Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 5289 (i5, 256GB, 8GB)

Flexibilidade e estamina. Os portáteis conversíveis com dobradiças de 360 ° tornaram-se cada vez mais populares nos últimos anos e até mesmo as empresas começaram a usá-los. Naturalmente, a Dell deseja um pedaço do bolo e, consequentemente, lançou o Latitude 5289. Leia nossa análise para descobrir por que ele terá dificuldade em afirmar-se, apesar do seu desempenho convincente.
Dell Latitude 5289 (Latitude 12 5200 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300U 2 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
, LPDDR3-1866
Pantalha
12.50 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, 10-point, native pen support, BOE NV12N51, IPS LED, Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 eSata
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.45 x 304.8 x 210
Bateria
60 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p Fixed Focus
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2W estéreo, Teclado: teclado chiclet de 6-filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Dell Command Power Manager, Dell Command Update, Dell System Detect, Dell TouchPad, Del SupportAssistAgent, Microsoft Office 2016 Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.34 kg, Suprimento de energia: 250 g
Preço
1328 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

opened to 180°
opened to 180°
from the back/side
from the front/side
in stand mode
in tent mode
in notebook mode
bottom of base unit

Size Comparison

323 mm 224.5 mm 14.3 mm 1.4 kg316.9 mm 218.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg313.5 mm 222.2 mm 18.2 mm 1.4 kg304.8 mm 210 mm 18.45 mm 1.3 kg305.6 mm 217.9 mm 13.7 mm 1.3 kg304 mm 199 mm 13.7 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
3.5 mm combined stereo jack, MicroSD card reader, SIM slot, USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington lock
3.5 mm combined stereo jack, MicroSD card reader, SIM slot, USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington lock
2x USB 3.0 Type-C (incl. DisplayPort/power supply), HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A, smart card reader
2x USB 3.0 Type-C (incl. DisplayPort/power supply), HDMI, USB 3.0 Type-A, smart card reader
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s +4%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
675 MBit/s +17%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
613 MBit/s +6%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
579 MBit/s
306
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV12N51 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 336 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 320.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.68 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.21% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.79% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Dell Latitude 5289
BOE NV12N51, , 1920x1080, 12.5"
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Sharp LQ133M1JX15, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 13.9"
Display
56%
46%
11%
48%
43%
Display P3 Coverage
42.79
67.9
59%
65.5
53%
47.32
11%
65.4
53%
62.2
45%
sRGB Coverage
64.3
97.3
51%
88.8
38%
71.1
11%
90.4
41%
90.1
40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
44.21
69.9
58%
64.9
47%
48.83
10%
65.8
49%
63.5
44%
Response Times
-22%
-10%
25%
16%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(22, 20)
42 ?(21.2, 20.8)
-0%
55.2 ?(21.2, 34)
-31%
48 ?(16.4, 31.6)
-14%
33.2 ?(16, 17.2)
21%
46 ?(14, 32)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
31 ?(18, 13)
32.8 ?(19.2, 13.6)
-6%
27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)
12%
32.8 ?(7.6, 25.2)
-6%
28 ?(5.6, 22.4)
10%
24 ?(6, 18)
23%
PWM Frequency
531 ?(90)
217.4 ?(50)
-59%
1042 ?(29)
96%
Screen
-20%
-28%
-41%
-40%
-45%
Brightness middle
336
374
11%
262
-22%
322.6
-4%
334.6
0%
348
4%
Brightness
320
356
11%
256
-20%
306
-4%
319
0%
310
-3%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
83
-8%
91
1%
90
0%
80
-11%
Black Level *
0.34
0.33
3%
0.25
26%
0.19
44%
0.336
1%
0.25
26%
Contrast
988
1133
15%
1048
6%
1698
72%
996
1%
1392
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.45
4.7
-36%
5.13
-49%
7.7
-123%
6.21
-80%
7.86
-128%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.95
9.5
-19%
9.46
-19%
11.1
-40%
12
-51%
13.43
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.68
6.5
-287%
6.23
-271%
7.9
-370%
7.71
-359%
8.25
-391%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.19 100%
2.45 90%
2.88 76%
2.36 93%
2.05 107%
CCT
6782 96%
7086 92%
6413 101%
7044 92%
6458 101%
6834 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41
63.1
54%
57.84
41%
44.1
8%
58.6
43%
58
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
97.2
52%
88.57
38%
69.9
9%
90
41%
90
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -6%
3% / -11%
-2% / -19%
8% / -15%
2% / -20%

* ... smaller is better

Outdoor use (in shade)
Outdoor use (in shade)
Outdoor use (in sunlight)
Outdoor use (in sunlight)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 531 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 531 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 531 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z Caches
GPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel Core i7-7500U
147 Points +1%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Core i5-7300U
145 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
144 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
130 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
126 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel Core i7-7500U
354 Points +4%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
346 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel Core i5-7300U
340 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
314 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel Core i5-7200U
312 Points -8%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
258 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.69 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
340 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3795 Points +7%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
3774 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3555 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 5289
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
3554 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3539 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3134 Points -12%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4910 Points +5%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4803 Points +3%
Dell Latitude 5289
HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
4681 Points
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4674 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4314 Points -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3554 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4681 pontos
Ajuda
Dell Latitude 5289
SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
128%
33%
130%
154%
179%
Read Seq
423.7
1070
153%
467.1
10%
1206
185%
1376
225%
1412
233%
Write Seq
406.4
484.5
19%
443.6
9%
629
55%
571
41%
578
42%
Read 512
260.8
680
161%
312.3
20%
966
270%
679
160%
701
169%
Write 512
255.6
483.1
89%
372.5
46%
410.7
61%
571
123%
580
127%
Read 4k
22.73
30.55
34%
29.43
29%
32.93
45%
42.66
88%
43.5
91%
Write 4k
27.92
127.3
356%
56.5
102%
121.2
334%
137.9
394%
159.7
472%
Read 4k QD32
306.2
460.8
50%
311.3
2%
411
34%
535
75%
570
86%
Write 4k QD32
158.8
414.5
161%
225.2
42%
250.2
58%
361.2
127%
488.7
208%
SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)
Sequential Read: 423.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 406.4 MB/s
512K Read: 260.8 MB/s
512K Write: 255.6 MB/s
4K Read: 22.73 MB/s
4K Write: 27.92 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 306.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 158.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1627 Points
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1623 Points 0%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1560 Points -4%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1476 Points -9%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
1370 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1338 Points -18%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
9060 Points +6%
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
8562 Points
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
8220 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7969 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
7839 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7059 Points -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 5289
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1081 Points
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1045 Points -3%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
972 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
964 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
917 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
827 Points -23%
3DMark 11 Performance
1787 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6359 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
931 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 53.6 32.6 27.7 8.6
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 22.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20.8

Barulho

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB
Carga
36 / 34.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.331.330.73233.32533.629.633.138.133.6313439.83336.1344030.130.931.131.530.15030.230.327.731.430.26329.128.226.92829.18027.225.92628.127.210025.926.626.62625.912525.325.625.425.225.316023.324.423.82323.320023.5242323.723.525022.822.622.321.822.831522.422.321.620.822.440021.921.219.920.421.950023.222.619.719.523.26302321.418.719.22380022.421.318.618.622.4100027.725.218.517.927.712502522.817.617.925160024.522.417.817.624.520002623.517.517.626250024.52317.417.724.5315024.826.217.917.724.8400024.62118.117.924.6500020.419.218.418.220.4630019.518.918.418.419.5800018.918.518.718.418.91000018.918.518.518.418.91250019.318.518.518.419.3160001918.418.718.319SPL3634.630.530.536N2.32.11.41.42.3median 23.2median 22.4median 18.6median 18.4median 23.2Delta22.41.11.3235.335.534.53336.934.934.634.235.73231.630.731.929.929.330.528.529.827.428.428.224.725.226.128.726.127.226.927.626.126.427.626.323.624.725.523.921.523.32423.922.221.524.422.821.922.623.32220.420.922.320.619.619.721.820.41918.821.621.11917.623.119.618.417.221.620.918.316.323.720.519162320.819.215.72421.919.915.425.223.420.715.127.824.321.715.328.324.919.115.326.918.716.615.623.317.316.215.820.716.61615.91916.316.115.918.416.416.11618.216.816.315.818.833.731.228.636.71.91.51.12.4median 20.9median 19.1median 16median 23.32.92.52.42.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Latitude 5289Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
Carga Máxima
 42.8 °C49 °C38.7 °C 
 35.7 °C42.7 °C33 °C 
 28.5 °C30.2 °C29.4 °C 
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
33.9 °C33.2 °C44.4 °C
30.1 °C39.8 °C37 °C
28.8 °C32.7 °C32.3 °C
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.83232.82531.938.131.93133.636.133.64030.431.530.45029.431.429.46328.92828.98027.628.127.610027.12627.112527.925.227.916030.92330.920038.823.738.825047.921.847.931552.520.852.540054.820.454.850056.919.556.963057.119.257.180065.618.665.6100061.617.961.6125061.917.961.9160058.517.658.5200061.517.661.5250061.517.761.5315062.617.762.6400056.117.956.150005918.259630056.818.456.8800068.318.468.31000069.618.469.61250060.718.460.71600056.818.356.8SPL74.530.574.5N33.71.433.7median 57.1median 18.4median 57.1Delta7.51.37.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 5289Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Dell Latitude 5289 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.68 / 1.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.7 / 5.1 / 7.6 Watt
Carga midlight 33 / 29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 5289
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5"
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9"
Power Consumption
-17%
-9%
17%
-30%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
3.6
-33%
3.2
-19%
3.1
-15%
5.5
-104%
4.3
-59%
Idle Average *
5.1
7.2
-41%
5.5
-8%
4.3
16%
6.7
-31%
6.3
-24%
Idle Maximum *
7.6
8.4
-11%
6.5
14%
4.9
36%
7.1
7%
9
-18%
Load Average *
33
29.9
9%
29.7
10%
24.3
26%
33.1
-0%
32.7
1%
Load Maximum *
29
32.2
-11%
41.3
-42%
22.8
21%
35.2
-21%
28.8
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
11h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 16min
Dell Latitude 5289
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 370-20JJS00100
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Battery Runtime
-24%
16%
-6%
-20%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1728
1163
-33%
1387
-20%
971
-44%
1233
-29%
1069
-38%
WiFi v1.3
708
488
-31%
630
-11%
686
-3%
558
-21%
644
-9%
Load
136
127
-7%
244
79%
175
29%
121
-11%
174
28%
H.264
576
659

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta
+ Digitação fácil no teclado
+ A ventoinha de resfriamento frequentemente está desativada
+ Uma boa seleção de portas para o uso diário
+ Tela brilhante
+ Ótimas durações da bateria

Contra

- Touchpad decepcionante
- Tela: baixa cobertura do espaço de cores e muito "bleeding" da iluminação de fundo
- Perturbante ruído da bobina
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
The Dell Latitude 5289: test unit provided by Dell.
The Dell Latitude 5289: test unit provided by Dell.

Escolher um conversível empresarial não é fácil. Depois de tudo o ThinkPad Yoga 370 e o EliteBook x360 são duas boas alternativas. Com o Latitude 5289, a Dell contribuiu com um concorrente interessante. A maior vantagem da unidade de teste: sua duração de bateria. Graças ao baixo consumo de energia e a uma bateria muito grande, o Latitude é o melhor aparelho nesta área. A carcaça robusta e o confortável teclado também merecem ser considerados. A ventoinha de resfriamento do Latitude 5289 permanece em silêncio  graças à sua CPU ULV. A seleção das portas é adequada para um aparelho empresarial, o que nos leva para os aspectos negativos.

Um aparelho claramente acima da marca dos $ 1.000 deve estar equipado com Thunderbolt 3 e todos seus concorrentes possuem a porta. A ventoinha de resfriamento não funciona com muita frequência, mas a Dell não conseguiu se livrar do ruído da bobina. O teclado é bom; o touchpad, no entanto, não é impressionante; especialmente em comparação com os concorrentes da HP e Lenovo, o touchpad que a Dell escolheu não é ótimo. Ao contrário da Lenovo e da HP, a Dell escolheu manter a tela de 12,5 polegadas. Isso pode ser uma vantagem ou uma desvantagem: você tem menos superfície de trabalho, mas também menos peso. Uma desvantagem típica das telas de 12,5 polegadas é a falta de cobertura de espaço de cores. Além disso, a tela exibe um forte "bleeding" da iluminação de fundo. Pelo menos, é suficientemente brilhante para usar em exteriores.

A Dell criou um bom conversível: sua longa duração da bateria é particularmente cativante. Mas não é fácil manter-se neste mercado altamente competitivo, e a Dell cometeu alguns erros.

O Latitude 5289 definitivamente não é um conversível ruim. Se você está procurando por um portátil conversível com a maior duração de bateria possível, este pode até ser uma escolha recomendável. No entanto, as alternativas - ThinkPad Yoga 370 e EliteBook x360 - igualmente possuem seus pontos fortes. O modelo de nível de entrada do Latitude custa menos, mas você também recebe uma configuração pior, com apenas 4 GB de memória de trabalho soldada. No geral, o Latitude tem dificuldade em se afirmar contra seus concorrentes. Poderia vencê-los com uma melhor tela de 13,3 polegadas e um touchpad melhorado. Em vez disso, ele permanece em terceiro lugar, apesar da ótimo duração da bateria, especialmente porque os modelos da Lenovo e da HP também oferecem boas durações de bateria.

Dell Latitude 5289 - 05/16/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
65 / 80 → 81%
Peso
71 / 35-78 → 83%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 68 → 85%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
88%
Audio
46 / 91 → 50%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
75%
84%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 5289 (i5, 256GB, 8GB)
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-06- 2 (Update: 2017-06- 9)