Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 523:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx 15.6", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | 10% | -34% | -33% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.8 | 64.8 3% | 64.1 2% | 68.5 9% | 39.97 -36% | 40.74 -35% |
sRGB Coverage | 88.2 | 83.5 -5% | 82.9 -6% | 97.2 10% | 59.8 -32% | 60.6 -31% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 61 -5% | 60.6 -5% | 70.4 10% | 41.32 -35% | 42.15 -34% |
Response Times | -16% | 26% | -87% | -7% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.8 ? | 40 ? -22% | 24 ? 27% | 64 ? -95% | 37 ? -13% | 43 ? -31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 30.4 ? -9% | 21 ? 25% | 50 ? -79% | 28 ? -0% | 23 ? 18% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
Screen | -2% | 2% | 3% | -32% | -64% | |
Brightness middle | 298 | 289.9 -3% | 294 -1% | 371.5 25% | 208 -30% | 249 -16% |
Brightness | 295 | 275 -7% | 285 -3% | 356 21% | 205 -31% | 235 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 83 -6% | 92 5% | 80 -9% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.289 49% | 0.26 54% | 0.252 56% | 0.26 54% | 0.44 23% |
Contrast | 523 | 1003 92% | 1131 116% | 1474 182% | 800 53% | 566 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.43 | 5.24 -18% | 5.07 -14% | 5.55 -25% | 6.97 -57% | 9.47 -114% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.62 | 9.55 -44% | 9.33 -41% | 10.95 -65% | 15.41 -133% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 4.46 -82% | 4.25 -73% | 7.1 -190% | 7.37 -201% | 10.22 -317% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.31 95% | 2.49 88% | 2.1 105% | 2.34 94% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 6326 103% | 6818 95% | 6597 99% | 6823 95% | 11451 57% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.2 | 54.7 -4% | 54 -6% | 63.4 11% | 38 -34% | 39 -32% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87.8 | 83.3 -5% | 83 -5% | 97.9 12% | 59 -33% | 57 -35% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-4% | 8% /
4% | -25% /
-8% | -24% /
-29% | -35% /
-50% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441231 | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 |
PCMark 7 Score | 5326 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2847 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3796 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3576 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 1% | 6% | 134% | -3% | 8% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 307.7 | 208.1 -32% | 178.3 -42% | 805 162% | 196.1 -36% | 197.6 -36% |
Copy Program MB/s | 215.3 | 185.6 -14% | 105.3 -51% | 325.3 51% | 137.9 -36% | 168.7 -22% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 403.4 | 224.2 -44% | 244.1 -39% | 1127 179% | 436.8 8% | 236 -41% |
Score Total | 850 | 882 4% | 1080 27% | 2410 184% | 950 12% | 1032 21% |
Score Write | 250 | 353 41% | 381 52% | 675 170% | 303 21% | 336 34% |
Score Read | 397 | 352 -11% | 463 17% | 1180 197% | 432 9% | 460 16% |
Access Time Write * | 0.057 | 0.05 12% | 0.041 28% | 0.035 39% | 0.044 23% | 0.041 28% |
Access Time Read * | 0.08 | 0.067 16% | 0.102 -28% | 0.038 52% | 0.131 -64% | 0.067 16% |
4K-64 Write | 143.8 | 252.9 76% | 271.8 89% | 513 257% | 201.8 40% | 223 55% |
4K-64 Read | 318 | 274.8 -14% | 380.8 20% | 990 211% | 356.5 12% | 376.6 18% |
4K Write | 78.3 | 74.1 -5% | 81.8 4% | 105.4 35% | 78.3 0% | 82.8 6% |
4K Read | 31.04 | 26 -16% | 32.34 4% | 31.86 3% | 25.25 -19% | 33.12 7% |
Seq Write | 278.1 | 263.2 -5% | 273.9 -2% | 570 105% | 226.4 -19% | 298.7 7% |
Seq Read | 475.3 | 513 8% | 498 5% | 1579 232% | 507 7% | 500 5% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD | |
Dell Vostro 3546 JAN15HSW1601_1K9_Win | |
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD | |
Dell Vostro 3546 JAN15HSW1601_1K9_Win |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1565 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 41767 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5217 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 825 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 373 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441231 GeForce GTX 960M, 4710HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP | Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK GeForce 920M, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | -10% | -4% | -14% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 29.5 | 22 25% | 31.3 -6% | |||
Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 31.3 -6% | 32.9 -12% | 29.2 1% | 29.6 -0% | 32.8 -11% |
Idle Average * | 29.5 | 31.3 -6% | 32.9 -12% | 29.3 1% | 31.1 -5% | 32.8 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 32.2 -9% | 32.9 -11% | 29.5 -0% | 34.3 -16% | 32.8 -11% |
Load Average * | 38.1 | 36.4 4% | 37 3% | 36.5 4% | 45 -18% | 39.4 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 36.6 4% | 46 -20% | 47.7 -25% | 49.2 -29% | 39.2 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 38.1 / 38.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441229 GeForce GTX 960M, 4710HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 8% | 17% | -62% | -120% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.5 | 5.8 11% | 4.7 28% | 4.15 36% | 4.3 34% | 12.5 -92% |
Idle Average * | 13.3 | 9.9 26% | 9.9 26% | 8.2 38% | 7.8 41% | 19.6 -47% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.1 | 11.1 26% | 10.1 33% | 8.2 46% | 10.6 30% | 22.8 -51% |
Load Average * | 30.8 | 30.6 1% | 36 -17% | 34.6 -12% | 99.7 -224% | 102 -231% |
Load Maximum * | 38.5 | 36.2 6% | 51 -32% | 48 -25% | 112.3 -192% | 107 -178% |
* ... smaller is better
desligado | 0.16 / 0.73 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.5 / 13.3 / 15.1 Watt |
Carga |
30.8 / 38.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 65 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx 65 Wh | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 45 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 84 Wh | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 48 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441229 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | -20% | 20% | -8% | -41% | |
Reader / Idle | 705 | 823 17% | 979 39% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 431 | 537 25% | 345 -20% | 544 26% | 398 -8% | 254 -41% |
Load | 113 | 149 32% | 106 -6% |
Pro
Contra
Você deveria comprar o SKU UHD 4K mais caro em vez do SKU FHD mais econômico? As vantagens são obvias incluindo os textos e imagens mais nítidos por multitarefas potencialmente melhores. Também estamos aliviados ao não ver grandes reduções no brilho da iluminação devido à contagem de pixels mais densa.
Enquanto a modificação para uma matriz de RGBW resultou em cores um pouco mais precisos antes da calibração, o contraste sofreu e a escala de cinzas é pior que o da contraparte FHD. A duração da bateria levou um golpe de mais de 2 horas durante o uso do WLAN. Somente podemos assumir que quanto mais alto for o SKU com o mais poderoso Core i7-6560U e Iris Graphics 540 reduzirá ainda mais a duração da bateria. Mesmo assim, sete horas de uso no mundo real é muito bom para um sistema de 15,6-polegadas.
O pequeno punhado de inconvenientes não é significativo o suficiente para dissuadir os potenciais compradores. Elas deveriam, no entanto, ser mais claras para os usuários, dado que as especificações como o brilho da luz, o contraste ou a precisão das cores não são sempre explicitamente declaradas pelo fabricante para cada opção de tela. Isso se aplica para todos os fabricantes e não apenas para a HP dado que registramos diferentes níveis de brilho, contraste, e gamas entre os SKUs do XPS 13, Zenbook UX303, e outros, devido a diferenças de resolução.
O Spectre x360 15 4K UHD SKU oferece uma tela táctil ainda mais incrível, como se esperava. A duração da bateria e o contraste levam golpes duros, mas ainda é um dos melhores conversíveis de 15-polegadas disponível atualmente.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
- 02/27/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo