Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 (i5-8250U, FHD)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 470.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1237:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.52
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB B133ZAN02.3, IPS LED, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 APPA03E, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 27% | 0% | -28% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 66.8 1% | 98.5 49% | 67.5 2% | 47.32 -28% | 65.5 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 97.7 0% | 99.9 2% | 94.5 -3% | 71.1 -27% | 88.8 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.8 | 68.3 1% | 87.3 29% | 68.7 1% | 48.83 -28% | 64.9 -4% |
| Response Times | -30% | 104% | -41% | -49% | -24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 54 ? -38% | 46 ? -17% | 43 ? -10% | 48 ? -22% | 55.2 ? -41% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 31.2 ? -22% | 32 ? -25% | 29 ? -13% | 32.8 ? -28% | 27.2 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 118000 ? 353% | 217 ? -99% | 1042 ? -96% | ||
| Screen | -14% | 23% | -5% | -45% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle | 470.1 | 310 -34% | 519 10% | 344 -27% | 322.6 -31% | 262 -44% |
| Brightness | 443 | 299 -33% | 504 14% | 320 -28% | 306 -31% | 256 -42% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 95 8% | 77 -12% | 91 3% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.2 47% | 0.33 13% | 0.31 18% | 0.19 50% | 0.25 34% |
| Contrast | 1237 | 1550 25% | 1573 27% | 1110 -10% | 1698 37% | 1048 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 4.2 -70% | 1.4 43% | 2.72 -10% | 7.7 -212% | 5.13 -108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.73 | 8 -40% | 2.8 51% | 5.92 -3% | 11.1 -94% | 9.46 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.52 | 1.4 8% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 6.2 -68% | 2.2 41% | 2.74 26% | 7.9 -114% | 6.23 -68% |
| Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.22 99% | 2.38 92% | 2.88 76% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 7373 88% | 6983 93% | 6908 94% | 6794 96% | 7044 92% | 6413 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62.8 1% | 77.3 25% | 61 -2% | 44.1 -29% | 57.84 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.2 | 97.6 -1% | 99.99 2% | 94 -4% | 69.9 -29% | 88.57 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-14% | 51% /
39% | -15% /
-11% | -41% /
-42% | -21% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 62 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 62 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3358 - 4081, n=67) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3453 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4336 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3695 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 28% | 189% | 125% | -11% | 224% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 164.5 | 275.8 68% | 486.3 196% | 726 341% | 178.5 9% | 598 264% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 74.3 | 163.9 121% | 312.3 320% | 263.8 255% | 110.6 49% | 400.6 439% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 208.1 | 442.4 113% | 739 255% | 950 357% | 255.9 23% | 1272 511% |
| Score Total | 781 | 885 13% | 2575 230% | 1495 91% | 736 -6% | 2811 260% |
| Score Write | 268 | 419 56% | 620 131% | 375 40% | 194 -28% | 837 212% |
| Score Read | 335 | 306 -9% | 1329 297% | 752 124% | 362 8% | 1317 293% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.048 | 0.057 -19% | 0.036 25% | 0.037 23% | 0.075 -56% | 0.031 35% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.093 | 0.099 -6% | 0.058 38% | 0.045 52% | 0.143 -54% | 0.04 57% |
| 4K-64 Write | 156.5 | 308.8 97% | 399.6 155% | 204.7 31% | 120.9 -23% | 640 309% |
| 4K-64 Read | 255.1 | 235.7 -8% | 1039 307% | 586 130% | 286.2 12% | 1130 343% |
| 4K Write | 70.8 | 73.8 4% | 103.1 46% | 96.9 37% | 52.6 -26% | 113 60% |
| 4K Read | 31.07 | 24.41 -21% | 48.33 56% | 37.69 21% | 27.37 -12% | 50.4 62% |
| Seq Write | 403.2 | 364.5 -10% | 1170 190% | 735 82% | 201.9 -50% | 840 108% |
| Seq Read | 488.2 | 455.5 -7% | 2416 395% | 1283 163% | 486.9 0% | 1369 180% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1902 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8008 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 68.6 | 34.9 | 29.5 | 9.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.2 | 10.7 | 6.5 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.7 | 13.2 | 6.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB |
| HDD |
| 29.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.3 / 33.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Lenovo ThinkPad 25 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo Yoga 730-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -5% | -11% | -11% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 29 -2% | 27.9 2% | 29.7 -4% | 30.13 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 29 -2% | 27.9 2% | 29.7 -4% | 30.13 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 29 -2% | 27.9 2% | 29.7 -4% | 30.13 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 29 -2% | 30 -5% | 30.7 -8% | 30.13 -6% |
| Load Average * | 31.3 | 33.6 -7% | 37.6 -20% | 39.3 -26% | 38.8 -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.5 | 35.8 -7% | 37.6 -12% | 39.3 -17% | 38.8 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.41 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 7.5 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
33.1 / 31.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad 25 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -36% | 32% | 9% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 2.4 37% | 3.5 8% | 3.1 18% | 3.2 16% | 4.2 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 7.5 | 5.5 27% | 8.9 -19% | 4.3 43% | 5.5 27% | 7.3 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 6 30% | 12.3 -43% | 4.9 43% | 6.5 24% | 7.7 10% |
| Load Average * | 33.1 | 31 6% | 54.2 -64% | 24.3 27% | 29.7 10% | 55.4 -67% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.8 | 32.6 -3% | 52.1 -64% | 22.8 28% | 41.3 -30% | 64.4 -103% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | 49.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | -16% | -8% | 11% | -3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1381 | 1167 -15% | 1243 -10% | 971 -30% | 1387 0% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 602 | 506 -16% | 557 -7% | 686 14% | 630 5% | 581 -3% |
| Load | 189 | 123 -35% | 133 -30% | 175 -7% | 244 29% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 94 |
Pro
Contra
O EliteBook x360 1030 G3 aborda diretamente nossa maior reclamação sobre o 1030 G2: a tela escura. Nossa unidade 1030 G3 é cerca de 75% mais brilhante do que a 1030 G2 e isso nem inclui a opção de 700 nit. Combine isso com o formato menor e marcos mais estreitos e o melhor conversível corporativo de 13 polegadas fica ainda melhor em quase todos os sentidos.
"Quase" é a palavra-chave aqui, porque esta última revisão deixou de lado alguns recursos. Os leitores de MicroSD e Smart Card parecem ter ido embora de vez e é improvável que vejamos as teclas dedicadas do mouse ou do TrackPoint retornar tão cedo. A sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost da CPU poderia ser melhor e o desempenho gráfico é fraco. Caso contrário, todo o resto do 1030 G2 está intacto. É incrível como a HP colocou as opções 4G LTE, NFC, ótimos alto-falantes, Thunderbolt 3 e tela táctil 4K UHD em um conversível de 13 polegadas portátil e relativamente silencioso. É uma pena que o preço inicial de $1.900 USD seja um obstáculo tão alto para a maioria, porque não podemos recomendá-lo o suficiente tanto para os usuários de escritório quanto para os estudantes que estão indo de um lugar para outro.
É uma pena que a HP não ofereça mais opções de Ryzen já que o Vega 8 ou Vega 10 teria impulsionado o desempenho gráfico de forma significativa sobre o UHD Graphics 620 para tarefas de edição leve. Esperamos ver as opções AMD ou Intel Bean Canyon Iris Plus em modelos futuros para expandir ainda mais a versatilidade da série.
É quase o dobro do preço de um Ultrabook sem diferenças no desempenho da CPU ou RAM. Todos esses dólares extras pagam pela longa lista de recursos auxiliares, incluindo NFC, 4G LTE, Thunderbolt 3, quatro alto-falantes, design conversível, bateria de longa duração e uma tela táctil mais brilhante do que todos os outros Ultrabooks no mercado. Este é um sistema cheio de recursos de cima para baixo que não deve ser menosprezado.
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
-
10/17/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
