Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB

Imperfeito. A Lenovo colocou uma placa de vídeo dedicada bastante inútil em seu novo conversível de 14 polegadas. Felizmente, os outros componentes garantem que o aparelho possa fazer seu trabalho como um companheiro de escritório móvel. Em nossa análise detalhada, vamos verificar este modelo e ver como sua duração de bateria e outras falhas se acumulam em comparação com a concorrência.
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB (Yoga 510 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon R5 M430 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1030 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, DDR3, Crimson 16.9.2, AMD Enduro
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Single Channel, 1 de 1 slot de memória ocupado
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 10 pontos, BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: COnector combinado de entrada/sáida de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.9 x 336 x 232
Bateria
35 Wh, 0 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 1 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, abaixo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim
peso
1.73 kg, Suprimento de energia: 232 g
Preço
799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510
Lenovo Yoga 510

Size Comparison

336 mm 232 mm 20.9 mm 1.7 kg330 mm 222 mm 19 mm 1.7 kg330 mm 228 mm 12.8 mm 1.2 kg305.6 mm 217.9 mm 13.7 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: Kensington, power, USB 2.0, audio in/out, SD card
Left: Kensington, power, USB 2.0, audio in/out, SD card
On/Off, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet (can be opened)
On/Off, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, Ethernet (can be opened)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
 
77.8 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
59.7 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
 
23.7 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
 
88.1 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
 
85.3 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
 
26.4 MB/s -69%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
125 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
103 MBit/s
239
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 262 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 247.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 759:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.74 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.78% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Samsung L_LLTN133YL03L01, , 3200x1800, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
51%
50%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
41.78
65.4
57%
64.6
55%
40.31
-4%
sRGB Coverage
62.9
90.4
44%
89.5
42%
60.5
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.17
65.8
52%
65.5
52%
41.65
-4%
Response Times
33%
113%
27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
53 ?(20, 33)
33.2 ?(16, 17.2)
37%
36 ?(15, 21)
32%
38 ?(19, 19)
28%
Response Time Black / White *
39 ?(12, 27)
28 ?(5.6, 22.4)
28%
28 ?(11, 17)
28%
29 ?(6, 23)
26%
PWM Frequency
350 ?(60)
1330 ?(60)
280%
Screen
8%
16%
-15%
Brightness middle
243
334.6
38%
314
29%
253
4%
Brightness
248
319
29%
294
19%
232
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
83
-9%
83
-9%
Black Level *
0.32
0.336
-5%
0.57
-78%
0.28
12%
Contrast
759
996
31%
551
-27%
904
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.44
6.21
-14%
2.18
60%
6.36
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.73
12
-23%
6.48
33%
12.72
-31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.74
7.71
-63%
2.45
48%
10.26
-116%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.36 93%
2.39 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
7799 83%
6458 101%
6745 96%
6500 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39.6
58.6
48%
58
46%
38
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62.5
90
44%
89
42%
60
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
31% / 20%
60% / 41%
3% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 350 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 350 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
126 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel Core i7-6500U
120 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Intel Core M-5Y70
92 Points -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
314 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel Core i7-6500U
310 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Intel Core M-5Y70
184 Points -45%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6225
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
25.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
32 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
332 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3795 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S
3224 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH
2307 Points -35%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3550 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4529 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Liteonit LCH-256V2S
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
63%
-9%
-15%
Read Seq
518
1376
166%
521
1%
486.3
-6%
Write Seq
476.5
571
20%
238.6
-50%
283.7
-40%
Read 512
408
679
66%
417.3
2%
337.5
-17%
Write 512
274.5
571
108%
237.7
-13%
283.5
3%
Read 4k
35.66
42.66
20%
35.9
1%
26.75
-25%
Write 4k
106.7
137.9
29%
99.9
-6%
85.3
-20%
Read 4k QD32
368.7
535
45%
366.6
-1%
309.7
-16%
Write 4k QD32
246.3
361.2
47%
236.7
-4%
250.8
2%
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 518 MB/s
Sequential Write: 476.5 MB/s
512K Read: 408 MB/s
512K Write: 274.5 MB/s
4K Read: 35.66 MB/s
4K Write: 106.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 368.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 246.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1560 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1268 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y70
740 Points -55%
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7969 Points +52%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
5896 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
5249 Points
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y70
3202 Points -39%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
6246 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
4697 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1772 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
39823 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4744 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
899 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
Diablo III (2012) 66.1 42.3 34.2 21.4
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 43.9 25.9 10
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.3 26.5 22.5 8.2
Metro: Last Light (2013) 29.1 21.2 12.4
Battlefield 4 (2013) 42.9 29.9 19.1
Dirt Rally (2015) 117.3 32.5 15.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 18
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 74 50.6 20.6 19.1
Anno 2205 (2015) 27.7 14.1
Fallout 4 (2015) 19.4 12.8
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 36.3 22.2 10.1
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 47 29.3 14.2
Just Cause 3 (2015) 25.1 19.5
Far Cry Primal (2016) 19 9
The Division (2016) 0 game wont start
Overwatch (2016) 41.3 31.3 14.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 27 16.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.5
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 66.1 43 17.3

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga
37.3 / 43.1 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 27.9 °C40.1 °C37.6 °C 
 23.9 °C33.9 °C33.5 °C 
 23.5 °C23.9 °C28.2 °C 
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C
38.1 °C46.1 °C27.2 °C
35.1 °C36.7 °C23.1 °C
28.7 °C23.9 °C23.3 °C
Máximo: 46.1 °C
Médio: 31.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.133.62534.135.23136.533.24038.538.15040.950.66337.947.380363310038.737.612536.83816029.738.120029.745.725030.260.831528.565.540027.561.450026.664.763025.966.980025.469.710002566.2125025.864.1160024.671.220002467.1250023.967.2315024.462.7400023.863.1500025.265.4630024.560800023.255.81000024.6561250024.853.41600023.247.1SPL37.478N3.142.3median 25.2median 62.7Delta2.17.239.339.536.838.136.336.234.733.933.935.233.335.332.831.932.2313131.429.435.829.648.52955.228.657.42859.826.260.125.660.22561.624.36724.57024.466.923.864.523.757.723.757.323.560.223.562.423.663.523.964.92461.72462.125.166.336.676.22.837.2median 24.5median 60.21.35.535.334.833.535.332.931.842.632.938.13636.438.132.331.931.232.330.433.731.530.429.728.331.729.726.827.829.726.827.22727.527.22826.227.32827.628.932.127.628.133.736.628.13337.442.5334753.356.44755.46165.355.452.258.162.252.246.752.456.846.751.357.46151.349.55558.949.541.447.450.941.444.349.953.944.350.856.460.550.847.553.657.447.548.35458.448.348.654.858.648.652.758.662.552.754.760.564.454.757.563.567.257.558.464.468.258.4586467.85857.963.967.757.964.370.374.164.317.825.632.717.8median 48.6median 54.8median 58.6median 48.68.79.59.48.741.340.641.341.635.541.64033.44042.132.442.142.731.842.742.833.642.841.430.841.443.53143.547.528.347.551.527.851.554.427.554.456.825.356.857.624.657.658.22458.261.223.461.264.322.364.370.221.670.265.520.965.565.520.565.566.819.966.863.819.763.857.819.757.860.419.760.461.519.561.565.119.665.160.319.460.359.819.559.856.419.356.459.419.359.46119.2617632.87638.21.938.2median 60.3median 20.5median 60.34.72.64.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga 510-14IKBHP Spectre x360 13-w023dxLenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGEDell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.25 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.1 / 7.7 Watt
Carga midlight 33.4 / 55.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
5Y70, HD Graphics 5300, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption
2%
-3%
18%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
5.5
-41%
4.8
-23%
4
-3%
Idle Average *
7.1
6.7
6%
10.7
-51%
4.8
32%
Idle Maximum *
7.7
7.1
8%
11.8
-53%
7.6
1%
Load Average *
33.4
33.1
1%
18.3
45%
30
10%
Load Maximum *
55.9
35.2
37%
19.7
65%
29.3
48%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 40min
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE
5Y70, HD Graphics 5300, 44 Wh
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime
47%
-29%
21%
Reader / Idle
722
1233
71%
886
23%
WiFi v1.3
373
558
50%
263
-29%
486
30%
Load
100
121
21%
109
9%

Pro

+ Belo design (subjetivo)
+ Impressões digitais não visíveis
+ Ótimo acabamento (por fora)
+ Portas localizadas de forma ergonômica
+ TPM + Sensor de digitais
+ Bom teclado
+ Touchpad muito bom
+ Funciona frio

Contra

- A tampa não pode ser aberta com uma mão
- Módulo WLAN fraco
- Tem que desmontar o portátil para acessar o hardware
- A bateria não pode ser removida desde o exterior
- A tela deveria ser mais brilhante
- PWM flickering
- Bleeding da tela
- Leve tonalidade azul com o perfil de cores padrão
- O Radeon R5 M430 não é suficientemente poderoso
- Duração da bateria limitada
In review: Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB. Test model provided by Campuspoint.
In review: Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB. Test model provided by Campuspoint.

Antes de começar a mencionar as diversas falhas listadas na lista dos contras, vamos ter em conta que o preço é de 800 Euros. Para este preço, achamos que a tela do Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB é inferior, mas além do "Screen Bleeding", é aceitável. No entanto, não há justificativa para o fraco desempenho do WLAN. Além disso, o fato de que quase nenhum conversível oferecem uma escotilha de manutenção, não impede a Lenovo de instalar uma neste modelo, dado que isso poderia aumentar a conveniência de fazer atualizações e manutenções, de forma significante. É claro que o fabricante afirma que esta característica para a fácil manutenção impede que eles possam construir uma carcaça fina e leve, mas, como isto economiza para o usuário altos preços de reparação e atualização, pode ser razoável para eles encontrar uma forma de alojar uma escotilha de manutenção.

No lado dos pros, temos o ótimo acabamento e a elegante carcaça (subjetivo). Os mecanismos de segurança também são uma surpresa, dado que poucos aparelhos desta faixa de preços, oferecem eles. 

O conversível Yoga deve ser muito mais econômico, dado que a Lenovo não precisou de uma placa de vídeo dedicada. Este motivo, combinado com a curta duração da bateria, nos deixou com sentimentos confusos. Nós não podemos recomendar sinceramente este conversível para os nossos leitores.

Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB - 11/17/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 80%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
49 / 80 → 61%
Peso
66 / 35-78 → 72%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 68 → 82%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 87 → 99%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
91%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Médio
76%
82%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)