Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE (jseb) |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 449 cd/m²
Contraste: 1403:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F IPS, 1920x1080, 10.1" | Google Pixel C LTPS, 2560x1800, 10.2" | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Triluminos display with X-Reality, 2560x1600, 10.1" | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE IPS , 1920x1080, 10.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -12% | 23% | -41% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 449 | 487 8% | 523 16% | 471 5% | 382 -15% |
Brightness | 421 | 510 21% | 500 19% | 457 9% | 363 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 93 8% | 92 7% | 83 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.39 -22% | 0.52 -63% | 0.46 -44% | 0.37 -16% |
Contrast | 1403 | 1249 -11% | 1006 -28% | 1024 -27% | 1032 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.24 -11% | 1.1 77% | 8.69 -85% | 3.61 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.1 | 1.9 83% | 7.92 29% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 7.95 -77% | 1.4 69% | 11.24 -150% | 3.77 16% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 7122 91% | 6565 99% | 6662 98% | 9508 68% | 6760 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.97 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.55 | 99 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Google Pixel C | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Google Pixel C | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Google Pixel C | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Google Pixel C |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Google Pixel C |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet |
* ... smaller is better
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Read 256KB | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Google Pixel C | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sequential Write 256KB | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Random Read 4KB | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Google Pixel C | |
Random Write 4KB | |
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Google Pixel C | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps | ||
very low | 30 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Configurações | Valor | ||
high | 30 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 9.7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.12 / 0.12 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.19 / 4.3 / 4.37 Watt |
Carga |
8.62 / 11.26 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 8500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -26% | -13% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 2.19 | 1.82 17% | 1.71 22% | 2 9% | |
Idle Average * | 4.3 | 4.26 1% | 7.55 -76% | 4.6 -7% | |
Idle Maximum * | 4.37 | 4.33 1% | 7.62 -74% | 5.7 -30% | |
Load Average * | 8.62 | 9.82 -14% | 8.39 3% | 11.5 -33% | |
Load Maximum * | 11.26 | 13.99 -24% | 12.08 -7% | 11.5 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F 8500 mAh | Google Pixel C mAh | Apple iPad Pro 9.7 7306 mAh | Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet mAh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 8500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | 2% | -8% | -30% | |
Reader / Idle | 1985 | 2090 5% | 1850 -7% | 2135 8% | 1153 -42% |
H.264 | 702 | 740 5% | 708 1% | 705 0% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 602 | 638 6% | 779 29% | 525 -13% | 498 -17% |
Load | 222 | 294 32% | 186 -16% | 166 -25% |
Pro
Contra
O Yoga Book ocupa um lugar especial em nossos corações e roda bem, inclusive com Android. De fato, em algumas áreas, ele inclusive consegue superar o tablet Windows. O design deste aparelho é único e é um verdadeiro prazer ver as dobradiças "watchband" em ação. O teclado Halo iluminado tem um ótimo visual e funciona bem no uso do dia a dia, mas recomendamos manter o aparelho longe de áreas ensolaradas. De outra forma, você sentirá falta de um teclado físico muito em breve.
O Yoga Book faz um ótimo trabalho digitalizando notas. Este é um ótimo plus para profissionais que tomam muitas notas e desejam uma tela táctil e um tablet de gráficos simultaneamente. O iPad Pro 9.7 não pode competir com esta oferta. De vez em quando, o modelo de teste demorou um pouco para reconhecer o conteúdo ou executar uma ação. Os usuários profissionais devem levar um pouco de tempo para sentir este dispositivo (especialmente o tablet de gráficos) antes de entregar seu dinheiro.
O desempenho e a tela são bons, mas não extraordinários. Eles bastarão para as tarefas do dia a dia. A tela pode ter desvios de cores muito altos para o uso profissional. Afortunadamente o aparelho quase não esquenta e o desempenho pleno sempre está disponível. Os bons alto falantes, a sólida carcaça e os dispositivos de entrada muitos flexíveis completam o Lenovo Yoga Book Android.
Apreciamos a longa duração da bateria. A barra Android foi ajustada para ser funcional e fácil de usar.
Prático, funcional, flexível e sem falhas maiores: o Yoga Book com Android é definitivamente um aparelho de nicho, mas é muito de divertido para se trabalhar.
Se você não precisa de Windows 10, recomendamos dar uma olhada na versão Android, dado que pode superar o aparelho Windows em algumas áreas: duração da bateria e tela.
Em resumo, a Lenovo está oferecendo uma ferramenta exclusiva para os designers gráficos que desejem um tablet portável. O Yoga Book também consegue ganhar pontos em termos de design e visual, graças à sua fabulosa carcaça e singulares dobradiças. O aparelho oferece tudo isto sem falhas maiores. Recomendamos que os compradores potenciais a dar uma olhada no Yoga Book Android.
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
- 11/09/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer