Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga (i7-8550U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 314 cd/m²
Contraste: 1963:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -3% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.9 | 67.9 3% | 64.4 -2% | 65.5 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.8 | 97.3 2% | 92.9 -3% | 88.8 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.8 | 69.9 3% | 66.1 -3% | 64.9 -4% |
| Response Times | -25% | 4% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 42 ? 16% | 48 ? 4% | 55.2 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 32.8 ? -13% | 28 ? 3% | 27.2 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 217.4 ? -78% | ||
| Screen | -6% | 12% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 314 | 374 19% | 348 11% | 262 -17% |
| Brightness | 302 | 356 18% | 306 1% | 256 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 78 -7% | 83 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.33 -106% | 0.2 -25% | 0.25 -56% |
| Contrast | 1963 | 1133 -42% | 1740 -11% | 1048 -47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.73 | 4.7 18% | 2.79 51% | 5.13 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.43 | 9.5 9% | 5.53 47% | 9.46 9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.39 | 6.5 12% | 3.47 53% | 6.23 16% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.54 87% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6351 102% | 7086 92% | 6564 99% | 6413 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 63.1 3% | 60 -2% | 57.84 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 97.2 1% | 93 -3% | 88.57 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-8% | 4% /
8% | -6% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (8918 - 14144, n=12) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (2471 - 4020, n=12) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (10747 - 15294, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (4439 - 4858, n=9) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (393 - 443, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP515-51GN-80A3 (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Ede 41) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (141.9 - 288, n=61) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 (Edge) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 (Edge 40) | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5898 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3687 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4788 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4656 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3632 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -41% | -53% | -63% | -9% | |
| Read Seq | 2486 | 1070 -57% | 1159 -53% | 467.1 -81% | 2002 ? -19% |
| Write Seq | 1341 | 484.5 -64% | 324.1 -76% | 443.6 -67% | 1656 ? 23% |
| Read 512 | 1788 | 680 -62% | 528 -70% | 312.3 -83% | 1213 ? -32% |
| Write 512 | 1885 | 483.1 -74% | 373.7 -80% | 372.5 -80% | 1641 ? -13% |
| Read 4k | 62.3 | 30.55 -51% | 29.26 -53% | 29.43 -53% | 61.4 ? -1% |
| Write 4k | 145.6 | 127.3 -13% | 108.3 -26% | 56.5 -61% | 131.3 ? -10% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 385.5 | 460.8 20% | 335.9 -13% | 311.3 -19% | 407 ? 6% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 535 | 414.5 -23% | 234.1 -56% | 225.2 -58% | 402 ? -25% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8282 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1801 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5821 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 786 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 85.8 | 43.3 | 28.2 | 12.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 62.9 | 32.4 | 26.7 | 9.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 15.5 | 9.5 | 4.9 | 3.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 35.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 28.6 6% | 29 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 28.6 6% | 29 5% |
| Idle Average * | 30.4 | 28.6 6% | 29 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 31.2 -3% | 29 5% |
| Load Average * | 34.2 | 33.7 1% | 33.6 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.2 | 36.7 -4% | 35.8 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | 4% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.2 | 42 -4% | 43.1 -7% | 36.1 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 48 -4% | 41.7 9% | 36.7 20% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.2 | 28 -11% | 23.8 6% | 26.8 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 29.7 -15% | 23.7 8% | 26.5 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.34 / 0.58 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 4.9 / 6.9 Watt |
| Carga |
36 / 34.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -49% | 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.6 10% | 8.2 -105% | 3.2 20% |
| Idle Average * | 4.9 | 7.2 -47% | 10.8 -120% | 5.5 -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 8.4 -22% | 12.7 -84% | 6.5 6% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 29.9 17% | 22.6 37% | 29.7 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 32.2 6% | 24.6 28% | 41.3 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | -20% | 33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1250 | 1163 -7% | 1387 11% | |
| H.264 | 550 | 576 5% | 659 20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 511 | 488 -5% | 410 -20% | 630 23% |
| Load | 138 | 127 -8% | 244 77% |
Pro
Contra
Nenhuma mudança fundamental foi feita no ThinkPad X380 Yoga, quando comparado ao seu antecessor (Thinkpad Yoga 370). Além de um novo nome, a Lenovo também apresenta um novo processador ULV quad-core da Intel.
O processador Core i7-8550U incorporado oferece desempenho mais que suficiente para trabalho de escritório e navegação na Internet. O processador pode utilizar seu Turbo boost apenas de forma limitada e por um curto período de tempo.
Tudo somado, o Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga pode ser descrito como um sucesso. É por isso que as falhas (cintilação PWM, garantia de um ano, sem antenas WWAN) parecem ainda mais irritantes. De fato, nessa faixa de preços, essas falhas não devem surgir em primeiro lugar.
Um SSD NVMe muito veloz, possibilita um sistema muito responsivo. O SSD pode ser substituído. Para isso, você terá que abrir a carcaça, o qual não deve apresentar nenhum problema. Quando a carcaça estiver aberta, você terá acesso ao slot do modem LTE. O slot do cartão SIM também é fornecido. No entanto, a instalação de um modem LTE está fora de questão, porque nosso dispositivo de teste não possui antenas WWAN.
O teclado iluminado deixou uma boa impressão. Não admira: Já conhecemos este teclado do ThinkPad Yoga 370. Além disso, precisamos mencionar a boa duração da bateria. A tela táctil baseada em IPS oferece ótimos ângulos de visão, bom contraste e alto brilho. No entanto, não esperamos ver a cintilação PWM em um dispositivo com esse preço.
A Lenovo deve realmente repensar sua política de garantia de um ano. É óbvio que os compradores atacadistas negociam seus próprios termos de suporte. Mas este fato não serve para os compradores varejistas. Os modelos do ThinkPad X380 Yoga vendidos em lojas de varejo ou online deveriam ter, no mínimo, uma garantia de três anos. O preço do conversível e os propósitos que a Lenovo alega que o dispositivo deve atender demandam tal garantia.
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00
- 03/09/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
