Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE

Seguidor do Surfacer. Um 2-em-1 seguindo os passos do MS Surface Pro 4 provavelmente seja muito similar a ele. O conversível da Lenovo possui melhor conectividade e um SSD melhor, mas a tela e as câmeras deixam a desejar.
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (Miix 510 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4 Dual Channel
Pantalha
12.20 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 186 PPI, Mmulti-touch de 10 dedos, native pen support, Unknown, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB 
, 185 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado, Brightness Sensor, Micro-SIM (Opção LTE)
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.9 x 300 x 205
Bateria
50 Wh Lítio-Polímero, Intel SR1 Real Battery, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 8 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix Front fixed focal length
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Rear with autofocus
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo comDolby Audio, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Adaptador de força de 45W, Active Pen com bateria, holder para a Active Pen, capa protetora, Lenovo ID, Always Online, App Explorer for FPC, CCSDK, WRITEit, PC Manager, Cloud Disk, Microsoft Office Desktop, Yandex, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.236 kg, Suprimento de energia: 176 g
Preço
980 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 510-12ISK sitting on the keyboard dock

Size Comparison

300 mm 205 mm 9.9 mm 1.2 kg300 mm 213.5 mm 8.05 mm 1.2 kg293 mm 224 mm 14.5 mm 1.1 kg291 mm 201 mm 11 mm 1.3 kg292.1 mm 201.4 mm 8.4 mm 1.1 kg278.8 mm 194.1 mm 6.9 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Power On/Off, volume, headphone jack
Power On/Off, volume, headphone jack
Power adapter, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, right + left dual array microphone
Power adapter, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, right + left dual array microphone
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
638 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
579 MBit/s -9%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
534 MBit/s -16%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
505 MBit/s -21%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
526 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)
500 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac
461 MBit/s -8%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)
453 MBit/s -9%
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Unknown tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 324.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: 934:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2"
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3"
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12"
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12"
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12"
Display
3%
-18%
3%
6%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
65
1%
53.8
-17%
65.5
2%
68.1
6%
65.8
2%
sRGB Coverage
92
96.5
5%
73.7
-20%
96.1
4%
97.4
6%
96.2
5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.5
67
2%
53.8
-18%
66.9
2%
70.2
7%
66.8
2%
Response Times
-45%
0%
230%
33%
25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33 ?(21, 12)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
-39%
33.2 ?(15.2, 18)
-1%
20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert)
39%
30 ?(11, 19)
9%
25 ?(9, 16)
24%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(10, 13)
31.2 ?(6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
-36%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
1%
34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU)
-48%
16 ?(4.4, 11.6)
30%
17 ?(4, 13)
26%
PWM Frequency
125 ?(90)
50 ?(50)
-60%
1000 ?(100)
700%
200 ?(18)
60%
Screen
21%
1%
6%
4%
4%
Brightness middle
327
413
26%
322
-2%
345
6%
341
4%
451
38%
Brightness
324
396
22%
319
-2%
328
1%
318
-2%
425
31%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
97
10%
91
3%
87
-1%
80
-9%
Black Level *
0.35
0.36
-3%
0.42
-20%
0.38
-9%
0.36
-3%
0.37
-6%
Contrast
934
1147
23%
767
-18%
908
-3%
947
1%
1219
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.54
3.09
53%
6.02
8%
8.4
-28%
6
8%
11.04
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.59
10.06
35%
11.9
24%
14.92
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.52
3.92
59%
6.29
34%
4.3
55%
8.12
15%
10.45
-10%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
2.63 84%
2.23 99%
2 110%
CCT
8802 74%
7333 89%
7712 84%
7368 88%
7011 93%
8849 73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
61
3%
47.8
-19%
62
5%
63.4
7%
74
25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
97
5%
73.2
-20%
97.4
6%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / 4%
-6% / -3%
80% / 50%
14% / 10%
11% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Graylevels
CalMAN Graylevels
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 125 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Systeminfo: CPU-Z CPU
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Mainboard
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Memory
Systeminfo: CPU-Z Cache
Systeminfo: GPU-Z HD 520
Systeminfo: HWinfo
Latency Monitor
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points -2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points -4%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
111 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
107 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
99 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel Core i5-6300U
306 Points +24%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points +4%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
246 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel Core m5-6Y54
232 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points -16%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
Intel Core i5-7Y54
205 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel Core m5-6Y54
200 Points -19%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
246 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
39.88 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3264 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points -9%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
2979 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2770 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2733 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2717 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4197 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D
HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG
4076 Points -3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3837 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3697 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
2721 Points -35%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3264 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4197 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Liteon L8H-256V2G
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-39%
-27%
-38%
-36%
-25%
Read Seq
1271
666
-48%
501
-61%
518
-59%
497.9
-61%
512
-60%
Write Seq
305.4
154.2
-50%
297.2
-3%
199.9
-35%
153.5
-50%
462.1
51%
Read 512
651
266.3
-59%
351.7
-46%
374.9
-42%
401.2
-38%
376
-42%
Write 512
305.2
154.2
-49%
295.7
-3%
201
-34%
154.5
-49%
295.2
-3%
Read 4k
41.07
28.51
-31%
28.31
-31%
29.3
-29%
36.2
-12%
31.83
-22%
Write 4k
122.7
101.5
-17%
90.3
-26%
76.8
-37%
95.5
-22%
64.5
-47%
Read 4k QD32
411.2
368.3
-10%
285
-31%
272
-34%
389.5
-5%
269.6
-34%
Write 4k QD32
305.1
153.6
-50%
268.4
-12%
197.1
-35%
154
-50%
178.2
-42%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Sequential Read: 1271 MB/s
Sequential Write: 305.4 MB/s
512K Read: 651 MB/s
512K Write: 305.2 MB/s
4K Read: 41.07 MB/s
4K Write: 122.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 411.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 305.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1402 Points +7%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1306 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1200 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1014 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
781 Points -40%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
7455 Points +19%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6271 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5638 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
5259 Points -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
905 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
697 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
1428 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4755 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
58.1 fps +25%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
54.4 fps +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
52.4 fps +13%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
46.3 fps
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
44.1 fps -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
33.1 fps -29%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
26.5 fps -43%
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
18.2 fps
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
13.9 fps -24%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
17.4 fps
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
17 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
7.3 fps -58%
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 46.3 24.9
Thief (2014) 18.2 11.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 17.4 9.2

Barulho

Ocioso
30.15 / 30.8 / 31 dB
Carga
36.8 / 33.8 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.15 dB(A)
Inatividade
 26.3 °C27.6 °C27.2 °C 
 26.8 °C27.3 °C27.5 °C 
 36.8 °C33.8 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 36.8 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
25.1 °C26.1 °C25 °C
25.4 °C26.2 °C25.5 °C
25.1 °C25.7 °C25.5 °C
Máximo: 26.2 °C
Médio: 25.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  32.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.332.831.32529.532.529.53130.136.930.14028.329.928.35026.631.226.66326.826.326.88026.726.326.710026.526.626.51252824.72816031.224.131.220032.622.232.62503021.53031537.120.737.140053.22053.250053.819.253.863056.618.556.6800541854100056.71856.7125059.517.559.5160060.317.260.3200053.917.553.9250055.917.455.9315063.217.663.2400060.617.860.650006117.861630050.117.950.1800050.117.950.11000055.917.855.91250053.417.753.41600040.722.140.7SPL70.430.270.4N25.31.425.3median 53.8median 18median 53.8Delta10.51.510.531.331.733.430.429.528.926.227.234.531.237.939.536.646.749.358.665.465.259.863.261.764.464.862.763.767.274.668.855.446.97868.73921.8median 59.8median 45.311.223.437.536.637.239.838.639.136.936.639.536.941.746.752.756.261.666.366.164.862.46763.861.562.653.944.646.245.350.355.954.3median 54.38.633.532.233.53231.73235.131.835.131.631.431.632.430.432.430.326.830.328.526.828.529.526.129.533.52633.536253638.224.338.238.922.738.947.22247.25621.35652.520.652.561.419.661.46819.16865.118.865.158.918.658.963.718.863.762.618.362.663.418.663.466.218.666.265.118.765.158.318.858.355.918.955.956.719.156.750.81950.844.818.844.836.318.736.374.931.274.9331.633median 56median 19median 5610.71.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GEAcer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HMLenovo IdeaPad Miix 700Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.33 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.2 / 11.5 / 11.7 Watt
Carga midlight 31 / 27.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2"
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1"
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12"
Power Consumption
18%
18%
-7%
0%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
4.4
-5%
3.7
12%
7.3
-74%
7.4
-76%
Idle Average *
11.5
9
22%
6.8
41%
10
13%
11.6
-1%
Idle Maximum *
11.7
10.7
9%
7.6
35%
10.15
13%
11.6
1%
Load Average *
31
19.6
37%
22.5
27%
25.2
19%
16.8
46%
Load Maximum *
27.4
19.9
27%
34.5
-26%
29.3
-7%
19.1
30%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 51min
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh
Battery Runtime
21%
20%
-2%
34%
-18%
Reader / Idle
696
899
29%
732
5%
640
-8%
861
24%
478
-31%
WiFi v1.3
322
427
33%
443
38%
321
0%
440
37%
263
-18%
Load
111
111
0%
130
17%
112
1%
157
41%
106
-5%
H.264
432
468
450

Pro

+ Bom teclado
+ USB Tipo-A e Tipo-C
+ Construção sólida e de luxo
+ Opção para LTE
+ Câmera principal utilizável
+ Bom microfone

Contra

- Tela não muito vívida
- PWM em e abaixo do 90 % do brilho
- Ventoinha sempre ativa durante o modo inativo / quando conectado na tomada
- Sem saída para monitor
- Webcam medíocre
- Duração da bateria não muito boa
In review: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE. Test model courtesy of campuspoint
In review: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE. Test model courtesy of campuspoint

Será o Lenovo Miix 510 Pro um concorrente digno para o Surface Pro 4? Sim, com algumas ressalvas, dado que o 2-em-1 não se desempenha tão bem quanto a unidade da Microsoft. O Miix precisaria de uma duração de bateria mais longa, uma câmera principal melhor e uma tela mais vívida para alcançar uma pontuação mais alta.

Nós apreciamos a alta qualidade de construção e o bom teclado, as ficamos pouco impressionados com o pequeno clickpad. O desempenho dos aplicativos é excelente, embora a CPU rode apenas com a velocidade nominal durante os testes de benchmark. Graças ao teclado, o bom microfone e as portas físicas (Type-A, Type-C), o Miix 510 é um companheiro quase ideal e muito conveniente para as comunicações e o trabalho. Teríamos preferido uma saída para monitor, porque como está agora, o usuário precisa comprar um dock USB.

A Lenovo oferece muitas configurações distintas do Miix 510, assim os usuários podem escolher uma versão de nível de entrada ou de gama alta, conforme desejar. A Acer segue uma abordage similar com o Switch 12 Alpha, que está disponível com preços que variam entre 650 e 1200 Euros (~$720 a ~$1330).

Aspire Switch Alpha 12 definitivamente é uma alternativa - particularmente se desejar uma resolução de tela mais alta. O LTE não é uma opção, no entanto, mas a Acer oferece um SSD de 512 GB. Apenas alguns modelos incluem o stylus, então isso é algo que deve ter em conta. Um dock de teclado sempre está incluído

Microsoft Surface Pro 4 com o Type Cover de 256 GB é vendido por 1300 Euros (~$1440). O Core i5 6300U é similar (o que significa que não é muito mais veloz). O Surface Pro oferece uma resolução mais alta, melhores cores, e um stylus, mas não conta com LTE e uma porta USB Type-C. A 980 Euros (~$1085), o Miix 510 Pro é um se posiciona em uma faixa muito boas. O conversível em análise vem com um Intel Core i5 6200U, 8 GB de RAM DDR4 e um SSD de 256 GB; o teclado também está incluído. O Lenovo 2-em-1 tem preço um pouco mais alto que o de um Switch 12 Alpha similar.

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE - 11/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
84%
Mouse
80%
Conectividade
40 / 80 → 50%
Peso
72 / 35-78 → 86%
Bateria
84%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 81%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 87 → 96%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
92%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
74%
82%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-16)