Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB (i5 8250U, GeForce MX130)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 251.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1398:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.83
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.49% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.943
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB M140NWF5 R2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA BOE CQ NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L BOE CQ NV140FHM-N41, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng Chi Mei, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -2% | 3% | 53% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.49 | 40.21 -1% | 39.68 -2% | 41.82 3% | 62.5 54% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.5 | 59.6 -1% | 58.9 -3% | 61.6 2% | 91.7 52% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.86 | 41.54 -1% | 41 -2% | 43.33 4% | 64.1 53% |
| Response Times | 24% | 25% | 1610% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 42 ? 3% | 43 ? -0% | 41 ? 5% | 46 ? -6% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 34 ? -18% | 35 ? -22% | 22 ? 24% | 31.6 ? -10% |
| PWM Frequency | 510 ? | 960 ? 88% | 1000 96% | 25000 ? 4802% | |
| Screen | 3% | 7% | -17% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 251.7 | 253 1% | 220 -13% | 252 0% | 297.9 18% |
| Brightness | 249 | 239 -4% | 221 -11% | 237 -5% | 278 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 76 -16% | 78 -14% | 90 -1% | 81 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.21 -17% | 0.18 -0% | 0.21 -17% | 0.44 -144% |
| Contrast | 1398 | 1205 -14% | 1222 -13% | 1200 -14% | 677 -52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.17 | 4.29 17% | 3.98 23% | 7.29 -41% | 5.1 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 26.18 | 8.74 67% | 7.69 71% | 17.55 33% | 11 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.83 | 5.93 -55% | 4 -4% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 1.49 55% | 1.68 49% | 7.48 -127% | 6.7 -103% |
| Gamma | 1.943 113% | 2.29 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.45 90% | 2.9 76% |
| CCT | 6179 105% | 6611 98% | 6382 102% | 6953 93% | 6839 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.6 | 38 -2% | 38 -2% | 40 4% | 64.1 66% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.4 | 59 -2% | 58 -4% | 61 1% | 91.7 52% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
6% | 10% /
9% | 532% /
292% | 12% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 510 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (4435 - 5830, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (3207 - 3903, n=5) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3207 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3267 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -50% | -56% | 14% | -94% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 231.9 | 166.2 | 319.2 | 537 ? | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 158.8 | 65.1 | 463.3 | 343 ? | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 329.8 | 211.3 | 1341 | 1004 ? | |
| Score Total | 2311 | 867 -62% | 974 -58% | 2536 10% | 2565 ? 11% |
| Score Write | 526 | 392 -25% | 261 -50% | 608 16% | 587 ? 12% |
| Score Read | 1200 | 311 -74% | 465 -61% | 1316 10% | 1378 ? 15% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.056 -44% | 0.076 -95% | 0.028 28% | 0.4637 ? -1089% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.062 | 0.091 -47% | 0.093 -50% | 0.044 29% | 0.06777 ? -9% |
| 4K-64 Write | 308.5 | 273.6 -11% | 128.4 -58% | 391.3 27% | 419 ? 36% |
| 4K-64 Read | 953 | 236.1 -75% | 381.4 -60% | 1039 9% | 1112 ? 17% |
| 4K Write | 96.4 | 77.9 -19% | 83.9 -13% | 128.1 33% | 91.6 ? -5% |
| 4K Read | 47.85 | 25.41 -47% | 32.19 -33% | 48.46 1% | 45.1 ? -6% |
| Seq Write | 1211 | 406.9 -66% | 491.5 -59% | 885 -27% | 960 ? -21% |
| Seq Read | 1984 | 491.1 -75% | 515 -74% | 2282 15% | 2019 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2476 - 3203, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Convertible (507 - 21287, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2169 - 3031, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3102 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (83.6 - 152.6, n=10) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (57.3 - 84.5, n=10) | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (48 - 69, n=10) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB | |
| Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L | |
| HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (22 - 48.7, n=10) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 115 | 61 | 48 | 22 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 39.1 / 39.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -7% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 30 -5% | 30 -5% | 28 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 30 -5% | 31.2 -9% | 28 2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 30 -5% | 31.2 -9% | 28.8 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.9 | 30 -4% | 31.7 -10% | 30.3 -5% |
| Load Average * | 39.1 | 38.5 2% | 38.4 2% | 34.5 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.1 | 44 -13% | 42.1 -8% | 34.3 12% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.4 °C / 74.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+4.6 °C / 8.3 F).
Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.4 / 5.3 / 9.4 Watt |
| Carga |
43.6 / 40.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 30% | 28% | -17% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 4.26 3% | 2.9 34% | 4.2 5% | 3.1 30% |
| Idle Average * | 5.3 | 7.1 -34% | 5.2 2% | 7.2 -36% | 6.6 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 7.44 21% | 5.4 43% | 9.8 -4% | 7 26% |
| Load Average * | 43.6 | 1.4 97% | 29.4 33% | 44 -1% | 35.2 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 40.5 | 15.6 61% | 29.6 27% | 61 -51% | 34.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 45 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP401NA Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 39 Wh | Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52.5 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41.5 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 415 | 391 -6% | 496 20% | 373 -10% | 685 65% |
Pro
Contra
O Flex 6 14 da Lenovo representa outra opção de consumidor intermediário para quem procura um conversível de tamanho moderado, mas não está disposto a gastar o dinheiro em uma opção mais sofisticada, como o Yoga 920. Comparado com seus irmãos mais caros, o Flex 6 14 conta com uma carcaça de plástico mais frágil e um estilo esteticamente medíocre, mas pelo menos tem um descanso de mãos de metal escovado e marcos finos para um design mais modernizado. Os dispositivos de entrada são aceitáveis, mas os datilógrafos que esperam o luxo de um teclado de Ultrabook premium devem passar algum tempo com o Flex 6 14 antes de decidir. Da mesma forma, a tela é suficiente para uso interno, mas seu acabamento refletivo e brilho fraco são rapidamente superados por reflexos disruptivos em exteriores.
O Flex 6 14 da Lenovo faz sentido para alguém interessado em um conversível de bom desempenho com opções de stylus ativo que talvez não esteja tão preocupado com os dispositivos de entrada premium e design de carcaça, ou o uso em exteriores.
Apesar das noções de design, o desempenho do Flex 6 14 é perfeitamente adequado. Graças ao seu Core i5 2430M, GeForce MX130 de 8va geração, memória física suficiente e SSD NVMe, o Flex ultrapassa muitos dos seus pares no que diz respeito ao desempenho de armazenamento e capacidade gráfica. Este não é um portátil para jogos, mas é bom ter essa flexibilidade se a função sobre a forma for o tema do dia. A inclusão de um Lenovo Active Pen com nossa configuração de teste também é um bônus para qualquer pessoa que prefira entradas ou desenho com caneta.
A $800, o Flex 6 14 da Lenovo faz sentido para alguém interessado em um conversível de bom desempenho com opções de stylus ativo que talvez não esteja tão preocupado com os dispositivos de entrada premium e design/estabilidade da carcaça, ou o uso em exteriores. Por algumas centenas de dólares a mais, a próxima série de máquinas (Yoga 920, XPS 13) resolve a maioria dessas queixas - mas com as revisões de hoje, o Flex 6 14 parece ser um concorrente de gama média mais prático do que seus antecessores.
Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB
- 06/09/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
