Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-em-1: Um Latitude 7400 de coração
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 14.89 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2019 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % v7 (old) | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1544:1 (Preto: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G Sharp LQ140M1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -4% | -6% | 1% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 66 -3% | 65 -5% | 64.3 -6% | 68.6 1% | 60.1 -12% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 97.9 -1% | 95.7 -4% | 94.1 -5% | 99.6 0% | 85.5 -14% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.4 | 67.3 -3% | 66.7 -4% | 65.5 -6% | 70 1% | 61.1 -12% |
Response Times | 17% | 10% | -23% | 1% | 32% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.4 ? | 49.6 ? 15% | 54 ? 8% | 70.8 ? -21% | 56 ? 4% | 36 ? 38% |
Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 30 ? 19% | 32.8 ? 12% | 34.4 ? 8% | 38 ? -2% | 28 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 1667 ? | 735 ? -56% | 1667 ? 0% | |||
Screen | -27% | -45% | -32% | -26% | -69% | |
Brightness middle | 293.4 | 384 31% | 322.2 10% | 416.3 42% | 277.2 -6% | 280 -5% |
Brightness | 290 | 363 25% | 301 4% | 400 38% | 263 -9% | 286 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 83 -10% | 78 -15% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.17 11% | 0.25 -32% | 0.29 -53% | 0.2 -5% | 0.208 -9% |
Contrast | 1544 | 2259 46% | 1289 -17% | 1436 -7% | 1386 -10% | 1346 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.29 | 3.5 -171% | 3.62 -181% | 2.69 -109% | 2.1 -63% | 3.97 -208% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.61 | 5.5 -52% | 6.9 -91% | 4.95 -37% | 5.91 -64% | 8.29 -130% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.88 | 1 -14% | 1.22 -39% | 2.13 -142% | 1.03 -17% | 3.42 -289% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.6 -171% | 3.9 -129% | 2.9 -71% | 3.4 -100% | 2.83 -66% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.241 98% | 2.34 94% |
CCT | 6394 102% | 6884 94% | 6344 102% | 6623 98% | 6030 108% | 6556 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.8 | 62 -3% | 61.3 -4% | 60.1 -6% | 64 0% | 56 -12% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | 97.7 -1% | 95.6 -4% | 94.5 -5% | 100 1% | 85 -14% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-17% | -13% /
-30% | -20% /
-26% | -8% /
-16% | -17% /
-46% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 32.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1667 Hz | ≤ 44 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1667 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 44 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1667 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (548 - 738, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (133 - 200, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1155 - 1261, n=6) | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3731 - 4622, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (56.1 - 106, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (0.637 - 0.855, n=6) | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Productivity | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3725 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5071 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4410 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G Micron 2200S 512GB | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 48% | 60% | 38% | -24% | -16% | |
Seq Read | 1117 | 2525 126% | 1829 64% | 1816 63% | 2289 105% | 1336 20% |
Seq Write | 969 | 1253 29% | 2048 111% | 1270 31% | 1163 20% | 653 -33% |
4K Read | 41.93 | 59.1 41% | 54.2 29% | 46.25 10% | 22.29 -47% | 26.65 -36% |
4K Write | 76.4 | 134.1 76% | 120.5 58% | 104.1 36% | 28.92 -62% | 52.7 -31% |
4K-64 Read | 827 | 1010 22% | 1512 83% | 1342 62% | 415.6 -50% | 644 -22% |
4K-64 Write | 792 | 1461 84% | 1573 99% | 1209 53% | 199.5 -75% | 482.9 -39% |
Access Time Read * | 0.055 | 0.052 5% | 0.046 16% | 0.043 22% | 0.122 -122% | 0.074 -35% |
Access Time Write * | 0.366 | 0.029 92% | 0.091 75% | 0.035 90% | 0.143 61% | 0.072 80% |
Score Read | 981 | 1322 35% | 1749 78% | 1569 60% | 667 -32% | 804 -18% |
Score Write | 966 | 1721 78% | 1899 97% | 1440 49% | 345 -64% | 601 -38% |
Score Total | 2450 | 3670 50% | 4560 86% | 3790 55% | 1300 -47% | 1786 -27% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1290 | 2016 56% | 1891 47% | 2034 58% | 1767 37% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 661 | 542 -18% | 569 -14% | 450.3 -32% | 379.4 -43% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1271 | 1278 1% | 1425 12% | 1024 -19% | 1055 -17% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 30% | 42% | 20% | -29% | -32% | |
Write 4K | 81.2 | 128.4 58% | 181.4 123% | 122.7 51% | 35.06 -57% | 54.6 -33% |
Read 4K | 45.41 | 46.37 2% | 52.5 16% | 46.57 3% | 23.64 -48% | 28.19 -38% |
Write Seq | 1190 | 1863 57% | 1592 34% | 1725 45% | 1537 29% | 840 -29% |
Read Seq | 1766 | 2340 33% | 1617 -8% | 2392 35% | 1782 1% | 905 -49% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 436 | 451.1 3% | 556 28% | 470.6 8% | 100.3 -77% | 409.5 -6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 374.4 | 415.3 11% | 539 44% | 313.2 -16% | 62.7 -83% | 292.4 -22% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1582 | 2985 89% | 2955 87% | 1869 18% | 2698 71% | 1038 -34% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3017 | 2565 -15% | 3270 8% | 3380 12% | 1073 -64% | 1607 -47% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 451.4 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1004 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
42% | 51% /
53% | 29% /
32% | -27% /
-26% | -24% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 2206 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9933 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1218 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 486 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 59.1 | 48.4 | 20.5 | 18.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 12 | 10.9 | 10.5 |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -5% | 1% | 6% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 29 -11% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Average * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.2 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.1 | 29.3 -12% | 30 -15% | 28.3 -8% | 28.3 -8% | 30.1 -15% |
Load Average * | 39.9 | 33.3 17% | 35.2 12% | 32.6 18% | 28.2 29% | 30.1 25% |
Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 33.3 26% | 37 17% | 36.6 18% | 28.8 36% | 32.02 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 26.1 / 26.1 / 26.1 dB |
Carga |
| 39.9 / 44.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.1 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.6 / 3.9 / 4.6 Watt |
Carga |
38.9 / 76.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 2200S 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -40% | -9% | -37% | -3% | -42% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.2 -23% | 2.9 -12% | 2.7 -4% | 2.6 -0% | 3.6 -38% |
Idle Average * | 3.9 | 7 -79% | 5.8 -49% | 6.5 -67% | 4.3 -10% | 7.5 -92% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.6 | 8.9 -93% | 6.2 -35% | 11.5 -150% | 5.5 -20% | 9.4 -104% |
Load Average * | 38.9 | 47.6 -22% | 32.9 15% | 38.7 1% | 32 18% | 42 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 76.2 | 63.1 17% | 48.5 36% | 50.5 34% | 78.8 -3% | 51 33% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -56% | -30% | -31% | -36% | -60% | |
Reader / Idle | 2892 | 1966 -32% | 1673 -42% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 1141 | 636 -44% | 751 -34% | 623 -45% | 732 -36% | 461 -60% |
Load | 202 | 64 -68% | 153 -24% | 187 -7% |
Pro
Contra
A boa notícia é que o 2-em-1 Latitude 9410 não é tão diferente do já excelente 2-em-1 Latitude 7400. A Dell não mexeu com nada bom e, em vez disso, simplesmente atualizou alguns componentes como a CPU e WLAN para permanecer competitivo contra o HP EliteBook x360 e a série conversível Lenovo Yoga.
Por outro lado, a má notícia é que o 2-em-1 Latitude 9410 não é tão diferente do já excelente 2-em-1 Latitude 7400. É uma faca de dois gumes porque os usuários podem comprar o 2-em-1 7400 do ano passado para obter essencialmente a mesma experiência e desempenho do 2-em-1 Latitude 9410, mais caro. Pequenas desvantagens como a falta de uma webcam adequada ou opções de tela mais brilhantes não foram abordadas e as opções de GPU ainda são inexistentes, mas elas não prejudicam um design de chassi excelente que mal tem um ano de idade.
Não se deixe enganar pelo novo nome, porque o 2-em-1 Latitude 9410 é apenas uma pequena atualização do já excelente Latitude 7400. Ainda é um dos melhores conversíveis empresariais de 14 polegadas que você pode comprar atualmente, embora possa não ter a tela mais brilhante que existe.
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
- 08/31/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo