | 31% | 69% | 76% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.4 ? | 2.3 ? 95% | 41.2 ? 15% | 34 ? 30% | 16.4 ? 66% | 9.6 ? 80% | 57 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36.4 ? | 2.4 ? 93% | 33.2 ? 9% | 25 ? 31% | 10.4 ? 71% | 10.4 ? 71% | 31 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 25000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -1% | -36% | -12% | 5% | 2% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 484.8 | 421.2 -13% | 312.6 -36% | 332 -32% | 345 -29% | 348.3 -28% | 330 -32% |
| Brightness | 463 | 417 -10% | 290 -37% | 301 -35% | 324 -30% | 327 -29% | 310 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 94 15% | 85 4% | 83 1% | 86 5% | 85 4% | 87 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.31 -19% | 0.29 -12% | 0.42 -62% | 0.4 -54% | 0.37 -42% | |
| Contrast | 1865 | 1008 -46% | 1145 -39% | 821 -56% | 871 -53% | 892 -52% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 6.06 -35% | 5.78 -28% | 3.73 17% | 1.3 71% | 1.6 64% | 4.03 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.55 | 11.89 -57% | 8.86 -17% | 6.6 13% | 2.8 63% | 5.07 33% | 6.74 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.19 | 3.78 -218% | 2 -68% | 1.1 8% | 1 16% | 1.96 -65% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 2.8 51% | 5.4 5% | 3.96 31% | 1.2 79% | 2.3 60% | 4.49 21% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.15 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.4 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.203 100% | 2.57 86% |
| CCT | 6101 107% | 6235 104% | 7864 83% | 6921 94% | 6476 100% | 6707 97% | 6744 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.7 | 81 38% | 57.1 -3% | 58 -1% | 60.5 3% | 61 4% | 61 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.8 | 99.6 7% | 87.4 -6% | 89 -4% | 94.9 2% | 96 3% | 94 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
21% | -8% /
-23% | 6% /
-4% | 26% /
13% | 27% /
12% | -4% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1105 (1057.31-1230.47)
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1260 (1250.7-1281.39)
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø899 (868.36-984.66)
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø904 (892.96-1015.9)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4069 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5359 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4887 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 99% | 75% | 139% | 27% | -17% | |
| Seq Read | 769 | 1723 124% | 1887 145% | 2469 221% | 2088 172% | 1307 70% |
| Seq Write | 351.1 | 1386 295% | 1432 308% | 1991 467% | 1347 284% | 730 108% |
| 4K Read | 69.1 | 43.25 -37% | 52.3 -24% | 54.3 -21% | 36.14 -48% | 27.58 -60% |
| 4K Write | 100.9 | 98.3 -3% | 146 45% | 99.8 -1% | 96.5 -4% | 80.3 -20% |
| 4K-64 Read | 472 | 1078 128% | 969 105% | 1823 286% | 565 20% | 878 86% |
| 4K-64 Write | 948 | 1456 54% | 1375 45% | 1282 35% | 588 -38% | 246.8 -74% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.05 30% | 0.034 52% | 0.042 41% | 0.093 -31% | 0.231 -225% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.137 | 0.039 72% | 0.075 45% | 0.039 72% | 0.038 72% | 0.223 -63% |
| Score Read | 618 | 1294 109% | 1210 96% | 2125 244% | 810 31% | 1036 68% |
| Score Write | 1084 | 1693 56% | 1664 54% | 1581 46% | 819 -24% | 400 -63% |
| Score Total | 2024 | 3638 80% | 3483 72% | 4771 136% | 2014 0% | 1940 -4% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 839 | 3182 279% | 1375 64% | 1043 24% | 993 18% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 455.8 | 984 116% | 468 3% | 371.7 -18% | 309.5 -32% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 969 | 1824 88% | 1287 33% | 399.9 -59% | 582 -40% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 50% | 63% | 59% | 14% | -26% | |
| Write 4K | 102.2 | 104.3 2% | 141.6 39% | 139.3 36% | 100 -2% | 99.3 -3% |
| Read 4K | 114.3 | 45.23 -60% | 45.28 -60% | 46.78 -59% | 31.39 -73% | 46.96 -59% |
| Write Seq | 468.3 | 1729 269% | 1975 322% | 2125 354% | 1308 179% | |
| Read Seq | 1236 | 1861 51% | 2272 84% | 2354 90% | 1083 -12% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 556 | 509 -8% | 458.6 -18% | 298.4 -46% | 362.9 -35% | 240.1 -57% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 421.6 | 388.5 -8% | 391.4 -7% | 355.8 -16% | 425.7 1% | 581 38% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1264 | 2813 123% | 2393 89% | 2128 68% | 1411 12% | 686 -46% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2239 | 2906 30% | 3464 55% | 3324 48% | 3240 45% | 1581 -29% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 268.1 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 977 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 75% /
81% | 69% /
70% | 99% /
105% | 21% /
23% | -22% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2239 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1264 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
421.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
556 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1236 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
468.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
114.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
102.2 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (10248 - 12259, n=14) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (6409 - 10846, n=13) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11952 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29013 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7717 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3494 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (92 - 151, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH | |
| Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (33 - 45, n=6) | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø32.1 (29-35)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 317.2 | 231.2 | 215.2 | 84.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 196 | 119.8 | 65.1 | 36.5 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 247.2 | 222.4 | 145.6 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 105 | 58 | 51 | 45 |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | 7% | 0% | 8% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.7 | 28.2 2% | 28.4 1% | 30.3 -6% | 28.2 2% | 28.2 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 28.2 2% | 28.4 1% | 30.3 -6% | 29.3 -2% | 29.5 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 28.2 2% | 28.4 1% | 30.3 -5% | 29.3 -2% | 29.6 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.8 | 30.4 -6% | 28.4 1% | 30.3 -5% | 29.3 -2% | 29.6 -3% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 43.8 3% | 33.9 25% | 39.3 13% | 32.3 28% | 33 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 47.2 -6% | 39.8 11% | 34 24% | 47.2 -6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 47.2 -6% | 40.2 10% | 39.6 11% | 41.2 8% | 52 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 44.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.15 / 2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.2 / 10.7 / 24.3 Watt |
| Carga |
84.4 / 142.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 7% | -11% | -61% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 6.2 -19% | 5 4% | 6.8 -31% | 13.6 -162% | 5.5 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 10.7 | 9.6 10% | 13.2 -23% | 10.7 -0% | 17.9 -67% | 8.5 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 21.2 13% | 24 1% | 12.5 49% | 20.6 15% | 11.9 51% |
| Load Average * | 84.4 | 104.3 -24% | 70 17% | 87.2 -3% | 96 -14% | 94 -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 83.9 | 91.7 -9% | 63.3 25% | 121 -44% | 154.6 -84% | 86 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 142.8 | 135.3 5% | 114 20% | 191.4 -34% | 218.6 -53% | 144 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 79 Wh | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 67% | 66% | 33% | -24% | -39% | -20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1092 | 910 -17% | 1289 18% | 1356 24% | 522 -52% | 359 -67% | 673 -38% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 583 | 467 -20% | 503 -14% | 588 1% | 290 -50% | 234 -60% | 420 -28% |
| Load | 59 | 199 237% | 174 195% | 102 73% | 76 29% | 65 10% | 63 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 60 |
Pro
+ Desempenho potente da GPU para um conversível
+ 4 alto-falantes fortes de 2 W com graves decentes
+ Sem maiores problemas de afogamentos da CPU ou GPU
+ USB Type-A e dois Thunderbolt 3
+ Slot para caneta ativa integrado
+ Tela brilhante de 500 nit
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ Longa duração da bateria
Contra
- Tela com calibração pobre, de fábrica
- RAM soldada; apenas 1 slot de armazenamento M.2
- O desempenho do Optane está abaixo do esperado
- A resposta do teclado poderia ser mais firme
- Teclado numérico e teclas de setas pequenas
- Pesado para um portátil conversível
- Sem HDMI ou leitor de cartões SD
- Clickpad esponjoso
- Sem webcam IR
- Carregamento lento
- Caro
Quando a Dell anunciou o XPS 15 2-em-1, os usuários esperavam um XPS 15 padrão, mas com dobradiças de 360 graus. O que obtivemos foi um chassi completamente diferente com uma série de CPU/GPU não comprovada que pode ter afastado a base de fãs do XPS 15 principal. O Lenovo Yoga C940-15 está realmente mais próximo do que a maioria dos usuários imaginou que o XPS 15 2-em-1: uma tela táctil conversível com um teclado chiclet tradicional, CPU tradicional Intel Core H, GPU GeForce GTX, armazenamento facilmente reparável e um slot para caneta mais seguro em vez de um magnético.
Ter uma GPU GTX com capacidade para jogos em um formato conversível de 15,6 polegadas tem suas desvantagens. Ou seja, o modo tablet é melhor usado com moderação ou durante períodos curtos devido ao peso e tamanho da unidade. Mesmo assim, o Yoga C940 ainda é mais leve, brilhante, menor e mais poderoso do que os concorrentes 2019 HP Spectre x360 15 para torná-lo a melhor opção geral nessa categoria específica. O XPS 15 9575 2-em-1 é um pouco menor, mas fica aquém da maioria dos outros aspectos, incluindo desempenho, duração da bateria, brilho e áudio. Esperamos que as iterações futuras melhorem o peso, as teclas suaves do teclado e o clickpad.
O Lenovo Yoga C940-15 oferece um desempenho por volume muito alto para um conversível de 15,6 polegadas. Embora não seja particularmente leve ou barato por cerca de US$ 1.500 no varejo, é a opção superior quando comparado ao XPS 15 2-em-1 ou ao atual HP Spectre x360 15.
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
- 12/15/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
