Breve Análise do Conversível HP Elite x2 1012 G2 (i5-7200U, 256 GB, 8 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 440 cd/m²
Contraste: 1080:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, , 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -5% | -12% | 1% | -22% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 67.6 1% | 62.8 -6% | 58.8 -12% | 68.7 3% | 53.8 -19% | |
sRGB Coverage | 98 | 99 1% | 94 -4% | 87.5 -11% | 96.8 -1% | 73.7 -25% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.7 | 69.1 1% | 64.7 -6% | 60.6 -12% | 70.4 2% | 53.8 -22% | |
Response Times | 288% | 29% | -42% | -1% | -64% | 11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 42 ? 8% | 3.6 ? 92% | 42.4 ? 7% | 37 ? 19% | 67 ? -47% | 33.2 ? 27% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.6 ? | 29 ? -34% | 3.2 ? 85% | 30.8 ? -43% | 26 ? -20% | 39 ? -81% | 22.8 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | 2119 ? | 21000 891% | 240.4 ? -89% | 210.1 ? -90% | |||
Screen | -3% | -37% | -20% | -49% | -34% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 443 | 417 -6% | 243 -45% | 523.2 18% | 369 -17% | 442 0% | 322 -27% |
Brightness | 446 | 401 -10% | 240 -46% | 522 17% | 331 -26% | 410 -8% | 319 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 95 8% | 88 0% | 75 -15% | 86 -2% | 97 10% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.29 29% | 0.42 -2% | 0.46 -12% | 0.22 46% | 0.42 -2% | |
Contrast | 1080 | 1438 33% | 1246 15% | 802 -26% | 2009 86% | 767 -29% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.63 -40% | 5.3 -104% | 4 -54% | 5.52 -112% | 5.22 -101% | 6.02 -132% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4 | 6.74 -69% | 8.9 -123% | 8.6 -115% | 9.29 -132% | 11.84 -196% | 10.06 -152% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.18 27% | 3.7 -23% | 5.5 -83% | 6.95 -132% | 7.88 -163% | 6.29 -110% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 3.09 71% | 1.78 124% | 2.16 102% | 2.58 85% | 2.51 88% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6780 96% | 6767 96% | 6202 105% | 7546 86% | 7009 93% | 6756 96% | 7712 84% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.6 | 63 1% | 84.8 35% | 64.86 4% | 56 -11% | 64 2% | 47.8 -24% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 99 1% | 100 2% | 93.97 -4% | 88 -10% | 97 -1% | 73.2 -25% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 95% /
52% | -4% /
-19% | -22% /
-22% | -21% /
-35% | -32% /
-31% | -21% /
-38% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2119 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2119 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
Productivity | |
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3289 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4412 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4036 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3146 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -34% | 21% | -30% | -28% | -57% | -56% | |
Read Seq | 1875 | 723 -61% | 2004 7% | 1294 -31% | 1066 -43% | 469 -75% | 501 -73% |
Write Seq | 1261 | 853 -32% | 1693 34% | 865 -31% | 593 -53% | 277.3 -78% | 297.2 -76% |
Read 512 | 1235 | 225 -82% | 1040 -16% | 406 -67% | 653 -47% | 404.4 -67% | 351.7 -72% |
Write 512 | 844 | 445 -47% | 1292 53% | 589 -30% | 535 -37% | 266.6 -68% | 295.7 -65% |
Read 4k | 56.9 | 46 -19% | 58.2 2% | 31.75 -44% | 35.92 -37% | 25.24 -56% | 28.31 -50% |
Write 4k | 145.4 | 125 -14% | 182.2 25% | 72.2 -50% | 128.3 -12% | 89.4 -39% | 90.3 -38% |
Read 4k QD32 | 398.3 | 423 6% | 632 59% | 493.3 24% | 460.6 16% | 322.5 -19% | 285 -28% |
Write 4k QD32 | 472.5 | 373 -21% | 507 7% | 434.5 -8% | 425.4 -10% | 208.1 -56% | 268.4 -43% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1646 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 53450 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5919 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 855 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 395 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 349 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52.9 | 30.5 | 25.2 | 7.5 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 40.6 | 27.2 | 18.3 | 6.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.1 | 11.9 | 6.8 | 4.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB |
Carga |
| 30.6 / 32.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | 2% | -2% | ||||
off / environment * | 29.5 | 29.3 1% | 28.2 4% | 30.4 -3% | |||
Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 29.3 1% | 28.2 4% | 30.5 -3% | |||
Idle Average * | 29.5 | 31.1 -5% | 28.2 4% | 30.5 -3% | |||
Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 33.3 -13% | 28.2 4% | 30.5 -3% | |||
Load Average * | 30.6 | 33.3 -9% | 30.4 1% | 31.2 -2% | |||
Load Maximum * | 32.5 | 38.9 -20% | 34 -5% | 31.3 4% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | 2% | -3% | -9% | 22% | -1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.3 | 39.2 7% | 47.5 -12% | 38.2 10% | 44.7 -6% | 35.7 16% | 39 8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.5 | 40.3 9% | 44.8 -1% | 48.6 -9% | 47.5 -7% | 24.2 46% | 41.2 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.5 | 37 -25% | 23.7 20% | 29.6 -0% | 29.7 -1% | 23.4 21% | 29.5 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.2 | 32.3 -28% | 24.6 2% | 28.8 -14% | 30.7 -22% | 24.2 4% | 29.8 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.9 °C / 96.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-7.8 °C / -14 F).
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.47 / 0.58 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.1 / 9.2 / 11.1 Watt |
Carga |
33.8 / 49.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | -4% | 24% | 23% | 37% | 26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.6 12% | 4.9 -20% | 2.85 30% | 3.86 6% | 3.4 17% | 3.7 10% |
Idle Average * | 9.2 | 8.1 12% | 7.6 17% | 6.76 27% | 6.4 30% | 5.8 37% | 6.8 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.1 | 8.7 22% | 13.8 -24% | 6.91 38% | 7.17 35% | 6.7 40% | 7.6 32% |
Load Average * | 33.8 | 25.5 25% | 33.4 1% | 32.88 3% | 30.5 10% | 21.4 37% | 22.5 33% |
Load Maximum * | 49.2 | 23.5 52% | 46.5 5% | 37.41 24% | 32.4 34% | 21.6 56% | 34.5 30% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 49% | -4% | 11% | -17% | 40% | 4% | |
Reader / Idle | 833 | 1054 27% | 784 -6% | 1075 29% | 711 -15% | 1001 20% | 732 -12% |
H.264 | 377 | 408 8% | 432 15% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 378 | 744 97% | 368 -3% | 486 29% | 355 -6% | 719 90% | 443 17% |
Load | 138 | 168 22% | 120 -13% | 105 -24% | 95 -31% | 150 9% | 130 -6% |
Pro
Contra
O Elite x2 1012 G2 da HP é um conversível elegante que se situa principalmente no setor empresarial e segue ao HP's Elite x2 1012 G1. O familiar design básico e elegante parece atraente e a boa escolha de materiais transmite uma sensação de alta qualidade ao usuário ao segurar o dispositivo. O Elite x2 1012 G2 da HP custa 1720 Euros (~$2017) em nossa configuração de teste. O comprador recebe um veloz processador Intel Core i5-7200U que consegue lidar com os requisitos do trabalho diário em um escritório. Os 8 GB de RAM e o SSD de 256 GB garantem um sistema veloz.
O Elite x2 1012 G2 da HP convence com uma construção imaculada e uma tela muito boa. Acessórios úteis, como a base do teclado e Active Pen, estendem suas possíveis aplicações e incentivam a criatividade.
Além da construção imaculada, gostamos do painel de alta resolução e dos acessórios na forma da base do teclado e Active Pen. O desempenho do sistema também está em um bom nível, embora a unidade de resfriamento encontre rapidamente seus limites durante a carga permanente. Portanto, os compradores devem considerar se é realmente sensato optar pelo modelo Core i7 antes de comprá-lo. A HP conseguiu aumentar o desempenho de forma clara em todos os aspectos, em comparação com o antecessor.
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
- 09/22/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade