Breve Análise do Conversível HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 (i7-8650U, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 416.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1436:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.13
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Chi Mei CMN14D7, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 66.8 4% | 64.3 0% | 65.9 2% | 64.7 1% | 67.1 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.1 | 97.1 3% | 94.6 1% | 95.2 1% | 93.1 -1% | 95.5 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 69 5% | 66.2 1% | 67.6 3% | 65.3 0% | 67.9 4% |
| Response Times | 1169% | 31% | 35% | 7% | 986% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 70.8 ? | 34.4 ? 51% | 40.8 ? 42% | 40.4 ? 43% | 58 ? 18% | 43 ? 39% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 30 ? 13% | 27.6 ? 20% | 25.6 ? 26% | 36 ? -5% | 25 ? 27% |
| PWM Frequency | 735 ? | 26040 ? 3443% | 22000 ? 2893% | |||
| Screen | -17% | -51% | -19% | -18% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 416.3 | 295.9 -29% | 316 -24% | 442.7 6% | 404 -3% | 484 16% |
| Brightness | 400 | 287 -28% | 291 -27% | 428 7% | 389 -3% | 473 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 85 -4% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.23 21% | 0.36 -24% | 0.31 -7% | 0.37 -28% | 0.33 -14% |
| Contrast | 1436 | 1287 -10% | 878 -39% | 1428 -1% | 1092 -24% | 1467 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.69 | 2.83 -5% | 5.9 -119% | 2.24 17% | 3.72 -38% | 4.29 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.95 | 7.34 -48% | 12.9 -161% | 7.19 -45% | 7.38 -49% | 6.46 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.13 | 1.3 39% | 1.11 48% | 2.06 3% | 1.34 37% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 5.2 -79% | 8.6 -197% | 9.7 -234% | 4.44 -53% | 4.3 -48% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 1.42 155% | 2.34 94% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6623 98% | 7056 92% | 6854 95% | 6227 104% | 7095 92% | 7315 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.1 | 63 5% | 60.7 1% | 61.6 2% | 60 0% | 62 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.5 | 97 3% | 94.5 0% | 95 1% | 93 -2% | 95 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 385% /
209% | -6% /
-31% | 6% /
-9% | -4% /
-12% | 327% /
170% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 70.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 34.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 36 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 735 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 735 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 735 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3308 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4558 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4078 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6 i5 256GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ256G | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -45% | -52% | -25% | -111% | -42% | |
| Seq Read | 1816 | 1585 -13% | 1850 2% | 2416 33% | 1169 -36% | 2035 12% |
| Seq Write | 1270 | 863 -32% | 661 -48% | 1170 -8% | 171 -87% | 658 -48% |
| 4K Read | 46.25 | 38.49 -17% | 38.04 -18% | 48.33 4% | 29.51 -36% | 39.74 -14% |
| 4K Write | 104.1 | 100.1 -4% | 95 -9% | 103.1 -1% | 83.7 -20% | 105.7 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1342 | 782 -42% | 434.3 -68% | 1039 -23% | 330 -75% | 461 -66% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1209 | 662 -45% | 266.3 -78% | 399.6 -67% | 130.5 -89% | 300.1 -75% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.105 -144% | 0.069 -60% | 0.058 -35% | 0.069 -60% | 0.061 -42% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.038 -9% | 0.056 -60% | 0.036 -3% | 0.276 -689% | 0.051 -46% |
| Score Read | 1569 | 979 -38% | 657 -58% | 1329 -15% | 476 -70% | 704 -55% |
| Score Write | 1440 | 848 -41% | 427 -70% | 620 -57% | 231 -84% | 471 -67% |
| Score Total | 3790 | 2299 -39% | 1373 -64% | 2575 -32% | 911 -76% | 1479 -61% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2034 | 534 -74% | 539 -74% | 739 -64% | 231.9 -89% | 893 -56% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 450.3 | 133.7 -70% | 209.7 -53% | 312.3 -31% | 218.1 -52% | 287.9 -36% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1024 | 394.2 -62% | 340 -67% | 486.3 -53% | 165.3 -84% | 618 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2131 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9217 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT HD Graphics 630, i7-7820HQ, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -1% | -5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.7 -5% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Load Average * | 32.6 | 33.3 -2% | 31.8 2% | 36.2 -11% | 33.5 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.6 | 35.3 4% | 32.7 11% | 45.2 -23% | 33.5 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.6 / 36.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.8 °C / 1.5 F).
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.7 / 6.5 / 11.5 Watt |
| Carga |
38.7 / 50.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -6% | -23% | -19% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 5.1 -89% | 3.3 -22% | 3.5 -30% | 4.8 -78% | 3.2 -19% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 7 -8% | 6.8 -5% | 8.9 -37% | 8.6 -32% | 8.7 -34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 11.7 -2% | 9.5 17% | 12.3 -7% | 10.4 10% | 10.4 10% |
| Load Average * | 38.7 | 41.2 -6% | 40.8 -5% | 54.2 -40% | 37.9 2% | 29.2 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.5 | 56.9 -13% | 57 -13% | 52.1 -3% | 48.5 4% | 40.8 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, 67 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -20% | -22% | -28% | -28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1673 | 1349 -19% | 1432 -14% | 1243 -26% | 1032 -38% | 1083 -35% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 623 | 665 7% | 550 -12% | 557 -11% | 498 -20% | 509 -18% |
| Load | 187 | 96 -49% | 124 -34% | 133 -29% | 141 -25% | 131 -30% |
Pro
Contra
O EliteBook x360 1040 G5 é tudo o que amamos no EliteBook x360 1030 G3, mas com uma tela mais espaçosa de 14 polegadas. Ele pode ser melhor descrito como um Spectre x360 13 em overdrive em termos de recursos e segurança. Você não encontrará outro conversível de 14 polegadas com um teclado melhor que também tenha Thunderbolt 3, 4G LTE, excelentes alto-falantes, uma tela muito brilhante de 700-nit, e bateria de longa duração. Está muito perto de ser um conversível Windows "definitivo” para os viajantes, se alguma vez houve um.
Há algumas desvantagens chave a ter em mente. Em primeiro lugar, a exclusiva tela táctil mate anti reflexo reduz o reflexo ao custo elevado da granulação aumentada. Alguns usuários podem não se incomodar com isso, mas aqueles que estão acostumados a telas nítidas com tempos de resposta rápidos acharão a tela táctil mate desagradável. Felizmente, existe uma opção padrão refletiva (BrightView).
Em segundo lugar, o desempenho da CPU está novamente abaixo da média devido ao Turbo Boost limitado. Espero que isso não se torne uma tendência com a série EliteBook x360 dado que descobrimos resultados similares no EliteBook x360 1030 G3. Simplesmente não parece certo quando o Core i7-8550U mais barato no Lenovo Yoga C930 consegue superar o supostamente mais rápido Core i7-8650U em nosso HP, em quase 20%.
Por último, o ruído do ventilador é mais agudo do que esperávamos de um Ultrabook. Suspeitamos que as pequenas ventoinhas de ~30 mm são as responsáveis, dado que o ruído do ventilador será naturalmente maior à medida que o diâmetro diminui. Isso não quer dizer que o portátil é barulhento, mas as ventoinhas são notórias quando começam a se movimentar.
Recomendamos que o EliteBook x360 1040 G5 não apenas para usuários empresariais que viajam, mas também para consumidores em geral que possam estar considerando um Ultrabook. Até mesmo o SKU menos caro pode oferecer tanto quanto qualquer Ultrabook conversível. Poupe algumas centenas de dólares evitando os SKUs Core i7 e indo para os SKUs Core i5. O sistema não consegue aproveitar todo o potencial da série Core i7 devido ao seu Turbo Boost limitado.
Este é o conversível de 14 polegadas a competir. Seus poucos inconvenientes não prejudicam a longa lista de recursos e opções de hardware não encontrados na maioria dos outros subportáteis, incluindo o 4G LTE e uma tela táctil de 700 nits. Se o desempenho da GPU é uma preocupação, no entanto, o Acer Swift 7 ou Surface Book 2 poderiam ser melhores alternativas.
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
- 10/22/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
