Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 13 5368

Name: Dell Inspiron 13 5368
Brand: Dell

Modo Fold. Apesar dos conversíveis Surface Pro 4 com poder de portátil, os fabricantes estão lançando portáteis de 360-graus com processadores padrão para o mercado. Com um preço de 1000 Euros (~$1115), eles não são exatamente baratos. As interfaces adicionais e a manutenção têm o seu preço. Como o modelo de 13,3-polegadas encaixa neste campo da concorrência?

Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/16/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows Skylake

Test device courtesy of Dell Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Dell Inspiron 13 5368 (Inspiron 13 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1000 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 20.19.15.4463

Memória

16 GB

, dual-channel

Pantalha

13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitiva de 10-dedos, AUO B133HAB, IPS, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, 256 GB

, 130 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fone/microfone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Sensores: Giroscópio

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.4 x 324.8 x 224.4

Bateria

42 Wh Lítio-Ion, SMP Dell P/N 3CRH35B, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 9 h

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1.2 MP 1280x720 + infravermelhos
Primary Camera: Windows Hello

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.616 kg, Suprimento de energia: 336 g

Links

Dell página inicial
Dell Seção de notebook
Inspiron 13 (Serie)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T DIN A4 ❌

Power-in, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, headphone/mic

Power-on, volume control, card reader, USB 2.0, cable lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 820 G3	73.7 MB/s +261%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T	27.9 MB/s +37%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368	20.4 MB/s
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	14.3 MB/s -30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP EliteBook 820 G3	86.9 MB/s +251%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T	37.17 MB/s +50%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	25.2 MB/s +2%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368	24.73 MB/s


240 cd/m²	222 cd/m²	229 cd/m²
234 cd/m²	240 cd/m²	221 cd/m²
229 cd/m²	222 cd/m²	224 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B133HAB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 240 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 229 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 239 cd/m²
Contraste: 1000:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.39% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.79% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.88% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 AUO B133HAB, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.3"	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng LG Philips LGD0000, , 2560x1440, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK 3200x1800, 13.3"
Display		75%	67%	65%	60%
Display P3 Coverage	38.88	69.6 79%	66.8 72%	65.1 67%	63.2 63%
sRGB Coverage	57.7	98 70%	92.8 61%	93 61%	88.7 54%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.17	70.7 76%	67.3 68%	66.5 66%	64.9 62%
Response Times		11%	42%	32%	20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 ?(20, 24)	36 ?(12, 24) 18%	24 ?(11, 36) 45%	29 ?(15, 14) 34%	38.8 ?(18.4, 20.4) 12%
Response Time Black / White *	31 ?(15, 16)	30 ?(8, 22) 3%	19 ?(10, 28) 39%	22 ?(5, 17) 29%	22.4 ?(9.2, 13.2) 28%
PWM Frequency		1000 ?(10)		192 ?(30)	1316
Screen		36%	17%	8%	-6%
Brightness middle	240	320 33%	324 35%	302 26%	319.8 33%
Brightness	229	308 34%	324 41%	298 30%	302 32%
Brightness Distribution	92	91 -1%	90 -2%	90 -2%	88 -4%
Black Level *	0.24	0.17 29%	0.34 -42%	0.21 12%	0.835 -248%
Contrast	1000	1882 88%	953 -5%	1438 44%	383 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.75	3.18 33%	4.36 8%	6.33 -33%	2.68 44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.09	9.91 -9%		11.89 -31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	4.13 4%	4.62 -7%	8.13 -89%	2.35 45%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.03 ^108%	2.18 ^101%	2.52 ^87%	2.09 ^105%
CCT	5893 ^110%	6752 ^96%	6857 ^95%	6811 ^95%	6975 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.79	65 77%	60 63%	60 63%	57 55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.39	98 71%	93 62%	93 62%	88 53%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		41% / 40%	42% / 31%	35% / 23%	25% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

System info GPU-Z Intel HD Graphics 520 (IGP)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel Core i5-6200U	113 Points -13%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	104 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Intel Core i7-6500U	87 Points -33%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	85 Points -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	321 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Intel Core i7-6500U	287 Points -8%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel Core i5-6200U	284 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	208 Points -33%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

312 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

43.77 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	3699 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3161 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	2837 Points -23%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	2727 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	4577 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3971 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH	3863 Points -16%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	3496 Points -24%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3699 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4577 pontos
Ajuda

	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Lite-On CV1-8B128	Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		13%	-17%	-19%	19%
Read Seq	479	507 6%	491.8 3% 491.8 3%	497 4%	514 7%
Write Seq	270.1	354.4 31%	264.5 -2% 264.5 -2%	182.9 -32%	459.5 70%
Read 512	428.3	355.3 -17%	396.2 -7% 396.2 -7%	353 -18%	413.4 -3%
Write 512	267.9	353.9 32%	264.5 -1% 264.5 -1%	144.1 -46%	424.5 58%
Read 4k	23.77	32.66 37%	30.88 30% 30.88 30%	31.89 34%	36.34 53%
Write 4k	81.4	81.6 0%	75.6 -7% 75.6 -7%	62 -24%	100.1 23%
Read 4k QD32	333.6	277.6 -17%	31.85 -90% 31.85 -90%	207.7 -38%	313.8 -6%
Write 4k QD32	200.9	261.2 30%	73.9 -63% 73.9 -63%	131.8 -34%	96.8 -52%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8

Sequential Read: 479 MB/s

Sequential Write: 270.1 MB/s

512K Read: 428.3 MB/s

512K Write: 267.9 MB/s

4K Read: 23.77 MB/s

4K Write: 81.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 333.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 200.9 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1490 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1415 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1382 Points -7%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1326 Points -11%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1326 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	714 Points -52%

3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7945 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7843 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7439 Points -6%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7439 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6808 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	5510 Points -31%

3DMark 11 Performance		1658 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5937 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Thief

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	17.3 fps
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	14 fps -19%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	8.4 fps -51%

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	32.2 fps
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	29.6 fps -8%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	27.3 fps -15%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	24.3 fps -25%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	20.2 fps -37%

Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	24.3 fps
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	13.3 fps -45%

	baixo	média	alto
BioShock Infinite (2013)	59.8	32.2	27.5
Thief (2014)	24.3	15.1	12.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17.3	11

Barulho

Ocioso		29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga		31 / 40.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


30.8 °C	32.7 °C	31.2 °C
30.4 °C	31.7 °C	29.3 °C
27.1 °C	28 °C	27.8 °C

Máximo: 32.7 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C


31 °C	34.1 °C	30.7 °C
29.9 °C	33 °C	31.6 °C
28.5 °C	28.9 °C	27.8 °C

Máximo: 34.1 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 34 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.9 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).

Dell Inspiron 13 5368 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.26 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	4.4 / 6.1 / 6.8 Watt
Carga	29 / 31.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption		-39%	-6%	13%
Idle Minimum *	4.4	6.2 -41%	3.9 11%	3.4 23%
Idle Average *	6.1	8 -31%	7.4 -21%	7 -15%
Idle Maximum *	6.8	11.6 -71%	9.2 -35%	7.6 -12%
Load Average *	29	40 -38%	28.1 3%	19 34%
Load Maximum *	31.9	36.6 -15%	27.6 13%	20.1 37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		11h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 26min

	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK 80MK 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 66 Wh
Battery Runtime		19%	108%	97%	47%
Reader / Idle	674	669 -1%		1027 52%	844 25%
WiFi v1.3	240	382 59%	500 108%	386 61%	403 68%
Load	86	85 -1%		239 178%	128 49%
H.264		393

Pro

+ Tempos de resposta rápidos

+ Muito boa utilização do Turbo

+ Baixa produção de ruído

+ Fácil manutenção

Contra

- Duração pobre da bateria

- Tela moderadamente brilhante

- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores

- Webcam inferior

- Curto deslocamento das teclas

In review: Dell Inspiron 13 5368-3188. Test model courtesy of Dell Germany

O Dell Inspiron 13 5368 não atinge a pontuação mais alta, e por isso é improvável que consiga chegar na lista dos Top 10 dos Conversíveis. O desempenho não é o motivo - o Core i7 e a configuração SSD supera todos os outros rivais e o Turbo é muito bem utilizado. As desvantagens começam na construção: o chassi flexível que não se fecha magneticamente no modo Tablet, as leves desvantagens do teclado, e o curto deslocamento do touchpad. Além disso, o peso de 1,6 quilogramas (~3,5 lb) é relativamente alto, a tela é apenas moderadamente brilhante, e o USB Type-C poderia melhorar sua conectividade. Embora estes aspectos ainda sejam toleráveis, os pontos totais reduzem a pontuação geral. O Dell Inspiron 13 5368 exibe sua maior desvantagem na duração do Wi-Fi de apenas quatro horas. Os rivais funcionam durante seis a outo horas aqui.

O total geral de pequenas desvantagens não consegue compensar pelas vantagens no desempenho, manutenção, e o bom contraste da tela. Finalmente, estamos encarando - em termos de computação – um potente conversível que não é muito caro em comparação com seus rivais com um preço de 1000 Euros (~$1115). Aqui, o HP Spectre x360 13 e o Acer Aspire R13 R7 tem muito a oferecer, particularmente em termos de construção. O Lenovo Yoga 900-13ISK tem um design ainda mais elegante, mas também é exageradamente caro. O Asus ZenBook UX360CA-FC060T possui uma carcaça fina, de alta qualidade, mas sofre por causa de seu teclado barulhento.

Dell Inspiron 13 5368 - 2016-08-26 08/26/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

84%

Mouse

79%

Conectividade

44 / 80 → 55%

Peso

68 / 35-78 → 77%

Bateria

75%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

57 / 68 → 84%

Desempenho da aplicação

87 / 87 → 100%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

94%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

31 / 85 → 37%

Médio

72%

79%

Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 13 5368

Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-09-16 (Update: 2016-09-22)