Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (jseb) | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: 934:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.2" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -18% | 3% | 6% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.5 | 65 1% | 53.8 -17% | 65.5 2% | 68.1 6% | 65.8 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 96.5 5% | 73.7 -20% | 96.1 4% | 97.4 6% | 96.2 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 67 2% | 53.8 -18% | 66.9 2% | 70.2 7% | 66.8 2% |
Response Times | -45% | 0% | 230% | 33% | 25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33 ? | 46 ? -39% | 33.2 ? -1% | 20 ? 39% | 30 ? 9% | 25 ? 24% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 31.2 ? -36% | 22.8 ? 1% | 34 ? -48% | 16 ? 30% | 17 ? 26% |
PWM Frequency | 125 ? | 50 ? -60% | 1000 ? 700% | 200 ? 60% | ||
Screen | 21% | 1% | 6% | 4% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 327 | 413 26% | 322 -2% | 345 6% | 341 4% | 451 38% |
Brightness | 324 | 396 22% | 319 -2% | 328 1% | 318 -2% | 425 31% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 97 10% | 91 3% | 87 -1% | 80 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.36 -3% | 0.42 -20% | 0.38 -9% | 0.36 -3% | 0.37 -6% |
Contrast | 934 | 1147 23% | 767 -18% | 908 -3% | 947 1% | 1219 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.54 | 3.09 53% | 6.02 8% | 8.4 -28% | 6 8% | 11.04 -69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.59 | 10.06 35% | 11.9 24% | 14.92 4% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.52 | 3.92 59% | 6.29 34% | 4.3 55% | 8.12 15% | 10.45 -10% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.3 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.63 84% | 2.23 99% | 2 110% |
CCT | 8802 74% | 7333 89% | 7712 84% | 7368 88% | 7011 93% | 8849 73% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 61 3% | 47.8 -19% | 62 5% | 63.4 7% | 74 25% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 97 5% | 73.2 -20% | 97.4 6% | 100 9% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
4% | -6% /
-3% | 80% /
50% | 14% /
10% | 11% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 125 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3264 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4197 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2 | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -39% | -27% | -38% | -36% | -25% | |
Read Seq | 1271 | 666 -48% | 501 -61% | 518 -59% | 497.9 -61% | 512 -60% |
Write Seq | 305.4 | 154.2 -50% | 297.2 -3% | 199.9 -35% | 153.5 -50% | 462.1 51% |
Read 512 | 651 | 266.3 -59% | 351.7 -46% | 374.9 -42% | 401.2 -38% | 376 -42% |
Write 512 | 305.2 | 154.2 -49% | 295.7 -3% | 201 -34% | 154.5 -49% | 295.2 -3% |
Read 4k | 41.07 | 28.51 -31% | 28.31 -31% | 29.3 -29% | 36.2 -12% | 31.83 -22% |
Write 4k | 122.7 | 101.5 -17% | 90.3 -26% | 76.8 -37% | 95.5 -22% | 64.5 -47% |
Read 4k QD32 | 411.2 | 368.3 -10% | 285 -31% | 272 -34% | 389.5 -5% | 269.6 -34% |
Write 4k QD32 | 305.1 | 153.6 -50% | 268.4 -12% | 197.1 -35% | 154 -50% | 178.2 -42% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1428 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4755 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 46.3 | 24.9 | ||
Thief (2014) | 18.2 | 11.2 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.4 | 9.2 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.15 / 30.8 / 31 dB |
Carga |
| 36.8 / 33.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.15 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.33 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.2 / 11.5 / 11.7 Watt |
Carga |
31 / 27.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.2" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 18% | 18% | -7% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.4 -5% | 3.7 12% | 7.3 -74% | 7.4 -76% |
Idle Average * | 11.5 | 9 22% | 6.8 41% | 10 13% | 11.6 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.7 | 10.7 9% | 7.6 35% | 10.15 13% | 11.6 1% |
Load Average * | 31 | 19.6 37% | 22.5 27% | 25.2 19% | 16.8 46% |
Load Maximum * | 27.4 | 19.9 27% | 34.5 -26% | 29.3 -7% | 19.1 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh | Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 21% | 20% | -2% | 34% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 696 | 899 29% | 732 5% | 640 -8% | 861 24% | 478 -31% |
WiFi v1.3 | 322 | 427 33% | 443 38% | 321 0% | 440 37% | 263 -18% |
Load | 111 | 111 0% | 130 17% | 112 1% | 157 41% | 106 -5% |
H.264 | 432 | 468 | 450 |
Pro
Contra
Será o Lenovo Miix 510 Pro um concorrente digno para o Surface Pro 4? Sim, com algumas ressalvas, dado que o 2-em-1 não se desempenha tão bem quanto a unidade da Microsoft. O Miix precisaria de uma duração de bateria mais longa, uma câmera principal melhor e uma tela mais vívida para alcançar uma pontuação mais alta.
Nós apreciamos a alta qualidade de construção e o bom teclado, as ficamos pouco impressionados com o pequeno clickpad. O desempenho dos aplicativos é excelente, embora a CPU rode apenas com a velocidade nominal durante os testes de benchmark. Graças ao teclado, o bom microfone e as portas físicas (Type-A, Type-C), o Miix 510 é um companheiro quase ideal e muito conveniente para as comunicações e o trabalho. Teríamos preferido uma saída para monitor, porque como está agora, o usuário precisa comprar um dock USB.
A Lenovo oferece muitas configurações distintas do Miix 510, assim os usuários podem escolher uma versão de nível de entrada ou de gama alta, conforme desejar. A Acer segue uma abordage similar com o Switch 12 Alpha, que está disponível com preços que variam entre 650 e 1200 Euros (~$720 a ~$1330).
O Aspire Switch Alpha 12 definitivamente é uma alternativa - particularmente se desejar uma resolução de tela mais alta. O LTE não é uma opção, no entanto, mas a Acer oferece um SSD de 512 GB. Apenas alguns modelos incluem o stylus, então isso é algo que deve ter em conta. Um dock de teclado sempre está incluído
O Microsoft Surface Pro 4 com o Type Cover de 256 GB é vendido por 1300 Euros (~$1440). O Core i5 6300U é similar (o que significa que não é muito mais veloz). O Surface Pro oferece uma resolução mais alta, melhores cores, e um stylus, mas não conta com LTE e uma porta USB Type-C. A 980 Euros (~$1085), o Miix 510 Pro é um se posiciona em uma faixa muito boas. O conversível em análise vem com um Intel Core i5 6200U, 8 GB de RAM DDR4 e um SSD de 256 GB; o teclado também está incluído. O Lenovo 2-em-1 tem preço um pouco mais alto que o de um Switch 12 Alpha similar.
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
-
11/01/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch