Breve Análise do Conversível HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 (i7-8650U, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 467.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1168:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.33
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Chuwi LapBook SE 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1834 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA AU Optronics AUO101A, IPS, 13", 3000x2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -3% | -5% | -2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 64.3 -4% | 65 -3% | 65.5 -2% | 65.9 -1% | 67.5 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 94.6 -4% | 94.8 -4% | 90.4 -8% | 95.2 -3% | 96.7 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.7 | 66.2 -4% | 66.5 -3% | 65.6 -5% | 67.6 -2% | 68.2 -1% |
| Response Times | -2% | -33% | -6% | 2% | -8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 40.8 ? -3% | 39.2 ? 1% | 42 ? -6% | 40.4 ? -2% | 47 ? -19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 27.6 ? -1% | 27.7 ? -2% | 25 ? 8% | 25.6 ? 6% | 26 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 200 ? -99% | 20800 ? -20% | |||
| Screen | -46% | -69% | -14% | -13% | -18% | |
| Brightness middle | 467.2 | 316 -32% | 227 -51% | 463 -1% | 442.7 -5% | 452 -3% |
| Brightness | 445 | 291 -35% | 210 -53% | 450 1% | 428 -4% | 412 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 83 -9% | 89 -2% | 83 -9% | 84 -8% | 85 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.36 10% | 0.44 -10% | 0.32 20% | 0.31 22% | 0.48 -20% |
| Contrast | 1168 | 878 -25% | 516 -56% | 1447 24% | 1428 22% | 942 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.41 | 5.9 -145% | 6.6 -174% | 3.76 -56% | 2.24 7% | 4.05 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.58 | 12.9 -131% | 12.2 -119% | 7.35 -32% | 7.19 -29% | 6.64 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.33 | 1.3 2% | 1.9 -43% | 2.68 -102% | 1.11 17% | 1.56 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 8.6 -132% | 7.9 -114% | 3.18 14% | 9.7 -162% | 4.87 -32% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.1 105% | 2.16 102% | 2.53 87% | 1.42 155% | 2.71 81% |
| CCT | 7158 91% | 6854 95% | 8879 73% | 6994 93% | 6227 104% | 7160 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.5 | 60.7 -3% | 59 -6% | 61.6 -1% | 62 -1% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.6 | 94.5 -5% | 90 -10% | 95 -5% | 97 -3% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-33% | -35% /
-49% | -8% /
-11% | -4% /
-9% | -9% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 62 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 62 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4103 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3901 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Chuwi LapBook SE SanDisk DF4032 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -50% | -518% | -261% | -23% | -73% | |
| Seq Read | 1798 | 1850 3% | 264.1 -85% | 1114 -38% | 2416 34% | 488.2 -73% |
| Seq Write | 1374 | 661 -52% | 131.8 -90% | 340 -75% | 1170 -15% | 403.2 -71% |
| 4K Read | 46.05 | 38.04 -17% | 6.3 -86% | 40.46 -12% | 48.33 5% | 31.07 -33% |
| 4K Write | 104.3 | 95 -9% | 13.6 -87% | 80.6 -23% | 103.1 -1% | 70.8 -32% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1408 | 434.3 -69% | 25.65 -98% | 277.9 -80% | 1039 -26% | 255.1 -82% |
| 4K-64 Write | 790 | 266.3 -66% | 9.11 -99% | 129.3 -84% | 399.6 -49% | 156.5 -80% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.041 | 0.069 -68% | 0.671 -1537% | 0.913 -2127% | 0.058 -41% | 0.093 -127% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.056 -56% | 1.233 -3325% | 0.301 -736% | 0.036 -0% | 0.048 -33% |
| Score Read | 1634 | 657 -60% | 58 -96% | 430 -74% | 1329 -19% | 335 -79% |
| Score Write | 1032 | 427 -59% | 36 -97% | 244 -76% | 620 -40% | 268 -74% |
| Score Total | 3484 | 1373 -61% | 120 -97% | 870 -75% | 2575 -26% | 781 -78% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1947 | 539 -72% | 128.1 -93% | 739 -62% | 208.1 -89% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 453.9 | 209.7 -54% | 94 -79% | 312.3 -31% | 74.3 -84% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 990 | 340 -66% | 124.4 -87% | 486.3 -51% | 164.5 -83% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1814 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 70.9 | 32.9 | 28.5 | 8.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.8 / 32.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -1% | -11% | -14% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.5 -0% | 30.13 -6% | 28.7 -1% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.5 -0% | 30.13 -6% | 28.7 -1% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.5 -0% | 30.13 -6% | 34.2 -20% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 29.7 -4% | 28.5 -0% | 30.13 -6% | 35.8 -26% | 30.3 -6% |
| Load Average * | 30.8 | 31.8 -3% | 31.3 -2% | 38.8 -26% | 35.8 -16% | 33.5 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.8 | 32.7 -0% | 33.5 -2% | 38.8 -18% | 39.6 -21% | 33.5 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.36 / 0.56 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 7.6 / 11.5 Watt |
| Carga |
35.4 / 51.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 38% | 8% | -3% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.3 3% | 2.7 21% | 3.2 6% | 4.9 -44% | 3.8 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 7.6 | 6.8 11% | 6.3 17% | 8.7 -14% | 8.9 -17% | 7.5 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 9.5 17% | 7.6 34% | 10.4 10% | 11 4% | 8.6 25% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 40.8 -15% | 12.6 64% | 29.2 18% | 32 10% | 33.1 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 57 -10% | 24.6 53% | 40.8 21% | 36 31% | 31.8 39% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -25% | -5% | -14% | 2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 589 | 550 -7% | 444 -25% | 557 -5% | 509 -14% | 602 2% |
| Reader / Idle | 1432 | 1243 | 1083 | 1381 | ||
| Load | 124 | 347 | 133 | 131 | 189 |
Pro
Contra
Em nossa análise original do Core i5 EliteBook x360 1030 G3, dissemos que era o melhor conversível empresarial de 13 polegadas com mais recursos e uma tela mais brilhante do que o seu típico Ultrabook carro chefe. Isso ainda é verdade para a configuração Core i7, mas com uma desvantagem importante: ela não é muito mais rápida do que a opção menos cara, Core i5-8250U. De fato, nossos resultados mostram que a CPU i7 é consistentemente mais lenta que a CPU i5 devido ao afogamento mais acentuado no Core i7. Em contraste, o Core i7 Yoga C930 é mais rápido que o Core i5 Yoga C930 especialmente quando estamos sujeitos a um alto estresse de processamento, ficamos decepcionados ao ver o oposto em um dos melhores subportáteis da HP.
O EliteBook x360 1030 G3 ainda é altamente recomendável, pois suas qualidades superam em muito seus poucos pontos negativos. Com isso dito, sugerimos ignorar o SKU Core i7-8650U e usar os fundos extras para opções mais utilitárias, como o Sure View, a luz de fundo "Outdoor Mode" de 700 nits, 4G LTE e até mesmo um Dock Thunderbolt G2 ou monitor externos.
O SKU Core i7 é pelo menos $200 ou $ 300 a mais que o SKU Core i5 e seus benefícios de desempenho - ou a falta dele - não justificam o preço premium. O SKU Core i5 continua a ser o melhor que o EliteBook x360 1030 G3 tem a oferecer.
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
- 11/06/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
