Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 5289 (i5, 256GB, 8GB)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.68 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.21% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.79% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| Dell Latitude 5289 BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Sharp LQ133M1JX15, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 56% | 46% | 11% | 48% | 43% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.79 | 67.9 59% | 65.5 53% | 47.32 11% | 65.4 53% | 62.2 45% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64.3 | 97.3 51% | 88.8 38% | 71.1 11% | 90.4 41% | 90.1 40% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.21 | 69.9 58% | 64.9 47% | 48.83 10% | 65.8 49% | 63.5 44% |
| Response Times | -22% | -10% | 25% | 16% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 42 ? -0% | 55.2 ? -31% | 48 ? -14% | 33.2 ? 21% | 46 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 32.8 ? -6% | 27.2 ? 12% | 32.8 ? -6% | 28 ? 10% | 24 ? 23% |
| PWM Frequency | 531 ? | 217.4 ? -59% | 1042 ? 96% | |||
| Screen | -20% | -28% | -41% | -40% | -45% | |
| Brightness middle | 336 | 374 11% | 262 -22% | 322.6 -4% | 334.6 0% | 348 4% |
| Brightness | 320 | 356 11% | 256 -20% | 306 -4% | 319 0% | 310 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 83 -8% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 80 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.33 3% | 0.25 26% | 0.19 44% | 0.336 1% | 0.25 26% |
| Contrast | 988 | 1133 15% | 1048 6% | 1698 72% | 996 1% | 1392 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.45 | 4.7 -36% | 5.13 -49% | 7.7 -123% | 6.21 -80% | 7.86 -128% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.95 | 9.5 -19% | 9.46 -19% | 11.1 -40% | 12 -51% | 13.43 -69% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.68 | 6.5 -287% | 6.23 -271% | 7.9 -370% | 7.71 -359% | 8.25 -391% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.19 100% | 2.45 90% | 2.88 76% | 2.36 93% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6782 96% | 7086 92% | 6413 101% | 7044 92% | 6458 101% | 6834 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 63.1 54% | 57.84 41% | 44.1 8% | 58.6 43% | 58 41% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 97.2 52% | 88.57 38% | 69.9 9% | 90 41% | 90 41% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-6% | 3% /
-11% | -2% /
-19% | 8% /
-15% | 2% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 531 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 531 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 531 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3554 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4681 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 5289 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 128% | 33% | 130% | 154% | 179% | |
| Read Seq | 423.7 | 1070 153% | 467.1 10% | 1206 185% | 1376 225% | 1412 233% |
| Write Seq | 406.4 | 484.5 19% | 443.6 9% | 629 55% | 571 41% | 578 42% |
| Read 512 | 260.8 | 680 161% | 312.3 20% | 966 270% | 679 160% | 701 169% |
| Write 512 | 255.6 | 483.1 89% | 372.5 46% | 410.7 61% | 571 123% | 580 127% |
| Read 4k | 22.73 | 30.55 34% | 29.43 29% | 32.93 45% | 42.66 88% | 43.5 91% |
| Write 4k | 27.92 | 127.3 356% | 56.5 102% | 121.2 334% | 137.9 394% | 159.7 472% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 306.2 | 460.8 50% | 311.3 2% | 411 34% | 535 75% | 570 86% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 158.8 | 414.5 161% | 225.2 42% | 250.2 58% | 361.2 127% | 488.7 208% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1787 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6359 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 931 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 53.6 | 32.6 | 27.7 | 8.6 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 22.6 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 36 / 34.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Dell Latitude 5289 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.68 / 1.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.7 / 5.1 / 7.6 Watt |
| Carga |
33 / 29 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -9% | 17% | -30% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 3.6 -33% | 3.2 -19% | 3.1 -15% | 5.5 -104% | 4.3 -59% |
| Idle Average * | 5.1 | 7.2 -41% | 5.5 -8% | 4.3 16% | 6.7 -31% | 6.3 -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 8.4 -11% | 6.5 14% | 4.9 36% | 7.1 7% | 9 -18% |
| Load Average * | 33 | 29.9 9% | 29.7 10% | 24.3 26% | 33.1 -0% | 32.7 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 29 | 32.2 -11% | 41.3 -42% | 22.8 21% | 35.2 -21% | 28.8 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 5289 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | 16% | -6% | -20% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1728 | 1163 -33% | 1387 -20% | 971 -44% | 1233 -29% | 1069 -38% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 708 | 488 -31% | 630 -11% | 686 -3% | 558 -21% | 644 -9% |
| Load | 136 | 127 -7% | 244 79% | 175 29% | 121 -11% | 174 28% |
| H.264 | 576 | 659 |
Pro
Contra
Escolher um conversível empresarial não é fácil. Depois de tudo o ThinkPad Yoga 370 e o EliteBook x360 são duas boas alternativas. Com o Latitude 5289, a Dell contribuiu com um concorrente interessante. A maior vantagem da unidade de teste: sua duração de bateria. Graças ao baixo consumo de energia e a uma bateria muito grande, o Latitude é o melhor aparelho nesta área. A carcaça robusta e o confortável teclado também merecem ser considerados. A ventoinha de resfriamento do Latitude 5289 permanece em silêncio graças à sua CPU ULV. A seleção das portas é adequada para um aparelho empresarial, o que nos leva para os aspectos negativos.
Um aparelho claramente acima da marca dos $ 1.000 deve estar equipado com Thunderbolt 3 e todos seus concorrentes possuem a porta. A ventoinha de resfriamento não funciona com muita frequência, mas a Dell não conseguiu se livrar do ruído da bobina. O teclado é bom; o touchpad, no entanto, não é impressionante; especialmente em comparação com os concorrentes da HP e Lenovo, o touchpad que a Dell escolheu não é ótimo. Ao contrário da Lenovo e da HP, a Dell escolheu manter a tela de 12,5 polegadas. Isso pode ser uma vantagem ou uma desvantagem: você tem menos superfície de trabalho, mas também menos peso. Uma desvantagem típica das telas de 12,5 polegadas é a falta de cobertura de espaço de cores. Além disso, a tela exibe um forte "bleeding" da iluminação de fundo. Pelo menos, é suficientemente brilhante para usar em exteriores.
A Dell criou um bom conversível: sua longa duração da bateria é particularmente cativante. Mas não é fácil manter-se neste mercado altamente competitivo, e a Dell cometeu alguns erros.
O Latitude 5289 definitivamente não é um conversível ruim. Se você está procurando por um portátil conversível com a maior duração de bateria possível, este pode até ser uma escolha recomendável. No entanto, as alternativas - ThinkPad Yoga 370 e EliteBook x360 - igualmente possuem seus pontos fortes. O modelo de nível de entrada do Latitude custa menos, mas você também recebe uma configuração pior, com apenas 4 GB de memória de trabalho soldada. No geral, o Latitude tem dificuldade em se afirmar contra seus concorrentes. Poderia vencê-los com uma melhor tela de 13,3 polegadas e um touchpad melhorado. Em vez disso, ele permanece em terceiro lugar, apesar da ótimo duração da bateria, especialmente porque os modelos da Lenovo e da HP também oferecem boas durações de bateria.
Dell Latitude 5289
- 05/16/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
