Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 720 12 (i5-7200U, 128 GB)

Name: Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB
Brand: Lenovo

Versátil com estamina limitada. O novo dispositivo compacto da Lenovo recebe uma boa carcaça de alumínio e dobradiças versáteis de 360 graus, mas também funciona bem como um subportátil de escritório convencional. As vantagens importantes, como a tela e os dispositivos de entrada, são contrariados por uma pequena quantidade de inconvenientes, e a maioria dos compradores interessados deve estar bem com eles - exceto um.

Sven Kloevekorn, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/18/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB (Yoga 720-12 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 1000 MHz, Memória compartilhada, 22.20.16.4708

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, soldered

Pantalha

12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, 10-point, AU Optronics AUO226D / B125HAN02.2, IPS, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Liteonit CV3-8D128, 128 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: combined 3.5 mm stereo jack, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.8 x 293 x 203.4

Bateria

36 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.18 kg, Suprimento de energia: 168 g

Preço

899 EUR

Links

Lenovo página inicial
Lenovo Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 DIN A4 ❌

Right side: Power button (illuminated), USB 3.1 Gen.1 Type-C with mDP, USB 3.0

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	665 MBit/s +94%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	655 MBit/s +91%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	580 MBit/s +69%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	516 MBit/s +50%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	343 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	550 MBit/s +63%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	528 MBit/s +56%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	495 MBit/s +46%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	338 MBit/s
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	308 MBit/s -9%


288 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
288 cd/m²	285 cd/m²	267 cd/m²
265 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	250 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics AUO226D / B125HAN02.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 273.6 cd/m² Minimum: 30.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 285 cd/m²
Contraste: 1239:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.49% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.05% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB AU Optronics AUO226D / B125HAN02.2, , 1920x1080, 12.5"	Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF LC133LF102, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T AU Optronics B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2"	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng LG Philips, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1826, 12.3"
Display		53%	44%	44%	-9%	55%
Display P3 Coverage	44.05	69.8 58%	64.1 46%	64.4 46%	39.43 -10%	68.5 56%
sRGB Coverage	64	94.6 48%	91.8 43%	90.8 42%	59.1 -8%	99.2 55%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	45.49	69.3 52%	65.2 43%	65.4 44%	40.76 -10%	70.1 54%
Response Times		-29%	-9%	-10%	-8%	-20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32 ?(15, 17)	49 ?(30, 19) -53%	36 ?(15, 21) -13%	35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4) -11%	38 ?(14, 24) -19%	42 ?(20, 22) -31%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(16, 10)	27 ?(15, 12) -4%	27 ?(6, 21) -4%	28 ?(14.8, 13.2) -8%	25 ?(6, 19) 4%	28 ?(18, 10) -8%
PWM Frequency		1000 ?(20)	50 ?(50)	198.4 ?(99)
Screen		21%	14%	-14%	-10%	33%
Brightness middle	285	295 4%	368 29%	348.8 22%	277 -3%	461 62%
Brightness	274	276 1%	350 28%	339 24%	263 -4%	444 62%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	87 0%	87 0%	88 1%	93 7%
Black Level *	0.23	0.27 -17%	0.29 -26%	0.4 -74%	0.31 -35%	0.34 -48%
Contrast	1239	1093 -12%	1269 2%	872 -30%	894 -28%	1356 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.6	2.97 47%	5.26 6%	7 -25%	5.57 1%	3.43 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.49	5.67 46%	8.78 16%	16.2 -54%	13.6 -30%	5.55 47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.39	3.12 42%	5.87 -9%	10.1 -87%	4.56 15%	3.08 43%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.45 ^90%	2.42 ^91%	2.22 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	3.03 ^73%
CCT	5925 ^110%	6676 ^97%	6998 ^93%	9065 ^72%	6648 ^98%	7014 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	41	62 51%	60 46%	58.7 43%	38 -7%	64 56%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	64	94 47%	92 44%	90.9 42%	59 -8%	99 55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 21%	16% / 17%	7% / -2%	-9% / -9%	23% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points +13%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Core i5-7200U	125 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	108 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel Core i5-8250U	566 Points +80%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	534 Points +70%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel Core i5-7200U	326 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	314 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	258 Points -18%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

314 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3733 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3699 Points
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	3665 Points -1%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	3274 Points -11%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3197 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M	2896 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4563 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Liteonit CV3-8D128	4442 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	4050 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M	3586 Points -19%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	2699 Points -39%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3699 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4442 pontos
Ajuda

	Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Liteonit CV3-8D128	Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		52%	38%	-86%	59%
Read Seq	449.7	462.7 3%	478.4 6%	104.8 -77%	691 54%
Write Seq	195.6	439.9 125%	419.9 115%	91 -53%	670 243%
Read 512	225.6	325.2 44%	351.7 56%	20.67 -91%	261.1 16%
Write 512	153	361.9 137%	294.2 92%	45.05 -71%	241 58%
Read 4k	28.01	27.52 -2%	24 -14%	0.215 -99%	40.11 43%
Write 4k	68.1	91.6 35%	87 28%	1.037 -98%	98.8 45%
Read 4k QD32	295.8	247.3 -16%	199.3 -33%	0.968 -100%	301.8 2%
Write 4k QD32	153.5	292 90%	232.4 51%	1.09 -99%	172 12%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Liteonit CV3-8D128

Sequential Read: 449.7 MB/s

Sequential Write: 195.6 MB/s

512K Read: 225.6 MB/s

512K Write: 153 MB/s

4K Read: 28.01 MB/s

4K Write: 68.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 295.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 153.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1617 Points +7%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1607 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1569 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1507 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1390 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	1251 Points -17%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	8654 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	8631 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8576 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6799 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	6096 Points -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1049 Points +2%
Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1030 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1028 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	762 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	748 Points -27%

3DMark 11 Performance		1658 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6488 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		931 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	19.2
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	0 severe graphical problems

Barulho

Ocioso		30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB
Carga		36 / 37.4 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


23.8 °C	24.9 °C	24.7 °C
23.1 °C	24.6 °C	24.4 °C
22.8 °C	22.1 °C	23.5 °C

Máximo: 24.9 °C
Médio: 23.8 °C


24.9 °C	24.4 °C	24 °C
24.7 °C	24.4 °C	23.5 °C
23.5 °C	23 °C	22.7 °C

Máximo: 24.9 °C
Médio: 23.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 28 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).

Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.23 / 0.47 Watt
Ocioso	3.7 / 5.7 / 6.9 Watt
Carga	29.6 / 29.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5"	Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2"	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, IPS, 2736x1826, 12.3"
Power Consumption		-15%	-16%	-44%	-13%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	3.7	3.9 -5%	4.2 -14%	5.5 -49%	4.7 -27%	3.1 16%
Idle Average *	5.7	8.2 -44%	7.4 -30%	8.3 -46%	7.2 -26%	8.8 -54%
Idle Maximum *	6.9	8.8 -28%	8.6 -25%	11.5 -67%	7.9 -14%	9.8 -42%
Load Average *	29.6	28.5 4%	32 -8%	38.3 -29%	30 -1%	22.7 23%
Load Maximum *	29.4	30.7 -4%	30.2 -3%	37.7 -28%	29 1%	23.6 20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		11h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 29min

	Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 36 Wh	Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh	Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	Lenovo Miix 520-12IKB 81CG i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		39%	96%	-9%	-11%	83%
Reader / Idle	688			739 7%	560 -19%	933 36%
WiFi v1.3	359	500 39%	702 96%	335 -7%	322 -10%	682 90%
Load	89			66 -26%	86 -3%	198 122%
H.264					320	668

Pro

+ Econômico (modelo de teste)

+ Leve e compacto

+ Design unibody representativo

+ Belas superfícies

+ Caneta Ativa

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Muito boa razão de contraste

+ Ângulos de visão amplos

+ Excepcionalmente silencioso

+ Baixo consumo de energia para sua classe

Contra

- A unidade base poderia ser mais firme

- São necessárias ambas mãos para abrir a tampa

- Número limitado de portas

- Apenas MIMO 1x1 WiFi

- Gama sRGB de apenas 64%

- SSD lento de acordo com AS SSD

- Baixa capacidade da bateria...

- ...com duração limitada

In review: Lenovo Yoga 720 12. Test model courtesy of Campuspoint.

Os usuários de escritório notarão duas desvantagens no bem-projetado Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB - o módulo WLAN comparativamente lento e, mais importante, os tempos de duração que não podem cobrir um dia útil completo. A escolha da tela é muito boa, exceto para edições sérias de imagens, e os resultados do benchmark do SSD lento não afetam o bom desempenho do sistema. A variedade limitada de portas é comum entre os conversíveis compactos, portanto, dificilmente podemos criticar o Yoga aqui.

A estabilidade da carcaça não é perfeita, mas ainda é um chassi bem-sucedido com um bom design e boa qualidade de construção. O Active Pen, os dispositivos de entrada decentes, incluindo a tela sensível ao toque, bem como a operação eficiente, fria e muito silenciosa, são outras vantagens.

O conversível Lenovo Yoga 720 12 versátil e compacto é acessível e atende quase todos os requisitos para usuários empresariais em constante movimento. A única desvantagem real é a limitada energia da bateria.

Em suma, podemos recomendar o modelo de teste.

Lenovo Yoga 720-12IKB - 2018-01-04 01/04/2018 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

88%

Conectividade

39 / 80 → 49%

Peso

73 / 35-78 → 88%

Bateria

88%

Pantalha

83%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 68 → 84%

Desempenho da aplicação

85 / 87 → 98%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

95%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

48 / 85 → 57%

Médio

74%

85%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 720 12 (i5-7200U, 128 GB)

Sven Kloevekorn, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2018-02- 1)