Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB (i5-8250U, 8 GB, SSD de 256 GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 240 cd/m²
Contraste: 2182:1 (Preto: 0.11 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.33
ΔE Greyscale 3.51 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.92% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.52% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE InfoVision M140NWF5 R2, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 Chi MEi, CMN14E0, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L BOE CQ NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T AUO B140HAN04.0, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 58% | -4% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.52 | 65.8 58% | 39.68 -4% | 39.42 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.1 | 98.2 58% | 58.9 -5% | 59.2 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.92 | 67.8 58% | 41 -4% | 40.73 -5% |
| Response Times | 1652% | 26% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 34 ? 24% | 43 ? 4% | 38 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 20 ? 33% | 35 ? -17% | 30.8 ? -3% |
| PWM Frequency | 520 ? | 26000 ? 4900% | 1000 92% | |
| Screen | 26% | -6% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 240 | 408 70% | 220 -8% | 255.5 6% |
| Brightness | 234 | 375 60% | 221 -6% | 242 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 78 -16% | 87 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.11 | 0.34 -209% | 0.18 -64% | 0.29 -164% |
| Contrast | 2182 | 1200 -45% | 1222 -44% | 881 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.98 | 1.2 76% | 3.98 20% | 4.18 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.75 | 2.44 77% | 7.69 28% | 19.15 -78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.33 | 0.67 80% | 4 -20% | 3.8 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.51 | 0.98 72% | 1.68 52% | 2.2 37% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.32 95% | 2.37 93% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6606 98% | 6485 100% | 6382 102% | 6599 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 62 55% | 38 -5% | 37.5 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 98 58% | 58 -6% | 59.1 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 579% /
319% | 5% /
-0% | -8% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 520 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 23% | -13% | 13% | ||
| Read Seq | 1368 | 1065 -22% | 484.3 -65% | 1513 ? 11% | |
| Write Seq | 343.3 | 695 102% | 439.8 28% | 458 ? 33% | |
| Read 512 | 773 | 620 -20% | 316.4 -59% | 844 ? 9% | |
| Write 512 | 329.3 | 449.4 36% | 345.4 5% | 333 ? 1% | |
| Read 4k | 27.92 | 41.23 48% | 27.17 -3% | 36 ? 29% | |
| Write 4k | 93.1 | 89.3 -4% | 86.7 -7% | 97.6 ? 5% | |
| Read 4k QD32 | 294.2 | 264.9 -10% | 246.7 -16% | 278 ? -6% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 222.5 | 340.2 53% | 260.6 17% | 268 ? 20% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1803 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7467 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 984 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13.2 - 13.7, n=2) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 53 | 29.2 | 24 | 10.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.9 | 11.8 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 13.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.1 / 33.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.3 °C / 81.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.8 °C / 1.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ProBook x360 440 G1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.28 / 0.44 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 5.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
29.2 / 31.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -28% | 12% | 3% | -23% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.6 -39% | 2.9 12% | 3.3 -0% | 3.81 ? -15% | 5.26 ? -59% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 7.5 -29% | 5.2 10% | 5.2 10% | 6.94 ? -20% | 8.18 ? -41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 9.6 -20% | 5.4 32% | 5.6 30% | 8.75 ? -9% | 11.2 ? -40% |
| Load Average * | 29.2 | 37 -27% | 29.4 -1% | 32.9 -13% | 35 ? -20% | 45.9 ? -57% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.1 | 38.8 -25% | 29.6 5% | 35.2 -13% | 47.5 ? -53% | 67 ? -115% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52.5 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 19% | 39% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 918 | 1038 13% | 1344 ? 46% | ||
| H.264 | 543 | 496 -9% | 773 ? 42% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 417 | 536 29% | 496 19% | 578 39% | 589 ? 41% |
| Load | 105 | 163 55% | 114.9 ? 9% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB é um dispositivo impressionante com alguns compromissos. Como mencionado inicialmente, esperávamos que houvesse algumas desvantagens devido ao preço inicial comparativamente baixo do dispositivo. Portanto, o volume de pontos negativos é um pouco enganador. Nossos principais problemas com o Yoga 530 são que ele é pesado, tem Wi-Fi abaixo da média, baixa cobertura de espaço de cor e tem uma duração de bateria comparativamente curta.
No lado positivo, o dispositivo é bem feito e tem uma carcaça sólida. Da mesma forma, a Lenovo equipou o Yoga 530 com recursos modernos de segurança e bons dispositivos de entrada. Além disso, a tela tem uma excelente taxa de contraste e um valor de preto incrivelmente baixo. A RAM no nosso dispositivo de teste é de apenas 8 GB, mas isso pode ser corrigido com um arquivo de página maior no SSD rápido. O dispositivo também é excepcionalmente frio e silencioso.
Em nossa opinião, o Yoga 530 termina em segundo, ficando atrás do HP ProBook x360 440 G1 de nossos dispositivos de comparação. O último custa mais, mas tem menos comprometimentos, uma escotilha de manutenção, uma câmera de infravermelhos, um módulo LTE e tem melhor duração da bateria. No entanto, o ProBook x360 é mais pesado e tem um ventilador de maior frequência.
O Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB 81EK00CWGE é um dos melhores conversíveis de 800 euros (~$920) apesar de seus compromissos. A relação preço-desempenho também parece se encaixar em toda a série 530.
Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE
- 10/15/2018 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
