Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB (i7-8550U, GTX 1050, SSD, 4K)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 314 cd/m²
Contraste: 1066:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.58 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 a-Si TFT-LCD, LCM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -39% | 29% | -3% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.7 | 65 -5% | 38.73 -44% | 86.6 26% | 66.6 -3% | 68.5 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90 | 90.8 1% | 58.3 -35% | 100 11% | 86.9 -3% | 90.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 65.8 0% | 40.02 -39% | 99.5 51% | 63.5 -3% | 66.3 1% |
| Response Times | 854% | -20% | -35% | -12% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 29.6 ? 13% | 42 ? -24% | 52 ? -53% | 41.2 ? -21% | 38 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 26.4 ? -6% | 29 ? -16% | 29 ? -16% | 29.6 ? -18% | 27.6 ? -10% |
| PWM Frequency | 961 ? | 25510 ? 2555% | 1000 4% | 943 ? -2% | ||
| Screen | -3% | 8% | 23% | 4% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 309 | 300.9 -3% | 221 -28% | 380 23% | 338.7 10% | 329.3 7% |
| Brightness | 299 | 285 -5% | 224 -25% | 371 24% | 325 9% | 316 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 92 10% | 89 6% | 87 4% | 91 8% | 84 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.24 17% | 0.12 59% | 0.28 3% | 0.28 3% | 0.31 -7% |
| Contrast | 1066 | 1254 18% | 1842 73% | 1357 27% | 1210 14% | 1062 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5 -28% | 4.12 -6% | 4.38 -12% | 4.9 -26% | 4.78 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.5 | 10.2 -36% | 6.41 15% | 7.59 -1% | 8.7 -16% | 11.75 -57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.58 | 7 -53% | 3.4 26% | 3.6 21% | 5.5 -20% | 7.9 -72% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.54 87% | 2.32 95% | 2.08 106% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7344 89% | 6578 99% | 6893 94% | 6860 95% | 7498 87% | 8323 78% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 59 51% | 37 -5% | 88 126% | 63.5 63% | 58.8 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 90 0% | 58 -36% | 100 11% | 86.92 -3% | 90.4 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.51 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 283% /
158% | -17% /
-5% | 6% /
16% | -4% /
-0% | -6% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 961 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 961 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 961 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (8918 - 14144, n=12) | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (2471 - 4020, n=12) | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (10747 - 15294, n=9) | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (4439 - 4858, n=9) | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (3462 - 30452, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (10869 - 16294, n=11) | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (4555 - 4997, n=11) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1989 - 6801, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (877 - 2114, n=45) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (50984 - 92146, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (17296 - 42043, n=39) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (393 - 443, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (40.15063.674.0) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (141.9 - 288, n=61) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 6299 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3505 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4961 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4382 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4347 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Average SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 19% | -17% | -52% | 27% | 11% | ||
| Read Seq | 1825 | 2046 12% | 1187 -35% | 476.3 -74% | 1248 -32% | 1748 ? -4% | |
| Write Seq | 812 | 1213 49% | 599 -26% | 394.4 -51% | 1476 82% | 1088 ? 34% | |
| Read 512 | 697 | 1242 78% | 935 34% | 291.9 -58% | 849 22% | 1134 ? 63% | |
| Write 512 | 633 | 799 26% | 609 -4% | 291.4 -54% | 1118 77% | 918 ? 45% | |
| Read 4k | 44.48 | 58.1 31% | 35.61 -20% | 27.54 -38% | 58.8 32% | 44.9 ? 1% | |
| Write 4k | 142.6 | 146.2 3% | 134.4 -6% | 92.7 -35% | 155.2 9% | 135.8 ? -5% | |
| Read 4k QD32 | 571 | 415.1 -27% | 289.3 -49% | 247.5 -57% | 645 13% | 427 ? -25% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 487.2 | 369.2 -24% | 331.1 -32% | 247 -49% | 547 12% | 386 ? -21% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 17289 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6282 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 33786 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16379 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5412 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2217 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1564 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 318.1 | 86.4 | 84.1 | 65.3 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 184.2 | 122.1 | 75.2 | 48.6 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 91.3 | 66.4 | 36.7 | 29.8 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 217.4 | 103.5 | 74.7 | 32.5 | |
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 94.5 | 53.1 | 46.9 | 34.6 | 12.4 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 77 | 41 | 32 | 28 | 9 |
| ELEX (2017) | 86.6 | 45.9 | 36.1 | 27.5 | 9 |
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 101 | 58.9 | 48.6 | 36.3 | 2.6 |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 68 | 36 | 27 | 23 | 10 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (48.6 - 67.5, n=35) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (43.2 - 48.6, n=2) | |
| Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (64 - 109, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (41 - 46, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (49 - 77.3, n=25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.5 / 37.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -5% | -1% | 1% | 3% | -6% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 28.2 8% | 30.2 1% | 30.4 -0% | 28.4 7% | 28.6 6% | 29.5 ? 3% | 23.8 ? 22% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 28.2 8% | 30.2 1% | 31.3 -3% | 28.4 7% | 29.2 4% | 31.2 ? -2% | 24.2 ? 21% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 28.2 8% | 30.2 1% | 31.3 -3% | 28.4 7% | 29.2 4% | 31.4 ? -3% | 24.5 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 28.2 8% | 30.9 -1% | 31.3 -3% | 28.4 7% | 29.2 4% | 31.9 ? -5% | 25.3 ? 17% |
| Load Average * | 37.5 | 39 -4% | 42.4 -13% | 36.4 3% | 41.6 -11% | 29.2 22% | 40.6 ? -8% | 34 ? 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.5 | 46.3 -23% | 44.8 -19% | 37.1 1% | 41.6 -11% | 45.7 -22% | 46.1 ? -23% | 40.3 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.1 | 38.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -6% | 3% | -7% | -17% | -7% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.9 | 42.8 -5% | 50.9 -24% | 41.9 -2% | 49.2 -20% | 46.4 -13% | 46.8 ? -14% | 40.4 ? 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 49.6 -15% | 44.2 -3% | 40.6 6% | 52 -21% | 49 -14% | 45.9 ? -7% | 43.6 ? -1% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.3 | 27.2 -0% | 26.3 4% | 26.6 3% | 24.8 9% | 32 -17% | 27.8 ? -2% | 28.8 ? -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.4 | 28.6 -4% | 27.1 1% | 26 5% | 26.4 4% | 34.2 -25% | 28.5 ? -4% | 29.6 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.8 / 10.1 / 10.7 Watt |
| Carga |
44 / 94.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | 4% | -37% | -49% | -15% | -36% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 8.3 -73% | 3.9 19% | 5.4 -13% | 11.6 -142% | 5.3 -10% | 6.99 ? -46% | 5.23 ? -9% |
| Idle Average * | 10.1 | 10.2 -1% | 6.7 34% | 10.8 -7% | 13.8 -37% | 9.8 3% | 10.7 ? -6% | 8.13 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 10.4 3% | 8.7 19% | 13.9 -30% | 14.2 -33% | 12.6 -18% | 12.7 ? -19% | 11.1 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 67.5 -53% | 74 -68% | 94 -114% | 67.9 -54% | 73 -66% | 82.9 ? -88% | 45.5 ? -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 94.7 | 117.2 -24% | 79 17% | 116.6 -23% | 76.9 19% | 80 16% | 115.3 ? -22% | 66.7 ? 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.5 | 59 | 67.6 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51.5 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 59% | 22% | 3% | 81% | 91% | 105% | |
| Reader / Idle | 697 | 1066 53% | 759 9% | 558 -20% | 934 34% | 927 33% | 1326 ? 90% |
| H.264 | 324 | 331 2% | 261 -19% | 773 ? 139% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 370 | 484 31% | 373 1% | 311 -16% | 511 38% | 625 69% | 588 ? 59% |
| Load | 50 | 96 92% | 88 76% | 84 68% | 136 172% | 135 170% | 115.5 ? 131% |
Pro
Contra
Não há mudanças visíveis entre o Yoga 730-15IKB e seu antecessor, o Yoga 720-15IKB. A única coisa que mudou é a CPU: O Yoga 730 vem com um processador ULV de 15 watts em vez de uma CPU de 45 watts.
Nosso dispositivo de análise apresenta um Core i7-8550U. Esta é uma CPU quad-core que oferece desempenho mais que suficiente para todas as tarefas modernas. Positivo: A CPU pode utilizar sua funcionalidade Turbo Boost durante um longo período de tempo. Graças a uma GPU dedicada, o Yoga 730 pode rodar os jogos mais modernos.
O dispositivos de 15,6 polegadas da Lenovo representa uma combinação de um portátil para jogos de nível básico e um conversível.
A Lenovo usou uma CPU ULV como desculpa para reduzir a capacidade da bateria. A bateria do Yoga 730 é 30% menor que a do Yoga 720. Em combinação com uma tela 4K, o Yoga 730 atinge uma duração de bateria medíocre, na melhor das hipóteses. No entanto, os concorrentes como o Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN e o Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD nçao se desempenho muito melhor neste aspecto.
Um SSD NVMe resulta em um sistema muito responsivo. O SSD pode ser substituído. No entanto, você terá que abrir a carcaça para fazer isto. O teclado deixou uma boa impressão. É adequado para quem digita muito. Positivo: O teclado possui uma luz de fundo. A tela táctil IPS 4K encanta com os seus excelentes ângulos de visão, boa reprodução de cores, boa relação de contraste e brilho aceitável. Pode ser operado com os dedos ou com o stylus incluído.
Com o Yoga 730, as coisas ficam mais fáceis para quem usa monitores externos: Ao contrário do Yoga 720, o Yoga 730 tem uma porta Thunderbolt 3 e também uma saída HDMI.
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
- 07/16/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck