Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga (i5-8250U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 1468:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE M133NWF4-R3, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 Lenovo M133NWF4 R3, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 LP133WF2-SPL78, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Lenovo 40AE / B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -34% | 1% | -38% | 29% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.1 | 42.79 -34% | 65.9 1% | 40.16 -38% | 86.5 33% | 65.5 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 64.3 -33% | 95.8 0% | 60 -37% | 100 5% | 88.8 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 44.21 -34% | 67.8 1% | 41.54 -38% | 99.4 49% | 64.9 -3% |
| Response Times | 48% | 117% | 4713% | -4% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 42 ? 11% | 50 ? -6% | 43.6 ? 7% | 56.8 ? -21% | 55.2 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 31 ? -11% | 29 ? -4% | 25.2 ? 10% | 24 ? 14% | 27.2 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency | 217 ? | 531 ? 145% | 1000 ? 361% | 30860 ? 14121% | ||
| Screen | -2% | 2% | -19% | 30% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 323 | 336 4% | 314 -3% | 306 -5% | 562 74% | 262 -19% |
| Brightness | 310 | 320 3% | 302 -3% | 307 -1% | 522 68% | 256 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 84 -5% | 89 1% | 86 -2% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.34 -55% | 0.16 27% | 0.36 -64% | 0.3 -36% | 0.25 -14% |
| Contrast | 1468 | 988 -33% | 1963 34% | 850 -42% | 1873 28% | 1048 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 3.45 31% | 5.73 -15% | 5.1 -2% | 2.8 44% | 5.13 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.56 | 7.95 17% | 10.43 -9% | 13.3 -39% | 5.8 39% | 9.46 1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.64 | 1.68 75% | 7.39 -11% | 3.9 41% | 4.5 32% | 6.23 6% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.14 103% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6638 98% | 6782 96% | 6351 102% | 6829 95% | 7205 90% | 6413 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 41 -33% | 61 0% | 38.24 -37% | 88.9 46% | 57.84 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 64 -33% | 96 1% | 59.75 -37% | 100 5% | 88.57 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
1% | 40% /
23% | 1552% /
865% | 18% /
25% | -6% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 217 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 217 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 217 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3669 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4776 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3638 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -64% | 33% | -21% | 21% | -55% | -7% | |
| Read Seq | 2073 | 423.7 -80% | 2486 20% | 1143 -45% | 2317 12% | 467.1 -77% | 1627 ? -22% |
| Write Seq | 943 | 406.4 -57% | 1341 42% | 653 -31% | 1889 100% | 443.6 -53% | 1136 ? 20% |
| Read 512 | 1221 | 260.8 -79% | 1788 46% | 629 -48% | 719 -41% | 312.3 -74% | 887 ? -27% |
| Write 512 | 819 | 255.6 -69% | 1885 130% | 518 -37% | 1413 73% | 372.5 -55% | 781 ? -5% |
| Read 4k | 53.5 | 22.73 -58% | 62.3 16% | 31.96 -40% | 61.4 15% | 29.43 -45% | 53 ? -1% |
| Write 4k | 127.4 | 27.92 -78% | 145.6 14% | 138.5 9% | 140 10% | 56.5 -56% | 126.7 ? -1% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 396.6 | 306.2 -23% | 385.5 -3% | 578 46% | 425.4 7% | 311.3 -22% | 419 ? 6% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 538 | 158.8 -70% | 535 -1% | 443.1 -18% | 474.5 -12% | 225.2 -58% | 384 ? -29% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1730 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6951 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 896 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.9 | 26.3 | 22.42 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18.7 | |||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 31.1 | 11.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.1 / 32.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.54 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.44 / 6.9 / 9.2 Watt |
| Carga |
27.6 / 29 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS Dolby Vision HDR, 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | -2% | 3% | -57% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.44 | 2.7 22% | 4 -16% | 3.16 8% | 3.4 1% | 3.2 7% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 5.1 26% | 4.9 29% | 5.9 14% | 8.8 -28% | 5.5 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 7.6 17% | 6.9 25% | 6.5 29% | 11.9 -29% | 6.5 29% |
| Load Average * | 27.6 | 33 -20% | 36 -30% | 30.6 -11% | 50.4 -83% | 29.7 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 29 | 29 -0% | 34.4 -19% | 35.8 -23% | 71.2 -146% | 41.3 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 71% | 30% | -8% | 17% | 73% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 833 | 1728 107% | 1250 50% | 904 9% | 1203 44% | 1387 67% | 1344 ? 61% |
| H.264 | 508 | 550 8% | 311 -39% | 561 10% | 659 30% | 773 ? 52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 420 | 708 69% | 511 22% | 475 13% | 517 23% | 630 50% | 594 ? 41% |
| Load | 99 | 136 37% | 138 39% | 85 -14% | 91 -8% | 244 146% | 114.9 ? 16% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga é de interesse para nós, pois é o único ThinkPad completamente novo deste ano. É uma expansão significativa do portfólio da Lenovo?
Um recurso importante do ThinkPad L380 Yoga é sua RAM expansível, com os dois slots SO-DIMM permitindo até 32 GB de RAM. Este grau de expansibilidade não é comum em conversíveis de 13,3 polegadas, já que muitos estão equipados com RAM não expansível que está soldada na placa-mãe. Mesmo os ThinkPads mais caros não podem competir com o ThinkPad L380 Yoga a esse respeito. A escolha e a qualidade dos dispositivos de entrada são do bom nível dos ThinkPads, tornando o ThinkPad L380 Yoga competitivo entre os portáteis no mais alto nível. Deve haver opções de entrada suficientes para atender a todos os usuários, seja uma caneta, tela táctil, teclado, touchpad ou TrackPoint. O ThinkPad L380 Yoga tem uma tela de qualidade, que é emprestada do mais caro ThinkPad X380 Yoga. Mais de 300 cd/m² de brilho e 95% de cobertura de espaço de cor sRGB são valores que não são alcançados por qualquer monitor. A seleção de portas é sólida, enquanto a carcaça se sente premium. O ventilador é bastante silencioso e as temperaturas da superfície permanecem relativamente baixas.
Temos preocupações com a durabilidade, o que não é uma crítica normalmente feita contra os ThinkPads. A unidade base pode ser visivelmente flexionada, o que poderia ser problemático para um dispositivo que se dobra e, portanto, deve suportar manuseio mais pesado do que um portátil convencional. Em segundo lugar, a falta do mecanismo de teclado Lift & Lock, que protege o teclado no modo tablet. Não podemos concluir se essas preocupações afetarão a durabilidade a longo prazo sem gastar mais tempo com o dispositivo. Independentemente disso, é uma pena que a Lenovo tenha economizado nessas duas áreas. Além disso, esperaríamos uma garantia mais longa que doze meses para um dispositivo nessa faixa de preços. Também encontramos um problema inesperado com velocidades baixas de transferência ao receber arquivos durante nossos testes de Wi-Fi. Embora a tela seja boa, é uma pena que exista PWM com uma frequência tão baixa. Teria sido bom se a Lenovo incluísse mais recursos de segurança e uma opção de WWAN, especialmente porque o ThinkPad L380 Yoga é um dispositivo empresarial.
A relação preço/desempenho está certa. No geral, o Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga é um pacote convincente com algumas desvantagens que deve ser considerado na hora da decisão de compra do dispositivo.
Muitas das fraquezas do ThinkPad L380 Yoga são tentativas de reduzir seu preço. Como resultado, o ThinkPad L380 Yoga é muito mais barato do que outros conversíveis ThinkPad Yoga. O preço mais acessível e a RAM expansível fazem do ThinkPad L380 Yoga uma expansão digna da linha ThinkPad. Portanto, recomendamos fortemente o ThinkPad L380 Yoga, que tem uma relação preço/desempenho atraente, apesar das questões relacionadas à durabilidade de longo prazo, que só poderíamos abordar com uma revisão de longo prazo.
Lenovo ThinkPad L380 Yoga-20M7001BGE
- 04/04/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
