Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre Folio 13 (i5-8500Y)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 389.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1444:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 LGD0588, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1834 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 1% | -4% | 1% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 71.9 9% | 66.7 1% | 65.5 -1% | 67.8 2% | 64.3 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 98.1 1% | 98.6 1% | 90.4 -7% | 96.1 -1% | 94.6 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 73.1 7% | 68.7 1% | 65.6 -4% | 69.8 2% | 66.2 -3% |
| Response Times | 7% | 26% | 26% | 25% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 51.6 ? 1% | 39.6 ? 24% | 42 ? 19% | 39.6 ? 24% | 40.8 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 32.4 ? 13% | 27.2 ? 27% | 25 ? 33% | 28 ? 25% | 27.6 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 20800 ? | 113600 ? | |||
| Screen | 3% | -1% | -15% | 16% | -45% | |
| Brightness middle | 389.8 | 329.8 -15% | 467.2 20% | 463 19% | 320 -18% | 316 -19% |
| Brightness | 396 | 318 -20% | 445 12% | 450 14% | 315 -20% | 291 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 74 -16% | 91 3% | 83 -6% | 95 8% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.25 7% | 0.4 -48% | 0.32 -19% | 0.29 -7% | 0.36 -33% |
| Contrast | 1444 | 1319 -9% | 1168 -19% | 1447 0% | 1103 -24% | 878 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.72 | 2.37 13% | 2.41 11% | 3.76 -38% | 1.2 56% | 5.9 -117% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.49 | 4.08 26% | 5.58 -2% | 7.35 -34% | 3.2 42% | 12.9 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.25 | 1.33 -6% | 2.68 -114% | 0.5 60% | 1.3 -4% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.8 33% | 3.7 12% | 3.18 24% | 0.8 81% | 8.6 -105% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.145 103% | 2.37 93% | 2.53 87% | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 7470 87% | 6441 101% | 7158 91% | 6994 93% | 6548 99% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.2 | 67 8% | 62.5 0% | 59 -5% | 62.1 0% | 60.7 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.2 | 98 0% | 99.6 1% | 90 -8% | 96 -2% | 94.5 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
4% | 9% /
2% | 2% /
-8% | 14% /
14% | -8% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (4435 - 5830, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2921 - 6089, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2737 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4406 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2945 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP Stream 14-ax002ng SanDisk DF4032 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 8% | -227% | -126% | -346% | |
| Seq Read | 1693 | 1798 6% | 1114 -34% | 289.8 -83% | 144.8 -91% |
| Seq Write | 1214 | 1374 13% | 340 -72% | 126.7 -90% | 89.2 -93% |
| 4K Read | 42.69 | 46.05 8% | 40.46 -5% | 18.29 -57% | 12.01 -72% |
| 4K Write | 95.9 | 104.3 9% | 80.6 -16% | 35.07 -63% | 9.2 -90% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1621 | 1408 -13% | 277.9 -83% | 40.27 -98% | 29.14 -98% |
| 4K-64 Write | 605 | 790 31% | 129.3 -79% | 44.48 -93% | 6.93 -99% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.041 20% | 0.913 -1690% | 0.151 -196% | 0.332 -551% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.036 3% | 0.301 -714% | 0.233 -530% | 0.932 -2419% |
| Score Read | 1833 | 1634 -11% | 430 -77% | 88 -95% | 56 -97% |
| Score Write | 823 | 1032 25% | 244 -70% | 92 -89% | 25 -97% |
| Score Total | 3569 | 3484 -2% | 870 -76% | 225 -94% | 112 -97% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1374 | 1947 42% | 128.1 -91% | 99.1 -93% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 631 | 453.9 -28% | 94 -85% | 44.34 -93% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 971 | 990 2% | 124.4 -87% | 76.5 -92% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 41% | -56% | -80% | -91% | |
| Write 4K | 140 | 120 -14% | 68.1 -51% | 26.91 -81% | 7.611 -95% |
| Read 4K | 52.4 | 43.42 -17% | 30.64 -42% | 19.72 -62% | 13.21 -75% |
| Write Seq | 948 | 1814 91% | 133.8 -86% | 126.2 -87% | 65.8 -93% |
| Read Seq | 922 | 2227 142% | 705 -24% | 268 -71% | 120.6 -87% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 227.8 | 391.8 72% | 104.4 -54% | 62.9 -72% | 7.547 -97% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 299.2 | 288.7 -4% | 196.3 -34% | 39.82 -87% | 35.25 -88% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1259 | 1860 48% | 135.5 -89% | 131.3 -90% | 61.5 -95% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3112 | 3376 8% | 1124 -64% | 259.3 -92% | 122 -96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
20% | -142% /
-165% | -103% /
-109% | -219% /
-238% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 (821 - 1378, n=10) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 (734 - 1294, n=10) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6386 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 3813 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1169 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 36523 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4660 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 648 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 257 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 39.2 | 19.8 | 18.1 | 5.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.6 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 33.2 | 16 | 10.3 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.23 / 0.54 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.8 / 3.8 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
26.9 / 38.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10" | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G, IPS, 2736x1834, 12.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -79% | -55% | -16% | -85% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 2.88 -60% | 5.3 -194% | 4.3 -139% | 2.2 -22% | 3.5 -94% |
| Idle Average * | 3.8 | 4.8 -26% | 9.6 -153% | 8.7 -129% | 5.7 -50% | 8.9 -134% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7.5 3% | 10.1 -31% | 9.4 -22% | 10.3 -34% | 12.3 -60% |
| Load Average * | 26.9 | 16.9 37% | 34.4 -28% | 24.5 9% | 25.6 5% | 54.2 -101% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.5 | 23.8 38% | 34.8 10% | 36 6% | 30.6 21% | 52.1 -35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -47% | -41% | -30% | -35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1882 | 771 -59% | 792 -58% | 1066 -43% | 1243 -34% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 852 | 448 -47% | 537 -37% | 545 -36% | 668 -22% | 557 -35% |
| Load | 212 | 180 -15% | 114 -46% | 118 -44% | 131 -38% | 133 -37% |
Pro
Contra
A HP criou um nicho confortável com o Spectre Folio. Quando comparado com o Surface Go ou Surface Pro Pro?, o conversível HP oferece conectividade 4G LTE, Thunderbolt 3, duração mais longa da bateria, e uma tela maior que deve atrair usuários empresariais em constante movimento. O exterior de couro trabalha esteticamente e na prática para o agarre e transporte.
Por mais lindo que possa parecer e se sentir, o maior inimigo do Spectre Folio é o Spectre x360 13 porque ambos são conversíveis de 13 polegadas por cerca do mesmo preço de $1.300 a $1.400 USD. O exterior de couro reconhecidamente elegante vem com o custo do tamanho, peso e capacidade de manutenção, pois o Spectre x360 13 é menor, mais leve, mais fino e mais fácil de reparar ou atualizar, se necessário. O Spectre x360 13 é ainda mais rápido que o Spectre Folio devido ao seu processador Kaby Lake-R e, de fato, ele integra tanto o USB Type-A quanto um leitor de cartões SD.
Os usuários que estão considerando o conversível HP revestido de couro devem se apaixonar por seu design e sentir a intenção de explorar seus recursos integrados 4G LTE. Caso contrário, o Spectre x360 13 é a melhor opção pelo dinheiro, pois oferece mais velocidade e recursos do que o Spectre Folio.
Um novo design apto para o trabalho em qualquer cafeteria ou sala de aula. O Spectre Folio combina uma aparência antiga com o mais recente processador Intel Amber Lake-Y e a tecnologia 4G LTE eSIM para maior duração da bateria e conectividade sempre ativa. Se você não é atraído pelo chassi exclusivo, no entanto, outros Ultrabooks tendem a oferecer mais recursos e tamanhos menores.
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
- 11/23/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
