Breve Análise do Conversível Dell XPS 13 9365 2-em-1
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 322.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1698:1 (Preto: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.83% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.32% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.88
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, 13.9", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T AU Optronics AUO142D, TN LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 29% | 33% | 28% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 47.32 | 62.2 31% | 65.4 38% | 61.9 31% | 48.94 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 71.1 | 90.1 27% | 90.4 27% | 88.3 24% | 73.3 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 48.83 | 63.5 30% | 65.8 35% | 63 29% | 50.5 3% |
Response Times | 16% | 23% | -16% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 46 ? 4% | 33.2 ? 31% | 39 ? 19% | 32.8 ? 32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 24 ? 27% | 28 ? 15% | 24 ? 27% | 33.2 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | 1042 ? | 50 ? -95% | |||
Screen | -2% | -4% | -9% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 322.6 | 348 8% | 334.6 4% | 247 -23% | 351.2 9% |
Brightness | 306 | 310 1% | 319 4% | 240 -22% | 325 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 80 -12% | 90 -1% | 90 -1% | 89 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.25 -32% | 0.336 -77% | 0.43 -126% | 0.195 -3% |
Contrast | 1698 | 1392 -18% | 996 -41% | 574 -66% | 1801 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.7 | 7.86 -2% | 6.21 19% | 4.74 38% | 7.4 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.1 | 13.43 -21% | 12 -8% | 9.14 18% | 9.08 18% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 8.25 -4% | 7.71 2% | 4.87 38% | 6.71 15% |
Gamma | 2.88 76% | 2.05 107% | 2.36 93% | 2.57 86% | 2.74 80% |
CCT | 7044 92% | 6834 95% | 6458 101% | 7450 87% | 7222 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44.1 | 58 32% | 58.6 33% | 57 29% | 50.48 14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 69.9 | 90 29% | 90 29% | 88 26% | 73.31 5% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
7% | 17% /
7% | 1% /
-3% | 9% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1042 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1042 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1042 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3134 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4277 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4674 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 28% | 17% | -46% | 3% | |
Read Seq | 1206 | 1412 17% | 1376 14% | 468.1 -61% | 1233 2% |
Write Seq | 629 | 578 -8% | 571 -9% | 319.2 -49% | 733 17% |
Read 512 | 966 | 701 -27% | 679 -30% | 318.6 -67% | 1036 7% |
Write 512 | 410.7 | 580 41% | 571 39% | 272.8 -34% | 439.9 7% |
Read 4k | 32.93 | 43.5 32% | 42.66 30% | 22.03 -33% | 29.31 -11% |
Write 4k | 121.2 | 159.7 32% | 137.9 14% | 72.1 -41% | 116.9 -4% |
Read 4k QD32 | 411 | 570 39% | 535 30% | 147.4 -64% | 479.2 17% |
Write 4k QD32 | 250.2 | 488.7 95% | 361.2 44% | 200.2 -20% | 218.3 -13% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1505 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 56912 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5828 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 829 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 392 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
HP 17-y044ng | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Fujitsu LifeBook E736 E7360M27BBPL | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D | |
Medion Akoya E2215T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38.4 | 18.8 | ||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 20.2 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 12.9 |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T GeForce 940MX, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | |||||
off / environment * | 31.7 | 29.1 | 30.5 | ||
Idle Minimum * | 31.7 | 29.1 | 30.5 | 28.9 | |
Idle Average * | 31.7 | 29.1 | 30.5 | 28.9 | |
Idle Maximum * | 31.7 | 31.2 | 31.5 | 28.9 | |
Load Average * | 38.4 | 37.3 | 36.2 | 30.9 | |
Load Maximum * | 34.7 | 39.6 | 40 | 33.5 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.45 / 1.48 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.1 / 4.3 / 4.9 Watt |
Carga |
24.3 / 22.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -46% | -54% | -68% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 4.3 -39% | 5.5 -77% | 3 3% | 4.1 -32% |
Idle Average * | 4.3 | 6.3 -47% | 6.7 -56% | 5.6 -30% | 4.2 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.9 | 9 -84% | 7.1 -45% | 6.8 -39% | 5.1 -4% |
Load Average * | 24.3 | 32.7 -35% | 33.1 -36% | 48.7 -100% | 22.1 9% |
Load Maximum * | 22.8 | 28.8 -26% | 35.2 -54% | 63 -176% | 29.4 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -8% | -27% | 7% | |
Reader / Idle | 971 | 1069 10% | 1233 27% | 878 -10% | 1295 33% |
WiFi v1.3 | 686 | 644 -6% | 558 -19% | 486 -29% | 677 -1% |
Load | 175 | 174 -1% | 121 -31% | 103 -41% | 157 -10% |
Pro
Contra
Por que comprar o XPS 13 original quando sua alternativa mais versátil 2-em-1 está disponível?
Apesar de sua aparência quase idêntica, ainda existem vários motivos a considerar o XPS 13 padrão. Primeiramente, o XPS 13 original é um pouco mais grosso e mais rígido em sua base e centro do teclado sem ser mais pesado. Em segundo lugar, ele integra USB Type-A e um leitor SD mais veloz em comparação com o 2-em-1 sem USB Type-A e apenas um leitor de MicroSD. Em terceiro lugar, as teclas do teclado do XPS 13 fornecem uma resposta um pouco mais firme quando premidas e se sente mais perto ao do excelente teclado AccuType em certos portáteis Lenovo.
As diferenças do desempenho da CPU entre o XPS 13 2-em-1 e o XPS 13 não devem ser ignoradas. O SKU de nível de entrada do XPS 13 com a CPU i7-5200U é quase 25 por cento mais veloz que o i7-7Y75 no SKUXPS de gama superior2-in-1 SKU. Os deltas somente são superiores quando se compara o SKU XPS 13 com o i7-7500U com o SKU XPS 2-em 1 com o i5-7Y54. Embora não seja notório se estiver usando um simples processador de texto ou navegando, os tempos de resposta se tornam mais óbvios para tempos de carga mais longos e programas. Adicione o limitado Turbo Boost e o potencial afogamento e você tem um sistema que é mais inadequado para a edição de fotos e multitarefas pesadas, que o seu típico Ultrabook ou Spectre x360 13 e Yoga 910.
Os usuários que podem ver além dessas desvantagens terão uma das melhores experiências 2-em-1 de um portátil de 13-polegadas que é ainda mais compacto e leve que o mais recente Lenovo ou HP. O design do InfinityEdge se traduz de forma bela em um conversível e outros aspectos chaves como a tela, desempenho do SSD, duração da bateria, e acabamento são quase iguais ao do XPS 13.
Os usuários que desejem fazer mais do que apenas navegar, fazer streaming de vídeos, e processamento de textos podem ainda preferir um Ultrabook com um processador classe U. De outra forma, este seria facilmente um dos nossos 2-em-1 favoritos, simplesmente por causa de seu tamanho pequeno e subsequente praticidade no modo tablet.
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
- 02/02/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo