Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (Seb) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 (Seb) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (Seb) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 (Seb) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 277 cd/m²
Contraste: 894:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.56 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T TN, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | -1% | 72% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.43 | 41.63 6% | 38.88 -1% | 69.6 77% | 41.78 6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.1 | 62.6 6% | 57.7 -2% | 98 66% | 62.9 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.76 | 43.02 6% | 40.17 -1% | 70.7 73% | 43.17 6% |
| Response Times | 32% | -20% | -8% | -48% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 38 ? -0% | 44 ? -16% | 36 ? 5% | 53 ? -39% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 9 ? 64% | 31 ? -24% | 30 ? -20% | 39 ? -56% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? | 350 ? | ||
| Screen | -7% | 6% | 41% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 277 | 166 -40% | 240 -13% | 320 16% | 243 -12% |
| Brightness | 263 | 165 -37% | 229 -13% | 308 17% | 248 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 92 5% | 91 3% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.44 -42% | 0.24 23% | 0.17 45% | 0.32 -3% |
| Contrast | 894 | 377 -58% | 1000 12% | 1882 111% | 759 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.57 | 4.07 27% | 4.75 15% | 3.18 43% | 5.44 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.6 | 6.38 53% | 9.09 33% | 9.91 27% | 9.73 28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.56 | 3.99 12% | 4.3 6% | 4.13 9% | 4.74 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.49 88% | 2.5 88% | 2.03 108% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 6648 98% | 7491 87% | 5893 110% | 6752 96% | 7799 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 40 5% | 36.79 -3% | 65 71% | 39.6 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 63 7% | 57.39 -3% | 98 66% | 62.5 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
1% | -5% /
1% | 35% /
41% | -14% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3227 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3274 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3806 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4050 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630 | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 1925% | 9303% | 9785% | 11295% | |
| Read Seq | 104.8 | 396 278% | 479 357% | 507 384% | 518 394% |
| Write Seq | 91 | 133.5 47% | 270.1 197% | 354.4 289% | 476.5 424% |
| Read 512 | 20.67 | 259.5 1155% | 428.3 1972% | 355.3 1619% | 408 1874% |
| Write 512 | 45.05 | 23.86 -47% | 267.9 495% | 353.9 686% | 274.5 509% |
| Read 4k | 0.215 | 5.783 2590% | 23.77 10956% | 32.66 15091% | 35.66 16486% |
| Write 4k | 1.037 | 8.507 720% | 81.4 7750% | 81.6 7769% | 106.7 10189% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.968 | 97.5 9972% | 333.6 34363% | 277.6 28578% | 368.7 37989% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.09 | 8.515 681% | 200.9 18331% | 261.2 23863% | 246.3 22496% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8117 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1509 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 48460 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5429 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 708 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 5368 | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
| Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 62.1 | 32.3 | 19.4 | 9.6 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38.6 | 24.4 | 20.1 | 7.1 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 34.9 | 25 | 16.3 | 6.2 |
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 13.8 | 11.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.6 dB |
| HDD |
| 31.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 37.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | 5% | -4% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 31 -2% | 29 5% | 31.3 -3% | 29 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 31.3 -0% | 29 7% | 31.3 -0% | 29 7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.3 | 31.3 -0% | 29 7% | 31.3 -0% | 29 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 32.9 -4% | 29 8% | 31.8 -1% | 29 8% |
| Load Average * | 34.2 | 35 -2% | 31 9% | 39.2 -15% | 37.3 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.3 | 34.9 6% | 40.3 -8% | 39.1 -5% | 43.1 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | -23% | -2% | -16% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 34.6 | 30.6 12% | 41.6 -20% | 40 -16% | 40.1 -16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 36.4 | 33.3 9% | 45.9 -26% | 37.6 -3% | 46.1 -27% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 25.7 3% | 32.7 -23% | 25.1 6% | 28.5 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 26.6 4% | 34.1 -23% | 26 6% | 31.6 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.7 / 7.2 / 7.9 Watt |
| Carga |
30 / 29 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 6% | -30% | -17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 2.95 37% | 4.4 6% | 6.2 -32% | 3.9 17% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 5.6 22% | 6.1 15% | 8 -11% | 7.1 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 7.7 3% | 6.8 14% | 11.6 -47% | 7.7 3% |
| Load Average * | 30 | 22.6 25% | 29 3% | 40 -33% | 33.4 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 29 | 23.5 19% | 31.9 -10% | 36.6 -26% | 55.9 -93% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 80% | -2% | 15% | 20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 560 | 1260 125% | 674 20% | 669 19% | 722 29% |
| H.264 | 320 | 393 23% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 322 | 290 -10% | 240 -25% | 382 19% | 373 16% |
| Load | 86 | 193 124% | 86 0% | 85 -1% | 100 16% |
O conversível de 13,3 polegadas da HP possui um processador Core i5 da atual coleção Kaby Lake da Intel. A CPU oferece uma boa dose de poder de processamento que também é suficiente para usos além dos aplicativos de escritório e navegação pela web. O portátil quase não esquenta e funciona se forma silenciosa, pelo menos no modo inativo. Com um velocidade de giro mais alta, a ventoinha começa a zumbir. Você não ficará sem espaço muito rápido, graças ao disco rígido de 1 TB. Você também pode substituir o HDD com um SSD. No entanto, o Pavilion não é particularmente prático para as manutenções. Se você deseja aumentar a RAM, você precisa remover a placa mãe.
Com o Pavilion x360 13-u102ng, a HP entrega um conversível de 13,3 polegadas para o uso doméstico.
O teclado integrado deixou uma boa sensação de digitação geral e também é adequado para usuários que escrevem frequentemente. A tela IPS Full-HD agrada com ângulos de visão estáveis e com contraste. No que diz respeito ao brilho, a tela poderia oferecer um pouco mais, mas considerando o preço do portátil, os valores medidos estão bem. Com o Pavilion, a HP poderia ter uma aparelho móvel de 13,3 polegadas relativamente acessível para escrever e navegar em sua linha, o qual poderia atrair estudantes. Infelizmente, a duração da bateria apenas média, estraga este plano. Adicionalmente, a HP somente garante uma garantia de um ano. Esperamos pelo menos uma garantia de dois anos, hoje em dia.
Pro
Contra
HP's 13.3-inch convertible sports a Core i5 processor of Intel's current Kaby Lake collection. The CPU offers a decent dose of processing power that is also sufficient for uses beyond office applications and web browsing. The laptop barely warms up and works, at least while idling, silently. At higher turning speeds, the fan starts to whine. You will not run out of storage anytime soon, thanks to the 1 TB hard drive. You can also replace the HDD with an SSD. However, the Pavilion is not particularly maintenance-friendly. If you want to increase the RAM, you need to remove the motherboard.
With the Pavilion x360 13-u102ng, HP delivers a 13.3-inch convertible for home use.
The built-in keyboard left an overall good typing feel and is also suitable for users who frequently type. The Full-HD IPS display pleases with stable viewing angles and good contrast. As for the brightness, the screen could offer some more, but considering the price of the laptop, the measured values are all right. With the Pavilion, HP could have a relatively affordable 13.3-inch mobile device for writing and browsing in its lineup, which could appeal to students. Unfortunately, the only average battery life undermines this plan. Additionally, HP only grants a one-year warranty. We expect at least a two-year warranty these days.
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng
- 12/14/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
