Breve Análise do Conversível HP Envy x360 15t-w200
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 204.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1009:1 (Preto: 0.203 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.31% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 BOE0679 , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Chi Mey CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -12% | -2% | 41% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 43.31 | 41.84 -3% | 38.04 -12% | 42.58 -2% | 62.8 45% |
| sRGB Coverage | 65 | 62.7 -4% | 57.1 -12% | 63.9 -2% | 88.2 36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.75 | 43.25 -3% | 39.3 -12% | 43.99 -2% | 63.9 43% |
| Response Times | 23% | 25% | 8% | 22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 30.8 ? 45% | 42 ? 25% | 43.2 ? 23% | 32.8 ? 41% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 22 ? 24% | 22 ? 24% | 30.8 ? -7% | 28 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 | 200 ? -1% | |||
| Screen | 6% | 1% | 5% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 204.9 | 225 10% | 266 30% | 254 24% | 298 45% |
| Brightness | 190 | 210 11% | 249 31% | 230 21% | 295 55% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 85 4% | 85 4% | 86 5% | 88 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.203 | 0.22 -8% | 0.26 -28% | 0.26 -28% | 0.57 -181% |
| Contrast | 1009 | 1023 1% | 1023 1% | 977 -3% | 523 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.13 12% | 4.98 -6% | 4.23 10% | 4.43 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.03 | 9.36 -4% | 11.82 -31% | 9.5 -5% | 6.62 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.86 | 2.53 34% | 2.68 31% | 2.87 26% | 2.45 37% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.6 85% | 2.27 97% | 2.35 94% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6834 95% | 6360 102% | 6583 99% | 5965 109% | 6326 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 39.8 -3% | 36 -12% | 40.35 -2% | 57.2 40% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 62.5 -2% | 57 -11% | 63.48 -1% | 87.8 37% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
7% | 5% /
1% | 4% /
4% | 22% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3236 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 7% | 8595% | 9131% | 8601% | |
| Read Seq | 104.3 | 106.9 2% | 458.6 340% | 487 367% | 475.6 356% |
| Write Seq | 104.2 | 106 2% | 270 159% | 450.7 333% | 425 308% |
| Read 512 | 31.86 | 33.01 4% | 397.4 1147% | 384.5 1107% | 258.4 711% |
| Write 512 | 48.09 | 51.2 6% | 242 403% | 356.3 641% | 318.9 563% |
| Read 4k | 0.352 | 0.373 6% | 19.88 5548% | 27.05 7585% | 35.48 9980% |
| Write 4k | 1.048 | 1.097 5% | 86.7 8173% | 63.7 5978% | 93 8774% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.801 | 1.029 28% | 275.3 34270% | 281.5 35044% | 281.2 35006% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.05 | 1.055 0% | 197.6 18719% | 232 21995% | 138.7 13110% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11671 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2286 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42360 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6639 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1340 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight | |
| 1280x720 Low / Off AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
| 1366x768 Normal / Off AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
| 1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| HP Envy 15-w103ng x360 | |
| Metro: Last Light | |
| 1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5568 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 63 | 46 | 46 | 13 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 43 | 34 | 21 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 27 | 23 | 11 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.8 / 33.9 / 34.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 36 / 44 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1 | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 3% | 9% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 30.2 | 28.9 4% | 31.2 -3% | 29 4% | 29.5 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.8 | 29.6 12% | 32.8 3% | 29 14% | 29.5 13% |
| Idle Average * | 33.9 | 29.6 13% | 32.8 3% | 29 14% | 29.5 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34.2 | 30.2 12% | 33.8 1% | 29 15% | 29.6 13% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 39 -8% | 36.3 -1% | 35.9 -0% | 38.1 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 39.9 9% | 36.3 17% | 41 7% | 38.2 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.2 °C / 73.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.9 °C / 8.8 F).
HP Envy x360 15t-w200 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 8.3 / 7.8 Watt |
| Carga |
28.8 / 49.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-24HWST1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK 6200U, Radeon R7 M460, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 9% | -6% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.3 14% | 4.34 13% | 4 20% | 6.5 -30% |
| Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.2 1% | 7.5 10% | 7.5 10% | 13.3 -60% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9 -15% | 8.4 -8% | 8.1 -4% | 15.1 -94% |
| Load Average * | 28.8 | 29.8 -3% | 30.4 -6% | 40.8 -42% | 30.8 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.7 | 36.4 27% | 32.5 35% | 57.3 -15% | 38.5 23% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy x360 15t-w200 i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK 6200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | -11% | 11% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 635 | 449 -29% | 730 15% | 705 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 320 | 401 25% | 299 -7% | 335 5% | 431 35% |
| Load | 89 | 93 4% | 100 12% | 113 27% |
Pro
Contra
Apto para todas as áreas, mestre em nenhuma. O HP Envy x360 15t-w200 parece estar preso no 2014; ele deseja tanto continuar com a bandeira de "conversível para todos os fins" que parece estar cego ao fato de que é uma máquina de 15,6-polegadas que pesa mais de 5 libras (2,26 kg) e é quase não consegue superar a marca de 5 horas navegando pela web. A sua tela táctil LCD refletiva e escura é tão invadida por reflexos que é muito desconfortável usa-la em qualquer ambiente brilhante - e para agravar ainda mais a situação, tocar a tela resulta em um salto notável graças ao desafortunado ajuste da dobradiça. Enquanto isso, o seu lento disco rígido mecânico de 5400 RPM não consegue se comparar com o ágil armazenamento SSD de muitos concorrentes com preços similares. E as atualizações pós-venda não são tão fáceis de fazer quanto parecem, dado que é necessária uma desmontagem significativa para acessar qualquer um dos componentes substituíveis (incluindo o disco rígido acima mencionado).
Apto para todas as áreas, mestre em nenhuma; o HP Envy x360 15t-w200 parece ter ficado preso no 2014.
No lado positivo, é uma máquina que consegue manter-se notavelmente fria sem se tornar muito barulhenta (graças em grande parte ao que parece ser uma limitação do TDP muito conservadora do firmware), e o design da carcaça é relativamente atraente e sólido, apesar da construção híbrida de metal e plástico. Também o desempenho da GPU parece estar livre de qualquer grau de estresse, mantendo velocidades estáveis, mesmo sob uso intenso. Apesar desta breve lista de qualidades positivas, no entanto, são opacadas pela enorme lista de qualidades negativas.
Os usuários interessados em um conversível realmente bom se sairiam muito melhor considerando um HP Spectre x360 de gama superior, ou talvez, depois de meditar um pouco, escolher sacrificar a funcionalidade multi-modo e optar por um portátil convencional, para o qual existe muitas mais opções. Depois de tudo, estamos no 2016: não está na hora de aceitar o fato de que realmente não precisamos de que o nosso portátil de 15 polegadas se dobre sobre si mesmo para se tornar um tablet?
HP Envy x360 15t-w200
- 12/16/2016 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
