Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 351.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1465:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx UHD UWVA eDP BrightView WLED-backlit , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung ATNA40JU01-0, OLED, 14", 2560x1440 | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE AU Optronics B140HAN03.0, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 8% | -3% | -39% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 62.8 -8% | 68.9 1% | 62 -9% | 38.04 -44% | |
sRGB Coverage | 88.2 | 88.2 0% | 98.9 12% | 89.5 1% | 57.1 -35% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.4 | 63.9 -1% | 70.9 10% | 63.3 -2% | 39.3 -39% | |
Response Times | 27% | -29% | 40% | -33% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 32.8 ? 25% | 54 ? -23% | 1 ? 98% | 53 ? -20% | 42 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 38.8 ? | 28 ? 28% | 52.4 ? -35% | 1 ? 97% | 33 ? 15% | 22 ? 43% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 240 ? -76% | 50 ? -95% | |||
Screen | -29% | -33% | -27% | -60% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 351.5 | 298 -15% | 400 14% | 279 -21% | 340 -3% | 266 -24% |
Brightness | 336 | 295 -12% | 392 17% | 277 -18% | 302 -10% | 249 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 88 6% | 89 7% | 91 10% | 77 -7% | 85 2% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.57 -138% | 0.26 -8% | 0.31 -29% | 0.26 -8% | |
Contrast | 1465 | 523 -64% | 1538 5% | 1097 -25% | 1023 -30% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 4.43 -34% | 4.9 -48% | 5.15 -56% | 6.75 -105% | 4.98 -51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 6.62 9% | 11 -51% | 8.28 -13% | 12.4 -70% | 11.82 -62% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.45 -29% | 7.2 -279% | 5.44 -186% | 8.47 -346% | 2.68 -41% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.45 90% | 2.11 104% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6784 96% | 6326 103% | 6911 94% | 5686 114% | 6557 99% | 6583 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.4 | 57.2 -11% | 64.2 0% | 98 52% | 58 -10% | 36 -44% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.2 | 87.8 0% | 98.9 12% | 100 13% | 89 1% | 57 -35% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-16% | -18% /
-24% | 7% /
-9% | -32% /
-45% | -16% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise | |
↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3249 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4542 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4016 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -1% | -50% | -90% | -4% | -55% | |
Read Seq | 1266 | 1412 12% | 475.6 -62% | 123 -90% | 1510 19% | 458.6 -64% |
Write Seq | 982 | 578 -41% | 425 -57% | 74.2 -92% | 1193 21% | 270 -73% |
Read 512 | 834 | 701 -16% | 258.4 -69% | 101.7 -88% | 397.4 -52% | |
Write 512 | 714 | 580 -19% | 318.9 -55% | 42.51 -94% | 242 -66% | |
Read 4k | 40.72 | 43.5 7% | 35.48 -13% | 10.84 -73% | 37 -9% | 19.88 -51% |
Write 4k | 139.4 | 159.7 15% | 93 -33% | 1.021 -99% | 126 -10% | 86.7 -38% |
Read 4k QD32 | 527 | 570 8% | 281.2 -47% | 69.8 -87% | 404 -23% | 275.3 -48% |
Write 4k QD32 | 395.2 | 488.7 24% | 138.7 -65% | 1.057 -100% | 319 -19% | 197.6 -50% |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2772 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 22543 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7908 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1926 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 969 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anno 2070 (2011) | 190.1 | 83.2 | 50.5 | 27.1 |
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 122.4 | 93.6 | 45.5 | 11.9 |
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 77.2 | 56.6 | 27.5 | 10.8 |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 184.4 | 92.7 | 52.1 | 26.5 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 127.5 | 69.8 | 59 | 21.6 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 28.4 | 24.2 | 14.6 | 8.7 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 55.3 | 32.5 | 19.3 | 15.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 38.5 | 18.4 | 15.3 | 13.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 36.3 dB |
Carga |
| 42.7 / 42.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0) | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 5% | -7% | 7% | -0% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 28.5 | 31.7 -11% | 29.5 -4% | 30.3 -6% | 28.9 -1% | 31.2 -9% | 30.16 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 31.7 -11% | 29.5 -4% | 31.6 -11% | 28.9 -1% | 32.8 -15% | 30.16 -6% |
Idle Average * | 28.5 | 31.7 -11% | 29.5 -4% | 31.6 -11% | 28.9 -1% | 32.8 -15% | 30.16 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 36.3 | 31.7 13% | 29.6 18% | 33.4 8% | 28.9 20% | 33.8 7% | 30.5 16% |
Load Average * | 42.7 | 38.4 10% | 38.1 11% | 47.8 -12% | 35.3 17% | 36.3 15% | 37.2 13% |
Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 34.7 19% | 38.2 11% | 47.8 -12% | 38.9 9% | 36.3 15% | 37 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.49 / 0.73 Watt |
Ocioso | 8.14 / 10.91 / 12.26 Watt |
Carga |
45.67 / 74.94 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZSLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 41% | 11% | -19% | 26% | 40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.14 | 4.3 47% | 6.5 20% | 6.6 19% | 4.7 42% | 4.34 47% |
Idle Average * | 10.91 | 6.3 42% | 13.3 -22% | 9 18% | 8.6 21% | 7.5 31% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.26 | 9 27% | 15.1 -23% | 10.7 13% | 12.2 -0% | 8.4 31% |
Load Average * | 45.67 | 32.7 28% | 30.8 33% | 77.5 -70% | 29.7 35% | 30.4 33% |
Load Maximum * | 74.94 | 28.8 62% | 38.5 49% | 130 -73% | 50.5 33% | 32.5 57% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 79.2 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga-20FRS1VS00 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 20% | -21% | -39% | -19% | -43% | |
Reader / Idle | 866 | 1069 23% | 705 -19% | 565 -35% | 824 -5% | 449 -48% |
WiFi v1.3 | 535 | 644 20% | 431 -19% | 334 -38% | 315 -41% | 299 -44% |
Load | 148 | 174 18% | 113 -24% | 84 -43% | 132 -11% | 93 -37% |
Pro
Contra
O HP Spectre x360 de 15,6 polegadas, recentemente redesenhado dá continuidade ao irmão menor de 13,3 polegadas. O chassi de alumínio CNC é sólido e se sente tão bem quanto aparenta, apesar do fato de que é um pouco mais grosso que antes. O hardware atualizado com processador Kaby Lake i7 e SSD M.2 de 512 GB é poderoso e também relativamente preparado para o futuro. A bateria de maior capacidade lida bem com os requerimentos de energia aumentados e a duração da bateria melhorou em comparação com o predecessor. O painel 4K - agora RGB padrão, em vez de PenTile - é brilhante e vívido, os dispositivos de entrada são bons e o Active Pen faz com que tomar notas seja uma experiência prazerosa. Uma das maiores novidades é a mudança para uma GPU dedicada, que deveria atrair usuários interessados em sessões de jogos ocasionais, além de tarefas produtivas.
Temos pouco que reclamar sobre: A tampa da tela de vidro colado que é pesada, portanto, as dobradiças não a seguram tão firmemente como gostaríamos. Não existe nenhum tipo de "para-choques" protetores que rodeiem a unidade de base ou a tela, por isso o conversível se desliza sobre superfícies lisas e as bordas de alumínio provavelmente se raspem ou arranhem se o conversível for usado no modo tenda em superfícies menos do que ideais. As telas 4K ainda sofrem com problemas de dimensionamento, às vezes e nem todos os usuários precisam ou querem uma resolução tão alta, portanto, teria sido bom para a HP oferecer um painel Full-HD ou WQHD, pelo menos como uma opção. Finalmente, um conversível de 15,6 polegadas é grande e pesado mesmo tendo marcos ultrafinos, portanto, sua utilidade como um tablet pode ser um pouco limitada.
Não conseguimos encontrar muitas falhas no HP Spectre x360 15. É um 2-em-1 sólido e de bom desempenho e como tal, uma das melhores opções ao considerar um conversível grande.
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
- 03/07/2017 v6 (old)
Bernhard Pechlaner