Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV

Name: HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV
Brand: HP

Tanque diminuto. A HP esteve ocupada atualizando sua linha Pavilion x360, e hoje vamos dar uma olhada no membro mais diminuto, o 11t. Com uma construção sólida, este conversível de 11,6" é tão forte quanto um tanque. Infelizmente, também se sente lento.

Sam Medley (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/07/2017 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Bay Trail Broadwell Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV (Pavilion x360 Serie)

Processador

Intel Pentium N3710 4 x 1.6 - 2.6 GHz, Braswell

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 700 MHz, Integrada, Intel HD Graphics 20.19.15.4364, No

Memória

8 GB

, DDR3-1600 / PC3-12800

Pantalha

11.60 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, Sim, Multitouch de 10-pontos, LG Philips LGD0497, IPS, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

Toshiba MQ01ABF050, 500 GB

, 500 GB, 5400 RPM, 448 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Heaphone/Microphone combo, Card Reader: Lietor de cartões SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Unidade ótica

Pinoneer BD-ROM BDCTD01RS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.3 x 306.07 x 208.03

Bateria

34.6 Wh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 7.5 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p, 30 fps

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dois alto falantes para cima, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Nenhum, McAfee Suite de teste, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

1.4107 kg, Suprimento de energia: 198.447 g

Preço

539 USD

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	49.23 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR	33.3 MB/s -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	82.1 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR	75.9 MB/s -8%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	47.3 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV	41.3 MBit/s


231.5 cd/m²	243.4 cd/m²	222.9 cd/m²
211.1 cd/m²	245.2 cd/m²	200.3 cd/m²
198.9 cd/m²	226 cd/m²	194.4 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD0497 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 245.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 219.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 766:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV LG Philips LGD0497, IPS, 11.6", 1366x768	Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 CMN 1130, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768	Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 AU Optronics B116XW01, TN, 11.6", 1366x768	Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR AU Optronics B116XTN02.3, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768	Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS InfoVision M116NWR4 R1, IPS, 11.6", 1366x768
Display		-2%	-9%	-10%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	41.11	40.42 -2%	37.53 -9%	36.86 -10%	41.33 1%
sRGB Coverage	61.8	60.3 -2%	56.4 -9%	55.4 -10%	62.3 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.47	41.82 -2%	38.81 -9%	38.08 -10%	42.7 1%
Response Times		-62%		-23%	-65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.8 ?(18, 24.8)	80 ?(46, 34) -87%		58 ?(26, 32) -36%	63 ?(22, 41, Plateau w. Spike) -47%
Response Time Black / White *	22 ?(4.4, 17.6)	30 ?(18, 12) -36%		24 ?(7, 17) -9%	40 ?(17, 23, Plateau w. Spike) -82%
PWM Frequency		50 ?(50)			190 ?(90)
Screen		-40%	-52%	-43%	11%
Brightness middle	245.2	221 -10%	261 6%	256 4%	264 8%
Brightness	219	220 0%	248 13%	242 11%	247 13%
Brightness Distribution	79	90 14%	90 14%	89 13%	90 14%
Black Level *	0.32	0.29 9%	0.3 6%	0.68 -113%	0.27 16%
Contrast	766	762 -1%	870 14%	376 -51%	978 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.5	10.31 -87%	12.64 -130%	8.87 -61%	3.75 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.9			14.35 15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	11.17 -285%	13.75 -374%	9.6 -231%	3.28 -13%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.39 ^92%	2.88 ^76%	2.2 ^100%	2.59 ^85%
CCT	6157 ^106%	12620 ^52%	17914 ^36%	9857 ^66%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	39 0%	36 -8%	35 -10%	39 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	62	60 -3%	57 -8%	55 -11%	62 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-35% / -35%	-31% / -41%	-25% / -34%	-18% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	3417 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	3054 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel Celeron N3050	1999 Points -41%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	1876 Points -45%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	1307 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	1087 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel Celeron N3050	1068 Points -18%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	779 Points -40%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	0.48 Points
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	0.38 Points -21%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	0.38 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	1.61 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	1.39 Points
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	0.79 Points -43%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	39 Points
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	36 Points -8%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	35 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel Celeron N3050	29 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	134 Points +28%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	105 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel Celeron N3050	60 Points -43%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	48 Points -54%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	1773 s * -142%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	732 s *
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	720 s * +2%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel Pentium N3700	2896 s * -70%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel Celeron N3050	1905 s * -12%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel Pentium N3710	1706 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1307

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

3417

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2412

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

1.39 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

13.06 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

39 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

105 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

13.06 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1651 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	1633 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1335 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	1295 Points -3%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1813 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	1650 Points -9%

PCMark 7 Score		1758 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1651 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		1813 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		1335 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680	Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 HBG3e 32G eMMC	Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS 32 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-1%	1517%	44%	2115%
Read Seq	93.9	84.2 -10%	159.9 70%	118.9 27%	164.5 75%
Write Seq	88	84.5 -4%	42.23 -52%	117.2 33%	67.8 -23%
Read 512	27.01	24.65 -9%	149 452%	38.89 44%	165.1 511%
Write 512	36.08	24.34 -33%	36.68 2%	76 111%	89.7 149%
Read 4k	0.311	0.361 16%	16.19 5106%	0.474 52%	18.05 5704%
Write 4k	0.787	0.863 10%	8.925 1034%	0.99 26%	20.49 2504%
Read 4k QD32	0.633	0.733 16%	29.32 4532%	1.081 71%	32.15 4979%
Write 4k QD32	0.815	0.842 3%	8.927 995%	0.724 -11%	25.44 3021%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABF050

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 6.1 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 110.3 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 73.3 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 24.9 ms

Índice de Explosão: 119.5 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 35 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	463 Points
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	404 Points -13%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	395 Points -15%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700	338 Points -27%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	484 Points +23%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700	461 Points +17%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	415 Points +5%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	395 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	2457 Points +30%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700	2353 Points +24%
Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	2175 Points +15%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	1897 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050	299 Points +29%
Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700	270 Points +17%
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	231 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710	12601 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		508 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		1758 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		216 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Barulho

Ocioso		0 / 0 / 0 dB
HDD		0 dB
Carga		0 / 0 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)

	HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680	Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, HBG3e 32G eMMC	Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Noise
Idle Minimum *				32.4
Idle Average *				32.5
Idle Maximum *				32.5
Load Average *				32.5
Load Maximum *				32.4

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


24.2 °C	30.8 °C	39 °C
25.2 °C	30.2 °C	36.8 °C
21.6 °C	23.6 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C


40.8 °C	56 °C	25 °C
37.8 °C	34.2 °C	24.8 °C
33.4 °C	26.4 °C	23.6 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.9 °C / -5.2 F).

HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.24 / 0.62 Watt
Ocioso	7.7 / 8.4 / 9.4 Watt
Carga	14.7 / 17.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Toshiba MQ01ABF050, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"	Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"	Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), HBG3e 32G eMMC, TN, 1366x768, 11.6"	Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6"	Asus Transformer Book Flip TP200SA-FV0108TS N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"
Power Consumption		12%	46%	10%	41%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	5 35%	2.8 64%	5.6 27%	2.6 66%
Idle Average *	8.4	7.8 7%	4.7 44%	7.7 8%	4.8 43%
Idle Maximum *	9.4	8.7 7%	4.9 48%	7.8 17%	5.1 46%
Load Average *	14.7	14.3 3%	9.9 33%	16 -9%	12.5 15%
Load Maximum *	17.3	16 8%	10.6 39%	16 8%	11.5 34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 35min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 30min

	HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV N3710, HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), 34.6 Wh	Toshiba Satellite Radius 11 L10W-C-108 N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), Wh	Acer Aspire R11 R3-131T-C122 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 50 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 30 Wh
Battery Runtime		-19%	147%	12%
Reader / Idle	448
WiFi v1.3	275	222 -19%	680 147%	308 12%
Load	150

Pro

+ Excelente teclado

+ Boa tela IPS

+ Sólida qualidade de construção

+ Trackpad e tela táctil responsivos

+ CPU Quad-Core

+ Operação silenciosa

Contra

- Afogamento da CPU e GPU sob uso intenso

- As temperaturas podem subir

- Manutenção difícil

- Duração média da bateria

- HD lento

- Desempenho geral lento

In review: HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O HP Pavilion x360 11t deixa sensações confusas. O quad-core Pentium N3710 atualizado é uma adição bem-vinda e traz um desempenho significantemente melhor quando comparado com a concorrência à custas de maior produção de calor. O teclado também é excelente e supera outros aparelhos econômicos. Sua resposta firme e alta responsividade fazem com que a digitação seja agradável. A tela é outro ponto alto, dado que o painel IPS cria uma experiência muito melhor que as telas TN tipicamente encontradas nesta faixa de preços. O chassi é sólido, e o portátil se sente muito bem construído e sólido.

No entanto, os problemas persistem em outras áreas. Enquanto o design sem ventoinha resulta em uma operação silenciosa, as temperaturas são difíceis de controlar. Embora mais poderosas que as da concorrência, tanto a CPU como a GPU se afogam sob uso intenso e, de fato, podem ficar atrás de seus rivais menos poderosos. Além disso, o disco rígido de velocidade realmente lenta de 400 RPM é um teste para a paciência; os aplicativos demoram muito ara ser inicializados, as multi tarefas podem se tronar uma tortura, e o computador como um todo se sente menos responsivo.

Tomando em conta o nível de preço mais alto de $540 USD, o HP Pavilion x360 11t é difícil de recomendar sobre o Lenovo Yoga 300-11IBR mais econômico. Este último oferece desempenho similar, um bom teclado, e uma unidade mais veloz, mas está equipado com uma tela TN de qualidade inferior. A HP frequentemente tem ofertas para seus portáteis (no momento desta análise o portátil estava sendo ofertado por $440 USD), o que poderia tornar o 11t mais atraente.

O HP Pavilion x360 11t tem dificuldade em se destacar entre seus similares. O aparelho se vê bem no papel, mas não consegue atender as expectativas. Como estão as coisas, o aparelho é apenas adequado e mais nada.

HP Pavilion x360 11t T5M27AV - 01/23/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sam Medley

Acabamento

68 / 98 → 70%

Teclado

64%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

29 / 80 → 37%

Peso

70 / 35-78 → 82%

Bateria