Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 4th Gen Core i7: Um ThinkPad X1 Carbon disfarçado
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS (ThinkPad X1 Yoga Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 26.20.100.7811
Memória
16 GB
, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, Capacitiva 10-pontos, native pen support, AU Optronics B140QAN02.2, IPS, Lenovo LP140QH1-SPE3, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, 512 GB
peso
1.348 kg, Suprimento de energia: 354 g
Preço
2000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
| 90.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2019 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.6 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88 % v6 (old) | 06/2017 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 |
5.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B140QAN02.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 299.4 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 269.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.03 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 284.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1016:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.05
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS AU Optronics B140QAN02.2, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, OLED, 14", 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 17% | 4% | -7% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 64.3 -3% | 83 25% | 68.6 3% | 65.5 -2% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.9 | 94.1 -2% | 99.7 4% | 99.6 4% | 85.2 -11% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.5 | 65.5 -3% | 83.1 23% | 70 4% | 62.2 -8% | |
| Response Times | -84% | -45% | -68% | -38% | 88% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 70.8 ? -121% | 49.2 ? -54% | 56 ? -75% | 42 ? -31% | 3.6 ? 89% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23.6 ? | 34.4 ? -46% | 32.2 ? -36% | 38 ? -61% | 34 ? -44% | 3.2 ? 86% |
| PWM Frequency | 735 ? | 201.6 ? | 1667 ? | 240.4 ? | ||
| Screen | -1% | -75% | -4% | -62% | -48% | |
| Brightness middle | 284.6 | 416.3 46% | 532 87% | 277.2 -3% | 306 8% | 243 -15% |
| Brightness | 269 | 400 49% | 513 91% | 263 -2% | 294 9% | 240 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 90 5% | 83 -3% | 81 -6% | 95 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.29 -4% | 0.41 -46% | 0.2 29% | 0.39 -39% | |
| Contrast | 1016 | 1436 41% | 1298 28% | 1386 36% | 785 -23% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.07 | 2.69 -30% | 6.88 -232% | 2.1 -1% | 5.16 -149% | 5.3 -156% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.75 | 4.95 -32% | 12.65 -237% | 5.91 -58% | 9.9 -164% | 8.9 -137% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.05 | 2.13 -4% | 2.52 -23% | 1.03 50% | 3.07 -50% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2.9 -71% | 10.5 -518% | 3.4 -100% | 5.86 -245% | 3.7 -118% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.4 92% | 1.98 111% | 2.241 98% | 2.31 95% | 1.78 124% |
| CCT | 6627 98% | 6623 98% | 7394 88% | 6030 108% | 6349 102% | 6202 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.7 | 60.1 -3% | 74.1 20% | 64 4% | 56 -9% | 84.8 37% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.8 | 94.5 -1% | 99.7 4% | 100 4% | 85 -11% | 100 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-11% | -34% /
-54% | -23% /
-11% | -36% /
-48% | 20% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø605 (498.15-760.43)
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø446 (440.95-506.36)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø628 (486.69-776.19)
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø550 (517.87-676.69)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø600 (525.84-708.92)
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (6763 - 26265, n=3) | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (5740 - 7748, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3674 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5059 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4611 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 8% | -9% | -53% | 36% | |
| Seq Read | 1939 | 1816 -6% | 1786 -8% | 2289 18% | 2783 44% |
| Seq Write | 1380 | 1270 -8% | 1259 -9% | 1163 -16% | 1734 26% |
| 4K Read | 41.38 | 46.25 12% | 45.86 11% | 22.29 -46% | 56.4 36% |
| 4K Write | 154.9 | 104.1 -33% | 147.9 -5% | 28.92 -81% | 158.1 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 970 | 1342 38% | 885 -9% | 415.6 -57% | 2140 121% |
| 4K-64 Write | 990 | 1209 22% | 950 -4% | 199.5 -80% | 1196 21% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.055 | 0.043 22% | 0.058 -5% | 0.122 -122% | 0.029 47% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.07 | 0.035 50% | 0.074 -6% | 0.143 -104% | 0.023 67% |
| Score Read | 1205 | 1569 30% | 1110 -8% | 667 -45% | 2475 105% |
| Score Write | 1283 | 1440 12% | 1224 -5% | 345 -73% | 1527 19% |
| Score Total | 3083 | 3790 23% | 2885 -6% | 1300 -58% | 5215 69% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2074 | 2034 -2% | 1384 -33% | 1767 -15% | 1807 -13% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 630 | 450.3 -29% | 525 -17% | 379.4 -40% | 444.3 -29% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1326 | 1024 -23% | 1008 -24% | 1055 -20% | 1237 -7% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -6% | 2% | -48% | ||
| Write 4K | 152 | 122.7 -19% | 151.5 0% | 35.06 -77% | |
| Read 4K | 45.96 | 46.57 1% | 45.83 0% | 23.64 -49% | |
| Write Seq | 2069 | 1725 -17% | 2060 0% | 1537 -26% | |
| Read Seq | 1708 | 2392 40% | 1973 16% | 1782 4% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 465.4 | 470.6 1% | 489.8 5% | 100.3 -78% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 410.1 | 313.2 -24% | 386.2 -6% | 62.7 -85% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2713 | 1869 -31% | 2703 0% | 2698 -1% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3399 | 3380 -1% | 3376 -1% | 1073 -68% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
3% | -4% /
-5% | -51% /
-51% | 36% /
36% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2713 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
410.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
465.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1708 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2069 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
45.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
152 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2208 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 70296 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9942 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1236 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 495 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 78.2 | 52.6 | 22.4 | 19.9 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 12.2 | 10.6 | 9.46 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T Vega 10, R7 3700U | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -2% | 6% | -6% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 28.3 -0% | 28.2 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -6% | 29.3 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 28.3 -0% | 28.2 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -6% | 29.3 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 28.3 -0% | 28.2 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -6% | 31.1 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 28.3 3% | 29.4 -0% | 28.3 3% | 30 -2% | 33.3 -14% |
| Load Average * | 29.3 | 32.6 -11% | 31.5 -8% | 28.2 4% | 34.2 -17% | 33.3 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 36.6 4% | 41.2 -8% | 28.8 25% | 37.5 2% | 38.9 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 29.3 / 38.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.6 / 6.5 Watt |
| Carga |
42.7 / 66.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T R7 3700U, Vega 10, , IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -40% | 14% | -4% | -27% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 2.7 23% | 3.5 -0% | 2.6 26% | 3.7 -6% | 4.9 -40% |
| Idle Average * | 5.6 | 6.5 -16% | 10.8 -93% | 4.3 23% | 6.9 -23% | 7.6 -36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 11.5 -77% | 12.5 -92% | 5.5 15% | 9.4 -45% | 13.8 -112% |
| Load Average * | 42.7 | 38.7 9% | 47.2 -11% | 32 25% | 34 20% | 33.4 22% |
| Load Maximum * | 66.5 | 50.5 24% | 68.8 -3% | 78.8 -18% | 44 34% | 46.5 30% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 50% | 8% | 32% | -19% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1195 | 1673 40% | 784 -34% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 553 | 623 13% | 598 8% | 732 32% | 448 -19% | 368 -33% |
| Load | 95 | 187 97% | 120 26% |
Pro
+ Compatível com Thunderbolt 3 e Lenovo Side Dock
+ Obturador da webcam, leitor de digitais e câmera infravermelha
+ Tela bem calibrada de fábrica
+ Em geral, ruído baixo da ventoinha
+ Teclado confortável
+ Caneta ativa integrada
+ Carregamento USB Tipo C
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ WAN opcional
+ Dobradiças firmes
Contra
- Uma velocidade instável da CPU pode ser indesejável
- Sem opções AMD ou opções de GPU mais rápidas
- Caneta ativa muito pequena para mãos grandes
- A garanria de 2 anos não é padrão
- RAM ou WLAN não atualizáveis
- O teclado não pode ser substituído
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Sem opções OLED
- Sem opções Wi-Fi 6
- Sem leitor SD
Se você já possui um Modelo 2019 Whiskey Lake-U, então, há poucas razões para pular para o modelo Comet Lake-U, pois é apenas uma pequena atualização de desempenho. Se você é proprietário de um portátil corporativo muito mais antigo, agora seria um ótimo momento para considerar o conversível ThinkPad. Sua ampla seleção de portas, bateria de longa duração, teclado confortável, caneta integrada, WAN opcional e baixo peso o tornam quase perfeito para processamento de texto e trabalho de escritório enquanto viaja.
Temos que dizer "quase perfeito" porque o sistema tem duas grandes desvantagens. O primeiro é o brilho da tela, já que o painel de 300 nit possui metade da luminosidade de outros carros-chefe da Dell, Apple, Samsung ou HP. Você enfrentará muitos reflexos se planeja usar o sistema ao ar livre. A Lenovo oferece uma opção mais brilhante de 500 nit, que custará mais. Em segundo lugar, o desempenho da GPU não é destacável. Embora não esperemos gráficos de primeira linha de um conversível comercial, a UHD Graphics 620 ficou desatualizada diante das alternativas AMD Ryzen e Ice Lake. Os editores de vídeo ou gráficos terão que abrir mão do formato 2 em 1 para um Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T490 (i7, MX250, Low Power FHD)Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo TahinkPad T490s (i5, Low Power FHD)ThinkPad T490/T495 onde as opções GeForce e Radeon estão disponíveis.
Para modelos futuros, gostaríamos de ver o Wi-Fi 6, opções de paineis de 600 a 1000 nit, marcos mais estreitos, uma caneta mais grossa para uma pegada mais fácil, opções AMD Ryzen 4000U e até uma tela 16:10. Esses recursos tornariam o ThinkPad X1 Yoga uma recomendação mais fácil sobre os concorrentes nessa faixa de preço ~US$ 2000.
A diferença de desempenho entre os modelos Core i7-8565U e Core i7-10510U é mínima, o que significa que o modelo 2019 poupará centenas sem sacrificar tanta potência da CPU. Para aproveitar ao máximo o modelo mais recente, considere o Core i7-10710U de gama mais alta ou a opção UHD 4K de 500 nit mais brilhante.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS
-
04/13/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
