Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 7285 (i5, 256 GB, 3K)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 525 cd/m²
Contraste: 1435:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
| Dell Latitude 7285 SHP1482 (LQ123Z1), , 2880x1920, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, , 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, , 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 WST KL.1200w.004, , 2160x1440, 12" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -11% | -17% | -5% | -27% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 73.3 | 67.6 -8% | 62.8 -14% | 58.8 -20% | 68.7 -6% | 53.8 -27% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99 -1% | 94 -6% | 87.5 -12% | 96.8 -3% | 73.7 -26% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.1 | 69.1 -7% | 64.7 -13% | 60.6 -18% | 70.4 -5% | 53.8 -27% | |
| Response Times | 729% | 36% | -25% | 15% | -40% | 25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 42 ? 5% | 3.6 ? 92% | 42.4 ? 4% | 37 ? 16% | 67 ? -52% | 33.2 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 29 ? 5% | 3.2 ? 89% | 30.8 ? -1% | 26 ? 14% | 39 ? -28% | 22.8 ? 25% |
| PWM Frequency | 922 ? | 21000 2178% | 240.4 ? -74% | 210.1 ? -77% | |||
| Screen | 2% | -18% | -10% | -33% | -17% | -35% | |
| Brightness middle | 531 | 417 -21% | 243 -54% | 523.2 -1% | 369 -31% | 442 -17% | 322 -39% |
| Brightness | 490 | 401 -18% | 240 -51% | 522 7% | 331 -32% | 410 -16% | 319 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 88 2% | 95 10% | 88 2% | 75 -13% | 86 0% | 97 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.29 22% | 0.42 -14% | 0.46 -24% | 0.22 41% | 0.42 -14% | |
| Contrast | 1435 | 1438 0% | 1246 -13% | 802 -44% | 2009 40% | 767 -47% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 3.63 -4% | 5.3 -51% | 4 -14% | 5.52 -58% | 5.22 -49% | 6.02 -72% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 6.74 -9% | 8.9 -44% | 8.6 -39% | 9.29 -50% | 11.84 -91% | 10.06 -62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.18 54% | 3.7 21% | 5.5 -17% | 6.95 -48% | 7.88 -68% | 6.29 -34% |
| Gamma | 2.04 108% | 3.09 71% | 1.78 124% | 2.16 102% | 2.58 85% | 2.51 88% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6581 99% | 6767 96% | 6202 105% | 7546 86% | 7009 93% | 6756 96% | 7712 84% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67.6 | 63 -7% | 84.8 25% | 64.86 -4% | 56 -17% | 64 -5% | 47.8 -29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 93.97 -6% | 88 -12% | 97 -3% | 73.2 -27% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 242% /
137% | 9% /
-3% | -15% /
-13% | -12% /
-23% | -21% /
-17% | -12% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 922 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 922 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 922 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| Productivity | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4854 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3073 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4137 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3911 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2876 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 7285 Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 4% | 97% | 13% | 13% | -35% | -32% | |
| Read Seq | 1017 | 723 -29% | 2004 97% | 1294 27% | 1066 5% | 469 -54% | 501 -51% |
| Write Seq | 587 | 853 45% | 1693 188% | 865 47% | 593 1% | 277.3 -53% | 297.2 -49% |
| Read 512 | 756 | 225 -70% | 1040 38% | 406 -46% | 653 -14% | 404.4 -47% | 351.7 -53% |
| Write 512 | 487.9 | 445 -9% | 1292 165% | 589 21% | 535 10% | 266.6 -45% | 295.7 -39% |
| Read 4k | 45.26 | 46 2% | 58.2 29% | 31.75 -30% | 35.92 -21% | 25.24 -44% | 28.31 -37% |
| Write 4k | 99.1 | 125 26% | 182.2 84% | 72.2 -27% | 128.3 29% | 89.4 -10% | 90.3 -9% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 357.7 | 423 18% | 632 77% | 493.3 38% | 460.6 29% | 322.5 -10% | 285 -20% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 253 | 373 47% | 507 100% | 434.5 72% | 425.4 68% | 208.1 -18% | 268.4 6% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
| Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 | |
| HP Elite x2 1012 G1 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7909 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1440 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46353 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5321 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 780 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 362 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 324 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.4 | 25.8 | 21.7 | 6.4 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 32.7 | 19.8 | 18.3 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 13.8 | 9.1 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.1 °C / 107.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
| Dell Latitude 7285 i5-7Y57, HD Graphics 615 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -0% | 11% | 5% | 0% | 28% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46.8 | 39.2 16% | 47.5 -1% | 38.2 18% | 44.7 4% | 35.7 24% | 39 17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49.6 | 40.3 19% | 44.8 10% | 48.6 2% | 47.5 4% | 24.2 51% | 41.2 17% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.1 | 37 -23% | 23.7 21% | 29.6 2% | 29.7 1% | 23.4 22% | 29.5 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 32.3 -13% | 24.6 14% | 28.8 -1% | 30.7 -8% | 24.2 15% | 29.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 7285 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.25 / 1.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  6.6 / 9.3 / 10.2 Watt |
| Carga |
25.1 / 36.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 7285 i5-7Y57, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | -11% | 16% | 18% | 35% | 22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.6 | 3.6 45% | 4.9 26% | 2.85 57% | 3.86 42% | 3.4 48% | 3.7 44% |
| Idle Average * | 9.3 | 8.1 13% | 7.6 18% | 6.76 27% | 6.4 31% | 5.8 38% | 6.8 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 8.7 15% | 13.8 -35% | 6.91 32% | 7.17 30% | 6.7 34% | 7.6 25% |
| Load Average * | 25.1 | 25.5 -2% | 33.4 -33% | 32.88 -31% | 30.5 -22% | 21.4 15% | 22.5 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.1 | 23.5 35% | 46.5 -29% | 37.41 -4% | 32.4 10% | 21.6 40% | 34.5 4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7285 i5-7Y57, HD Graphics 615, 54 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | -11% | -2% | -27% | 25% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1030 | 1054 2% | 784 -24% | 1075 4% | 711 -31% | 1001 -3% | 732 -29% |
| H.264 | 369 | 408 11% | 432 17% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 391 | 744 90% | 368 -6% | 486 24% | 355 -9% | 719 84% | 443 13% |
| Load | 162 | 168 4% | 120 -26% | 105 -35% | 95 -41% | 150 -7% | 130 -20% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Dell Latitude 7285, o fabricante nos apresenta um conversível de muita alta qualidade com componentes modernos. O Intel Core i5-7Y57 oferece um desempenho sólido e está à altura para tarefas do escritório do dia a dia. A CPU também pode lidar com aplicativos multimídia. Muitas vezes, o SoC frugal pode manter-se bem com os processadores ULV mais rápidos. 2.300 Euros (~$2740) por um aparelho com o equipamento de nossa unidade de teste é o que o usuário final tem que pagar. No entanto, os clientes recebem um dispositivo perfeitamente construído, o que dá uma impressão de muito alta qualidade em todos os aspectos.
O preço de venda pode assustar muitos no início, mas a Dell oferece um dispositivo muito bem construído com uma tela 3K de primeira classe e uma seleção de conexões modernas. Além do tablet e da base de teclado, o pacote também inclui o Dell Active Pen e uma garantia de 36 meses.
Gostamos da muito boa seleção de materiais e do design moderado. O Dell Latitude 7285 recebe muito boas marcas pela tela, o que fornece um brilho muito alto e também pode exibir o espaço de cores muito bem. Francamente, teríamos esperado menos desempenho no processador, mas, como a Dell não o opera com o seu TPD de 4,5 watts, o desempenho está ligeiramente acima de nossas expectativas. Todos os resultados do teste, sem exceção, mostram que o Dell Latitude 7285, baseado no Intel Core i5-7Y57 pode competir bem contra a concorrência.
No consumo de energia, o dispositivo nos decepcionou um pouco, porque esperávamos valores muito melhores dos componentes frugais. Isso resultou também nos resultados confusos da duração da bateria. A ideia de colocar uma bateria adicional na base do teclado é boa e evita uma posição pior em nossa comparação de testes.
Dell Latitude 7285
- 09/06/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
