Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 900S 12ISK
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML (Yoga 900 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 515, 20.19.15.4380
Memória
3.9 GB
, 933 MHz, 12-12-15-34, Dual-Channel, Soldada
Pantalha
12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Name: AUO B125HAN02.2, ID: AUO226D, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128, 128 GB
peso
1.01 kg, Suprimento de energia: 193 g
Preço
1100 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 340.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 325.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.014 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1322:1 (Preto: 0.248 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML 12.5", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 12.5", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 12", 2304x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 49% | 26% | 50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 44.15 | 42.98 -3% | 65.6 49% | 54.8 24% | 66.8 51% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64.2 | 62.8 -2% | 94.7 48% | 82.3 28% | 95.4 49% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.36 | 44.55 -2% | 67.5 49% | 56.6 25% | 68 50% |
| Response Times | -70% | -56% | -24% | -34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.6 ? | 64 ? -103% | 50.8 ? -61% | 42.8 ? -35% | 41.2 ? -30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 30 ? -36% | 33.2 ? -51% | 24.8 ? -13% | 30.4 ? -38% |
| PWM Frequency | 62.5 ? | ||||
| Screen | -74% | 12% | 1% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 327.9 | 371 13% | 300.5 -8% | 385 17% | 387 18% |
| Brightness | 326 | 335 3% | 305 -6% | 350 7% | 358 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 76 -16% | 86 -4% | 88 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.248 | 0.29 -17% | 0.184 26% | 0.17 31% | 0.47 -90% |
| Contrast | 1322 | 1279 -3% | 1633 24% | 2265 71% | 823 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.43 | 8.51 -148% | 2.64 23% | 4.17 -22% | 1.6 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.13 | 20.43 -187% | 5.06 29% | 7.61 -7% | 4 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.88 | 9.23 -391% | 2.8 -49% | 5.39 -187% | 1 47% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6460 101% | 6759 96% | 6999 93% | 7404 88% | 6680 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41.3 | 41 -1% | 60.9 47% | 62.7 52% | 61.6 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 62 -3% | 94.3 47% | 99.8 56% | 82.2 28% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -49% /
-59% | 2% /
10% | 1% /
3% | 9% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 62.5 Hz | ≤ 39 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 62.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 39 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 62.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2736 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3194 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3912 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 4% | 80% | 31% | 64% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 126.4 | 239 89% | 178.2 41% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 100.7 | 262.3 160% | 98.1 -3% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 131.1 | 352.8 169% | 222.3 70% | 545 316% | |
| Score Total | 1168 | 1037 -11% | 2335 100% | 1684 44% | |
| Score Write | 240 | 361 50% | 382 59% | 318 33% | |
| Score Read | 632 | 448 -29% | 1325 110% | 935 48% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.051 -34% | 0.035 8% | 0.035 8% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.076 | 0.082 -8% | 0.047 38% | 0.088 -16% | 0.186 -145% |
| 4K-64 Write | 134.4 | 262.3 95% | 248.4 85% | 186.3 39% | 283 111% |
| 4K-64 Read | 505 | 370.9 -27% | 1153 128% | 767 52% | 509 1% |
| 4K Write | 90.9 | 70 -23% | 103.7 14% | 108.3 19% | 22.1 -76% |
| 4K Read | 35.76 | 29.07 -19% | 37.06 4% | 35.4 -1% | 16.4 -54% |
| Seq Write | 145.6 | 282.9 94% | 295.5 103% | 235.3 62% | 651 347% |
| Seq Read | 920 | 482.3 -48% | 1347 46% | 1323 44% | 1056 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128
Sequential Read:
826 MB/s
Sequential Write:
153 MB/s
512K Read:
470.3 MB/s
512K Write:
153.3 MB/s
4K Read:
40.74 MB/s
4K Write:
118.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
400.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
153.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 887 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 34458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3231 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 218 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 80.8 | 24.9 | 14.6 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.5 | 16 | 13.6 | 4 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 13.8 | 8.4 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -73% | 15% | -54% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 3.6 25% | 8.6 -79% | 2.7 44% | 6.8 -42% | 4.3 10% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.3 12% | 11 -53% | 2.7 62% | 10 -39% | 6 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 7.6 -1% | 11.3 -51% | 7.2 4% | 10.5 -40% | 6.4 15% |
| Load Average * | 17.4 | 27.2 -56% | 33.8 -94% | 22 -26% | 30.2 -74% | 22.7 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 19.2 | 22.8 -19% | 36.2 -89% | 20.5 -7% | 33.6 -75% | 31.2 -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado |   0.28 / 0.32 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.8 / 7.2 / 7.5 Watt |
| Carga |
17.4 / 19.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 44 Wh | HP Spectre 13 38 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9350 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -31% | -42% | -5% | -23% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 894 | 943 5% | 715 -20% | 782 -13% | 628 -30% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 582 | 346 -41% | 338 -42% | 501 -14% | 451 -23% | 300 -48% |
| Load | 219 | 92 -58% | 78 -64% | 231 5% | 150 -32% | 118 -46% |
Pro
+ Tela táctil refletiva de qualidade; opções de 1080p e 1440p
+ Duração de bateria muito longa; bateria de alta capacidade
+ Pequeno e portável; apenas 1 kg em peso
+ Interior acessível; atualizável SSD
+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Completamente silencioso
+ Porta USB Type-C
Contra
- Desempenho médio do SSD NVMe
- Sem leitor de SmartCard ou leitor de digitais
- Alto falantes estéreo comuns
- Afogamento da CPU e GPU
- Curto deslocamento das teclas
- Caro
É difícil não gostar do Yoga 900S à primeira vista. É atraente, silencioso, duradouro, e incrivelmente fácil de pegar e jogar em interiores. O acabamento e a qualidade são sólidos e dignos do nome carro chefe Yoga 900. Neste sentido, é um dos conversíveis mais acessível e sem complicações, disponível.
A principal desvantagem que nos impede outorgar uma recomendação plena são o seu teclado e o afogamento de seu desempenho. Os resultados dos benchmarks e jogos revelam que os proprietários não obterão o desempenho pleno da CPU quando comparado com sistemas com o mesmo processador Intel e gráficos. Os usuários que pretendem fazer mais do que processar textos, navegar, e reproduzir vídeos, provavelmente não sintam, mas nós achamos que os usuários deveriam ter acesso a cada pingo de poder de processamento possível, especialmente ao considerar que o desempenho bruto de uma CPU da série Core m já é bastante limitado. Enquanto isso, o teclado pode se sentir muito raso e suave para usuários acostumados a configurações de desktop ou inclusive quando comparado com a maioria de Ultrabooks disponíveis atualmente.
De outra forma, há muito pouco do que reclamar sobre o sistema. A falta de uma porta de saída de vídeo dedicada, stylus integrado, leitor SD, e porta Thunderbolt 3 são minuciocidades menores. Recursos extra como NFC ou GPS teriam feito o sistema ainda mais versátil. Em resumo, no entanto, o Yoga 900S de $1000+ é tão caro quanto alguns Ultrabooks populares mais poderosos, como o XPS 13, ZenBook UX303, ou Spectre, portanto, os leitor que estiverem considerando o Lenovo terão que ver benefícios tremendos em sua tela táctil e dobradiça de 360-graus sobre ditas alternativas.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
- 06/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
