Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 700 14ISK
Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD (Yoga 700 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 10.18.15.4279
Memória
8 GB
, LPDDR3-1600 SDRAM, 800 MHz, 11-11-11-28, single-channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, IPS, ID: Chi Mei CMN14B6, Name: N140HCE-EBA, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
peso
1.49 kg, Suprimento de energia: 220 g
Preço
900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 224.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 210.6 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 224.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 980:1 (Preto: 0.229 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV 1366x768 | Acer Aspire E5-473G-59QT 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 3 14 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude E7450 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | -9% | 45% | 56% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.58 | 37.38 -10% | 37.82 -9% | 64.8 56% | 66.6 60% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.8 | 56.3 -9% | 56.9 -8% | 83.8 36% | 92.4 50% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.03 | 38.62 -10% | 39.07 -9% | 61.2 42% | 67.7 57% | |
| Response Times | ||||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.8 ? | |||||
| Response Time Black / White * | 42 ? | |||||
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | |||||
| Screen | -77% | -45% | 18% | -8% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 224.5 | 238.4 6% | 238 6% | 288 28% | 234.6 4% | 280 25% |
| Brightness | 211 | 218 3% | 228 8% | 281 33% | 225 7% | 257 22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 90 2% | 94 7% | 82 -7% | 75 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.229 | 1.029 -349% | 0.54 -136% | 0.286 -25% | 0.394 -72% | 0.3 -31% |
| Contrast | 980 | 232 -76% | 441 -55% | 1007 3% | 595 -39% | 933 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.06 | 12.21 -101% | 10.64 -76% | 4.35 28% | 5.22 14% | 3.45 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 13.44 -169% | 11.74 -135% | 3.7 26% | 3.35 33% | 3.35 33% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.42 91% | 2.68 82% | 2.27 97% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 7030 92% | 20097 32% | 13043 50% | 6076 107% | 6184 105% | 6940 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 38.62 -1% | 36 -8% | 54.7 40% | 36.92 -5% | 60 54% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61 | 56.26 -8% | 57 -7% | 92 51% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -44% /
-61% | -27% /
-36% | 32% /
25% | -8% /
-8% | 38% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 36.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8782 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-791G-79GT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 H7W22EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9350 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 14 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4848 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3057 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3758 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4289 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima:
258.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima:
430.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média:
409.2 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso:
0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão:
200.4 MB/s
Uso da CPU:
4.5 %
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| MSI GS30 Shadow | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook E554 | |
| Vizio CT14-A0 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| MSI GS30 Shadow | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook E554 | |
| Vizio CT14-A0 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| MSI GS30 Shadow | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook E554 | |
| Vizio CT14-A0 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| MSI GS30 Shadow | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook E554 | |
| Vizio CT14-A0 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | |
| MSI GS30 Shadow | |
| Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook E554 | |
| Vizio CT14-A0 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1313 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37935 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4708 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 621 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 305 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 45.8 | 15.3 | 6.5 | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 121.2 | 42.9 | 23.8 | 13 |
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD | HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV | Acer Aspire E5-473G-59QT | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | Lenovo Yoga 3 14 | Dell Latitude E7450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -15% | -1% | -9% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 31.6 -10% | 32.2 -12% | 29.1 -1% | 32.2 -12% | 29.1 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 31.4 -3% | 32.4 -6% | 29.1 5% | 32.5 -7% | 29.1 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 31.8 -4% | 33.4 -9% | 29.1 5% | 32.6 -7% | 30 2% |
| Load Average * | 31 | 33.3 -7% | 37.7 -22% | 33.1 -7% | 33.6 -8% | 36.4 -17% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.8 | 34.6 -5% | 41 -25% | 34.3 -5% | 37.2 -13% | 37.8 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 30.5 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 31 / 32.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.6 °C / 8.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.6 °C / 8.2 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD 45 Wh | HP Pavilion 14t-ab000 K9E07AV 41 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-473G-59QT 37 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 48 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 14 45 Wh | Dell Latitude E7450 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -27% | -13% | 42% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 748 | 649 -13% | 565 -24% | 774 3% | 1183 58% | 714 -5% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 363 | 233 -36% | 280 -23% | 276 -24% | 422 16% | |
| Load | 108 | 119 10% | 70 -35% | 88 -19% | 135 25% | 115 6% |
| WiFi | 336 | 467 | 459 |
Pro
+ Ruído baixo do ventilador
+ Interior relativamente acessível
+ SSD de 2,5-polegadas atualizável e RAM SODIMM
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Placa de vídeo Nvidia GT 940M opcional
+ Desempenho pleno do sistema com bateria
Contra
- A retro iluminação poderia ter sido mais brilhante para uma melhor usabilidade em exteriores
- Bateria não removível
- Utiliza PWM para o controle do brilho
- Precisão média das cores
- Carregamento lento
Como o Yoga 3 14 e Yoga 3 Pro do ano passado, o Yoga 700 se sente como um Yoga 900 recortado para atrair usuários com um orçamento. Isto não é necessariamente ruim, dado que a mecânica do Yoga não é funcionalmente inferior de forma alguma. Em vez disso, o Yoga 700 foi feito para parecer maior, mais pesado, e menos luxuoso, portanto, como resultado o modo tablet, infelizmente é mais desconfortável para usar.
Uma vantagem importante do Yoga 700 sobre o Yoga 900 de gama superior, é que a grossura adicionada permite alojar uma GPU Nvidia dedicada. Se os jogos forem um fator importante, então lhe recomendamos um SKU com a placa de vídeo Nvidia dedicada sobre o Yoga 900. De outra maneira, inclusive um Yoga 900 SKU de gama baixa é o melhor investimento para o uso do tablet e trabalho de classe em geral. Se o suto for uma preocupação, o Yoga 3 14 ou Yoga 3 Pro do ano passado ainda são muito bons candidatos, dado que muito pouco mudou além do novo nome da Lenovo.
O Yoga 700 é um dos melhores conversíveis disponível no mercado por menos de $1000 USD com discretas opções da GPU Nvidia. O seu brilho, tamanho, e peso, no entanto, limitam mais ou menos o modo Tablet para o uso apenas em interiores. O Yoga 900 é o melhor conversível para viagens e uso em exteriores.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo Yoga 700-14ISK 80QD
-
11/29/2015 v4 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
