Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 3390 (Core i5-8250U, Full HD, SSD de 256 GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook x360 440 G1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 276 cd/m²
Contraste: 952:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 5.15
ΔE Greyscale 3.54 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 BOE06A7, NV13FHM, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE LEN4094, NV133FHM-N5A, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA BOE NV140FHM-N62, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 Chi MEi, CMN14E0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 58% | 56% | 47% | 60% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.9 | 69.2 69% | 64.3 57% | 64.4 57% | 65.8 61% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.3 | 90.6 48% | 94.6 54% | 84.6 38% | 98.2 60% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.29 | 66.3 57% | 66.2 57% | 61.8 46% | 67.8 60% |
| Response Times | 115% | 9% | -4% | 4152% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 51.2 ? -22% | 40.8 ? 3% | 44 ? -5% | 34 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 36.8 ? -15% | 27.6 ? 14% | 33 ? -3% | 20 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 208 ? | 1000 ? 381% | 200 ? -4% | 26000 ? 12400% | |
| Screen | 17% | 8% | 5% | 50% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 313 13% | 316 14% | 302 9% | 408 48% |
| Brightness | 274 | 295 8% | 291 6% | 288 5% | 375 37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 90 10% | 83 1% | 90 10% | 87 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.22 24% | 0.36 -24% | 0.57 -97% | 0.34 -17% |
| Contrast | 952 | 1423 49% | 878 -8% | 530 -44% | 1200 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.84 | 6.2 -6% | 5.9 -1% | 5.17 11% | 1.2 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 26.72 | 10.7 60% | 12.9 52% | 7.68 71% | 2.44 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.15 | 2.5 51% | 1.3 75% | 0.67 87% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.54 | 8 -126% | 8.6 -143% | 3.26 8% | 0.98 72% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.38 92% | 2.1 105% | 2.45 90% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6747 96% | 7100 92% | 6854 95% | 7142 91% | 6485 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 59.1 52% | 60.7 56% | 55 41% | 62 59% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61 | 90.6 49% | 94.5 55% | 85 39% | 98 61% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 63% /
41% | 24% /
17% | 16% /
11% | 1421% /
776% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 208 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3.02 - 4.78, n=8) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (813 - 1209, n=8) | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE | |
| Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=58, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3797 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4799 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3541 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 SK hynix SC311 SATA | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Average SK hynix SC311 SATA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 203% | 73% | -4% | 77% | -11% | |
| Seq Read | 479.5 | 1724 260% | 1850 286% | 459.9 -4% | 1255 162% | 499 ? 4% |
| Seq Write | 354.9 | 1123 216% | 661 86% | 388.2 9% | 625 76% | 296 ? -17% |
| 4K Read | 23.88 | 51.8 117% | 38.04 59% | 26.93 13% | 42.09 76% | 23.9 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 51.3 | 133.8 161% | 95 85% | 50.7 -1% | 96.1 87% | 54.3 ? 6% |
| 4K-64 Read | 294.8 | 745 153% | 434.3 47% | 368.3 25% | 624 112% | 231 ? -22% |
| 4K-64 Write | 217.5 | 1193 449% | 266.3 22% | 146.4 -33% | 298.3 37% | 169.7 ? -22% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.093 | 0.041 56% | 0.069 26% | 0.123 -32% | 0.122 -31% | 0.133 ? -43% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.071 | 0.028 61% | 0.056 21% | 0.086 -21% | 0.224 -215% | 0.07075 ? -0% |
| Score Read | 367 | 969 164% | 657 79% | 441 20% | 791 116% | 305 ? -17% |
| Score Write | 304 | 1440 374% | 427 40% | 236 -22% | 457 50% | 254 ? -16% |
| Score Total | 860 | 2889 236% | 1373 60% | 908 6% | 1634 90% | 713 ? -17% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 294 | 1025 249% | 539 83% | 324.1 10% | 983 234% | 303 ? 3% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 137.4 | 322.1 134% | 209.7 53% | 118.6 -14% | 274.5 100% | 132.6 ? -3% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 202.2 | 637 215% | 340 68% | 186.1 -8% | 572 183% | 195.3 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1779 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 76683 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7687 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1016 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 468 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 379 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48 | 28.4 | 25.8 | 8.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 44.7 | 31.4 | 22.1 | 7.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 62.9 | 40.6 | 17.9 | 16.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.2 | 11.6 | 6.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 24.1 | 15.4 | 13.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.3 / 33 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | -1% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 30.6 | 29.5 4% | 29.3 4% | 30.4 1% | 30.6 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 29.5 4% | 29.3 4% | 30.4 1% | 30.6 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 30.6 | 29.5 4% | 29.3 4% | 30.4 1% | 30.6 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 29.5 4% | 29.7 3% | 32 -5% | 32 -5% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 30.6 8% | 31.8 5% | 31.7 5% | 36.7 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 33 | 30.6 7% | 32.7 1% | 35.9 -9% | 36.7 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 3% | 6% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40 | 46.7 -17% | 41.8 -5% | 39 2% | 41.2 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.1 | 50.7 -10% | 40.9 11% | 45.6 1% | 42.4 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 23.8 7% | 25.6 -0% | 23.3 9% | 26.9 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 25.6 2% | 24.5 6% | 23.1 11% | 28.4 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 13 3390 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 6.5 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
25 / 48.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | -16% | -1% | -15% | -9% | -42% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 4 -3% | 3.3 15% | 3.3 15% | 4.6 -18% | 3.81 ? 2% | 5.23 ? -34% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 7.1 -9% | 6.8 -5% | 6.3 3% | 7.5 -15% | 6.94 ? -7% | 8.13 ? -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 10.7 -24% | 9.5 -10% | 11 -28% | 9.6 -12% | 8.75 ? -2% | 11.1 ? -29% |
| Load Average * | 25 | 33.8 -35% | 40.8 -63% | 30 -20% | 37 -48% | 35 ? -40% | 45.5 ? -82% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.1 | 48.8 -1% | 57 -19% | 35.4 26% | 38.8 19% | 47.5 ? 1% | 66.7 ? -39% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 13 3390 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L390 Yoga-20NT000XGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX461UA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP ProBook x360 440 G1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 43% | 28% | 31% | 50% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1002 | 949 -5% | 1432 43% | 1131 13% | 1038 4% | 1326 ? 32% |
| H.264 | 356 | 444 25% | 632 78% | 513 44% | 496 39% | 773 ? 117% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 402 | 431 7% | 550 37% | 566 41% | 536 33% | 588 ? 46% |
| Load | 110 | 89 -19% | 124 13% | 125 14% | 163 48% | 115.5 ? 5% |
Pro
Contra
O Dell Latitude 3390 é um conversível empresarial de 13,3 polegadas com preços razoáveis. Nossa unidade de teste vem com um processador Intel Core i5-8250U, 8 GB de RAM e um SSD de 256 GB, o que o torna bem equipado para seu preço de de 999 Euros (~$ 1.130). Em suma, o Latitude 3390 na configuração que testamos é comparativamente barato para um dispositivo de negócios e é uma alternativa decente para portáteis de consumo e para compradores privados também.
Infelizmente, o dispositivo não possui recursos empresariais importantes, como conectividade LTE opcional e recursos de segurança, como um sensor de digitais. Portanto, o Latitude 3390 provavelmente será uma opção pouco atraente para os profissionais.
O Core i5-8250U quad-core é poderoso o suficiente para as tarefas mais exigentes, assim como os 8 GB de RAM. No entanto, eles não são preparados para o futuro e dão a impressão de que a Dell trouxe o Latitude 3390 ao mercado com um ano de atraso. O design também é parte dessa visão. O design simples parecerá elegante para algumas pessoas, mas os marcos de tela ampla parecem desatualizados. A Dell poderia ter facilmente equipado o Latitude 3390 com um painel de 14 polegadas dentro do mesmo chassi.
Enquanto estamos no assunto, a tela é uma das grandes decepções do Latitude 3390. É simplesmente muito escura, tornando muito desconfortáveis as tarefas em exteriores Da mesma forma, em nossa opinião, a cobertura de espaço de cores é muito baixa para um dispositivo de negócios.
O Dell Latitude 3390 deixa uma impressão ambígua. Não tem um ponto de venda exclusivo e não atende às expectativas do que um conversível empresarial deveria ser.
No entanto, nem tudo são más notícias. A Dell construiu o Latitude 3390 com fibra de carbono reciclada, o que torna a nossa unidade de teste mais robusta. Ao mesmo tempo, mantém o peso total abaixo dos 1,6 kg. A tela táctil, o trackpad e o teclado também são decentes, embora o último não esteja no mesmo nível que os concorrentes do ThinkPad. O Latitude 3390 também é extremamente eficiente em termos de energia e tem alto-falantes amplos, mas é provável que eles sejam esquecidos quando as pessoas experimentem sua tela.
The Dell Latitude 3390 is a reasonably priced 13.3-inch business convertible. Our review unit comes with an Intel Core i5-8250U processor, 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD, which makes it well equipped for its 999-Euro (~$1,130) retail price. In short, the Latitude 3390 in the configuration that we tested is comparatively cheap for a business device and is a decent alternative to consumer-grade laptops for private buyers too.
Unfortunately, the device lacks important business features like optional LTE connectivity and security features like a fingerprint sensor. Hence, the Latitude 3390 will probably prove an unattractive option for professionals.
The quad-core Core i5-8250U is powerful enough for most demanding tasks though, as is the 8 GB of RAM. However, they are not future-proofed and give the impression that Dell has brought the Latitude 3390 to market a year late. The design compounds this view too. The simple design will look elegant to some people, but the wide display bezels look outdated. Dell could have easily equipped the Latitude 3390 with a 14-inch panel within the same chassis.
While we are on the subject, the display is one of the big let-downs of the Latitude 3390. It is simply too dark, making outdoor use a chore. Likewise, the colour-space coverage is too low for a business device in our opinion.
The Dell Latitude 3390 leaves an ambiguous impression. It has no unique selling point and does not meet expectations of what a business convertible should be.
It is not all bad news though. Dell has built the Latitude 3390 with recycled carbon fibre, which makes our review unit feel sturdy. At the same time, it keeps the overall weight below 1.6 kg. The touchscreen, trackpad and keyboard are decent too, although the latter is not in the same league as its ThinkPad competitors. The Latitude 3390 is impressively energy-efficient too and has full-bodied speakers, but these are likely to be forgotten when people experience its display.
Dell Latitude 13 3390
- 06/11/2019 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
