Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Fujitsu Lifebook P727 (i7, 16 GB, LTE)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 303 cd/m²
Contraste: 659:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 5.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 LP125WF4-SPH1, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Sharp LQ133M1JX15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 Sharp SHP141B , , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -6% | -35% | 1% | -38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 67.9 1% | 65.5 -3% | 42.79 -36% | 68.7 2% | 41.08 -39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 97.3 0% | 88.8 -9% | 64.3 -34% | 96.8 -1% | 61.6 -37% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.1 | 69.9 1% | 64.9 -6% | 44.21 -36% | 70.4 2% | 42.48 -39% |
| Response Times | -11% | -15% | -7% | -51% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 42 ? 5% | 55.2 ? -25% | 42 ? 5% | 67 ? -52% | 46 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 32.8 ? -26% | 27.2 ? -5% | 31 ? -19% | 39 ? -50% | 32 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 217.4 ? | 531 ? | 212 ? | |||
| Screen | 7% | -2% | 11% | 20% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 303 | 374 23% | 262 -14% | 336 11% | 442 46% | 236 -22% |
| Brightness | 272 | 356 31% | 256 -6% | 320 18% | 410 51% | 219 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 87 10% | 83 5% | 90 14% | 86 9% | 87 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.33 28% | 0.25 46% | 0.34 26% | 0.22 52% | 0.18 61% |
| Contrast | 659 | 1133 72% | 1048 59% | 988 50% | 2009 205% | 1311 99% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 4.7 -19% | 5.13 -30% | 3.45 12% | 5.22 -32% | 4.25 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.57 | 9.5 -45% | 9.46 -44% | 7.95 -21% | 11.84 -80% | 7.4 -13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.14 | 6.5 -26% | 6.23 -21% | 1.68 67% | 7.88 -53% | 2.5 51% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.19 100% | 2.45 90% | 2.49 88% | 2.51 88% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6521 100% | 7086 92% | 6413 101% | 6782 96% | 6756 96% | 7082 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 63.1 0% | 57.84 -8% | 41 -35% | 64 2% | 39 -38% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 97.2 -1% | 88.57 -10% | 64 -35% | 97 -1% | 62 -37% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
4% | -8% /
-5% | -10% /
-1% | -10% /
7% | -15% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3714 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4932 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 42% | -15% | -32% | -17% | -1% | |
| Read Seq | 513 | 1070 109% | 467.1 -9% | 423.7 -17% | 469 -9% | 549 7% |
| Write Seq | 467.7 | 484.5 4% | 443.6 -5% | 406.4 -13% | 277.3 -41% | 526 12% |
| Read 512 | 379.8 | 680 79% | 312.3 -18% | 260.8 -31% | 404.4 6% | |
| Write 512 | 399.1 | 483.1 21% | 372.5 -7% | 255.6 -36% | 266.6 -33% | |
| Read 4k | 38.74 | 30.55 -21% | 29.43 -24% | 22.73 -41% | 25.24 -35% | 34.71 -10% |
| Write 4k | 89.8 | 127.3 42% | 56.5 -37% | 27.92 -69% | 89.4 0% | 89.6 0% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 337.1 | 460.8 37% | 311.3 -8% | 306.2 -9% | 322.5 -4% | 279.3 -17% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 254.2 | 414.5 63% | 225.2 -11% | 158.8 -38% | 208.1 -18% | 255.8 1% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1597 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5792 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 796 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44.27 | 25.35 | 21.31 | |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 20.76 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.84 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| HDD |
| 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.8 / 30.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.6 °C / 1.1 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook P727 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.15 / 0.46 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 6.6 / 6.9 Watt |
| Carga |
27 / 27.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871A MZNTN512HDJH, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -4% | 3% | 14% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.6 8% | 3.2 18% | 2.7 31% | 3.4 13% | 3 23% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 7.2 -9% | 5.5 17% | 5.1 23% | 5.8 12% | 6.8 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 8.4 -22% | 6.5 6% | 7.6 -10% | 6.7 3% | 7.7 -12% |
| Load Average * | 27 | 29.9 -11% | 29.7 -10% | 33 -22% | 21.4 21% | 30 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 27.1 | 32.2 -19% | 41.3 -52% | 29 -7% | 21.6 20% | 30.3 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Fujitsu Lifebook P727 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook T937 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 13% | 58% | 56% | 34% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 941 | 1163 24% | 1387 47% | 1728 84% | 1001 6% | 1022 9% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 353 | 488 38% | 630 78% | 708 101% | 719 104% | 523 48% |
| Load | 164 | 127 -23% | 244 49% | 136 -17% | 150 -9% | 184 12% |
| H.264 | 576 | 659 |
Pro
Contra
É muito difícil se destacar em um mercado carregado com dispositivos excepcionais. A Dell teve que engolir esta pílula amarga com o Latitude 5289, e agora é a vez da Fujitsu. Primeiro, os aspectos positivos: a carcaça é feita particularmente bem com materiais premium e é muito rígida; o painel, embora não seja tão brilhante como prometido, se desempenhou muito bem, em particular em relação à cobertura do espaço de cores; a conectividade é única - nenhum outro aparelho oferece portas VGA e Ethernet de tamanho normal ou um slot de cartão MicroSD de tamanho normal; uma bateria substituível pelo usuário, mesmo que seja menor do que a média, é um ponto de venda único; o teclado é muito bem feito e é um prazer digitar nele; e por último, mas não menos importante, o Lifebook P727 está disponível com um modem LTE opcional em alguns mercados (atualmente não nos EUA, no entanto).
Infelizmente, também há algumas falhas. O P727 não pode negar sua herança da série Lifebook U, e mostra mais proeminentemente no touchpad horrível, que foi muito impreciso e muito perturbante. E embora aplaudimos a Fujitsu por incluir portas legadas, como VGA e Ethernet, a falta de Thunderbolt 3 é desconcertante. Dado que a sua porta docking proprietária na parte inferior também está faltando, os usuários estão limitados às soluções docking USB-C. Outra desvantagem é o envelope térmico em que a CPU está espremida, e não consegue se desempenhar tão bem como deveria, de acordo com as especificações e, em alguns casos, até mesmo ficar atrás de seus irmãos Core i5 mais lentos. E, para piorar a situação, a duração da bateria é bastante curta.
Suas portas legadas e a bateria substituível pelo usuário são os dois pontos de venda exclusivos do Lifebook P727. O touchpad horrível e a duração de sua bateria abaixo da média estragam a boa impressão que ele deixa.
Consequentemente, não podemos recomendar o P727 sem restrições. Se você tiver um hardware mais antigo, por exemplo, um projetor VGA, o P727 pode certamente ser uma opção muito interessante. O mesmo se aplica para aqueles que insistem em uma bateria substituível pelo usuário. Caso contrário, o Elitebook x360 e o ThinkPad Yoga 370 são melhores notebooks com maior autonomia e melhores dispositivos de entrada. Em troca, esses conversíveis de 13,3 polegadas são ligeiramente maiores e mais pesados do que o P727.
Fujitsu Lifebook P727
-
06/07/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
