Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 7390 2-em-1 Black Edition
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7386 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 329.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1268:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.082
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 AUO252B, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 B140HAN05.8, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng InfoVision, M133NVF3 R2, IPS, 120 Hz, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, IPS LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 Chi Mei CMN1385 / 133DCE / Dell 3GRT6, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -4% | 1% | 5% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 67.1 2% | 63 -4% | 65.2 -1% | 68.6 5% | 68.2 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.2 | 98.2 4% | 90.8 -4% | 97 3% | 99.6 6% | 99.8 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 68.9 4% | 63.8 -4% | 67.3 1% | 70 5% | 70 5% |
| Response Times | -2% | 40% | 7% | 0% | 10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.4 ? | 61.6 ? -9% | 35 ? 38% | 59.2 ? -5% | 56 ? 1% | 57 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 ? | 35.2 ? 6% | 22 ? 41% | 30.8 ? 18% | 38 ? -1% | 30 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 4065 ? | 1667 ? | 26000 ? | |||
| Screen | -14% | -5% | -32% | -0% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 329.8 | 372 13% | 633 92% | 319 -3% | 277.2 -16% | 318 -4% |
| Brightness | 325 | 368 13% | 675 108% | 306 -6% | 263 -19% | 278 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 75 -20% | 90 -4% | 83 -12% | 81 -14% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.22 15% | 0.55 -112% | 0.15 42% | 0.2 23% | 0.18 31% |
| Contrast | 1268 | 1691 33% | 1151 -9% | 2127 68% | 1386 9% | 1767 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.05 | 4.6 -51% | 3.12 -2% | 6.1 -100% | 2.1 31% | 2.91 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.01 | 7.8 -56% | 6.37 -27% | 9.7 -94% | 5.91 -18% | 6.11 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.03 | 0.9 56% | 1.83 10% | 1 51% | 1.03 49% | 2.91 -43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 5.9 -181% | 3.89 -85% | 8.6 -310% | 3.4 -62% | 4.37 -108% |
| Gamma | 2.082 106% | 2.58 85% | 2.39 92% | 2.62 84% | 2.241 98% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6713 97% | 6516 100% | 6476 100% | 6613 98% | 6030 108% | 6448 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 62.7 3% | 59 -3% | 61.9 1% | 64 5% | 70 15% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 97.8 4% | 91 -3% | 96.8 3% | 100 6% | 93 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-9% | 10% /
1% | -8% /
-21% | 2% /
1% | 1% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3178 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4333 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4038 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 154% | 14% | -14% | 31% | |
| Seq Read | 984 | 2888 193% | 1412 43% | 2289 133% | 1122 14% |
| Seq Write | 320.1 | 2381 644% | 540 69% | 1163 263% | 619 93% |
| 4K Read | 66.2 | 45.66 -31% | 32.24 -51% | 22.29 -66% | 39.58 -40% |
| 4K Write | 128 | 162.4 27% | 74.7 -42% | 28.92 -77% | 108.5 -15% |
| 4K-64 Read | 365.9 | 1276 249% | 567 55% | 415.6 14% | 776 112% |
| 4K-64 Write | 673 | 1432 113% | 700 4% | 199.5 -70% | 671 0% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.065 | 0.088 -35% | 0.049 25% | 0.122 -88% | 0.045 31% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.023 50% | 0.048 -4% | 0.143 -211% | 0.033 28% |
| Score Read | 531 | 1610 203% | 741 40% | 667 26% | 928 75% |
| Score Write | 833 | 1832 120% | 829 0% | 345 -59% | 841 1% |
| Score Total | 1628 | 4245 161% | 1913 18% | 1300 -20% | 2228 37% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1810 | 521 | 1767 | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 498.3 | 253.1 | 379.4 | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 921 | 392.9 | 1055 | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 78% | -18% | -1% | -17% | |
| Write 4K | 99.7 | 194.3 95% | 88.3 -11% | 35.06 -65% | 97.4 -2% |
| Read 4K | 113.7 | 51.2 -55% | 34.84 -69% | 23.64 -79% | 38.05 -67% |
| Write Seq | 511 | 1773 247% | 740 45% | 1537 201% | 656 28% |
| Read Seq | 1431 | 2512 76% | 985 -31% | 1782 25% | 1043 -27% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 313.5 | 431.7 38% | 313.7 0% | 100.3 -68% | 331.5 6% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 289.1 | 539 86% | 243.1 -16% | 62.7 -78% | 253.8 -12% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1274 | 2538 99% | 846 -34% | 2698 112% | 879 -31% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2500 | 3489 40% | 1783 -29% | 1073 -57% | 1639 -34% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 867 | 305.7 | |||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1315 | 698 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 116% /
122% | -2% /
1% | -8% /
-9% | 7% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2131 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8645 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1194 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Metro: Last Light | |
| 1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (23.3 - 41, n=5) | |
| 1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (16.4 - 28, n=4) | |
| 1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13 - 16, n=3) | |
| 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6 - 8, n=3) | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.9 - 32, n=42) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3 - 14.5, n=11) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 64 | 33 | 29 | 10 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 35 | 28 | 16 | 8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21 | 13 | 7 | 6 |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -9% | 2% | 10% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 30.5 -8% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 31.1 -10% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.3 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
| Load Average * | 37.3 | 32.7 12% | 40.8 -9% | 35 6% | 28.2 24% | 34.3 8% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.4 | 32.7 26% | 41.9 6% | 35 21% | 28.8 35% | 34.2 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.3 / 44.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.7 °C / -8.4 F).
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.42 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.6 / 7.5 / 7.8 Watt |
| Carga |
37.6 / 65.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 120 Hz, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 19% | 2% | 22% | -26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 3.8 17% | 3.2 30% | 3.46 25% | 2.6 43% | 6.5 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 7.5 | 6.1 19% | 2.8 63% | 5.88 22% | 4.3 43% | 12.2 -63% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9.1 -17% | 12.4 -59% | 9.12 -17% | 5.5 29% | 12.7 -63% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 38.6 -3% | 24.2 36% | 45.6 -21% | 32 15% | 39 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.3 | 64.5 1% | 50 23% | 65.9 -1% | 78.8 -21% | 39 40% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng R7 3700U, Vega 10, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -1% | -2% | 84% | -38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 759 | 632 -17% | 402 -47% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 397 | 541 36% | 437 10% | 492 24% | 732 84% | 235 -41% |
| Load | 125 | 85 -32% | 130 4% | 91 -27% | 91 -27% |
Pro
Contra
O Dell Inspiron 7390 2-em-1 Black Edition de US$ 1.249 (conforme configurado) pode não parecer muito diferente de seu antecessor, mas na verdade resolve algumas das maiores reclamações que tivemos sobre o Inspiron 7386 2-em-1. A principal delas é o consumo de energia no modo ocioso, que caiu quase para a metade, e a duração da bateria, que é 40% mais longa do que antes. Também não detectamos nenhum ruído da bobina em nossa unidade de teste, e a tela é um pouco mais brilhante do que antes. Até o desempenho da CPU também está um pouco melhor do que era anteriormente, apesar do fato de as duas máquinas serem impulsionadas pelo mesmo chip.
Além disso, a tela UHD é atraente, com boa reprodução e calibração de cores prontas para uso, e o botão liga/desliga redesenhado (com leitor de digitais integrado) e o layout do teclado funcionam bem em nossa opinião. O design da construção e da carcaça é bom para sua classe e parece um pouco mais resistente do que alguns dos concorrentes de metal mais finos. Por fim, o novo design inteligente da dobradiça da Dell, que incorpora uma cavidade magnética para a Dell Active Pen incluída, é uma das melhores soluções de armazenamento que vimos para uma caneta de tamanho normal.
O Inspiron 7390 2-em-1 aprimora seu antecessor de várias maneiras - mais notavelmente, duração da bateria muito melhor e desempenho ainda melhor. Apesar de algumas reclamações sobre os dispositivos de entrada e o valor questionável da CPU Core i7, ele representa uma alternativa séria aos concorrentes de fabricantes como Lenovo e HP.
Ainda assim, algumas das mesmas queixas permanecem. O desempenho ainda é insatisfatório no contexto, com os resultados publicados pelos concorrentes do cTDP Up, como Lenovo’s ThinkBook 13s, que são realmente melhores. A seleção de portas é escassa e a falta de Thunderbolt 3 e uma porta Kensington Lock incomodará alguns usuários. O teclado é razoavelmente bom, mas a resposta e a força de atuação poderiam ser melhores. Da mesma forma, os botões do touchpad integrado exigem muita força para serem accionados e se tornam bastante cansativos para operar depois de um tempo. Por fim, embora a tela seja certamente agradável, teria sido bom ter uma opção de FHD, o que aumentaria bastante a duração da bateria.
Alguns concorrentes diretos que vale a pena considerar incluem o ThinkPad X1 Yoga, Breve Análise do Conversível HP Envy x360 13:, Uma alternativa ThinkPad X390 Yoga, e—no lado mais caro—o Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Além das preocupações sobre os dispositivos de entrada e as lamentações que cercam os chips de preço mais alto, o peso do Inspiron 7390 2-em-1 agora parece uma alternativa razoável aos populares conversíveis da série Yoga e x360 que se elevavam acima do seu antecessor.
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
-
08/23/2019 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
