Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre x360 15 2018 (i7-8550U, GeForce MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 329.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1062:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.51
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr BOE0730, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G Sharp SHP148D, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | 1% | 14% | -2% | 28% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.5 | 66.6 -3% | 66 -4% | 78.7 15% | 63.6 -7% | 85.9 25% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.7 | 86.9 -4% | 96.5 6% | 97.9 8% | 93.8 3% | 100 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.3 | 63.5 -4% | 66.7 1% | 79.2 19% | 64.9 -2% | 99.1 49% |
| Response Times | -3% | -12% | -16% | 58% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 41.2 ? -8% | 49 ? -29% | 48.4 ? -27% | 16.8 ? 56% | 44 ? -16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 29.6 ? -7% | 30 ? -9% | 34.8 ? -26% | 11.2 ? 59% | 22.8 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 943 ? | 1000 6% | 961 ? 2% | 1000 ? 6% | ||
| Screen | 10% | 28% | 29% | 22% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 329.3 | 338.7 3% | 413 25% | 488 48% | 313 -5% | 357.6 9% |
| Brightness | 316 | 325 3% | 378 20% | 440 39% | 300 -5% | 350 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 91 8% | 86 2% | 81 -4% | 78 -7% | 85 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.28 10% | 0.29 6% | 0.3 3% | 0.33 -6% | 0.35 -13% |
| Contrast | 1062 | 1210 14% | 1424 34% | 1627 53% | 948 -11% | 1022 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.78 | 4.9 -3% | 2.44 49% | 3.16 34% | 1.29 73% | 4.12 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.75 | 8.7 26% | 4.46 62% | 8.8 25% | 2.04 83% | 9.91 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.51 | 2.48 29% | 4.23 -21% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 5.5 30% | 2.48 69% | 3.3 58% | 0.69 91% | 1.8 77% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.43 91% | 2.178 101% | 2.43 91% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 8323 78% | 7498 87% | 7006 93% | 6811 95% | 6550 99% | 6613 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.8 | 63.5 8% | 62 5% | 71.7 22% | 60 2% | 87.5 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.4 | 86.92 -4% | 96 6% | 97.9 8% | 94 4% | 100 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
5% | 6% /
16% | 9% /
18% | 26% /
22% | 14% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 943 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 943 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 943 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3482 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4323 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3938 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 53% | 3% | 0% | -174% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1042 | 1134 9% | 944 -9% | 465.9 -55% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 486.8 | 534 10% | 487.9 0% | 117.2 -76% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1668 | 1936 16% | 1523 -9% | 632 -62% | |
| Score Total | 2037 | 3781 86% | 2132 5% | 2536 24% | 750 -63% |
| Score Write | 757 | 1556 106% | 807 7% | 939 24% | 58 -92% |
| Score Read | 859 | 1493 74% | 921 7% | 1092 27% | 492 -43% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.051 | 0.026 49% | 0.051 -0% | 0.046 10% | 0.889 -1643% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.04 26% | 0.044 19% | 0.119 -120% | 0.086 -59% |
| 4K-64 Write | 545 | 1262 132% | 637 17% | 742 36% | 19.19 -96% |
| 4K-64 Read | 646 | 1206 87% | 649 0% | 847 31% | 301.8 -53% |
| 4K Write | 93.2 | 141.1 51% | 94.3 1% | 80.4 -14% | 5.12 -95% |
| 4K Read | 38.76 | 51.9 34% | 41.38 7% | 23.36 -40% | 32.5 -16% |
| Seq Write | 1189 | 1530 29% | 752 -37% | 1163 -2% | 340.3 -71% |
| Seq Read | 1739 | 2342 35% | 2302 32% | 2213 27% | 1574 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4969 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12588 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3267 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 197.4 | 114.2 | 96 | 35.2 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 60 | 51 | 20 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 67.4 | 43.1 | 23 | 18.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 29.2 / 45.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G Vega M GL / 870, i7-8705G, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -1% | -21% | -9% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 28.4 1% | 28.2 1% | 29 -1% | 28 2% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 28.4 3% | 28.2 3% | 30 -3% | 28.6 2% | 30.3 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.2 | 28.4 3% | 28.2 3% | 31 -6% | 29.9 -2% | 30.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 28.4 3% | 28.2 3% | 35 -20% | 30.5 -4% | 30.3 -4% |
| Load Average * | 29.2 | 41.6 -42% | 29 1% | 49 -68% | 42.5 -46% | 37.1 -27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.4 | 36.1 6% | 44.7 -16% | 51 -33% | 44.8 -17% | 43.3 -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 41.6 9% | 47.4 -4% | 54 -18% | 44.8 2% | 43 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.31 / 0.72 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.3 / 9.8 / 12.6 Watt |
| Carga |
73 / 80 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 R7 2700U, Vega 10, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | 10% | -18% | -69% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 11.6 -119% | 2.9 45% | 6.2 -17% | 11.7 -121% | 5.9 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 9.8 | 13.8 -41% | 5.8 41% | 12.9 -32% | 18.5 -89% | 8.6 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.6 | 14.2 -13% | 7.5 40% | 13.6 -8% | 22.8 -81% | 8.7 31% |
| Load Average * | 73 | 67.9 7% | 77.5 -6% | 76.1 -4% | 97.5 -34% | 32.8 55% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 67.6 | 59 13% | 84 -24% | 84.3 -25% | 102.9 -52% | 38.2 43% |
| Load Maximum * | 80 | 76.9 4% | 107 -34% | 99.4 -24% | 111.1 -39% | 40.9 49% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 R7 2700U, Vega 10, 49 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -5% | 18% | -38% | -31% | -36% | |
| Reader / Idle | 927 | 934 1% | 673 -27% | 842 -9% | 795 -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 625 | 511 -18% | 942 51% | 420 -33% | 375 -40% | 317 -49% |
| Load | 135 | 136 1% | 114 -16% | 63 -53% | 76 -44% | 75 -44% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 62 |
Pro
Contra
Enquanto a maioria dos OEMs tendem a ficar mais finos, menores e mais leves em cada geração sucessora, o HP teve a coragem de ficar um pouco mais grosso e a aposta valeu a pena. A terceira geração do Spectre x360 15 é mais silenciosa com temperaturas do núcleo mais baixas do que no modelo do ano passado, ao mesmo tempo em que oferece mais recursos para justificar o aumento do tamanho marginal. Talvez o melhor de tudo, a HP não encontrou a necessidade de reposicionar a webcam ou colocar portas USB tipo A, leitores SD de tamanho completo ou o tradicional teclado numérico - todos atributos importantes para ter produtividade. Não podemos necessariamente dizer o mesmo de portáteis concorrentes como o popular Dell XPS 15 9570 ou MacBook Pro 15.
Sendo um pouco maior que o 2017 Spectre x360 15, no entanto, o modelo 2018 não resolve o principal problema que vem afligindo a série Spectre x360 desde 2016. Ou seja, este ainda é um portátil pesado e um pouco desconfortável para usar no modo tablet. O marco superior ainda é bastante grosso em comparação com a concorrência e esperamos que a HP tenha aumentado a luz de fundo da tela para uma melhor usabilidade em ambientes externos. Por outro lado, estes são preços justos para pagar por uma máquina bem construída e inflexível, digna de estar de igual para igual com o XPS 15 9575 e 9570.
As temperaturas frias e tranquilas desta configuração de 90 W Kaby Lake-R nos deixou animados para testar a mais potente configuração de 150 W do Kaby Lake-G. Deve ser interessante ver como este mesmo chassi consegue lidar com um processador mais exigente em uma análise futura.
O 2017 Spectre x360 15 foi um dos melhores conversíveis de 15 polegadas disponível e a atualização de 2018 não é diferente. Nosso 2-em-1 favorito agora é mais silencioso, mais frio e mais cheio de recursos do que antes. Os usuários que originalmente desistiram pelo peso e tamanho da série Spectre x360 15, no entanto, não mudarão de ideia.
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
-
06/29/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
