Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018 (i7-8550U, HDR WQHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: 1873:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Lenovo 40AE / B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, , 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , , 3000x2000, 13.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | -19% | -18% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.5 | 65.5 -24% | 67.9 -22% | 68.7 -21% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 88.8 -11% | 95.7 -4% | 96.8 -3% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.4 | 64.9 -35% | 69.4 -30% | 70.4 -29% | |
| Response Times | 91% | -5% | -9% | -41% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 3.6 ? 94% | 55.2 ? 3% | 52.8 ? 7% | 67 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 3.2 ? 87% | 27.2 ? -13% | 30 ? -25% | 39 ? -63% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | ||||
| Screen | -29% | -36% | 7% | -30% | |
| Brightness middle | 562 | 243 -57% | 262 -53% | 385 -31% | 442 -21% |
| Brightness | 522 | 240 -54% | 256 -51% | 372 -29% | 410 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 95 10% | 83 -3% | 89 3% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.25 17% | 0.21 30% | 0.22 27% | |
| Contrast | 1873 | 1048 -44% | 1833 -2% | 2009 7% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.3 -89% | 5.13 -83% | 1.6 43% | 5.22 -86% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 8.9 -53% | 9.46 -63% | 4.5 22% | 11.84 -104% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.7 18% | 6.23 -38% | 1.5 67% | 7.88 -75% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 1.78 124% | 2.45 90% | 2.22 99% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 7205 90% | 6202 105% | 6413 101% | 6502 100% | 6756 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.9 | 84.8 -5% | 57.84 -35% | 64 -28% | 64 -28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 88.57 -11% | 95.9 -4% | 97 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 31% /
-5% | -21% /
-30% | -7% /
-0% | -30% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 35.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3824 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4719 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3829 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | -60% | -31% | -58% | 4% | |
| Read Seq | 2317 | 2004 -14% | 467.1 -80% | 1370 -41% | 469 -80% | 2002 ? -14% |
| Write Seq | 1889 | 1693 -10% | 443.6 -77% | 341.2 -82% | 277.3 -85% | 1656 ? -12% |
| Read 512 | 719 | 1040 45% | 312.3 -57% | 654 -9% | 404.4 -44% | 1213 ? 69% |
| Write 512 | 1413 | 1292 -9% | 372.5 -74% | 337.9 -76% | 266.6 -81% | 1641 ? 16% |
| Read 4k | 61.4 | 58.2 -5% | 29.43 -52% | 43.64 -29% | 25.24 -59% | 61.4 ? 0% |
| Write 4k | 140 | 182.2 30% | 56.5 -60% | 148.5 6% | 89.4 -36% | 131.3 ? -6% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 425.4 | 632 49% | 311.3 -27% | 465.5 9% | 322.5 -24% | 407 ? -4% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 474.5 | 507 7% | 225.2 -53% | 337.1 -29% | 208.1 -56% | 402 ? -15% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2081 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9415 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1178 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.3 | |||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 29.7 | 18.9 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 45.6 | 25.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 31.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Microsoft Surface Book 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.36 / 1.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 8.8 / 11.9 Watt |
| Carga |
50.4 / 71.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS Dolby Vision HDR, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 34% | -33% | 41% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 4.9 -44% | 3.2 6% | 4.7 -38% | 3.4 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 8.8 | 7.6 14% | 5.5 37% | 10.6 -20% | 5.8 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 13.8 -16% | 6.5 45% | 12.3 -3% | 6.7 44% |
| Load Average * | 50.4 | 33.4 34% | 29.7 41% | 81 -61% | 21.4 58% |
| Load Maximum * | 71.2 | 46.5 35% | 41.3 42% | 100.3 -41% | 21.6 70% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 97 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | 56% | 56% | 29% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1203 | 784 -35% | 1387 15% | 1469 22% | 1001 -17% | 1304 ? 8% |
| H.264 | 561 | 408 -27% | 659 17% | 933 66% | 776 ? 38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 368 -29% | 630 22% | 663 28% | 719 39% | 587 ? 14% |
| Load | 91 | 120 32% | 244 168% | 190 109% | 150 65% | 115.6 ? 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 90 ? |
Pro
Contra
Nosso modelo Campuspoint do novo Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga está disponível por 1800 Euros no momento da compra. Nos EUA, o aparelho é vendido por pouco menos de $2.000 - você pode obter um portátil para jogos rápido por esse preço. Se você tem o dinheiro extra para este dispositivo, será recompensado com um conversível de boa aparência, flexível, rápido e particularmente bem equipado com uma tela inovadora que preenche todos os requisitos e uma seleção de portas luxuosa e moderna que é difícil encontrar em outros dispositivos e deve satisfazer todas as suas necessidades. Detalhes como o teclado retrátil, a tampa da webcam ThinkShutter e os adaptadores incluídos, mostram que a Lenovo está fazendo um esforço para melhorar constantemente a série ThinkPad.
Se a nossa versão incluísse o Windows 10 Pro com o recurso de criptografia de disco rígido do BitLocker, os recursos de segurança estariam completos. Os usuários de negócios em constante movimento apreciarão a garantia de três anos no local, bem como os excelentes dispositivos de entrada, que são típicos dos ThinkPads. Se você é novo na série, primeiro terá que se acostumar com as particularidades do layout do teclado.
A única desvantagem é que os tempos de duração da bateria não são tão bons. Este é o preço que você tem que pagar por quatro núcleos "reais" - embora estes dificilmente ofereçam vantagens reais para usuários de escritório em comparação com os dual-cores hyper-threading antigos, como o i5-7200U.
Um conversível com Dolby Vision HDR e uma seleção de portas incluindo 2 Thunderbolt 3 sobre portas USB Type-C - esses componentes fazem do Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018 um dispositivo único.
É claro que podemos recomendar este dispositivo apesar do problema do alto-falante, já que isso é certamente uma questão única da nossa unidade de teste.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00
-
10/17/2019 v7 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
