Breve Análise do Conversível HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 (i7-7600U, FHD Sure View)
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 677.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 880:1 (Preto: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 ID: IVO04E8, Name: M125NVF6 R0, IPS, 12.5", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, IPS, 12.5", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, IGZO IPS, 13.3", 3200x1800 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Dell Latitude 5280 TN LED, 12.5", 1366x768 | Razer Blade Stealth UHD i7-6500U IPS IGZO, 12.5", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -27% | 4% | 11% | -35% | 35% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.1 | 44.45 -27% | 63.9 5% | 67.6 11% | 39.34 -36% | 83.7 37% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.5 | 65.2 -27% | 91.7 2% | 99 11% | 59.2 -34% | 99.2 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.2 | 45.96 -26% | 65.7 6% | 69.1 11% | 40.67 -35% | 97.2 56% |
| Response Times | 11% | 370% | 389% | -3% | -60% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.4 ? | 32 ? 7% | 29 ? 16% | 42 ? -22% | 42 ? -22% | 63.2 ? -84% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 24 ? 14% | 30 ? -7% | 29 ? -4% | 23.2 ? 17% | 38 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 1623 ? | 19500 ? 1101% | 21000 1194% | |||
| Screen | -32% | -33% | 2% | -138% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 677.4 | 289 -57% | 361 -47% | 417 -38% | 251.8 -63% | 415 -39% |
| Brightness | 673 | 298 -56% | 303 -55% | 401 -40% | 246 -63% | 399 -41% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 72 -15% | 88 4% | 90 6% | 93 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.77 | 0.27 65% | 0.33 57% | 0.29 62% | 0.75 3% | 0.309 60% |
| Contrast | 880 | 1070 22% | 1094 24% | 1438 63% | 336 -62% | 1343 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.24 | 4.82 -115% | 5.26 -135% | 3.63 -62% | 11.3 -404% | 3.78 -69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.09 | 10.73 -51% | 7.79 -10% | 6.74 5% | 23.1 -226% | 7.2 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.84 -75% | 5.69 -159% | 2.18 1% | 13.2 -500% | 3.38 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.41 91% | 1.63 135% | 3.09 71% | 2.05 107% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6821 95% | 6492 100% | 6499 100% | 6767 96% | 14912 44% | 7329 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 42.03 -26% | 59 4% | 63 11% | 37.6 -34% | 85.1 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.6 | 64.8 -28% | 92 3% | 99 10% | 59.2 -34% | 99.3 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-25% | 114% /
49% | 134% /
76% | -59% /
-99% | -9% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1623 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1623 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1623 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3684 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4931 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4880 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3683 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -24% | -31% | -239% | -36% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 905 | 582 -36% | 582 -36% | 390 -57% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 323.7 | 295 -9% | 386 19% | 188 -42% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1435 | 754 -47% | 1036 -28% | 283.3 -80% | |
| Score Total | 3738 | 2195 -41% | 1202 -68% | 1774 -53% | 1607 -57% |
| Score Write | 1122 | 491 -56% | 474 -58% | 52 -95% | 327 -71% |
| Score Read | 1757 | 1147 -35% | 472 -73% | 1164 -34% | 870 -50% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.26 | 0.297 -14% | 0.035 87% | 7.6 -2823% | 0.035 87% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.39 | 0.049 87% | 0.05 87% | 0.04 90% | 0.055 86% |
| 4K-64 Write | 878 | 304 -65% | 330.8 -62% | 34 -96% | 197.7 -77% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1506 | 938 -38% | 378 -75% | 1015 -33% | 723 -52% |
| 4K Write | 141.1 | 80.9 -43% | 95.8 -32% | 0.2 -100% | 92 -35% |
| 4K Read | 54.4 | 35.58 -35% | 43 -21% | 41 -25% | 29.52 -46% |
| Seq Write | 1032 | 1061 3% | 472.8 -54% | 171 -83% | 372.8 -64% |
| Seq Read | 1964 | 1731 -12% | 512 -74% | 1070 -46% | 1179 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1842 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 70030 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7131 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 980 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 446 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 58.7 | 31.9 | 25.9 | 8.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.2 / 34.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -3% | -7% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 29.6 -5% | 30.4 -7% | 29.5 -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 30 -6% | 29.6 -5% | 30.4 -7% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 30.5 -8% | 29.6 -5% | 30.4 -7% | 29.5 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 31.1 -6% | 29.6 -1% | 30.4 -4% | 29.5 -1% |
| Load Average * | 32.2 | 35.9 -11% | 33.4 -4% | 38.3 -19% | 30.6 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 39.5 -14% | 34.1 1% | 33.6 3% | 32.5 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.3 °C / 4.1 F).
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.7 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 7.5 / 11.1 Watt |
| Carga |
37.6 / 37.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Dell Latitude 5280 N014L528012QG45 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HMJP, , 1366x768, 12.5" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 24% | -15% | -3% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 4.3 -26% | 2 41% | 4.2 -24% | 3.6 -6% | 5.6 -65% |
| Idle Average * | 7.5 | 6 20% | 5.9 21% | 10.1 -35% | 7.9 -5% | 7.5 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.1 | 6.4 42% | 8.5 23% | 14 -26% | 8.5 23% | 8.4 24% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 22.7 40% | 30.4 19% | 37.4 1% | 43 -14% | 33.7 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 31.2 17% | 31.1 17% | 34 10% | 43 -14% | 34.6 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 | 31 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 5Y51, HD Graphics 5300, 36 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Dell Latitude 5280 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | -4% | 35% | -13% | 18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 769 | 660 -14% | 1092 42% | 526 -32% | 1112 45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 448 | 412 -8% | 489 9% | 689 54% | 355 -21% | 470 5% |
| Load | 134 | 164 22% | 112 -16% | 146 9% | 152 13% | 138 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 115 |
Pro
Contra
Há muito do que gostar no EliteBook x360 1020 G2. As maiores falhas são talvez a sua forte filosofia de design conversível inspirado no Spectre, tela super brilhante que é mais brilhante do que qualquer portátil de consumidor disponível e um modo de tablet que seja realmente leve e não pesado quando está em movimento. A qualidade de áudio forte e equilibrada e a resposta do teclado satisfatório são vantagens muito surpreendentes que provam que tais características não precisam ser prejudicadas por design menores. Apreciamos que a HP não tenha ignorado os recursos de segurança, apesar do foco em um perfil mais fino e elegante. Combine isso com opções de tela Sure View de 4K UHD e FHD 120 Hz e o 1020 G2 torna-se facilmente um conversível de negócios único.
Por mais único que possa ser na categoria de subportáteis empresariais conversíveis, o 1020 G2 está longe de ser perfeito. Há uma lista de recursos omitidos e outras estranhezas, conforme mostrado na nossa lista de Pros e Contras, que os potenciais compradores devem ter em mente. A sua seleção de portas continua a ser muito limitada e é difícil ignorar para um portátil de classe empresarial.
Em um nível mais profundo, a tela exibe algumas desvantagens notáveis, apesar da sua fachada muito brilhante. Por um lado, o grau de bleeding da luz de fundo é muito alto para um sistema carro-chefe nesta faixa de preços, dado que é algo que esperaríamos de em um portátil de consumo de orçamento. Em segundo lugar, o PWM está presente em quase todos os níveis de brilho para potencialmente afastar os usuários que são sensíveis à cintilação na tela. A luz de fundo muito brilhante realmente exacerba esse problema, pois a tela estaria cintilante em intensidades mais brilhantes do que a maioria dos outros portáteis. Por fim, a tela é um pouco granulada para um painel refletivo e o brilho aparente cai bruscamente se não estiver sentado diretamente na frente da tela. Em comparação, as telas do Surface Pro e do Miix 520 parecem mais nítidas e sem problemas de uniformidade de brilho independentemente da orientação. Não temos certeza se isso é devido à camada Sure View ou se os SKUs sem Sure View também sofrem com essas mesmas anomalias, e é algo que investigaremos ainda mais através de SKUs adicionais.
Nossa lista de desejos para o EliteBook x360 1020 G2 sucessor é curta, mas justificável. USB Type-A, MicroSD, 4G LTE, 4K UHD 120 Hz, tela táctil mate e Kaby Lake-R ou Iris Pro impulsionariam a série acima e além do Surface Pro, MacBook 12, XPS 13 9365, e Latitude 7280. Abordar o PWM e avançando para os ventiladores de diâmetro maior afetariam menos usuários que talvez fossem mais sensíveis ao cintilamento e ao ruído agudo do ventilador. Até então, este é o melhor subportátil conversível Windows disponível em termos de visibilidade em exteriores, tactilidade, qualidade de som e segurança.
O EliteBook x360 1020 G2 possui recursos de tela não encontrados em nenhum outro portátil empresarial, incluindo a opção para um painel brilhante de 120 Hz 700 nit. Existem algumas características estranhas em relação ao brilho em certos ângulos de visão e uma tela refletiva ligeiramente granulada. No entanto, os usuários que estão acostumados a transportar dongles e adaptadores e podem explorar o modo tablet e a tela muito brilhante não serão decepcionados por esta máquina empresarial reconhecidamente atraente.
HP EliteBook x360 1020 G2
- 12/21/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
