Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 390:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 14.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.28% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
34.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 22% | 15% | 17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 34.15 | 41.78 22% | 39.43 15% | 39.99 17% |
sRGB Coverage | 51.4 | 62.9 22% | 59.1 15% | 59.5 16% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 35.28 | 43.17 22% | 40.76 16% | 41.32 17% |
Response Times | -5% | 30% | 14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 70 ? | 53 ? 24% | 38 ? 46% | 56 ? 20% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 39 ? -34% | 25 ? 14% | 27 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 350 ? | |||
Screen | 37% | 39% | 49% | |
Brightness middle | 242 | 243 0% | 277 14% | 245 1% |
Brightness | 224 | 248 11% | 263 17% | 233 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 88 0% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.32 48% | 0.31 50% | 0.21 66% |
Contrast | 390 | 759 95% | 894 129% | 1167 199% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 13.03 | 5.44 58% | 5.57 57% | 4.2 68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.79 | 9.73 48% | 13.6 28% | 8.75 53% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.6 | 4.74 68% | 4.56 69% | 3.94 73% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.66 83% |
CCT | 18869 34% | 7799 83% | 6648 98% | 6096 107% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 33 | 39.6 20% | 38 15% | 38 15% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 52 | 62.5 20% | 59 13% | 59 13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
28% | 28% /
33% | 27% /
38% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
70 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise | |
↘ 38 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 | |
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Lenovo M30-70 | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H | |
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT |
PCMark 7 Score | 3814 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2670 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2898 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3728 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630 | |
---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 61% | -87% | |
Read Seq | 434.6 | 518 19% | 104.8 -76% |
Write Seq | 207.7 | 476.5 129% | 91 -56% |
Read 512 | 356.3 | 408 15% | 20.67 -94% |
Write 512 | 195.6 | 274.5 40% | 45.05 -77% |
Read 4k | 26.71 | 35.66 34% | 0.215 -99% |
Write 4k | 56.8 | 106.7 88% | 1.037 -98% |
Read 4k QD32 | 176.3 | 368.7 109% | 0.968 -99% |
Write 4k QD32 | 163.3 | 246.3 51% | 1.09 -99% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5141 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 3346 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1199 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 36896 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3010 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 712 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 344 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 274 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
World of Warcraft (2005) | 82.6 | 43.7 | ||
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 62.4 | 29 | ||
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 32.7 | 22.2 | 15.4 | |
Diablo III (2012) | 59.6 | 41.8 | 33.6 | |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 39.2 | 28.5 | 25 | |
Dead Space 3 (2013) | 63.9 | 31 | 26.6 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 51.9 | 25.7 | 18.2 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.5 | 26.9 | 22.2 | |
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) | 31.7 | 17.7 | 9.6 | |
GRID: Autosport (2014) | 65.1 | 29.7 | ||
Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014) | 20.9 | 12.9 | ||
Sims 4 (2014) | 111.9 | 34.3 | ||
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 22.3 | 13.8 | ||
F1 2014 (2014) | 39 | 30 | ||
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 19.3 | 14.8 | ||
Dirt Rally (2015) | 59.7 | 22 | ||
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 34.1 | 24.9 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 33.1 | 23.2 | ||
World of Warships (2015) | 37.7 | 28.8 | ||
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 26.9 | 21.6 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 16.1 | 10.4 | ||
The Division (2016) | 18.2 | 11.3 | ||
Civilization VI (2016) | 29.4 | 12.1 | ||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 53.4 | 36.1 | ||
Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 28.6 | 13.2 | ||
For Honor (2017) | 19.9 | 7.3 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 10.9 | 5.2 |
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Low Preset | |
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
GRID: Autosport - 1024x768 Ultra Low Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB |
Carga |
| 31.3 / 33.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -5% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 30.4 | 29 5% | 30.5 -0% | 30.5 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 29 5% | 31.3 -3% | 30.5 -0% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 29 5% | 31.3 -3% | 30.5 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 29 5% | 31.6 -4% | 30.6 -1% |
Load Average * | 31.3 | 37.3 -19% | 34.2 -9% | 31 1% |
Load Maximum * | 33.3 | 43.1 -29% | 37.3 -12% | 36.8 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | 10% | -0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.5 | 40.1 -16% | 34.6 -0% | 38.3 -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 46.1 -18% | 36.4 7% | 42.5 -9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.8 | 28.5 7% | 26.6 14% | 28.7 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.4 | 31.6 5% | 27.7 17% | 29.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 0.28 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.4 / 9.4 Watt |
Carga |
19.2 / 22.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -40% | -17% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.9 -0% | 4.7 -21% | 4.1 -5% |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.1 4% | 7.2 3% | 6.8 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 7.7 18% | 7.9 16% | 7.9 16% |
Load Average * | 19.2 | 33.4 -74% | 30 -56% | 20.4 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 22.5 | 55.9 -148% | 29 -29% | 26.8 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | -13% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 847 | 722 -15% | 560 -34% | 749 -12% |
H.264 | 306 | 320 5% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 325 | 373 15% | 322 -1% | 463 42% |
Load | 112 | 100 -11% | 86 -23% | 133 19% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Yoga 510-14AST, a Lenovo entrega a versão acessível do Yoga 510-15IKB que testamos. Com um preço de aproximadamente 500 Euros (~$533), o Yoga 510-14AST é bons 400 Euros (~$427) mais barato que o modelo irmão testado. A nova APU Stoney Bridge deixou uma boa impressão: A CPU tem suficiente poder para a aplicação que se pretende (escritório, Internet), e a GPU compete com a unidade gráfica da Intel HD Graphics 520 e roda fluentemente alguns jogos.
O Yoga funciona silenciosamente durante todo o uso intenso e esquenta moderadamente. Um SSD garante um sistema veloz. Os usuários que precisem de mais capacidade de armazenamento que o SSD de 128 GB fornece, podem substituí-lo com um modelo de maior capacidade. A bandeja da base do portátil deve ser removida para isso. O teclado instalado é atraente, e ele inclusive permite sessões de digitação frequentes. As durações da bateria são curtas.
A tela de decepcionante. Os trabalhadores responsáveis na Lenovo aparentemente acreditam que um painel TN dependentes dos ângulos de visão é uma boa opção para um conversível.
Além disso, também é um modelo escuro e de baixo contraste que fornece reprodução de cores pobre no estado de fábrica. A Lenovo diminui significativamente o atrativo do aparelho com a escolha de sua tela. Isso é uma penas, dado que a Lenovo, de fato criou um aparelho completo que certamente encontraria seus compradores. Aparentemente não é possível escolher outro modelo. Todas as versões 14AST disponíveis no momento da análise foram equipadas com esta tela inferior - incompreensível.
Os usuários que desejem um painel com ângulos de visão estáveis terão que optar por um modelo Yoga baseado em Intel. O Yoga 510-14IKB 80VB0081GE custa 50 Euros (~$53) a mais e vem com um processador Core i3-7100U muito mais poderoso e uma tela IPS Full HD com ângulos de visão estáveis. Por isso, existem poucos motivos para optar o modelo baseado em AMD.
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
-
03/23/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck