Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-em-1 (i7-8565U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 193.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1139:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.86
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 NV14N4H, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE InfoVision M140NWF5 R2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T AUO B140HAN04.0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Sharp LQ133Z1, IPS, 13.3", 3200x1800 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -2% | 59% | 59% | 62% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.57 | 41.52 2% | 39.42 -3% | 64.4 59% | 64.3 58% | 65.9 62% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.6 | 62.1 6% | 59.2 1% | 92.9 59% | 94.6 61% | 95.2 62% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.91 | 42.92 2% | 40.73 -3% | 66.1 58% | 66.2 58% | 67.6 61% |
| Response Times | 65% | 21% | 17% | 24% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.8 ? | 45 ? 23% | 38 ? 35% | 48 ? 18% | 40.8 ? 31% | 40.4 ? 31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 30 ? 10% | 30.8 ? 7% | 28 ? 16% | 27.6 ? 17% | 25.6 ? 23% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 520 ? 162% | ||||
| Screen | 36% | 13% | 47% | 14% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 193.6 | 240 24% | 255.5 32% | 348 80% | 316 63% | 442.7 129% |
| Brightness | 181 | 234 29% | 242 34% | 306 69% | 291 61% | 428 136% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 93 19% | 87 12% | 78 0% | 83 6% | 84 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.11 35% | 0.29 -71% | 0.2 -18% | 0.36 -112% | 0.31 -82% |
| Contrast | 1139 | 2182 92% | 881 -23% | 1740 53% | 878 -23% | 1428 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.99 | 4.98 29% | 4.18 40% | 2.79 60% | 5.9 16% | 2.24 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.58 | 10.75 54% | 19.15 19% | 5.53 77% | 12.9 45% | 7.19 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.86 | 3.33 31% | 3.8 22% | 1.3 73% | 1.11 77% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 3.51 38% | 2.2 61% | 3.47 39% | 8.6 -51% | 9.7 -70% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.05 107% | 2.54 87% | 2.1 105% | 1.42 155% |
| CCT | 5845 111% | 6606 98% | 6599 98% | 6564 99% | 6854 95% | 6227 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.6 | 40 6% | 37.5 0% | 60 60% | 60.7 61% | 61.6 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 59.1 | 93 | 94.5 | 95 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
35% | 11% /
11% | 41% /
45% | 32% /
24% | 44% /
44% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 98 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360-4764 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (263 - 420, n=7) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3537 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5032 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4069 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 13% | -41% | -22% | -5% | 51% | |
| Seq Read | 576 | 2071 260% | 437.9 -24% | 1342 133% | 1850 221% | 2416 319% |
| Seq Write | 471.6 | 721 53% | 350.3 -26% | 543 15% | 661 40% | 1170 148% |
| 4K Read | 39.48 | 34.44 -13% | 23.31 -41% | 34.77 -12% | 38.04 -4% | 48.33 22% |
| 4K Write | 112.4 | 91 -19% | 64.7 -42% | 85.8 -24% | 95 -15% | 103.1 -8% |
| 4K-64 Read | 522 | 448.2 -14% | 234.3 -55% | 512 -2% | 434.3 -17% | 1039 99% |
| 4K-64 Write | 416.5 | 268.9 -35% | 279.4 -33% | 249.4 -40% | 266.3 -36% | 399.6 -4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.046 -0% | 0.079 -72% | 0.169 -267% | 0.069 -50% | 0.058 -26% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.054 -69% | 0.056 -75% | 0.041 -28% | 0.056 -75% | 0.036 -13% |
| Score Read | 619 | 690 11% | 301 -51% | 681 10% | 657 6% | 1329 115% |
| Score Write | 576 | 432 -25% | 379 -34% | 389 -32% | 427 -26% | 620 8% |
| Score Total | 1520 | 1416 -7% | 839 -45% | 1388 -9% | 1373 -10% | 2575 69% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 773 | 414.4 -46% | 714 -8% | 539 -30% | 739 -4% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 344.4 | 364.3 6% | 264.7 -23% | 209.7 -39% | 312.3 -9% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 536 | 354 -34% | 457.8 -15% | 340 -37% | 486.3 -9% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | -48% | 1% | 19% | ||
| Write 4K | 111.8 | 123.1 10% | 66.5 -41% | 94.5 -15% | 116.5 4% | |
| Read 4K | 42.6 | 43.24 2% | 24.65 -42% | 39.95 -6% | 42.18 -1% | |
| Write Seq | 716 | 763 7% | 413.2 -42% | 531 -26% | 1079 51% | |
| Read Seq | 1107 | 1632 47% | 465.2 -58% | 1499 35% | 1030 -7% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 451.5 | 268.6 -41% | 227 -50% | 315.3 -30% | 225.7 -50% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 316.8 | 345.2 9% | 188.4 -41% | 279.8 -12% | 302.9 -4% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 809 | 800 -1% | 439.9 -46% | 829 2% | 1174 45% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1610 | 2620 63% | 533 -67% | 2570 60% | 3394 111% | |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 332 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 488.6 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
13% | -45% /
-44% | -22% /
-22% | -2% /
-3% | 35% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10342 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1911 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8073 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1025 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 51.1 | 30.3 | 24.5 | 7.6 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 50.6 | 24.3 | 15.7 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 12 |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE Vega 8, R5 PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -2% | -3% | -10% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.3 -7% | 28.4 -1% | 27.9 1% | 30.5 -8% | 29.3 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 30.3 -7% | 28.4 -1% | 27.9 1% | 30.9 -10% | 29.3 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 30.3 -7% | 28.4 -1% | 27.9 1% | 30.9 -10% | 29.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.4 | 30.3 -3% | 28.4 3% | 27.9 5% | 30.9 -5% | 29.6 -1% |
| Load Average * | 35.8 | 36.1 -1% | 35.7 -0% | 36.2 -1% | 40.2 -12% | 31.6 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.8 | 33.9 5% | 39 -9% | 45.2 -26% | 40.2 -12% | 31.6 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 29.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.8 / 35.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 6.4 / 7.8 Watt |
| Carga |
36.7 / 49.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 18% | -37% | -10% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.3 3% | 3.3 3% | 8.2 -141% | 3.3 3% | 3.5 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 6.4 | 5.8 9% | 5.2 19% | 10.8 -69% | 6.8 -6% | 8.9 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 8 -3% | 5.6 28% | 12.7 -63% | 9.5 -22% | 12.3 -58% |
| Load Average * | 36.7 | 29.2 20% | 32.9 10% | 22.6 38% | 40.8 -11% | 54.2 -48% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.3 | 31.1 37% | 35.2 29% | 24.6 50% | 57 -16% | 52.1 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 530-14IKB-81EK00CWGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA-DB51T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 14% | 35% | -4% | 55% | 50% | |
| Reader / Idle | 742 | 918 24% | 1432 93% | 1243 68% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 429 | 417 -3% | 578 35% | 410 -4% | 550 28% | 557 30% |
| Load | 87 | 105 21% | 124 43% | 133 53% |
Pro
Contra
O mais recente conversível Inspiron é bem completo. Ele não oferece algo mais atraente do que seus concorrentes para atrair compradores em potencial. Pequenas vantagens, como uma tela mais brilhante, caneta WACOM gratuita ou carregamento mais rápido, poderiam ter impulsionado o atraente do sistema ou dado a ele uma ligeira vantagem para se destacar da multidão.
Devido ao seu preço inicial muito acessível e tela táctil de 1080p, o Inspiron 14 5482 2-em-1 é mais adequado para uso dos alunos, reprodução de multimídia em casa ou uma viagem de carro ocasional. Alternativas como o Yoga 530 e VivoBook Flip 14são de fato menores e mais leves, mas por preços de varejo ligeiramente mais altos.
Um conversível de nível de entrada bem completo, para usuários iniciantes. É uma opção acessível de volta às aulas, mesmo que não ofereça nada de extraordinário para sua categoria.
Dell Inspiron 14 5000 5482 2-in-1
- 12/07/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
