Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (i7-8550U, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 338.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1210:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 LG Philips (Dell 156WF7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng LG Philips, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx LG Philips LGD054D, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -32% | 2% | -36% | 0% | 9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 41.74 -37% | 65 -2% | 39.45 -41% | 62.5 -6% | 69.4 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 62.8 -28% | 90.8 4% | 59.2 -32% | 91.7 6% | 96.8 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 43.13 -32% | 65.8 4% | 40.76 -36% | 64.1 1% | 71.1 12% |
| Response Times | -1% | 830% | -39% | -10% | -5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.2 ? | 55 ? -33% | 29.6 ? 28% | 55 ? -33% | 46 ? -12% | 42 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 20 ? 32% | 26.4 ? 11% | 26 ? 12% | 31.6 ? -7% | 32 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 | 25510 ? 2451% | 50 ? -95% | |||
| Screen | -10% | -5% | -34% | -18% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 338.7 | 244 -28% | 300.9 -11% | 205 -39% | 297.9 -12% | 302.6 -11% |
| Brightness | 325 | 242 -26% | 285 -12% | 191 -41% | 278 -14% | 282 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 93 2% | 92 1% | 74 -19% | 81 -11% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.25 11% | 0.24 14% | 0.3 -7% | 0.44 -57% | 0.25 11% |
| Contrast | 1210 | 976 -19% | 1254 4% | 683 -44% | 677 -44% | 1210 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 4.94 -1% | 5 -2% | 7.2 -47% | 5.1 -4% | 2.4 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.7 | 7.3 16% | 10.2 -17% | 12.7 -46% | 11 -26% | 4.9 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4.93 10% | 7 -27% | 6.86 -25% | 6.7 -22% | 2.8 49% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.7 81% | 2.34 94% | 2.27 97% | 2.9 76% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7498 87% | 7401 88% | 6578 99% | 6983 93% | 6839 95% | 6333 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | 40 -37% | 59 -7% | 38 -40% | 64.1 1% | 65.5 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.92 | 63 -28% | 90 4% | 59 -32% | 91.7 5% | 97.1 12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-13% | 276% /
153% | -36% /
-35% | -9% /
-13% | 6% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3457 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5083 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4217 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3673 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -96% | -1505% | -27% | -649% | -20% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1134 | 150 -87% | 319.2 -72% | 727 -36% | 1123 -1% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 534 | 77.3 -86% | 463.3 -13% | 475.1 -11% | 466.7 -13% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1936 | 325.7 -83% | 1341 -31% | 1126 -42% | 1672 -14% | |
| Score Total | 3781 | 920 -76% | 942 -75% | 2536 -33% | 426 -89% | 2219 -41% |
| Score Write | 1556 | 241 -85% | 48 -97% | 608 -61% | 20 -99% | 832 -47% |
| Score Read | 1493 | 443 -70% | 646 -57% | 1316 -12% | 307 -79% | 945 -37% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.083 -219% | 4.15 -15862% | 0.028 -8% | 2.179 -8281% | 0.031 -19% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.128 -220% | 0.08 -100% | 0.044 -10% | 0.044 -10% | 0.036 10% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1262 | 144.6 -89% | 15.3 -99% | 391.3 -69% | 2.08 -100% | 566 -55% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1206 | 371.1 -69% | 371.6 -69% | 1039 -14% | 113.7 -91% | 641 -47% |
| 4K Write | 141.1 | 50.4 -64% | 1.2 -99% | 128.1 -9% | 1.91 -99% | 118.5 -16% |
| 4K Read | 51.9 | 27.09 -48% | 47.1 -9% | 48.46 -7% | 35 -33% | 48.18 -7% |
| Seq Write | 1530 | 460.3 -70% | 311.7 -80% | 885 -42% | 160.4 -90% | 1476 -4% |
| Seq Read | 2342 | 451 -81% | 2277 -3% | 2282 -3% | 1599 -32% | 2556 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4825 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13664 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3217 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A517-51G-80L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 201 | 112.9 | 94.3 | 34.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 68.3 | 39.5 | 22.8 | 12.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 72.3 | 40.8 | 23.1 | 17.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.6 / 41.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -0% | 5% | -6% | -3% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 30.6 -8% | 28.2 1% | 28 1% | 28.5 -0% | 28.7 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 28 1% | 28.5 -0% | 31.7 -12% | 28.7 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 28.8 -1% | 28.5 -0% | 31.7 -12% | 34.2 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 28.2 1% | 30.3 -7% | 36.3 -28% | 31.7 -12% | 35.8 -26% |
| Load Average * | 41.6 | 32.3 22% | 39 6% | 34.5 17% | 42.7 -3% | 38.8 7% | 35.8 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.1 | ||||||
| Load Maximum * | 41.6 | 35.2 15% | 46.3 -11% | 34.3 18% | 42.7 -3% | 36.8 12% | 39.6 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.4 °C / -9.8 F).
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.49 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11.6 / 13.8 / 14.2 Watt |
| Carga |
67.9 / 76.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 51% | -6% | 20% | 44% | 56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11.6 | 4.3 63% | 8.3 28% | 8.14 30% | 5.9 49% | 3.1 73% |
| Idle Average * | 13.8 | 7.6 45% | 10.2 26% | 10.91 21% | 9.2 33% | 6.6 52% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.2 | 9.8 31% | 10.4 27% | 12.26 14% | 9.3 35% | 7 51% |
| Load Average * | 67.9 | 32.6 52% | 67.5 1% | 45.67 33% | 35.6 48% | 35.2 48% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 59 | 96.5 -64% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 76.9 | 28.4 63% | 117.2 -52% | 74.94 3% | 32.9 57% | 34.6 55% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5578-1777 2-in-1 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -23% | -7% | 38% | 2% | -32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 934 | 1066 14% | 1655 77% | 866 -7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 511 | 394 -23% | 484 -5% | 685 34% | 535 5% | 348 -32% |
| Load | 136 | 96 -29% | 140 3% | 148 9% |
Pro
Contra
O Spectre x360 15 de 15,6 polegadas é um ótimo 2-em-1 com suficiente poder de processamento para lidar inclusive com aplicativos exigentes. A HP deixou o chassi intacto, mas atualizou o hardware com uma CPU Kaby Lake-R mais poderosa e gráficos GeForce de nível de entrada. As grandes novidades são, é claro, as melhorias no desempenho da CPU e GPU e aqui o novo Spectre supera o predecessor por uma boa margem - pelo menos quando o aplicativo pode tomar vantagem dos dois núcleos adicionais. Como tal, o conversível com sua vívida tela 4K, 16 GB de RAM e um SSD NVMe de 512 GB ainda mais veloz, possa ser muito atraente para os usuários que procuram uma máquina produtiva que também possa lidar com jogos leves.
As durações da bateria sofreram um pouco, mas com um uso moderado, o Spectre ainda duraria todo um dia de trabalho. De outra maneira, os pros e os contras da nossa anterior análise ainda se aplicam: As dobradiças não são muito rígidas para segurar a tela com segurança em todas as posições, o painel 4K pode ser demais para alguns usuários, especialmente em vista dos ocasionais problemas de dimensionamento, e um conversível de 15,6 polegadas é bastante grande e pesado, o que pode limitar sua utilidade no modo tablet.
Depois da atualização somente de hardware, o HP Spectre x360 15t continua sendo um 2-em-1 sólido com bom desempenho e uma das melhores opções ao considerar um conversível grande.
Os usuários que não precisem de uma GPU dedicada e que preferem uma duração de bateria mais longa, também deveriam dar uma olhada no Lenovo Yoga 920 um pouco menor
.
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Price comparison
