Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 341 cd/m²
Contraste: 947:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 18 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 IPS, 2160x1440 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 IPS, 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB IPS, 2736x1824 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 IPS, 2736x1824 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 IPS, 2732x2048 | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 IPS-Panel, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -4% | -1% | 16% | -34% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 67.5 -1% | 65 -5% | 66.9 -2% | 91.2 34% | 44.4 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 96.6 -1% | 96.5 -1% | 97.5 0% | 98.1 1% | 66.4 -32% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.2 | 69 -2% | 67 -5% | 68.6 -2% | 79.3 13% | 45.91 -35% |
Response Times | -74% | -74% | 1642% | |||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 46 ? -53% | 46 ? -53% | 48.4 ? -61% | ||
Response Time Black / White * | 16 ? | 31 ? -94% | 31.2 ? -95% | 35.6 ? -123% | ||
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? -75% | 50 ? -75% | 10420 5110% | ||
Screen | 24% | 18% | 29% | 34% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 341 | 389.2 14% | 413 21% | 436.7 28% | 399 17% | 364 7% |
Brightness | 318 | 392 23% | 396 25% | 433 36% | 393 24% | 331 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 87 0% | 87 0% | 92 6% | 84 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.27 25% | 0.36 -0% | 0.326 9% | 0.22 39% | 0.44 -22% |
Contrast | 947 | 1441 52% | 1147 21% | 1340 41% | 1814 92% | 827 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6 | 3.61 40% | 3.09 48% | 1.82 70% | 2.96 51% | 7.32 -22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.12 | 3.8 53% | 3.92 52% | 1.44 82% | 3 63% | 7.37 9% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.03 108% |
CCT | 7011 93% | 5969 109% | 7333 89% | 6560 99% | 7049 92% | 6479 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.4 | 63 -1% | 61 -4% | 62.3 -2% | 71.15 12% | 42.2 -33% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.4 | 97 0% | 97 0% | 97.5 0% | 97.87 0% | 66.1 -32% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-1% | -20% /
-5% | 557% /
346% | 25% /
29% | -23% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 | |
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 4518 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2733 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3344 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3837 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 5842 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1109 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 38523 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3936 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 630 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Elite x2 1011 G1 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) | 50 | 27.2 | 11.2 | |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 31.1 | 18.7 | 11.6 | 7.1 |
Diablo III (2012) | 61.9 | 41.8 | 35.1 | 20.5 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 76.7 | 57.3 | 35.1 | 20.2 |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 45.3 | 23 | 16.3 | 7.2 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 33.1 | 18.5 | 15.4 | 4.7 |
GRID: Autosport (2014) | 86.5 | 26.3 | 14.9 | 12.5 |
Sims 4 (2014) | 161.1 | 39.2 | 17.1 | 10.4 |
F1 2014 (2014) | 41 | 28 | 17 | 12.5 |
Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 22.1 | 18.1 | 6.8 | 4.1 |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 65.7 | 14.4 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
World of Warships (2015) | 42.8 | 26.3 | 12.7 | 7.4 |
Anno 2205 (2015) | 15.5 | 9.3 | ||
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 18.7 | 10.4 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.5 °C / -18.9 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 6650U, Iris Graphics 540 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | -33% | 2% | -7% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.6 | 43.6 -13% | 52.3 -35% | 45.4 -18% | 40.1 -4% | 36.6 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.8 | 45.2 -11% | 51.4 -26% | 43.2 -6% | 39.3 4% | 37.3 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 32.4 -7% | 43.2 -42% | 25.2 17% | 33.8 -11% | 30.5 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 28 | 29.6 -6% | 36 -29% | 24 14% | 32.9 -18% | 29.9 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
desligado | 0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 4 / 8.6 / 9.3 Watt |
Carga |
18.6 / 36.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | 18% | 48% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 4.4 -10% | 2.69 33% | 1.5 62% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 9 -5% | 10.95 -27% | 4 53% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 10.7 -15% | 11.14 -20% | 5 46% |
Load Average * | 18.6 | 19.6 -5% | 11.54 38% | 13.9 25% |
Load Maximum * | 36.3 | 19.9 45% | 12.8 65% | 16.9 53% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 41 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 38 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 38 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 39 Wh | HP Elite x2 1011 G1 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -9% | -36% | 62% | 51% | |
Reader / Idle | 861 | 791 -8% | 899 4% | 654 -24% | 1933 125% | 1063 23% |
H.264 | 450 | 630 40% | 658 46% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 440 | 488 11% | 427 -3% | 293 -33% | 695 58% | 675 53% |
Load | 157 | 138 -12% | 111 -29% | 79 -50% | 195 24% | 288 83% |
Pro
Contra
Lenovo has an elegant tablet/convertible in its lineup with the IdeaPad Miix 700 that overall, made a positive impression. The installed Core M processor provides enough computing power for routine use. It can permanently develop its performance despite passive cooling - at least in single thread performance. A (minor) performance decrease can be observed in Multithread performance. The graphics core never fully develops its performance. It cannot hold a candle to the slightly weaker opponent in the Core m3 Surface Pro 4 even after a cold start.
This raises the question whether Lenovo should perhaps have installed a Core m3 processor. The Core m5 processor only outperforms the Core m3 in the Surface Pro 4 slightly. Lenovo could even offer a Core m3 version of the Miix 700 at a lower price, which would make the device even more attractive.
A positive effect of the passive CPU cooling is the noiseless operation. This is the case for all Miix 700 models. Lenovo exclusively installs Core M processors within the lineup. The device does not produce noises apart from an electronic hum or whistling noise. The installed solid-state drive ensures a fast-running system. It could be replaced with a higher-capacity model when required. The Miix 700' screen is overall satisfactory. It is bright, high-contrast and viewing angle stable. Its color reproduction is also impressive - post calibration. Very good battery runtimes round off the total package.
A clear winner cannot be ascertained in the duel of the Miix 700 and Core m3 Surface Pro 4.
Both devices can serve with the qualities that the other does not have. The Miix 700 is less expensive - the Surface Pro 4 boasts with the brighter, higher-contrast screen. Microsoft offers dedicated accessories for the Surface Pro - Lenovo has Miix 700 models with an LTE modem in its lineup. Which one is the most suitable device depends on the user's needs.
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
-
08/22/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck