Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx (Spectre x360 13 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 20.19.15.4360
Memória
15.9 GB
, 532 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel, Kapazitiv, IPS, Name: LG Philips LGD04E0, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, 256 GB
peso
1.853 kg, Suprimento de energia: 155 g
Preço
1350 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 311.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 295.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.6 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 523:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx 15.6", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 14", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -3% | 10% | -34% | -33% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62.8 | 64.8 3% | 64.1 2% | 68.5 9% | 39.97 -36% | 40.74 -35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.2 | 83.5 -5% | 82.9 -6% | 97.2 10% | 59.8 -32% | 60.6 -31% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 61 -5% | 60.6 -5% | 70.4 10% | 41.32 -35% | 42.15 -34% |
| Response Times | -16% | 26% | -87% | -7% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.8 ? | 40 ? -22% | 24 ? 27% | 64 ? -95% | 37 ? -13% | 43 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 30.4 ? -9% | 21 ? 25% | 50 ? -79% | 28 ? -0% | 23 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
| Screen | -2% | 2% | 3% | -32% | -64% | |
| Brightness middle | 298 | 289.9 -3% | 294 -1% | 371.5 25% | 208 -30% | 249 -16% |
| Brightness | 295 | 275 -7% | 285 -3% | 356 21% | 205 -31% | 235 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 83 -6% | 92 5% | 80 -9% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | 0.289 49% | 0.26 54% | 0.252 56% | 0.26 54% | 0.44 23% |
| Contrast | 523 | 1003 92% | 1131 116% | 1474 182% | 800 53% | 566 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.43 | 5.24 -18% | 5.07 -14% | 5.55 -25% | 6.97 -57% | 9.47 -114% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.62 | 9.55 -44% | 9.33 -41% | 10.95 -65% | 15.41 -133% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 4.46 -82% | 4.25 -73% | 7.1 -190% | 7.37 -201% | 10.22 -317% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.31 95% | 2.49 88% | 2.1 105% | 2.34 94% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 6326 103% | 6818 95% | 6597 99% | 6823 95% | 11451 57% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.2 | 54.7 -4% | 54 -6% | 63.4 11% | 38 -34% | 39 -32% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87.8 | 83.3 -5% | 83 -5% | 97.9 12% | 59 -33% | 57 -35% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-4% | 8% /
4% | -25% /
-8% | -24% /
-29% | -35% /
-50% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T440s 20AQ006BGE | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441231 | |
| HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5326 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2847 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3796 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3576 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima:
356.7 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima:
421.8 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média:
414.7 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso:
0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão:
47.7 MB/s
Uso da CPU:
3.5 %
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK GeForce 940M, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 1% | 6% | 134% | -3% | 8% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 307.7 | 208.1 -32% | 178.3 -42% | 805 162% | 196.1 -36% | 197.6 -36% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 215.3 | 185.6 -14% | 105.3 -51% | 325.3 51% | 137.9 -36% | 168.7 -22% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 403.4 | 224.2 -44% | 244.1 -39% | 1127 179% | 436.8 8% | 236 -41% |
| Score Total | 850 | 882 4% | 1080 27% | 2410 184% | 950 12% | 1032 21% |
| Score Write | 250 | 353 41% | 381 52% | 675 170% | 303 21% | 336 34% |
| Score Read | 397 | 352 -11% | 463 17% | 1180 197% | 432 9% | 460 16% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.057 | 0.05 12% | 0.041 28% | 0.035 39% | 0.044 23% | 0.041 28% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.08 | 0.067 16% | 0.102 -28% | 0.038 52% | 0.131 -64% | 0.067 16% |
| 4K-64 Write | 143.8 | 252.9 76% | 271.8 89% | 513 257% | 201.8 40% | 223 55% |
| 4K-64 Read | 318 | 274.8 -14% | 380.8 20% | 990 211% | 356.5 12% | 376.6 18% |
| 4K Write | 78.3 | 74.1 -5% | 81.8 4% | 105.4 35% | 78.3 0% | 82.8 6% |
| 4K Read | 31.04 | 26 -16% | 32.34 4% | 31.86 3% | 25.25 -19% | 33.12 7% |
| Seq Write | 278.1 | 263.2 -5% | 273.9 -2% | 570 105% | 226.4 -19% | 298.7 7% |
| Seq Read | 475.3 | 513 8% | 498 5% | 1579 232% | 507 7% | 500 5% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD | |
| Dell Vostro 3546 JAN15HSW1601_1K9_Win | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD | |
| Dell Vostro 3546 JAN15HSW1601_1K9_Win | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1565 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 41767 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5217 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 825 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 373 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441231 GeForce GTX 960M, 4710HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 512 GB MZ7TE512HMHP | Lenovo Yoga 500-14ISK GeForce 920M, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -10% | -4% | -14% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 22 25% | 31.3 -6% | |||
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 31.3 -6% | 32.9 -12% | 29.2 1% | 29.6 -0% | 32.8 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 29.5 | 31.3 -6% | 32.9 -12% | 29.3 1% | 31.1 -5% | 32.8 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 32.2 -9% | 32.9 -11% | 29.5 -0% | 34.3 -16% | 32.8 -11% |
| Load Average * | 38.1 | 36.4 4% | 37 3% | 36.5 4% | 45 -18% | 39.4 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 36.6 4% | 46 -20% | 47.7 -25% | 49.2 -29% | 39.2 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 38.1 / 38.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441229 GeForce GTX 960M, 4710HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 8% | 17% | -62% | -120% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.5 | 5.8 11% | 4.7 28% | 4.15 36% | 4.3 34% | 12.5 -92% |
| Idle Average * | 13.3 | 9.9 26% | 9.9 26% | 8.2 38% | 7.8 41% | 19.6 -47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.1 | 11.1 26% | 10.1 33% | 8.2 46% | 10.6 30% | 22.8 -51% |
| Load Average * | 30.8 | 30.6 1% | 36 -17% | 34.6 -12% | 99.7 -224% | 102 -231% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.5 | 36.2 6% | 51 -32% | 48 -25% | 112.3 -192% | 107 -178% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.16 / 0.73 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.5 / 13.3 / 15.1 Watt |
| Carga |
30.8 / 38.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 65 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ap011dx 65 Wh | Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 45 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 84 Wh | HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 48 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70-59441229 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | -20% | 20% | -8% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 705 | 823 17% | 979 39% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 431 | 537 25% | 345 -20% | 544 26% | 398 -8% | 254 -41% |
| Load | 113 | 149 32% | 106 -6% |
Pro
+ Níveis de brilho máximo iguais que os do FHD SKU
+ Cores um pouco mais precisas de fábrica
+ Textos e imagens muito nítidos
+ Bleeding da retro iluminação mínimo
Contra
- Duração da bateria reduzida, em comparação com o FHD SKU
- Contraste inferior
Você deveria comprar o SKU UHD 4K mais caro em vez do SKU FHD mais econômico? As vantagens são obvias incluindo os textos e imagens mais nítidos por multitarefas potencialmente melhores. Também estamos aliviados ao não ver grandes reduções no brilho da iluminação devido à contagem de pixels mais densa.
Enquanto a modificação para uma matriz de RGBW resultou em cores um pouco mais precisos antes da calibração, o contraste sofreu e a escala de cinzas é pior que o da contraparte FHD. A duração da bateria levou um golpe de mais de 2 horas durante o uso do WLAN. Somente podemos assumir que quanto mais alto for o SKU com o mais poderoso Core i7-6560U e Iris Graphics 540 reduzirá ainda mais a duração da bateria. Mesmo assim, sete horas de uso no mundo real é muito bom para um sistema de 15,6-polegadas.
O pequeno punhado de inconvenientes não é significativo o suficiente para dissuadir os potenciais compradores. Elas deveriam, no entanto, ser mais claras para os usuários, dado que as especificações como o brilho da luz, o contraste ou a precisão das cores não são sempre explicitamente declaradas pelo fabricante para cada opção de tela. Isso se aplica para todos os fabricantes e não apenas para a HP dado que registramos diferentes níveis de brilho, contraste, e gamas entre os SKUs do XPS 13, Zenbook UX303, e outros, devido a diferenças de resolução.
O Spectre x360 15 4K UHD SKU oferece uma tela táctil ainda mais incrível, como se esperava. A duração da bateria e o contraste levam golpes duros, mas ainda é um dos melhores conversíveis de 15-polegadas disponível atualmente.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
- 02/27/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
